TG992 From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 2910 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3812 times:
I can't remember the details, but this pic has been doing the rounds for at least the 6 years I've been a member of a.net.. it's apparently an urban myth debunked by a website I can't remember. The belts were fastened around the engine during ground transport, not flight.
The engine is OBVIOUSLY fodded out, and inoperable. Seatbelt sections are wrapped through the fans, and through the stages of the engine to keep the fan stationary during flight. This is a VERY common practice.
Recently we had a 727 sling a blade in flight. No big deal - it happens from time to time. Aircraft landed at it's destination, and the engine was examined. Extensive blade damage was found, so we "strapped" the engine (it was in the #2 position), and ferried it to a station that could accomplish the engine change.
So the question is - why strap an engine? Well, if you look at the photos, you'll see all kinds of carnage in that engine. Pieces missing, bent blades, etc. Lots of damage. Engines cost a lot of money - you want to limit the damage done to them. You do NOT want to just let it spin while ferrying it to an engine change. A 400 mph breeze will get that engine spinning EXTREMELY fast, and will do further damage. So - you strap it, lock the blades into position, and use a little rudder enroute to the engine change.
No big deal here people, this is a standard procedure. And no, you are NOT likely to see this on a passenger airline, as they would not carry pax during a ferry flight anyway.
797charter From Denmark, joined Jun 2005, 219 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3422 times:
Quoting AndrewUber (Reply 6): No big deal here people, this is a standard procedure. And no, you are NOT likely to see this on a passenger airline, as they would not carry pax during a ferry flight anyway.
I am sure you are right, - and FI has now remowed the article too!