Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
VS Alliance?  
User currently offlineTeamREGAL From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 114 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3002 times:

When is Virgin Atlantic going to choose an alliance? I would nominate SkyTeam as the best choice. Anyone else?


You would dare to challenge me? .........Insanity!
24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimboflier215 From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 1317 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2990 times:

SQ owns 49% of VS, so Star would make sense. But their application was, apparently, blocked by 2 existing members of that alliance. I can't see SQ being happy with VS joining forces with rival airlines in a rival alliance.

User currently offlineStylo777 From Turkey, joined Feb 2006, 2904 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2973 times:

Quoting Timboflier215 (Reply 1):
SQ owns 49% of VS, so Star would make sense. But their application was, apparently, blocked by 2 existing members of that alliance. I can't see SQ being happy with VS joining forces with rival airlines in a rival alliance.

didn't know that SQ owns 49% however I don't think that VS will ever join an alliance. the markets they serve are already full of other airlines in other alliances. just take BA in OneWorld...


User currently offlineConcorde001 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1230 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2930 times:

The way Virgin is expanding its group of airlines, maybe we will see a 'Virgin Alliance'?







User currently offlineVermeer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 447 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 2867 times:

Quoting Timboflier215 (Reply 1):
But their application was, apparently, blocked by 2 existing members of that alliance.

Really? I was not aware, to me *Alliance would have been a perfect fit. Do you know who the airlines where and their motivation?


User currently offlineBDL2DCA From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 2815 times:

Quoting Vermeer (Reply 4):
Do you know who the airlines where and their motivation?

I would hazard a guess that it was United and BMI, or United and Lufthansa. UA and BM probably do not want the LHR competition. And UA and LH revenue share across the atlantic.



146,319,320,321,333,343,722,732,733,734,735,73G,738,744,752,762,763,772,ARJ,BE1,CRJ,D9S,D10,DH8,ERJ,E70,F100,S80
User currently offlineTimboflier215 From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 1317 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 2807 times:

Quoting Vermeer (Reply 4):

I assume one would have been bmi. There is no love lost between them, especially with impending open skies and the 2 airlines being on opposite sides of the fence on that issue. I'm not sure which the other airline was.



Quoting Concorde001 (Reply 3):
The way Virgin is expanding its group of airlines, maybe we will see a 'Virgin Alliance'?

The Virgin group certainly seems to be expanding to a world-wide reach. If all of the airlines linked up in terms of flight transfers etc, they could be a major alliance on their own.


User currently offlinePhilb From Ireland, joined May 1999, 2915 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 2784 times:

Virgin always kept away from alliances and, whilst codesharing with DL and then CO and having a link with Midwest Express out of Boston, were always protective of what used to be their "uniqueness".

I'm not sure if they feel they need to join an alliance and, if they were to stitch their different airlines loosely together they would have an alliance across a controllable brand.


User currently offlineRick767 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 2662 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2579 times:

As already mentioned, VS applied to join the Star Alliance in 2006, but approval requires the unanimous agreement of all existing alliance members.

BD and UA are widely suspected of being the two votes which vetoed the application.



I used to love the smell of Jet-A in the morning...
User currently offlineBoysteve From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 2469 times:

Quoting Rick767 (Reply 8):
BD and UA are widely suspected of being the two votes which vetoed the application.

BD most definitely and I would expect UA rather than LH. This is because UA directly compete with VS aross the Atlantic whereas LH do not.


User currently offlineBosWashSprStar From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 2427 times:

I had also assumed that there was a cost element to VS's abstinence--does anyone know what the "dues" or other ongoing costs are related to alliance membership?

User currently offlineVonRichtofen From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 4626 posts, RR: 37
Reply 11, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 2303 times:

Best scenario would be a VS take-over of BD and then entrance into STAR.

STAR really lacks a good connector from LHR unless you go to either Scandinavia or Germany.


Kris



Word
User currently offlineSparklehorse12 From Australia, joined Feb 2007, 884 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 2296 times:

DJ and VS have an alliance of sorts through Velocity Rewards as do EK and VS...? I went to book SYD to BKK and the fare was direct on EK but coming back was via Hong Kong on VS....either a glitch in the system or an alliance of sorts..?


Airlines Flown : QF,NW,AA, CX, AC, MH, SQ, DJ, NZ, TG, PG,US, FJ, J8, AN, DD, JQ
User currently offlineChalliday From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 88 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 2259 times:

Quoting VonRichtofen (Reply 11):
STAR really lacks a good connector from LHR

But do they need one? LH run a powerhouse of European, Asian, and African destinations from hubs in Germany. To be honest with you a VS addition to the Star Alliance, even if they tied up with BD in any way, wouldn't add anything to the expansion of the alliance.


User currently offlineKiwiandrew From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 8492 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 2245 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Challiday (Reply 13):
To be honest with you a VS addition to the Star Alliance, even if they tied up with BD in any way, wouldn't add anything to the expansion of the alliance.

they would if they brought VK and DJ with them



Moderation in all things ... including moderation ;-)
User currently offlineKevin777 From Denmark, joined Sep 2006, 1165 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (7 years 1 month 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 2193 times:

Quoting TeamREGAL (Thread starter):
When is Virgin Atlantic going to choose an alliance?

I don't think it's a quesiton of when, rather if... VS seems to be doing all right on their own, and not being in an alliance also has its benefits - they can choose who they want to play with all the time... SQ, Star, CO, EK... not easy when you're tied up in an alliance,,

Quoting Concorde001 (Reply 3):
The way Virgin is expanding its group of airlines, maybe we will see a 'Virgin Alliance'?

Doubt if that would be a good idea all over the board... the products are very diiferent, and it is essential to VS that they keep their high brand value on long-hauls, and that this not be diluted by short-haul airlines. However, some sort of agreements could be done of course, but let's not forget that TV never had anything to do with VS for instance

GO VS!!

Kevin777  Smile



"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
User currently offlineChalliday From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 88 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (7 years 1 month 6 days ago) and read 2005 times:

Quoting Kiwiandrew (Reply 14):
they would if they brought VK and DJ with them

VS does codeshare with VK but don't in anyway codeshare with DJ. Also VS only share the "Virgin" brand with VK and DJ. As VS don't own these two airlines (only 49% of them) they can't bring VK or DJ with them into any alliance.


User currently offlineStarGoldLHR From Heard and McDonald Islands, joined Feb 2004, 1529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1894 times:

Now UA has pulled out of JFK-LHR and reduced all it's other activity maybe they should try again.

As for BD..they will do as LH/SK/UA tells them (they all pay BD's losses)



So far in 2008 45 flights and Gold already. JFK, IAD, LGA, SIN, HKG, NRT, AKL, PPT, LAX still to book ! Home Airport LCY
User currently offlineAisak From Spain, joined Aug 2005, 760 posts, RR: 10
Reply 18, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1823 times:

Quoting Timboflier215 (Reply 6):
There is no love lost between them, especially with impending open skies and the 2 airlines being on opposite sides of the fence on that issue.

If they're seen as the enemy, I suppose BMI haven't heard those things about "it's important to keep friends closer..." or "if you can't beat'em..."

Fact: BMI can't fly from Heatrow to the USA and if they could as of tomorrow they don't have the equipment. They however have a decent operation out of MAN to ORD, LAS, ANU and BGI with two 330 based there.

Fact: Virgin Atlantic, however, can fly from Heathrow to some US destinations but have to mantain another base in LGW to fly to other US destinations. They also fly some routes from MAN to UVF, BGI and MCO but without a base there I imagine (flying to MAN via destination LON-XXX-MAN-XXX-LON)

They have FFP agreements, codeshare aggrements.... It's not they have to join Star alliance because of that (and the SQ ownership) but HELLOOO!!! Extensive cooperation à-la NW-KLM would be rather sensible. Am I the only one seeing the symbiosis? Virgin focused on LON longhaul, BMI focused on MAN longhaul and LHR mediumhaul (now with Bmed)

Even if they think it won't work out... How many people would have thought that the AF-QF relationship could be so successful for both of them?

Quoting Philb (Reply 7):
I'm not sure if they feel they need to join an alliance

Me neither. And when you take into consideration the size of Star... wow. I sometimes wonder how many people have used an Aer Lingus' Gold Circle card to enter the MEL lounge or the Spanair's Gold card to use the lounge at ICN.

Maybe it's more "profitable" for Virgin to have agreements on a one-to-one basis.


User currently offlineJfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8092 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1813 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

With Singapore's Star limg, Virgin would ssem to be good for that alliance. Star has gotten so big Virgin wouldn't be a threat to any other airline. With its Continental code-share link and Delta frequent flyer reciprocity Skyteam would be good for Virgin. The best outcome would be Sir Richard Branson buying Sir Michael Bishop's BMI and joining Star, getting all those LHR slots BMI has.

User currently offlineKevin777 From Denmark, joined Sep 2006, 1165 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1664 times:

Quoting StarGoldLHR (Reply 17):
As for BD..they will do as LH/SK/UA tells them

They bloody well should, too, but I'm afraid SMB has a lot to say, still.. God SK should have stayed away from that airline... but hindsight is 20/20..

Quoting Jfk777 (Reply 19):
The best outcome would be Sir Richard Branson buying Sir Michael Bishop's BMI (...) getting all those LHR slots BMI has.

Which will happen over SMB's dead body, sadly...

Kevin777  Smile



"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
User currently offlineUnitedFirst From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 478 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (7 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1571 times:

Does anyone have a proper source (ie, not hear-say) that references VS's rejection from Star?

Derek


User currently offlineSQ452 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1082 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (7 years 1 month 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1458 times:

Quoting BDL2DCA (Reply 5):
I would hazard a guess that it was United and BMI, or United and Lufthansa. UA and BM probably do not want the LHR competition. And UA and LH revenue share across the atlantic.

I'm actually a bit surprised that British Midland would object, simply due to the fact that you don't have a lot of flight overlap with VS, especially on transatlantic and asia routes. BD is very small as it is and it does not have much of an overseas presence, particularly to North America. I think the two could compliment eachother very well, and no chance in hell SQ would allow VS to join a competing alliance. My guess is it was UA and LH that objected.



SIN > CVG > BOS
User currently offlineRick767 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 2662 posts, RR: 51
Reply 23, posted (7 years 1 month 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1402 times:

Quoting Aisak (Reply 18):
Fact: BMI can't fly from Heatrow to the USA and if they could as of tomorrow they don't have the equipment. They however have a decent operation out of MAN to ORD, LAS, ANU and BGI with two 330 based there.

You kind of defeated your own argument there. Do you seriously think if bmi could fly transatlantic from LHR as of tomorrow those 330s would last 5 minutes at MAN? That's why bmi bought them - in anticipation of open skies which never happened (but look likely to perhaps happen soon).

If (or when as some see it) EU-US open skies comes to fruition, bmi will be competing head-to-head with VS in no time on the North Atlantic.



I used to love the smell of Jet-A in the morning...
User currently offlineTeamREGAL From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 114 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (7 years 1 month 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1309 times:

This is exactly why VS would make a great fit into SkyTeam. I'm very much aware that SQ owns 49% of VS. It is also understood that Branson's crew is doing well on their own simply by codesharing. However, if VS did join SkyTeam, they would bring with them some new routes maybe not all being exploited by AF-KL?


You would dare to challenge me? .........Insanity!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Alliance Vs. Alliance Air posted Fri Jan 26 2001 14:41:52 by Cfalk
VS: Why No Alliance? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 03:21:13 by Heathrow
VS To Join An Alliance? posted Sun Feb 12 2006 05:51:04 by Wargo7772
Why Is VS Not In An Alliance? posted Tue Jan 4 2005 02:01:47 by Catatonic
VS & Star Alliance posted Mon Dec 13 2004 13:31:55 by Scotron11
Star Alliance Vs BAA At LHR posted Mon Dec 13 2004 07:33:15 by Scotron11
Alliance Vs. Code Sharing posted Wed Sep 1 2004 00:53:56 by MoneyShot
VS To Join An Alliance? posted Fri Mar 19 2004 00:14:05 by AF330
Oneworld Vs Star Alliance - Whats The Difference posted Tue Mar 2 2004 04:32:03 by KLM11
Why Doesn't VS Join Star Alliance? posted Sun Jan 18 2004 13:52:44 by Mozart