Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA And 747X  
User currently offline#-B777-# From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1165 times:

hello, does anyone out there know how many 747X BA will order? thanx

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (15 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 1137 times:

Who else is interested in 747X anyways? I heard that Airbus is undercutting Boeing pricewise.
Btw, I couldn't picture my self in A3XX. Way too big. I even think 747 is too big for my liking. It's freaks me out thinking that one of those fully-packed A3XX can take away so many lives in a single accident.

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8244 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (15 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 1139 times:

However, given the major restructuring of BA's operations, I doubt that BA will be buying the 747X.

In fact, they're actually reducing their fleet of 747-400's.

What I do see is that BA may buy the 777-300ER once the exclusive deal between Boeing and GE ends.

User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 11376 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (15 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 1131 times:

If BA doesn´t order the B747X or the A3XX they´ll loose ground to Virgin Atlantic. Who wants to fly in a 777 when he can fly in a more roomy, more modern and comfortable A3XX for possibly even less money? Surely not me.

And, Watewate, I absolutely don´t share your fears of an accident of an A3XX. The bigger the planes are, the less aircraft you´ll need, the less traffic you´ll have, the less delays, the less slot problems. Flying one A3XX instead of two 777s reduces the risk of a crash by about 50%.

User currently offlineRIX From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1847 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (15 years 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 1116 times:

"Flying one A3XX instead of two 777s reduces the risk of a crash by about 50%. "
... and increases your chances to be in a crashed aircraft by about the same 

And "more roomy" means "more cramped" too... People still fly 767 when they can fly "truly" widebodies.

User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (15 years 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 1083 times:


I agree with you but not much airlines are craving for the A3XX... now.


Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (15 years 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 1072 times:

I never said A3XX will have a higher accident rate, I was just wondering what the outcome will be like if one of those birds crashed fully loaded. It's scary to say the least.

User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1027 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (15 years 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 1066 times:

Hi Na. I disagree with your comment regarding roominess on the 777 and A3XX. Both are large aircraft with a very roomy feel. A person can only feel the roominess in his/her immediate vicinity and as far as they can see in the cabin. I have flown many 747's, 767's, MD11's etc and I don't find one more "roomy" than another. I have my seat, overhead storage, an aisle, an area near the bathroom to stand etc., and those dimensions aren't significantly different on any of the aircraft, except for maybe the L1011. The L1011 has a row of 5 lavatories next to each other in the rear of the plane which makes for a roomy waiting area. No one who flies an A3XX will have large open areas. If they did, there would be wasted revenue producing area or they are hauling around unnecessary metal and weight. None of us should make the mistake of forgetting how every extra pound on an airliner costs the airline precious dollars or euros. Please pardon me for rambling and getting off topic and thanks for posting Na.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA And The 752 posted Sun Aug 23 2009 18:09:00 by Mascmo
BA And Latin America posted Mon Jun 22 2009 11:44:21 by B752OS
AA, BA And Antitrust. posted Wed Apr 22 2009 01:09:38 by Sevenforty
BA And The GE90 posted Sun Feb 15 2009 17:19:31 by Mascmo
BA And QF Fail To Agree On Merger posted Wed Dec 17 2008 23:23:57 by Brenintw
BA And BD Share Codes On LHR-LBA posted Thu Nov 20 2008 11:08:21 by AIR MALTA
BA And AA Alliance - Attempt #3 posted Sun Aug 3 2008 02:04:57 by JACK02116
BBC: BA And IB Discuss Merger posted Tue Jul 29 2008 03:38:28 by JoKeR
BA And T4 - Why? posted Wed Jul 16 2008 02:43:52 by AirbusA6
BA And L'Avion Code Share! posted Tue May 6 2008 00:55:24 by AIR MALTA