Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Does CO Need A West Coast Hub?  
User currently offlineILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2098 times:

Hello,

I've looked at CO's route map, and they have a very weak operation in the west! Do you think that they need a west coast hub? They could fly Trans-Pacifics from it, as well as shorter hops. What do you think? Where would they put it?

Happy Flying

29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 1, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1984 times:

They wouldn't dare compete with United. The West Coast is United.


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 2, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1972 times:

The west coast is only for United, and United wouldn't dare let any other airline pass. Look at what happened to Continental in Denver. They've learned there lesson and know to never get in Uniteds way.


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineAWA320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1965 times:

Very wrong... The west coast is NOT only for United.

Southwest, America West, Alaska, American, as well as other carriers, are competing just fine.


User currently offlineSR3496 From Switzerland, joined May 2000, 792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 4, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1958 times:

I think LAX and SFO are United yes, but the rest of the Western part of the USA belongs to the airlines that AWA320 listed.

User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1949 times:

CO's main goal right now is to expand from their current hubs. They don't have enough aircraft to open up a new hub.

User currently offline777gk From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1933 times:

CO pulled out of Denver as a cost-cutting move, not because United was beating the pants off us! UA is much much bigger out of DEN now that we've left. When we were in there, UA didn't have such comprehensive operations. In fact, for a number of years, CO was bigger in terms of destinations, pax carried, and movements!

User currently offlineFlashmeister From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2900 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1929 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

American? Competitive on the West Coast? Hardly... perhaps on select routes they are, but as a comprehensive solution? No way...

Continental could do well out west. People are sick of United and Alaska. The intra-California market, however, would be hard to enter considering United and Southwest.


User currently offlineModesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2788 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1912 times:

Yes, United is big in California. But you can't forget about Southwest. It would be interesting to see the statistics...United Shuttle vs. Southwest. And American has started LAX-OAK. United should be careful...Southwest definitely has a large share of the market!

User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1912 times:

Delta isn't doing bad out west with SLC.

CO won't start a new hub out west. They're in a codeshare partnership with America West, so CO has connections in the west.


User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7760 posts, RR: 16
Reply 10, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1919 times:

This has been discussed many times before.

EVEN IF Continental had enough equipment to start a hub on the west coast, where would they do it??? With the exception of PDX, no major airport in the west really has room for an airline to establish a legitamate hub. For the time being PHX is full, so is LAS, LAX has room to grow but not on a large scale, the bay area airports lack space or have operational difficulties (read SFO), RNO could be but lacks a large enough population base, SMF is too small, SEA is short of terminal space.... only PDX has space, but then with DL pulling out one has to question the viability of a PDX hub.

The west and west coast is a very competitive market with UA,HP,AS,WN,DL and to a smaller level AA duking it out for their own piece of the pie.



Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineSn330 From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 16 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1897 times:

CO does need a west coast hub, that is for sure. There is just way too much distance between Guam and IAH. That gap does need to be filled in the future. But, AA is starting to build up at SJC, which is larger in population than San Francisco, and more business oriented, and there are rumors that they will buy out Alaska in order to gain even more of a foothold in that market. (They would either completely buy AS out, or purchase a percentage of their shares on the stock market.)

User currently offlineAirNondo From Moldova, joined May 2000, 241 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1880 times:

PDX is absolutely viable as western hub for CO. All/most airlines currently operate very profitably out of PDX. Dl was even profitable for more than a decade with their int'l flights out of PDX, their recent failure is a result of their general lack of focus out west, lack of a western codeshare, and the INS fiasco. CO already has codeshares with two dominant airlines at PDX (AS and HP). Not to mention I'm sure they could work out some sort of guaranteed seat purchases from local biz for the first few years if they were to ad an asian flight to fill the void left by Dl.

~mtc


User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 1875 times:

PDX a hub for CO??? Nonsense. This topic has come up so many times before. Continental is focused on its very
profitable hubs at the moment and does not have the
extra capacity to add a fourth hub. The Cleveland hub
is slated for further growth as runway improvements
are made and new aircraft are delivered.

Continental won't build a West Coast hub because
the market there is dominated by UA and WN and
America West and American Airlines and Alaska all
have a serious chunk of the market pie.

Continental does not need to be strong in the West
to be profitable and successful. It has a very strong
route network and powerful, unique, and profitable
hub operations at IAH and EWR with CLE also adding
to the bottom line nicely.

Continental also has interline arrangements with HP
so it is covered.

ContinentalEWR


User currently offlineRepublic From Canada, joined Dec 2012, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1847 times:

It is just a matter of time before CO adds their fifth hub, one on the West coast. Let's take a look. Hubs in Guam, Houston, Cleveland, and Newark. Where is CO lacking. The West coast! Yes, the other CO hubs can and will certainly accomodate much future, profitable growth. We have heard all the reasons against: not enough aircraft, runway additions which will accomodate more flights, too much competition, no suitable hub sites, code share arrangements. Let me ask this question: As time goes by, do you think there will be more or less competition on the West coast? The answer is fairly obvious. This is precisely the reason CO needs to act sooner than later. In business, you are either growing, or you are in death throes. (If you don't believe me, look at TWA, unfortunately). And if they don't add a West coast hub sooner, then they never will. This will eventually cause the doom of CO, as another carrier will inevitably swallow up CO. If you don't believe me, refresh your memory with Delta and its interest in CO recently. Why was Delta interested in CO and not AA? The weaker are prey to the stronger, the smaller to the larger. CO has expressed its intention of "going it alone" without merging with another carrier. To insure this from happening, CO must grow. The West coast offers tremendous opportunities both domestically and internationally. Asia offers more long term possibilities than Europe for growth in the 21st century. A West coast hub will offer synergies with Guam and Houston. The need for a West coast hub for CO is fairly obvious, whether or not it fits within the dogma recited by some posters.

Joe


User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1843 times:

SMF too small?! What are you smokin'?!

The Sacramento area currently has a population of nearly two million, and projections show that the Sacramento area should break the two million-mark within the next year. Many, many companies, such as Intel and Hewlett-Packard are moving quite a lot of their operations from the Silicon Valley to El Dorado Hills (30 minutes from the airport), and are bringing thousands of employees with them. The attraction of the area is also draining a significant portion of Bay Area residents each year. Airport traffic is nearing eight million yearly, which is quite a lot, considering that no carrier uses SMF as a hub. Compare that to PDX, which has 10 million passengers annually, but also has three carriers (Alaska, Horizon, and Southwest) which pull in well over a million passengers each per year, and SMF is booming.

SMF is currently equipped with 24 passenger gates, split between two terminals, Terminal A (brand new), and Terminal B (60's-era), and two 8600' (2621m) long runways are in operation 'round-the-clock.




Don't discount SMF...

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7760 posts, RR: 16
Reply 16, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1836 times:

I really should be smoking something. Currently there would not be enough terminal room at the places I listed for a serious hub to be built. I can think of a few possibilities at PHX where room could be made if they built the final two concourses on terminal 4. But most other west coast airports do not have the space to support a new serious hub. Granted SMF is one of the more likely sites though. But what airport is ready within the next 24-36 months to have an airline dump 100 daily jet departures into it???


Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1835 times:

A: SMF.

Terminal A was built for quick and easy expansion (at least eight gates on the east wing could be constructed within the next 12 months), and I'd say that over half of the gates in Terminal B are ready to go as we speak (eight gates).

With the weather such as it is, year-round, non-stop building could take place for a new terminal to be built with at least 20 gates within 24 mos. The new terminal area would be connected onto both Terminal A and B, which would only require the demolition of the Sacramento County Airport Authority offices, which sit between the two terminals. These offices could be moved to the third story level of the new terminal.

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1817 times:

What about SAN as a hub?

User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 21
Reply 19, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1814 times:

SAN is too far down south for a hub, and the airport is too small . Perhaps as a point where aircraft can be based when a new one is built here though.

Right now if an airline wants to have a chance in the West, it would have to cater to high-fare business travelers, as there is too much capacity in the economy sector of the marketplace. If you look at schedules that include flight availability statistics, you will find that often the first sections of flights are always full within CA and up to SEA and PDX while the coach sections usually have tons of seats left. So that means if CO would want to have a chance to succeed greatly out here, it would have to do an overhaul of its cabin and other passenger services. I would think that if it had the aircraft, TWA could do well on the West Coast b/c of the amount of first-class seats in its planes.

Airports, as already mentioned, are a huge problem. SAN is too small and too far down unless you wanted to include Baja and N. Mexico in your scheme, LAX too crowded, SNA to restricted, ONT to far out in the boondocks, and SFO, SEA, PHX dominated by UA, AS and AW, respectively. So that leaves pretty much SMF and PDX. I think that a problem with DL at PDX was that they didn't expand it enough domestically, with a viable shuttle system up and down the West Coast. This may have been because it was too close to SLC. I bet that if CO had the aircraft, it could create a good operation out of PDX, but as has already been said, Continental is concentrating on IAH, Europe, and COExpress now.
SMF is an interesting choice, with a very good location, but I think that if a hub was built there it would only be for the purpose of filling planes with connecting passengers, rather than a stable combination of connecting and O&D pax.

Aaron G.


User currently offlineILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Reply 20, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1803 times:

I wonder...if SMF was used as a hub would CO have flights to and from SFO and LAX, other than RJ's? Just a thought.

User currently offlineJohnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2576 posts, RR: 7
Reply 21, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1795 times:

Please don't suggest SMF as a hub. Long-term parking there feels like I've died and gone to heaven, as compared with any Bay Area airport.

Although I must admit, after driving back from Reno this evening I'm shocked at how much Sacratomato has grown. And that airport is way, way out there in the cornfields and almond groves with no homes intruding......(nice pic, BTW)


User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4488 posts, RR: 33
Reply 22, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1780 times:

An airline hub usually needs at least one-third O & D pax to be viable. SMF would have a hard time supporting a big enough O & D base to make a hub for CO, or anyone else, profitable. And as others have noted, the West Coast's major airports all would have a tough time digesting 100 additional departures per day. CO is smart to focus on its existing hubs and stick with codeshare in the West.

Jim


User currently offlineAirNondo From Moldova, joined May 2000, 241 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1753 times:

While I think PDX would be a successful CO hub, I do agree with ContinentalEWR that for the short term CO is focusing on building up current hubs. It is true that while they are not directly heavy in the west, they code share with an airline serving just about every single airport out here in the west (through AS (read Horizon) and HP (read express)).

Even if a western CO hub is out of the question, it is interesting to consider the possiblity that CO would add an asian flight out of PDX or LAX, using solely codeshares and other hub traffic to fill the flights. A possibility...


User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (13 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1743 times:

Johnboy-
Just wait until the new parking garage goes up... [tear]

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


25 Matt D : Someone stated above that LAS cannot support another hub. I would have to disgree with that. LAS is already underserved. One of the terminals (the A g
26 Travelin man : What is the gate arrangement at LAX with United? UA and CO "share" Terminal 6, but it seems like CO is either retreating or getting pushed out of Term
27 ILUV767 : I wonder... if CO was to use SMF as a hub, would they have trans-pacific flights? Can SMF even support a 777? Wouldn't that be a sight, a 777 in SMF!
28 Trvlr : I think that if an airline set up SMF as a West Coast hub, it would only have a regional operation based there; international flights probably wouldn'
29 DesertJets : SMF would not be bad as a regional hub. It is ideally situated for N/S traffic on the west coast, but could only support LIMITED transcon traffic and
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Does CO Need More Metal? posted Sat Apr 22 2006 05:27:20 by AlexInWa
Does CO Need More 777's Or 767's? posted Thu Jan 27 2005 16:17:38 by Airplane
FedEx New West Coast Hub? posted Sun Dec 19 2004 21:58:52 by Blackhawk144
Cargo Hub On The West Coast posted Fri Apr 16 2004 22:11:46 by Leneld
Will CO Ever Fly To Europe From The West Coast? posted Thu Aug 31 2000 05:21:32 by Ben88
Does Asiana Need A Flight To BOM To Compete? posted Mon Dec 11 2006 06:23:23 by B773ER
Ethiopian New Dests & West African Hub posted Mon Oct 30 2006 12:52:04 by Dkny
Island Air Signs LOI For S/H On West Coast posted Tue Oct 24 2006 16:58:35 by Kalakaua
DL Turns SLC Into West's Largest Hub posted Mon Aug 14 2006 16:52:04 by OttoPylit
US West Coast To Europe Non-Stop posted Sat Jul 29 2006 02:15:37 by StarGoldLHR