Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Can Airbus Break The Product Design Cycle?  
User currently offlineBillReid From Netherlands, joined Jun 2006, 1012 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2376 times:

In this thread I want to create A vs. B stretegic planning dialogue. I want to hear what the future holds strategically from a competitive perspective. I do not wish to hear what manuf is better, I wish to hear which manuf is better positioned in terms of timing.

For instance, is Boeing waiting for the final financing and design plan to come to fruition for the A350XWB just to announce the B737 replacement in response?

Would Airbus be able to respond to the next Boeing narrowbody?

Can Airbus handle both the design of the A350XWB and a A320 replacement simultaneously?

Has the A380 delay really set the stage for Airbus to be a delayed follower to Boeing?
As they are late with the A350XWB versus the B787?
Will the same occur in the narrowbody cycle?

And how does Airbus break this cycle?
Would it be wiser to scrap the A350XWB and go directly to a repalcement for the A320 series ahead of Boeing on the narrowbody front.


Some people don't get it. Business is about making MONEY!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9633 posts, RR: 68
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2353 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Airlines want (at least) two vendors. Until the Russians get it together, and maybe the Chinese, Airbus and Boeing are it.

And being late to market isn't always a bad thing. The airline business is cyclical, and Airbus can learn from the 'mistakes' of the 787 project to make their answer a better product.


User currently offlineAirFrnt From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2826 posts, RR: 42
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2210 times:

Quoting BillReid (Thread starter):
For instance, is Boeing waiting for the final financing and design plan to come to fruition for the A350XWB just to announce the B737 replacement in response?

Yes. Or Y3. Y3 would be best for Boeing, Y1 would be worst for Airbus.

Quoting BillReid (Thread starter):

Would Airbus be able to respond to the next Boeing narrowbody?

Yes. They won't have any choice, and governments are not shy about pumping cash into Airbus.

Quoting BillReid (Thread starter):
Can Airbus handle both the design of the A350XWB and a A320 replacement simultaneously?

No. Historically only Boeing has been able to pull multiple independent projects together simultaneously, which is why Lockheed and Douglass are out of the game now.

Quoting BillReid (Thread starter):

Has the A380 delay really set the stage for Airbus to be a delayed follower to Boeing?

Yes. Airbus has to do something to break that cycle.

Quoting BillReid (Thread starter):
As they are late with the A350XWB versus the B787?

Would it be wiser to scrap the A350XWB and go directly to a repalcement for the A320 series ahead of Boeing on the narrowbody front.

No. But not because of orders. The technology isn't there right now for a 787 efficiency 320/737 replacement. In terms of orders, the overall market depends on the percentage of the market that has gone with the 787. Right now BA, the US carriers and EK have not made their decision. If BA, US and EK (picky any two) go 787, then it is extremely unlikely that the 350XWB will be able to get the orders that they need for the program to be sustainable.

Leahy repeats the 5-10% market mantra, but in reality the later purchases are going to be determined by follow up orders by blue chip customers, who are right now in Boeing's pocket.

But what other choice does Airbus have? They can't afford to cannibalize the A380, the technology isn't there for a 320 replacement, and Boeing is threating to make them a niche manufacturer with the 787.


User currently offlineSEPilot From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 6910 posts, RR: 46
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2157 times:

Quoting AirFrnt (Reply 2):
The technology isn't there right now for a 787 efficiency 320/737 replacement.

It may be very soon; see the thread about engines for the 737RS.

Quoting BillReid (Thread starter):
Has the A380 delay really set the stage for Airbus to be a delayed follower to Boeing?

It's not just the delay, it's the A380 itself. Airbus built it because they wanted a bigger, better one, not because there was a market for it. Granted, some people did want it, but not enough to justify the time and money it cost. The delay is just making a bad situation worse. Boeing has used the time during which Airbus was preoccupied with the A380 to get a headstart on the next generation of airliners which Airbus will be very hard pressed to overcome.



The problem with making things foolproof is that fools are so doggone ingenious...Dan Keebler
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Can Airbus Send The A350 Back To Redesign? posted Thu Dec 15 2005 08:09:41 by MrComet
Can Airbus Afford Not To Redesign The A350? posted Wed Apr 5 2006 22:46:37 by BoomBoom
Boeing And Airbus...can You Tell The Difference? posted Mon Jul 14 2003 00:38:42 by Flynboy747
Can We Visit The Airbus Facilities In Toulouse posted Mon Sep 23 2002 04:18:17 by 1world
Will Airbus Offer The ACJ2 And ACJ3 A320/21LR? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 12:08:31 by OyKIE
Airbus Gives The Go-ahead For The A350 posted Fri Dec 1 2006 14:11:39 by Gh123
Arial Shot: Can Anyone ID The Location? posted Fri Nov 24 2006 02:08:02 by Matt D
Could Airbus Bring The A389-schedule Forward? posted Wed Nov 8 2006 00:48:37 by Johnny
German Govt. To Buy Into Airbus Via The Back Door? posted Sun Oct 29 2006 15:17:47 by NAV20
Airbus And Boeing Product Strategy posted Wed Oct 25 2006 20:52:57 by Katekebo