Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Does EU Open Skies Abolish The Shannon Stop?  
User currently offlineORDTerminal1 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 129 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5056 times:

Title is pretty self explanatory.


717, 727, 732,733, 734, 735, 738, 742, 744, 752, 763, 319, 320, 340, F100
31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTi717 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 227 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5037 times:

Yes


Filler


Filler



Sir, don't you think we should turn on the runway lights?" "No, that's just what there expecting us to do!"
User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12598 posts, RR: 34
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4928 times:

It's not quite gone, but it's as near to being history as makes no difference. This is an ex-rule; it has (nearly) ceased to be. Bereft of life it lies. It has joined the choir invisible.

Strictly speaking, the stopover ratio goes from 1:1 to 3:1 today. As of next March, when O/S comes into being proper, it is actually a dead parrot, I mean rule.  Big grin


User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4919 times:

This will probably severely decrease the load at SNN, shifting much of it to DUB. The fact that DUB warrants more demand makes zero sense to me since to SNN area is far more interesting country. But I guess some people would rather go tour the Guinness brewery than drive the Ring of Kerry.

[Edited 2007-03-22 19:05:40]


When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineANother From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4880 times:

See my reply 105 here. Not until the end of the Winter season 07/08.

User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4927 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4807 times:

Guess the next questions is how much US service will SNN keep. I could see CO keeping a B752 to EWR


Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11979 posts, RR: 62
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4774 times:

Quoting Humberside (Reply 5):
Guess the next questions is how much US service will SNN keep. I could see CO keeping a B752 to EWR

My prediction is that SNN will retain:

- a daily (perhaps year-round, perhaps going 3-5x weekly in the winter) CO 757 to EWR
- a daily (perhaps year-round, perhaps going 3-5x weekly in the winter) US 767 to PHL
- a daily (perhaps year-round, perhaps going 3-5x weekly in the winter) DL 767 to JFK and/or ATL
- a daily, year-round EI A330 to JFK and BOS

Beyond that, I think SNN will lose all AA service, the remainder of EI service, and any other nonstop U.S. service it now has.


User currently offlineWhappeh From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1563 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4769 times:

Quoting Commavia (Reply 6):
- a daily (perhaps year-round, perhaps going 3-5x weekly in the winter) US 767 to PHL

That flight is already a 757, and I can see it being a 3x weekly 757, I doubt Daily, I don't think the loads were ever that great.



-Travel now, journey infinitely.
User currently offlineRemcor From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 358 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4660 times:

Forgive my ignorance, but why is there a rule that makes flights route to Shannon? What's so special about Shannon? I hear it's a nice place around there, but there's no big city nearby.

User currently offlineWhappeh From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1563 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 4569 times:

Quoting Remcor (Reply 8):
Forgive my ignorance, but why is there a rule that makes flights route to Shannon? What's so special about Shannon? I hear it's a nice place around there, but there's no big city nearby.

Its to spread economic growth around the country of Ireland. You hit the reason on the head with out realizing it. With out a mandatory reason to go to Shannon, nobody would, and Dublin would reap all the benefits. So in order to fly to Dublin you have to fly to Shannon.



-Travel now, journey infinitely.
User currently offlineRemcor From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 358 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4470 times:

Quoting Whappeh (Reply 9):
Its to spread economic growth around the country of Ireland. You hit the reason on the head with out realizing it. With out a mandatory reason to go to Shannon, nobody would, and Dublin would reap all the benefits. So in order to fly to Dublin you have to fly to Shannon.

Seems pretty silly. People either have a reason to go there or they don't. Tourists would go to that region anyway because as a friend told me who recently went to Ireland, "Dublin is is a bit of a dump, so Shannon is closer to the touristy areas." But why mandate it?


User currently offlineWhappeh From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1563 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4427 times:

Quoting Remcor (Reply 10):
Seems pretty silly. People either have a reason to go there or they don't. Tourists would go to that region anyway because as a friend told me who recently went to Ireland, "Dublin is is a bit of a dump, so Shannon is closer to the touristy areas." But why mandate it?

I'm no authority on the subject, so I could be very wrong, but I think it has something to do with the fact that Shannon used to be an important fuel stop on Trans-Atlantic flights back when aircraft didn't have the legs to get from Central/Eastern Europe and the Middle East over to the US and that provided a substantial amount of revenue for the Shannon Airport and the Shannon Area, the laws made it so the Shannon area wouldn't have its flight services dropped out from underneath them simply because aircraft could now over fly the area. Also, the area around the Shannon Airport is some sort of tax free, or used to be tax free, industrial complex (this is the part I'm shaky on, because I can't recall the exact way it was explained to me) and they need the flights for their cargo to help keep costs low.



-Travel now, journey infinitely.
User currently offlineBoysteve From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 958 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4398 times:

Quoting Kaitak (Reply 2):
It's not quite gone, but it's as near to being history as makes no difference. This is an ex-rule; it has (nearly) ceased to be. Bereft of life it lies. It has joined the choir invisible.

Strictly speaking, the stopover ratio goes from 1:1 to 3:1 today. As of next March, when O/S comes into being proper, it is actually a dead parrot, I mean rule.

Like it!!!!!!!!!!

Quoting N328KF (Reply 3):
This will probably severely decrease the load at SNN, shifting much of it to DUB. The fact that DUB warrants more demand makes zero sense to me since to SNN area is far more interesting country. But I guess some people would rather go tour the Guinness brewery than drive the Ring of Kerry.

Can someone explain what the max aircraft size/range that Cork could handle. Is it possible that CO, for example, might entertain an EWR B752 from there rather than SNN?


User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3516 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4361 times:

Quoting Commavia (Reply 6):
My prediction is that SNN will retain:

- a daily (perhaps year-round, perhaps going 3-5x weekly in the winter) CO 757 to EWR
- a daily (perhaps year-round, perhaps going 3-5x weekly in the winter) US 767 to PHL
- a daily (perhaps year-round, perhaps going 3-5x weekly in the winter) DL 767 to JFK and/or ATL
- a daily, year-round EI A330 to JFK and BOS

CO to EWR 5x weekly 757 - agree.
US to PHL - I think US will give up on SNN effective summer 2008.
DL - I think they will keep 5x weekly JFK maybe BOS on 757.
EI should keep daily to JFK and perhaps 5x weekly to BOS.

That's about it.


User currently offlineDoug_Or From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3442 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 4286 times:

Quoting Whappeh (Reply 7):
That flight is already a 757, and I can see it being a 3x weekly 757, I doubt Daily, I don't think the loads were ever that great.

They were miserable.



When in doubt, one B pump off
User currently offlineBraybuddy From Ireland, joined Aug 2004, 5815 posts, RR: 31
Reply 15, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 4266 times:

Quoting Whappeh (Reply 11):
I'm no authority on the subject, so I could be very wrong, but I think it has something to do with the fact that Shannon used to be an important fuel stop on Trans-Atlantic flights back when aircraft didn't have the legs to get from Central/Eastern Europe and the Middle East over to the US and that provided a substantial amount of revenue for the Shannon Airport and the Shannon Area, the laws made it so the Shannon area wouldn't have its flight services dropped out from underneath them simply because aircraft could now over fly the area. Also, the area around the Shannon Airport is some sort of tax free, or used to be tax free, industrial complex (this is the part I'm shaky on, because I can't recall the exact way it was explained to me) and they need the flights for their cargo to help keep costs low.

I beg to differ, Whappeh, you ARE an authority on the subject. Got it in one.

Did you know that Shannon was the first airport in the world to have a duty free shop?


User currently offlineWhappeh From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1563 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4222 times:

Quoting Doug_Or (Reply 14):
They were miserable.

Yeah, that was the only time I've ever non-reved with confidence. I must say, the lack of stress about the return leg was amazing!

And Braybuddy: Glad to know I got it right!



-Travel now, journey infinitely.
User currently offlineBraybuddy From Ireland, joined Aug 2004, 5815 posts, RR: 31
Reply 17, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4196 times:

Quoting Whappeh (Reply 16):
And Braybuddy: Glad to know I got it right!

The only thing I could add to that is that most European airlines used it as a stop-over, being the most westerly airport before hitting Newfoundland. A KLM Connie crashed in the Shannon esutary sometime in the 1950s.


User currently offlineCALPSAFltSkeds From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 2728 posts, RR: 9
Reply 18, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4182 times:

Quoting Boysteve (Reply 12):
Can someone explain what the max aircraft size/range that Cork could handle. Is it possible that CO, for example, might entertain an EWR B752 from there rather than SNN?

According to Google Earth, ORK has a 6900 foot runway. The ramp looks like its serving props, but there's a large building that looks new and appears to have at least one jetway. Is that a new terminal or for cargo?

In comparision, BRS has a 6200 foot runway and is farther from EWR than ORK.
According to a wbsite, Cork (127K) is second in population to Dublin (505K). I have thought it could be a CO 752 market similar to BRS as it would be pretty much a monopoly route.

One would think that ORK would look like a better opportunity for service if SNN had reduced services.

[Edited 2007-03-23 03:20:54]

User currently offlineWhappeh From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1563 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4142 times:

Quoting Braybuddy (Reply 17):
A KLM Connie crashed in the Shannon esutary sometime in the 1950s.

Isn't it still there? I seem to recall being able to see some sort of aircraft off in the river/muck/something right outside the terminal.



-Travel now, journey infinitely.
User currently offlineBraybuddy From Ireland, joined Aug 2004, 5815 posts, RR: 31
Reply 20, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 4062 times:

Quoting Whappeh (Reply 19):
Isn't it still there? I seem to recall being able to see some sort of aircraft off in the river/muck/something right outside the terminal.

Really? I'd be surprised if it was the Connie, seeing it was so long ago. Maybe it was some other aircraft you saw? Must check it out.


User currently offlineSteve332 From Ireland, joined Feb 2007, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3969 times:

Quoting CALPSAFltSkeds (Reply 18):
Is that a new terminal or for cargo?

Yes thats the new terminal at ORK

Quoting CALPSAFltSkeds (Reply 18):
Dublin (505K).

Iv live in Dublin and apart from 4 months in Vancouver iv never lived anywhere else. I would have taught that there was a much larger population in Dublin than 505K but according to Wikipedia 505 is correct, I never knew that.


User currently offlineRineanna From Ireland, joined Jan 2007, 881 posts, RR: 12
Reply 22, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3934 times:

Quoting Steve332 (Reply 21):
Iv live in Dublin and apart from 4 months in Vancouver iv never lived anywhere else. I would have taught that there was a much larger population in Dublin than 505K but according to Wikipedia 505 is correct, I never knew that.

Well Wikipedia might have been just referring to the inner city population, but according to the CSO (which I think we can definitely trust!) Dublin had a total population (in all the county) of 1,122,821. Here's the breakdown of how the population is spread throughout Dublin:

Quote:
Dublin 544,075 578,746 1,122,821
of which
Dublin City 237,813 257,968 495,781
Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown 91,337 100,455 191,792
Fingal 97,409 99,004 196,413
South Dublin 117,516 121,319 238,835

Source: http://www.cso.ie/statistics/popofeachprovcountycity2002.htm

Quoting Braybuddy (Reply 20):
Really? I'd be surprised if it was the Connie, seeing it was so long ago. Maybe it was some other aircraft you saw? Must check it out.

Maybe I'm mistaken, but there is a vertical stabiliser of an aircraft on the round-about just outside the airport which can be seen from the terminal. Not sure if that's the connie though. Interestingly, my late grandad worked in the emergency services at Shannon airport during the time of the crash and was involved in the rescue operation immediatly afterwards. I remember him telling me of seeing the bodies being pulled from the aircraft.


User currently offlineSteve332 From Ireland, joined Feb 2007, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3883 times:

Quoting Rineanna (Reply 22):
Well Wikipedia might have been just referring to the inner city population, but according to the CSO (which I think we can definitely trust!) Dublin had a total population (in all the county) of 1,122,821. Here's the breakdown of how the population is spread throughout Dublin:

Yeah makes a lot more sense!!

Does anyone know what happened the Connie i.e. How did it crash??


User currently offlineRineanna From Ireland, joined Jan 2007, 881 posts, RR: 12
Reply 24, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3878 times:

Quoting Steve332 (Reply 23):
Does anyone know what happened the Connie i.e. How did it crash??



Quote:
The official investigation concluded that the accident was caused by an unexpected re-extension of the landing gear and the captain's incorrect behaviour in this situation. Viruly, who had been only one year from retirement, rejected the responsibility for the crash and was bitter about his subsequent treatment by KLM. In an interview he later stated that there simply had not been enough time to react.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KLM_Flight_633


25 CMHSRQ : When operating from/to the US to Dublin the Shannon policy goes into effect quote To qualify to operate a non-stop service to/from US to/from Dublin,
26 JoFMO : Shannon has a good amount of Ryanair flights. Could a 737-900ER fly nonstop to the USA? If yes then I could see them trying flights to east coast. The
27 Antonovman : Isn't it still there? I seem to recall being able to see some sort of aircraft off in the river/muck/something right outside the terminal. Its a tail
28 CALPSAFltSkeds : According to Boeing, a 739ER could make SNN-BOS and SNN-NYC as the range is 3200 nm with 2 aux fuel tanks and SNN-JFK is 2678 nm. One would think that
29 RobertS975 : FlyGlobeSpan is apprently starting up service between Knock in western Ireland to both BOS and JFK this Spring. That may further erode the value of SN
30 B52murph : Even with the reduction/elimination of some scheduled US commercial flights, SNN is also still a major stop-over point for US military charters headi
31 Rineanna : Unfortunately WO pulled out of SNN last year, favouring Leipzig instead due to cost reasons. But there are still other airlines flying troop charters
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US-EU Open Skies Delayed Again posted Wed Aug 16 2006 06:56:27 by MasseyBrown
Bye, Bye Ms. America - EU Open Skies posted Sun Jul 23 2006 18:55:47 by ANother
New US-EU Open Skies Treaty Possible? posted Sun Dec 4 2005 20:32:56 by Targowski
US-EU Open Skies News! posted Fri Nov 18 2005 22:46:33 by Panaman
US-EU Open Skies - What's New? posted Thu Sep 22 2005 22:46:08 by Elagabal
US Offers EU Open-Skies Concessions posted Thu Jan 23 2003 19:01:28 by N79969
New Tentative EU-US Open-Skies posted Fri Mar 2 2007 17:27:52 by FlyHoss
EU-US Open Skies Talks Resume Today posted Mon Feb 26 2007 19:15:46 by DLPMMM
Open Skies: EU Still Not Taking "no" For An Answer posted Mon Jan 29 2007 19:29:40 by Kaitak
EU/US Open Skies Talks: 10/11 January 2007 posted Wed Jan 10 2007 19:40:53 by Kaitak
EU-Open Skies New Routes And Changes-guesses posted Tue Mar 20 2007 23:50:08 by Drerx7