Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Northwest Plans To Shift Traffic To Regional Jets  
User currently offlinePilotfox From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 553 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 9778 times:

Here's an interesting Article from the Star Tribune about Northwest Airlines. I know there is always talk about NWA and their DC-9's, but this article mentions that they plane to "phase out one-third of its aging DC-9 planes within two years". Any way, heres the article, http://www.startribune.com/535/story/1060988.html

47 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCentrair From Japan, joined Jan 2005, 3598 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 9679 times:

Get this out quickly...NW getting rid of the DC-9s? Never!

What is really the interesting parts are...

Quote:
Northwest intends to shrink its mainline fleet -- aircraft used for domestic and international flying and seating 100 or more people -- from 375 planes in 2006 to 337 in 2008. Northwest also plans to substantially increase its fleet of regional planes, which seat up to 76 passengers -- from 226 planes in 2006 to 262 in 2008.[quote]

More work for Mesaba, Pinnacle and Compass.

[quote]The airline is projecting that aircraft used solely for overseas flights will grow from 61 this year to 74 by 2011.

That is only 13 planes... but by then there will be an increase of 18 aircraft. Maybe the 742s are going.
More crews training to do international routes? I think someone mentioned in another thread about Jr staff now gettng more chances to work WBC.

Quote:
In a bankruptcy court filing, Northwest said its international flight capacity is expected to grow an average of 4.3 percent a year between this year and 2010. Meanwhile, domestic flying is projected to decline by an average of 2.7 percent a year.

Flying done by regional affiliates is expected to mushroom by 16.9 percent a year, Northwest said.

That is a huge increase in regional flying. Are other carriers seeing this kind of increase?



Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
User currently offlineBicoastal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 9618 times:

United has been doing this for what seems like years now. During bankruptcy, United reduced its fleet quite a bit and had its regional United Express contractors pick up the routes. Though some of these routes could certainly use larger aircraft at times, its seems more cost effective to fill an RJ consistently rather than a 737 occasionally. Plus they've been able to get rid of expensive union labor at many stations and replace them with the contractors' employees....Skywest, Mesa, Air Wisconsin (operations only), etc.

User currently offlinePU752 From Uruguay, joined Mar 2005, 584 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 9602 times:

Quoting Bicoastal (Reply 2):
United has been doing this for what seems like years now. During bankruptcy, United reduced its fleet quite a bit and had its regional United Express contractors pick up the routes. Though some of these routes could certainly use larger aircraft at times, its seems more cost effective to fill an RJ consistently rather than a 737 occasionally. Plus they've been able to get rid of expensive union labor at many stations and replace them with the contractors' employees....Skywest, Mesa, Air Wisconsin (operations only), etc.

Remeber at IAD, ACA was flying thos Bae and CRJs now they fly ERJs !


User currently offlineRedTailDTW From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 757 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 9604 times:

That is a big jump in regional flights indeed!



Mason

[Edited 2007-03-17 10:57:41]


Northwest Airlines. Now your flying smart!
User currently offlineLexy From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 2515 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 9456 times:

Quoting Bicoastal (Reply 2):
its seems more cost effective to fill an RJ consistently rather than a 737 occasionally

Here at BNA, that's the case and I just don't believe that for one second. Eg. CO flies around 17 flights a day from here all on E145's and E135's. That is just stupid. Especially when you have a mainline 737 in the system that comes as close as MEM on the routing system on a daily basis. That is just laziness on the part of the carrier to provide a positive, and enjoyable, experience for the paying customer. To this day, I will not fly Continental, United, and even some Northwest flights out of Nashville due to their reliance on smaller, less comfortable, aircraft. Call me stupid, call me an idiot, but all three of them flew mainlines into here on an almost regular basis up until two years ago. Now, with the exception of Northwest which is dwindling fast as well, you are lucky to even get a mainline diversion here. What a joke. I'm glad we have Southwest and Frontier to cover the majority of places a Legacy flies from BNA to. That assures, at the very least, a somewhat confortable flight on a mainline jet. I look at it like this, BNA is capable of mainline flights on all three of these carriers named above. If we are no better than some tiny town out station, then give your gate space up and hit the road. I am sure we could find someone to fill your flights and space up.



Nashville, Tennessee KBNA
User currently offlineTinPusher007 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 981 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 9448 times:

Quoting PU752 (Reply 3):
Remeber at IAD, ACA was flying thos Bae and CRJs now they fly ERJs !

ACA does not fly ERJ's now or anything else for that matter. They became Independence Air and ultimately went out of business. Interestingly enough, Compass then purchased their operating certificate.



"Flying isn't inherently dangerous...but very unforgiving of carelessness, incapacity or neglect."
User currently offlineFlyorski From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 996 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 9439 times:

Very interesting, NO MORE NW DC-9s!!!!! Of course they will only be replacing one-third of them. I bet when they retire the barbie jets, the other DC-9s will still be flying  Wink


"None are more hopelessly enslaved, than those who falsly believe they are free" -Goethe
User currently offlineNitrohelper From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 469 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 9379 times:

In one of the other DC -9 threads I guessed 2012 for the end of an era. The article says 75 still flying in 2011, so maybe my new guess is 2015 for the answer to the famous A-net question.
"when will NW retire the DC-9s ? "  scratchchin 


User currently offlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 6093 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 9339 times:

Quoting Lexy (Reply 10):
I can see your point, but that is describing two types of spending habits that have nothing really in common.

I was never one for analogies.  Wink



Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
User currently offlineGregarious119 From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 9257 times:

Quoting Lexy (Reply 5):
CO flies around 17 flights a day from here all on E145's and E135's. That is just stupid. Especially when you have a mainline 737 in the system that comes as close as MEM on the routing system on a daily basis. That is just laziness on the part of the carrier to provide a positive, and enjoyable, experience for the paying customer.

While I can understand your perspective (as I don't much love the RJ's either), it's not too stupid of a concept from the airlines perspective.

Imagine the needs of a heavily traveled leisure market. People traveling there don't particularly care whether their flight leaves at 10am or 2pm or 5pm...they just want to go lay on the beach for a week. So send 3 737's, fill the seats, and you're using your aircraft well.

Now...take a place that is a heavy business market. If you're catering to corporate execs who have a meeting at 10 and need to be back by 3, it makes sense to have 17 flights a day staggered an hour apart. Although I'm sure any exec would love to have a nice big first class seat - lots of frequency gives them better use of their time and they're more likely to fly you again.

Bear in mind - i know these are gross generalities, however, they were made just to show the case why in some cases, more frequency on smaller jets can be better than the same capacity spread out over fewer (albeit larger) flights.

G

[Edited 2007-03-17 14:45:37]

User currently offlineAf773atmsp From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 2706 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 9191 times:

It also says NW will be doing international expansion by 2008 when NW gets their first 787. MSP-CDG-MSP! MSP-FRA-MSP! MSP-HKG-MSP! MSP-KIX-MSPBig grin  bigthumbsup 


It ain't no normal MD80 its a Super 80!
User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6515 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 9100 times:

Quoting Af773atmsp (Reply 11):
It also says NW will be doing international expansion by 2008 when NW gets their first 787. MSP-CDG-MSP! MSP-FRA-MSP! MSP-HKG-MSP! MSP-KIX-MSP!

I would wager that not one of those markets will be flown in 2008.


User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3975 posts, RR: 28
Reply 13, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 9087 times:

There will always be a need for a 100 seater in the NWA route structure. That is where the mystery lies... what will they buy/lease to replace the remaining DC9s? My guess is EMB195s flown at the mainline level. The scope prevents any airlink from totally replacing the domestic operatio, let alone flying anything more than 100 seats. It seems that NWA has identifed the needs for about 75 or less 100 seat jets, down from the nearly 100+ we see today.


AZJ


User currently offlineAf773atmsp From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 2706 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 9032 times:

My best guess is NW will replace the DC-9s with A319s/320s, and maybe order the E195 to replace the DC-9-30. I'm also wondering if NW will replace the Saab 340s.


It ain't no normal MD80 its a Super 80!
User currently offlineBUFjets From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8990 times:

Does anybody know if any of the DC-9's to be retired in the next year or two are the DC-9-50's? They are "newer" than the DC-9-30's, but maybe they are retiring based on when D checks are needed.

Slightly off topic, but... are all the engines on the DC-9-30's the same? Are they interchangeable with any DC-9-30 in the fleet?

Thanks.


User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3975 posts, RR: 28
Reply 16, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8990 times:

The old days of NWA are over, therefore we have to forget about the replacement plans for the fleet as we saw it before ch11. It would be innacurate to simply think of a replacement for the DC9-30/40/50 fleets on a one for one basis. Same goes for the 742 fleet. It seems that the fleet requirement is shifting to smaller a/c worldwide therefore the fleet plan going forward has shifted. NWA traditionally has had a much larger domestic mainline operation than all the others, who relied heavily on RJs. NWA was late to the party with this respect, but pad off with the DC9s. Without the DC9s the costs to operate the "same" domestic fleet would be out of control. So, we see the push for large RJs and less mainline a/c.

I think it would be pretty safe to say the DC9-50s would be replaced by the 319. That is only however, NWA still finds the need to maintain a fleet of roughly 100 frames (combined 319s and D95 today). If they think they'll only need to operate a fleet of roughly 70, 125 seat a/c, there is no replacement required. The same goes for the 100 seat market. If the new business model requires roughly 75 frames, then all will likely be replaced by a new type. If they identify the need for only 50, then only 50 will be replaced and the remainder will shift to the 76 seat large RJ to be operated at airlink.

NWA has always matched capasity to demand pretty well, while also maximizing revenues and attempting to be profitable. Operating widebodies in the domestic system does not fit the business model for a profitable operation. Even though it could be filled, this is the reason you don't see a 330 flying MSP-SEA. Delta finally realized that flying 767s from ATL-JAX is probably not the brightest idea, even though they could be full. Delta has always tried to be EVERYONES airline and it doesn't work. NWA has always tried to serve the markets that they do best... midwest, asia and AMS with KLM. The future of NWA is likely to be the same, but on a scale that ensures profitability.

As for the saabs... there have been rumblings at XJ regarding this. Apparently the new agreements with the leasing companies have some of the leases starting to expire in 5 years time. The only real solution to serve the same markets with the same capacity would be the bombardier Q family, or the ATR 42. Since for some reason the company wanted a Q400 pay rate, I would think the logical solution would be the Q family. The only stumbling block would be the costs of operating the dash again. The dash was abandoned in the 90s for the saab because they could get more than 1 saab, for the price of ONE dash. But with the new efficiencies the company has found in its fake bankruptcy, perhaps they kind find a way to operate the dashes better than they could in the past. So... for saab replacement, my vote goes to a mix of the Q family products by bombardier.

AZJ

[Edited 2007-03-17 15:57:16]

User currently offlineInnocuousFox From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2805 posts, RR: 14
Reply 17, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 8836 times:

Wow... and to think that another thread was talking about increased traffic and crowding at airports. That's what we need, more RJs!  Yeah sure


Dave Mark - Intrinsic Algorithm - Reducing the world to mathematical equations!
User currently offlineKingAir200 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 1628 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 8714 times:

Quoting Pilotfox (Thread starter):
"phase out one-third of its aging DC-9 planes within two years".

Not being an insider, I don't know that much about this, but I feel bad for everyone on the DC-9, especially the bottom folks. There's gonna be some movin' on the position lists. To where, I wonder.

[Edited 2007-03-17 17:44:43]


Hey Swifty
User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3975 posts, RR: 28
Reply 19, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 8476 times:

If the fleet has net growth, nobody has to worry about anything. Plus, if the net growth is in lager equipment, that means more pay and a better lifestyle. I"m sure the DC9 drivers who bounce around the midwest won't be so unhappy they'll get to bid the airbus or 757 sooner than later. If there is a net decrease in planes, then there is a problem. Only the problem has been partially solved by the creation of Compass...


AZJ


User currently offlineNwarooster From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1125 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 7689 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Centrair (Reply 1):
That is only 13 planes... but by then there will be an increase of 18 aircraft. Maybe the 742s are going.

Northwest intends to replace all Boeing 747-200s. They probably will be with new Boeing 787s.
The new larger regional jets, along with the A319/A320will replace the DC-9s.
The 747-400s Northwest has will continue as passenger jets. However, the 400s that Northwest operates will be converted into BCFs as the airline has to retire the 747-200Fs it has. Will they buy new 747 freighters with a nose door? Good question.


User currently offlineBobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6515 posts, RR: 9
Reply 21, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 7582 times:

Quoting Nwarooster (Reply 20):
The 747-400s Northwest has will continue as passenger jets. However, the 400s that Northwest operates will be converted into BCFs as the airline has to retire the 747-200Fs it has.

Isn't this a contradiction? They can't be both passenger and freighters.


User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Reply 22, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 7548 times:

Quoting Af773atmsp (Reply 14):
My best guess is NW will replace the DC-9s with A319s/320s

Only way to completely replace the DC9 fleet with the A320 family would be for them to acquire A318s.
And that is not one of the possible scenarios.....the A318 and 737-600 are desperate attempts to recapture the days when running a mainline jet with 100 passengers, at 125,000 to 150,000 pounds made some amount of sense. The EMB-195 does almost the same thing, but with 30,000 to 50,000 pounds less. (Depending on what it is being compared to.)

With Northwest, the DC-9-30 seats 100 and the -40 seats 110....I don't really see NW putting an A318 with 124 seats onto a route that was once served by aircraft of 100 and 110 seats.
Enter the E190 and E195.....or the CRJ-900/1000....much better replacements. But they are going to have a hornets nest with the pilots....who say they will be 1 for 1 mainline replacements, while management is going to say they are regional jets.
A battle of semantics.if you ask me....desperate times: desperate measures.

Quoting Azjubilee (Reply 16):
The old days of NWA are over

Ain't that the truth. The entire way of thinking in running an airline is being challenged. Airlines are fighting to stay in business, employees fighting to keep their families fed....

The employees have a valid point, 100 seats used to mean mainline, now in the middle of the game the rules are being changed....now management says 100 seats, 110 seats is: Regional, and with it, less money.

From a non-industry perspective, it looks to me that the airlines are using the shift in manufacturers to perpetuate a "Fairy Tale" ....."Well, Boys, Bombardier and Embraer make regional jets, so anything they produce that we will fly, has to be at the regional pay-scale!"
Even though the boys at "B" and "E" are assuming the manufacturing position once held by McDonnell-Douglas, and BAe.....the airlines (NW) are still trying to ram this down the employees throat; "If you fly anything made by Embraer or Bombardier, it is not worth as much as what the Airbus and few Boeing drivers earn."
In their attempt at changing the plot of the story for their benefit, NW has given us Compass. Well. That makes everything better.

It's just the way I see it....my perception of a very complicated situation with no real clear solution no matter how much the A.Net CEOs would like to have us believe.

Quoting Azjubilee (Reply 16):
I think it would be pretty safe to say the DC9-50s would be replaced by the 319.

At a difference of only one seat that would seem the safe bet.

Quoting Azjubilee (Reply 16):
NWA has always matched capasity to demand pretty well, while also maximizing revenues and attempting to be profitable. Operating widebodies in the domestic system does not fit the business model for a profitable operation. Even though it could be filled, this is the reason you don't see a 330 flying MSP-SEA.

QANTAS found this out in trying to fly the 330 domestically....it just didn't work, 1700nm SYD-PER just didn't work out, no matter what the brochure said.
The A330 series was supposed to have been the high-tech replacement for the A300 that could make a profit on runs of less than 2500nm....even down to 750nm-1000nm.
Just look at Eastern and how they used their A300 fleet up and down the East Coast....the typical stage length being 500nm (MIA-ATL), up to a max of 1400nm (SJU-JFK/PHL), and as short as 200nm (SDQ-SJU). The A330 is a fine airplane, but no where as versatile as the A300.
Air Inter of France was an even better example, the A300 performed handsomely, in a country where no route is longer than 500nm....I wish I had some empirical evidence to back this up, alas, I only have anecdotal information from ex-Air Inter employees that did not have much good to say about the A330 they received. ORY-TLS a popular route for the A330-300, while nice from the customers point of view, was too much aircraft for a 308nm route.

This fact has not escaped Northwest.
Once upon a time, Northwest would send up to 7 DC-10s a day MSP-ORD, 290nm, exactly half of the 14 daily flights between the two cities. Today, they operate only 10 flights a day!
7 DC-9 variants, 2 A320s, and 1 A319.
Granted, there is a little more competition on the route, but not so much that their capacity has been cut by almost 60%?

It would have seemed logical, a natural progression if you will, to replace those 7 DC-10s with A330-300s they have, or -200s, maybe even some 757-300s, but no, another troubling incident in how the world of aviation as we know it, is changing before our eyes. It would not surprise me in the least to one day see E190/E195s or CRJ-1000s dominate on the route...or whatever the fleet at NW looks like in 10 years.

Quoting Lexy (Reply 5):
laziness on the part of the carrier to provide a positive, and enjoyable, experience for the paying customer.

I am afraid you are just going to have to get used to it, the situation, for all airlines, is not going to get better.

Within 10 years the predominant type in the NW fleet is going to be a mix of the CRJ-700s, CRJ-900s, maybe some -1000s, and the E190/E195 serving the majority of their domestic flights, with the obvious exceptions of course. The smaller jets are becoming the baseline equipment, while a few years ago that position was held by aircraft of the 737/MD80/320 variety, and the mainline fleet went up from there.
Not anymore.
The 737 family and A320s are assuming the position the widebodies held not even 15 years ago.....when flying a "Big" aircraft to your domestic destination meant an L-1011, DC-10, 767, or in some limited cases even a 747. From here on out, flying a "Big" aircraft from here on out will mean a 737-900 or A321. (Not to veer off topic too much, but with this paradigm shift happening before our eyes, where is the case for the A380? Or even 747-8i? Except for a few international carriers?)

Southwest will remain the anomaly, and those that will try and emulate their success, but will be destined to failure for the simple reason of not having the economy of scale that makes having a "Large-Jet" fleet possible.

The world is changing, we can piss and moan ad nauseum, but the days of big jets are over. Get used to the new products coming out of Canada and Brasil.....otherwise stay home. Sorry, I don't mean to sound harsh.



Delete this User
User currently offlineSESGDL From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3489 posts, RR: 10
Reply 23, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 7493 times:

I'm very disappointed with this move by NW. It's look like this will cut overall capacity in their system, further shrinking MSP, DTW, and MEM. When will airlines (legacy carriers besides CO) start to grow again?

Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 12):

I would wager that not one of those markets will be flown in 2008.

Why? It's only a matter of time before MSP-CDG is started, the others, however, are a bit of a stretch.

Jeremy


User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 6340 posts, RR: 34
Reply 24, posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 7474 times:

Quoting SESGDL (Reply 23):
When will airlines (legacy carriers besides CO) start to grow again?

When the LCC's stop growing.  Smile



Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
25 JetBlueGuy2006 : It will be interesting to see what happens in Lansing; they fly a mix of DC-9's and regionals. I would love to see the EMB series in Lansing.
26 MCOflyer : Agreed. Would NW order the Dash 8-300 or 400? If they do, this marks the second time they flew the type. NW Airlink flew the 100 version. Also, both
27 B707Stu : A friend is a trainer for NW and at a recent MSP meeting was advised no further major maintenance will be given to the DC9's. As they come up for majo
28 M404 : Has anyone heard about Compass' plans for ground handling? Are they going have their own agents? When they operate from a airport that still has Mainl
29 Burnsie28 : WRONG, NW will still have 75 DC-9's in service in 2011. Here are the details. 10 A319's will be dropped this year due to unfavorable lease cost compa
30 FlyDreamliner : Bob, you don't think MSP-CDG-MSP will happen by 2008... everyone seems pretty sure that one is inevitable, do you know something we don't?
31 StearmanNut : So that explains the sudden appearance of the red NWA tails at Marana Pinal Airpark (KMJZ). Noticed that this morning.
32 DTWAGENT : So, If I read this right.... NWA will be flying the ERJ-170's and the CRJ-700 (which will go to Mesaba) right? Now are they going to stop flying into
33 FCYTravis : Actually, with US keeping the 99-seat E190 as a mainline jet, the scope creep seems to have been stopped at that line for now.
34 Jetjack74 : They vary form aircraft to aircraft.They're all have JT8D's but some have the doggish -7A/B's which usually are weight-restricting in high heat, wet
35 NW748i : I'd wager on your side. I'm still unconvinced that the 787-8 will bring all this traffic to MSP. DTW will be getting yet another runway and the lates
36 Bobnwa : My reasoning is as follows. Other than JFK-NRT, the initial International expansion will take place out of DTW, with non-stops to Asian cities and a
37 PSU.DTW.SCE : This article really doesn't say anything we didn't already know. NW has been gradually retired DC-9's since the late 90's, however the rate has accele
38 Flyinryan99 : I was wondering about this. Where would they put a new one? They already have 6 runways with 4 being parallel and the 2 crosswind runways can handle
39 Post contains links Jano : Northwest Enhances Hawaii Schedule Features Airbus A330 http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070319/20070319005886.html?.v=1 TOKYO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Northwest Airl
40 TR1 : I know it has been discussed before, but with this news would a "beach market" (with a smaller WBC cabin) A330-300 now be in the works? To me it woul
41 Stirling : It doesn't say whether they will be -200 or -300......is it safe to assume these routes will be the -300? My reasoning is the current capacity of the
42 Post contains links Jano : It's gotta be -300. Per http://ir.nwa.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=111021&p=irol-fleet they have 10 still to be delivered. For -200 it is 2 still to be delive
43 PSU.DTW.SCE : They are indeed A330-300's, per nwa.com While there will be somewhat of a reduction of seats in certain markets, there will be an increase on the NRT-
44 Post contains links NW748i : Indeed they will be getting a new runway. This was first publically mentioned a few months back. Some of those who attended the series of meeting con
45 PSU.DTW.SCE : Well, call it what you want, but DTW is not getting a new runway in the forseeable future. You won't see an new runway at DTW for at least 15-20 years
46 VC10DC10 : You have the number of 742Fs declining from 14 to 8 without a corresponding increase in any other type of heavy freighter. What exactly did you mean?
47 Post contains images Mrocktor : And they have 100 purchase rights on E190/195. Interesting
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Egyptair To Order Regional Jets posted Mon Dec 13 2004 01:53:19 by Horus
SAS To Buy Regional Jets posted Sun Mar 28 2004 04:44:32 by Planemaker
Aeromexico Close To Buy Regional Jets posted Thu Nov 6 2003 15:37:01 by Vector
KLM To Start Regional Jets From Ams? posted Mon Dec 23 2002 21:22:00 by PW100
REGIO: Arkia To Take Regional Jets posted Sun Mar 11 2007 20:16:40 by Flying-Tiger
Kenya Airways To Get Regional Jets posted Fri Oct 27 2006 23:27:22 by 787KQ
Indian Airlines To Order Regional Jets posted Thu Sep 21 2006 10:56:28 by Flying-Tiger
Midwest Connect To Add 2 Regional Jets posted Thu Aug 3 2006 19:13:42 by Daus
Northwest Drafts Plans To Operate Amid Strike posted Wed Jul 20 2005 21:59:54 by KarlB737
China Eastern To Buy More Short Haul Regional Jets posted Mon Mar 28 2005 06:04:35 by 777ER