Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
N900ER - 739ER Test Aircraft - Tail Strike?  
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9623 posts, RR: 68
Posted (7 years 5 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 8356 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Anyone heard anything about the 737-900ER test article, N900ER, being damaged during a tail strike at KEDW?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4105 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 8267 times:

Haven't heard anything, but maybe it was intentional?

User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9623 posts, RR: 68
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 8144 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Well, they would of course be doing Vmu testing, but they would not intentionally damage the airplane.

User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3946 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 7669 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Thread starter):
Anyone heard anything about the 737-900ER test article, N900ER, being damaged during a tail strike at KEDW?

 Wow!

Keep us updated Royal! It could be why the 2nd one was out testing today perhaps? This is only the second time it's been out since its initial test flights too.

However, the tracker shows plenty of BFI-BFI testing for N900ER in recent days...  confused  Did this happen recently or some time ago?

R


User currently offlineCX flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6597 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 7582 times:

Wasn't there something about this in Flight International a couple of weeks ago about the first aircraft being damaged? Maybe since Lion Airlines are the first customer they thought they would purposely damage it to see how bad it was. Any word on when the high and fast approach into a short runway with less than landing flaps test will happen? Big grin

User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9623 posts, RR: 68
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 7567 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I was told it happened in late January.

Funny, I have been to BFI several times in the past couple of weeks and I have not seen N900ER. Maybe they are keeping it inside.


User currently offlineKbdude From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 154 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 7501 times:

when is the committed delivery date of the first 739er?

User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3946 posts, RR: 18
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 7352 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 5):
Funny, I have been to BFI several times in the past couple of weeks and I have not seen N900ER.

My last confirmed sighting was 12 March (photo proof of it in the air having just lifted off from BFI going to YKM, however nothing on the tracker under BOE900 for this date!). Last tracked date was a BFI-BFI on 19 March.

R


User currently offlineBrendows From Norway, joined Apr 2006, 1020 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (7 years 5 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 7250 times:

Quoting CX flyboy (Reply 4):
Wasn't there something about this in Flight International a couple of weeks ago about the first aircraft being damaged?

You are correct, you'll find it here, dated 20th of February:
http://www.flightglobal.com/

From the article:

Quote:

Certification of the Boeing 737-900ER is still on schedule to meet its original April delivery target to launch customer Lion Air despite extended testing periods caused by faulty sensors, and additional evaluation for revised stall characteristics and the autoland system.



Windshear disrupts YH001

Boeing has transferred remaining test work to YH002 following an incident during abused landing tests with YH001 at Edwards AFB around 9 February. Boeing says the aircraft "experienced a small windshear event", and that it is "carefully reviewing the data gathered during the flight to ensure that all factors have been considered for the performance data used in the subject condition". External doublers were added to the skin to enable YH001 to ferry back to Seattle for maintenance. Although the shift to YH002 will delay its refurbishment for delivery to Lion Air, Boeing adds that "there is no reason to expect a delay at the moment".



Delays were caused by the unexpected need to replace strain gauges in the horizontal stabiliser around year-end, and by the weather, which refused to co-operate for several days while the test team hunted for suitable crosswinds for the autoland tests.

"We also did some testing with the new leading-edge slat configuration and added Boeing stall testing to that, which used up one or two weeks," adds Craig.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Grob G180 Test Aircraft Incident posted Wed Nov 29 2006 19:50:07 by Cdekoe
Boeing 747 LCF Successfully Test Swing Tail posted Tue Oct 24 2006 02:37:26 by Brendows
Help With Aircraft Tail Numbers For NW Flights posted Wed Feb 1 2006 14:39:52 by Singapore 777
A380 Flight Test Aircraft posted Fri Jun 17 2005 11:58:26 by Leelaw
JetX Near Tail Strike? posted Fri Apr 1 2005 18:40:28 by RichM
CO 777 Tail Strike? posted Tue Mar 15 2005 17:34:42 by MasseyBrown
Tail Strike Champions posted Sat Aug 7 2004 17:23:38 by EnoreFilho
PanAm 747 Tail Strike posted Tue Mar 16 2004 00:45:11 by Bigphilnyc
Airbus Awiator A340 Test Aircraft posted Thu Oct 16 2003 00:26:23 by Keesje
AC A330 Tail Strike In Frankfurt posted Sat Aug 30 2003 03:43:15 by CanadaEH