AirRyan From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2389 times:
Book it on TZ than, it's there and can be done but WN's website doesn't always show all available flights because of the amount of connections one can make. WN just released their schedule out to August today so put in the dates your looking for and see what they say.
Wjcandee From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5485 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2201 times:
What was the actual route here? In other words, what was the connecting city (or cities)? Perhaps a sked change just made it unfeasible, or a complex routing made it undesireable, or there were too many misconnects d/t tight conx that made them decide not to offer it anymore. Through LAS, for example, the conx going BHM-HNL isn't too bad, like 1:15 wait, but the conx coming back is 4 hours in LAS after flying overnight from HNL. Yuck. Still, WN pax have been known to endure worse, so I'm curious why it's no longer offered as a connecting flight.
Chase From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 1054 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2135 times:
I was curious to know if (at www.ata.com) it was a case of "you're able to pick BHM-HNL, but no flights are returned" vs "If you pick BHM as origin, then HNL disappears from the possible destination list". I just went to the site and found that it's the latter.
As for why the routemap still shows it, I'd say give it a while, and it won't anymore. When I was there, we didn't always push "functionality" and "content" to the production server at the same time.
However, I do owe those folks a "hi, how ya doin" email, so if you want I can ask them for sure. Just let me know.