Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing 787 Development Video  
User currently offlineT773ER From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 278 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 10 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 7174 times:

Here's a link to an interesting video on Boeing, and the 787.

Warning: It's pretty long, so make sure you have plenty of time to watch it.

http://airlinepilotcentral.com/web_v...g_787_development_20070211192.html


"Fixed fortifications are monuments to the stupidity of man."
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLHStarAlliance From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 7052 times:

Really good report ! Thanks  wave 

Konstantin


User currently offlineCentrair From Japan, joined Jan 2005, 3599 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 6692 times:

Quoting T773ER (Thread starter):




Quoting LHStarAlliance (Reply 1):
Really good report ! Thanks  

Second that. It is interesting to watch. Also interesting to see it from the Local persepctive. I was curious on how the Unions were taking this aircraft. It is nt just a hub buster but could be a union job killer. Progress in technology is good, but some people loose out. (I am for some reason reminded of Star Trek 6: the Undiscovered Country)



Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
User currently offlineRICARIZA From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2393 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 6417 times:

Very cool.. thanks for sharing!!


I miss ACES, I am proud of AVIANCA & I am loyal to AMERICAN
User currently offlineNonfirm From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 434 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 6058 times:

Great story.Thanks for sharing.  airplane 

User currently offlineBlackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1895 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 4900 times:

I think it is a good thing. Common interests and goals are the things that might hold the world together.
Thanks for the link.



Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
User currently offlineT773ER From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 278 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3489 times:

Quoting Centrair (Reply 2):
I was curious on how the Unions were taking this aircraft. It is nt just a hub buster but could be a union job killer

It makes you wonder how many people will be working for BCA in 20 or 30 years.



"Fixed fortifications are monuments to the stupidity of man."
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21580 posts, RR: 59
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3166 times:

Very typical of the tv news media in the USA, especially local.

Pretty pictures, superficial information, and then they ask the viewers to make a judgment despite not preparing them to do so. And they give the machinist union rep the last word regarding "trust the union, not your suppliers." Of course, I doubt the union sings the same tune when they represent workers for suppliers, but hey, hypocrisy never bothered tv journalism before...  Wink



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 6415 posts, RR: 34
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2986 times:

Quoting Centrair (Reply 2):
I was curious on how the Unions were taking this aircraft. It is nt just a hub buster but could be a union job killer. Progress in technology is good, but some people loose out.



Quoting T773ER (Reply 6):
It makes you wonder how many people will be working for BCA in 20 or 30 years.

I was reading this article...

Airbus weighs up factory spin-offs in restructuring
The troubled aircraft manufacturer is considering spinning off some of its factories as part of a cost-cutting and restructuring programme
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...ors/engineering/article1381341.ece

... which linked to this paper...

Strategic Destruction of the North American and European Commercial Aircraft Industry:
Implications of the System Integration Business Model
http://www.custac.buffalo.edu/content/documents/OccPaper35.pdf

which states in the conclusion...

For the first time in Western commercial aviation history, the system integration launch
process has been structured in a fashion that gives foreign partners the control over
design, manufacturing, sub tier supplier selection and, ultimately, the financial muscle to
undermine the Western commercial aircraft industry. Will there be any corporate social
responsibility from Boeing, Airbus, or Bombardier to their home countries that have
spent countless billions of dollars in supporting and developing the technologies and
innovation which they possess today? Instead, will they take short-term financial gains
for their current shareholders at the cost of losing the long-term strategic value of their
proprietary assets? There seems to be no turning back for these aircraft manufacturers.
The cost of launching a new aircraft can run into the tens of billions dollars, and with the
reluctance of the two who can self-fund their programs compared to the one that is
financially unable, the new system integration business model is here to stay.

From a policy perspective, there is probably little room for corrective action in terms of
regional employment protection or the maximization of value-added at the local scale – at
least not for those localities that house systems integrators such as Boeing or Airbus.
Subsidies granted to these major corporations appear to be void of clawback provisions,
if only because affected regions or communities are invariably desperate to retain as
many aerospace-related jobs as they can.

A final and perhaps curious twist in this unfolding story of corporate change is that
outsourcing under systems integration is not driven by a strategic interest in the
minimization of total costs for any given aircraft launch. Rather, a more important goal is
to cut unit costs for the systems integrator and spread financial risk across the supply
chain. Hickie (2006) shows that systems integration in the aircraft industry tends to
inflate total costs for a new product launch. Airlines and passengers do not absorb these
extra costs, at least not directly. Instead, large chunks of these extra costs are paid by
public agencies that fund their subsidy programs from tax dollars.

From a global welfare perspective, what might look like a free meal is anything but.
Somebody has to pay, right?



Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing Says Development Of 787-8 On Track posted Tue Feb 21 2006 17:05:06 by NYC777
Boeing 787 Update From Earnings Conference Call posted Wed Jan 31 2007 16:40:51 by NYC777
NZ Purchases Four More Boeing 787-9 A/C posted Tue Dec 19 2006 06:19:59 by TG992
Boeing Adds Lufthansa Video To "New Airplane" Site posted Thu Dec 7 2006 07:08:45 by Thebry
New Boeing 787 Order Rumor posted Thu Dec 7 2006 03:13:06 by ERAUgrad02
Photo Of Boeing 787 Section Being Transported posted Sat Oct 28 2006 16:09:01 by RobK
AA, DL, UA Vie For Boeing 787 Gold Care Contracts posted Wed Oct 18 2006 01:13:52 by WorldTraveler
Boeing 787 To Have Best Cabin Air/Comfort Ever posted Sun Oct 8 2006 20:32:05 by RoseFlyer
Boeing 787 Dreamliner Break Even No! posted Tue Oct 3 2006 22:26:50 by Bringiton
Boeing 787-3 For Delta Hawaii Routes? posted Sat Sep 9 2006 22:30:06 by 1337Delta764