Blackbird1331 From United States, joined Apr 2004, 1878 posts, RR: 1 Reply 1, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 15821 times:
Outstanding graphics. I wish they made a flight sim training program. Thanks for the link.
P.S. It takes awhile to load, but it's worth it.
Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
MD80fanatic From United States, joined Apr 2004, 2426 posts, RR: 14 Reply 3, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 15418 times:
If the vertical stab could be moved mid-ship (I know it wouldn't be functional in that position), the plane would look exactly like a killer whale. So much so I bet WN would be forced to purchase a dozen just for their Shamu liveries.
Blackbird1331 From United States, joined Apr 2004, 1878 posts, RR: 1 Reply 5, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 15208 times:
N328KF: The video feed I recieved was like watching a movie. Maybe you need to update your graphics card. I have the Radon9800PRO, and that is old. Go to cnet.com and look for an upgrade.
Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
Thebry From United States, joined Jan 2006, 365 posts, RR: 0 Reply 7, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 14799 times:
That was AMAZING. It's a sneak peek at what we've all been waiting for -- seeing the Dreamliner in various airline liveries. Seeing it in flight was really quite cool. All I've seen to date are the static images Boeing publishes (and that one video on the www.newairplane.com website.
Very cool. And, by the way, the video quality was spectacular. (of course I'm using a 17" MacBook Pro).
N328KF From United States, joined May 2004, 5585 posts, RR: 7 Reply 8, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14570 times:
Quoting Blackbird1331 (Reply 5): N328KF: The video feed I recieved was like watching a movie. Maybe you need to update your graphics card. I have the Radon9800PRO, and that is old. Go to cnet.com and look for an upgrade.
How about you not assume I'm operating on outdated equipment? It was a rather low resolution video — only 640x360.
When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
Zippyjet From United States, joined Sep 2001, 2500 posts, RR: 15 Reply 10, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 14413 times:
Quoting Blackbird1331 (Reply 1): Outstanding graphics. I wish they made a flight sim training program. Thanks for the link.
P.S. It takes awhile to load, but it's worth it.
Couldn't agree with you more! For the heck of it, I muted the video's volume and ran Andrew Loog Oldham's instrumental
The Last Song (original instrumental version of the Verve's Bittersweet Symphony) way cool!
HA_DC9 From United States, joined Jul 1999, 581 posts, RR: 1 Reply 12, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 14222 times:
Outstanding video. Thanks for posting it. I was never a fan of the flight deck windows on the 787, but after seeing this video and the head-on flight shots it had I can say I like those windows now. I can't wait to fly on one!
Ole From Denmark, joined Feb 2003, 15 posts, RR: 0 Reply 17, posted (2 years 8 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 5701 times:
Hello Everybody !
Thanks a lot for your comments about the video we have released...keep it coming
We are two danish guys who are trying to get a business going here, so we need every support we can get. So spread the word and hopefully someone in the Airline business will hear about us.
Bbobbo From United States, joined Dec 2006, 183 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (2 years 8 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5071 times:
Ole,
Great job with the video. I love how you incorporate the movement of the "camera" into the flight scenes (you can see the entire frame move, as if the "plane" that the "camera" is in is being jostled by turbulence). It really adds to the realism of the flying scenes.
My only minor criticism is that the taxiing onto the runway at the beginning doesn't seem quite right. Too smooth, and maybe a little too fast. Would it be possible at all to add some jetwash from the engines? Maybe some shake in the wings and the engine as the wheels travel over the expansion seams in the concrete?
Ole From Denmark, joined Feb 2003, 15 posts, RR: 0 Reply 21, posted (2 years 8 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 4795 times:
Thanks for your feedback Bbobbo !
Details counts and you are pointing out some details that would worth working on in the next version. Also the windsock in the beginning of that clip should be moving a bit in my own opinion.
Others see things that we don't see ourselves why its good to get feedback from you guys.
Uh oh! You have now unleashed the floodgates! But then, if you want an absolutely perfect rendering I am sure the people of this site (nit-pickers unite!) will ba able to direct you to the "little things" that separate normal animation from reality.
My own example...
Quoting Bbobbo (Reply 20): I love how you incorporate the movement of the "camera" into the flight scenes (you can see the entire frame move, as if the "plane" that the "camera" is in is being jostled by turbulence). It really adds to the realism of the flying scenes.
I noticed this "jiggle" to but found it disconcerting and unreal. I might have noticed some slight movement in other live footage but not that much, I suspect it may be that most are done with a steady cam nowadays. Just my two cents.
Otherwise it was very good, I was impressed.
Tug
everything I have learned I have learned by mistake
N328KF From United States, joined May 2004, 5585 posts, RR: 7 Reply 23, posted (2 years 8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4694 times:
Quoting Tugger (Reply 22): I noticed this "jiggle" to but found it disconcerting and unreal. I might have noticed some slight movement in other live footage but not that much, I suspect it may be that most are done with a steady cam nowadays.
A Steadicam cannot compensate for the movement of the photographic platform. That's what this "jiggle" is intended to represent, and to me, it only made the video seem that much more realistic.
When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
Tugger From United States, joined Apr 2006, 1890 posts, RR: 2 Reply 24, posted (2 years 8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4616 times:
Quoting N328KF (Reply 23): A Steadicam cannot compensate for the movement of the photographic platform.
I understand that. And I mean no disrespect to Bbobbo by using his comment. It was that since he commented on that aspect specifically but to which I had had a different reaction made me want to share my own (which I had refrained from doing when I first saw it).
For me I think the movement is good but needs to be more subtle. But again that is just my opinion!
Other questions/comments I had:
Gold engines on the Icelandair. Isn't Boeing "recommending" a specific grey paint only for laminar flow reasons (for fuel efficiency), is Icelandair choosing to still go with gold?
I liked the detail of the female F/O in the Continental plane.
Tug
everything I have learned I have learned by mistake
LimaNiner From United States, joined Oct 2006, 221 posts, RR: 0 Reply 25, posted (2 years 8 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 4459 times:
Quoting Ole (Reply 17): Thanks a lot for your comments about the video we have released...keep it coming
You guys should release your movies in cross-platform formats -- I'm on a Linux machine and can't watch it.
YouTube has done a great job realizing that Flash players are available on "all 3 platforms". (Yes, I realize there are many more OS platforms than Windows, Mac, and Linux, but those 3 really do cover most of us...)
26 N328KF: Flash leaves a lot to be desired. H.264 is the way to go to have quality and stay cross-platform.
27 Ole: Hi Tug, Impressive that you noticed the female F/O in the CO plane ! I don't know about the Boeing recommendation for engine paint. But yellow/gold is
28 Zippyjet: Best of luck to you! If this is any indication you two are on the way UP! http://youtube.com/watch?v=1ku-ma1dVI8 Some more computer fun, check out th
29 Iloveboeing: Wow! Very nice! I loved it! Thanks for sharing!
30 CO738: I am sorry but this video made me break down... i'll buy 40 -10 series with options for 30 more thank you
31 LimaNiner: Of course Flash video doesn't compare to anything encoded in a real codec, but Flash works "out-of-the-box" pretty much everywhere. I don't think FC6
32 Bbobbo: Oh, I didn't take it as disrespect at all. I'm perfectly okay with people having different opinions from my own. Wow, nice observation. I had to go b
33 Tugger: I noticed that too and was also thinking that it needed to get "fuzzier" as the plane rises. I also think the light point-source should not be direct
34 Boeing747_600: Good call! The music in the otherwise excellent video sounds like it was lifted from some porn soundtrack
35 Call911mfc: I noticed the missing passengers in the CO flight, too. I just figured it was a non-rev flight out of Heathrow to keep a slot viable
36 SirOmega: Goddamn that was excellent. All I can ask for is a higher resolution - watching it on my 1920x1200 res display at full screen made it all pixelated. M
37 ADent: Very nice. Critical Feedback - The Boeing 787 logo at the beginning looks a bit off - like it was scaled up from a small font size? - The overhead tak
Sponsor Message: 
From Poland, joined Jul 2004, 1178 posts, 
From United States, joined Apr 2004, 1878 posts, 
From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 6421 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From China, joined Sep 2004, 794 posts, 
From Switzerland, joined Jun 2006, 1046 posts, 
From Denmark, joined Feb 2003, 15 posts, 
From Iraq, joined Oct 2006, 653 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
