Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JetBlue Approval For 3 F/A's On The A320  
User currently offlineJetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2978 posts, RR: 14
Posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 3629 times:

JetBlue now has 150 seats on all of its A320s, but 4 flight attendants are still operating the flight. How close is JetBlue to getting FAA approval to operate with only 3 flight attendants instead of 4?

JetBluefan1


Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLN-MOW From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1908 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 3534 times:

They don't need any. The requirement is one f/a per 50 seats.

[Edited 2007-03-19 12:28:50]


- I am LN-MOW, and I approve this message.
User currently offlineMovingtin From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 183 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 3434 times:

Quoting LN-MOW (Reply 1):
They don't need any. The requirement is one f/a per 50 seats.

The requirement is what their FAA approved company manuals say. If it says they will use 4 attendants on A320 then thet have to get FAA approval to change their manuals to 3. The FAR's are the MINIMUM requirements required to operate. If an airline says in their ops manual that 10 pilots and 10 attendants are required to operate an A/C in their fleet, the FAA will approve the manual because it meets the minimum. Now the FAA will hold that airline to what their manual says, they cannot all of a sudden decide to change that requirement on their own. they have to go thru the FAA and get their ops manuals reapproved before they can make the change.


User currently offlineAvConsultant From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1360 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 3297 times:

Years back the rule required a second F/A per 50 seats. When the RJ's gained popularity, airlines petitioned an amendment to the ruling for the 2nd F/A per 51-101 seats. This rule change cascaded the requirement by 1. Thus 3 F/A are required per 101 - 151.

As Movingtin stated, JBLU was over and above the FAR minimum requirement. This topic surfaced 6 months to a year ago, the tone was as if JBLU was attempting to rewrite the rules. They were not, they were making adjustments to their manuals that take place daily throughout the aviation world..


User currently offlineInTheSky74 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 546 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 3062 times:

Where do you get your information that they are still flying with 4?

I have heard they are already flying with 3!


User currently offlineJerseyguy From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1977 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2919 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting InTheSky74 (Reply 4):
Where do you get your information that they are still flying with 4?

I have heard they are already flying with 3!

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that my flight from OAK-JFK on March 5th was only 3 FAs



Frontier Early Returns Ascent Status| Webmaster of an unoffical TTN page see profile for details
User currently offlineNASBWI From Bahamas, joined Feb 2005, 1310 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2771 times:

You're both correct. We are operating with 3 flight attendants on our A320s, and have been doing so since March 2. Now, given that we were undergoing cabin enhancements since the beginning of January, it wasn't uncommon to fly in an A320 with 150 seats and be served by 4 FAs. This was because not all the planes were reconfigured during that period, and since scheduling did not know which planes were configured and which weren't, there was no way to schedule 3 or 4 FAs per A320. So they kept it at 4 until all planes were reconfigured.

[Edited 2007-03-19 18:26:58]


Fierce, Fabulous, and Flawless ;)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is The IAE V2500 So Successful On The A320? posted Thu Jul 14 2005 16:45:08 by TheSonntag
What Livery Looks Best On The A320? posted Sun Nov 4 2001 14:42:54 by Coolair
JetBlue Gets Segment On The Daily Show posted Thu May 10 2001 07:56:01 by Pilot1113
JetBlue CEO On The US Bid For DL posted Thu Jan 4 2007 23:20:46 by QXatFAT
JetBlue Paying For The A320's? posted Mon Jan 12 2004 15:02:30 by Dtw757
JetBlue Gets Approval For BOS-BDA posted Thu Mar 15 2007 13:53:46 by PVD757
Korean Air On The Way For 747-8s posted Sat Oct 28 2006 23:47:48 by FCKC
JetBlue Gets Approval For 4 Flights To ORD posted Mon Oct 16 2006 22:00:41 by Planemannyc
JetBlue Was Just On CNN - In The Money posted Sat Jul 8 2006 20:00:13 by JetBlueNYFL
If It Was'nt For The A320 Where Would Airbus Be posted Tue Jun 27 2006 14:32:01 by Malb777