Gbfra From Germany, joined Sep 2006, 448 posts, RR: 0 Posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1853 times:
The French Government supports Power 8:
" I am confident that the decisions made by the management of Airbus will be in the long-term interest of the company, the employees and of France", Francois Loos, Minister of Industry, said at the National Assembly.
He added that Airbus needed a reorganisation in order to develop the A350.
AirFrnt From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2830 posts, RR: 42
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1818 times:
Quoting BoomBoom (Reply 1):
Translation: We support Power8 as long as the majority of job cuts occur in Germany.
Remember that to the French Government, Airbus isn't just a jobs program, it's also a prestige program. That prestige, like the rest of the EU since the rejected constitution votes, has been taking a battering.
LTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13926 posts, RR: 49
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1791 times:
Quoting BoomBoom (Reply 1): Translation: We support Power8 as long as the majority of job cuts occur in Germany.
That's the same impression I get. Also, check out this:
Die französischen Gewerkschaften machen kurzfristige Profitinteressen der EADS-Privataktionäre für die Probleme beim Superjumbo A380 verantwortlich, die den europäischen Luft- und Raumfahrtkonzern in die Schieflage gebracht haben.
Translation: French Unions blame the short term profit hunt of private EADS shareholders for the problems with the A380 Superjumbo, which lead to the current situation at EADS.
I don't buy it. How can private shareholders be responsible for the wiring problems of the A380? I don't get that. Or are the French Unions simply looking for a scapegoat in order to protect their own jobs and force more job cuts in Hamburg and Bremen?