Beijing21 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2004, 83 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted
Tue Mar 13 2007 20:20:20 UTC (8 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2556 times:
will completely restructure its existing network.
Consequences for GVA operations ?
A342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4804 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted
Tue Mar 13 2007 20:22:58 UTC (8 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2548 times:
Are they also targeting other European destinations ?
Exceptions confirm the rule.
Behramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4923 posts, RR: 45
Reply 3, posted
Tue Mar 13 2007 20:28:04 UTC (8 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2528 times:
PEK is a good choice but
MAN and JNB are overcrowded with daily QR-EK-EY services... EK has double daily to both cities.
I would opt for BHX over MAN because there is less competition.
If they want to restructure their network then AUH and MCT should be suspended ASAP as they arent profitable... AUH is flown twice a week via DXB on A 320s!
CHI787ORD From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 610 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted
Tue Mar 13 2007 21:29:47 UTC (8 years 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2457 times:
Any chance of coming back to
Codeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted
Tue Mar 13 2007 22:50:34 UTC (8 years 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2352 times:
KU do a codeshare with Air China (which uses 767-200ERs on the route). So probably it might be an increase in frequency?
I don't think GVA should be affected. Probably a lot of diplomatic and business issues here fro Kuwaitis.
JNB and MAN could form an alternative to the already flying services by EK/EY/QR. But for Kuwaiti and transit passengers?
How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?