Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA DFW - LHR?  
User currently offlineGhillier From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 36 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2367 times:

With the new "Open Skies" agreement, what are the chances of AA shifting their 2x DFW-LGW flights to Heathrow ?

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJetdeltamsy From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2987 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2354 times:

about 100%


AA has been clear for years they prefer operating at LHR.



Tired of airline bankruptcies....EA/PA/TW and finally DL.
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21511 posts, RR: 60
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2343 times:

How about RDU. Will that remain and move to LHR?


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11559 posts, RR: 61
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2261 times:

I think the likelihood of AA shifting 50/51 and 78/79 from Gatwick to Heathrow is very high. I think that, now, pretty much the only thing standing in the way of it is waiting until the Heathrow restrictions actually expire (I think now March 2008) and AA's ability to get adequate slots. If AA is willing to pay enough, which I suspect they will be, I think they will very quickly shift their flights to Heathrow from their largest and most important hub, Dallas/Fort Worth. The immense connecting opportunities alone would justify shifting the flights to Heathrow.

As for Raleigh/Durham, the future is much less certain with respect to which London airport the flight will use. I tend to think that AA will eventually shift the flight over to Heathrow for several reasons.

First and foremost, the same thing applies to Raleigh and to D/FW: the connections AA and BA could then jointly offer from RDU to cities across Europe and the world would be huge, far more than is today available via Gatwick.

Second, for simplification purposes, AA would likely prefer to shift as many flight as possible over to Heathrow where its operations are huge and it employs over 1,000 staff with a fairly large customer service group, maintenance base, etc.

Finally, if AA wants to continue to operate a 777 on RDU-London and shifts both of its DFW-London flights over to Heathrow, it will likely have to shift the RDU flights to Heathrow as well for purely scheduling purposes. Right now, the 777 that flights LGW-RDU-LGW each day is routed through LGW but originates in DFW and does a three-day DFW-LGW-RDU-LGW-DFW routing.

There are several alternatives to avoid this problem and keep the RDU flight at Gatwick, including routing a seperate 777 from DFW directly to RDU (i.e., each day send a 777 DFW-RDU-LGW-RDU-DFW) but that is hardly appealing because of the waste of the plane for a short DFW-RDU sector each day. They could also add a daily DFW-Gatwick flight in addition to 50/51 and 78/79 that are likely heading to Heathrow -- something I suspect will happen regardless of what they decide to do about the RDU flight. Although, it is likely that this third flight -- possibly 80/81 as has operated on and off for the last few years since they cancelled STL -- would be with a 767, not a 777, and then force a downgrade of the LGW-RDU route if this alternative pattern were elected.

For the foregoing reasons, I suspect -- in the end -- that even with the exceedingly high cost of getting slots at Heathrow, AA will eventually move the Raleigh flight over there.

I predict that AA's London flight schedule in 2-3 years from now will look like this:

Heathrow

AA108/109 / BOS / daily 777
AA155/156 / BOS / daily 777 (* xSat during winter)
AA50/51 / DFW / daily 777
AA78/79 / DFW / daily 777
AA134/135 / LAX / daily 777 (*summer seasonal)
AA136/137 / LAX / daily 777
AA56/67 / MIA / daily 777
AA182/113 / MIA / Saturday-only 777
AA100/101 / JFK / daily 777
AA104/105 / JFK / daily 777
AA116/115 / JFK / daily 777
AA122/107 / JFK / daily 777 (*122 xSat)
AA132/131 / JFK / daily 777
AA142/141 / JFK / daily 777 (*142 xSat)
AA46/47 / ORD / daily 777
AA66/67 / ORD / daily 777 (*66 summer seasonal)
AA86/87 / ORD / daily 777
AA90/91 / ORD / daily 777
AA98/99 / ORD / daily 777 (*99 summer seasonal)
AA174/173 / RDU / daily 777

Gatwick

AA80/81 / DFW / daily 767-300


User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2237 times:

Does anyone think the opening up of LHR would lead AA to offer more Dallas-London frequencies? Would the connecting opportunities justify 3 dailies?

AA used to have seasonal 3x daily service from DFW to LGW, with two flights on the 777 and one on the 763.



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently onlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7569 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2115 times:

I think the odds of AA shifting DFW-LON service to LHR is about 99.999%. I think AA will be willing to shell out for the slots into LHR. DFW, much like IAH, is a market that desperately needs service into LHR. I think getting service from DFW to LHR is now a huge priority for AA!!!


Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineAirStatDFW From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 376 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2014 times:

I agree that AA will move to LHR, will BA follow suit or stay at LGW. I wonder if moving to LHR for BA will help their service into DFW.

AirStatDFW


User currently offlineTommy767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 6584 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1984 times:

Quoting Commavia (Reply 3):
Finally, if AA wants to continue to operate a 777 on RDU-London and shifts both of its DFW-London flights over to Heathrow, it will likely have to shift the RDU flights to Heathrow as well for purely scheduling purposes.

Do you think eventually AA would downgrade this route to a 767 or scrap it in general? I know AA has contracts with businesses on this route, but I always hear that the daily 777 goes out pretty wide open. Plus I'm sure AA could better utilize this bird on another routing.



"Folks that's the news and I'm outta here!" -- Dennis Miller
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1961 times:

Quoting Commavia (Reply 3):
As for Raleigh/Durham, the future is much less certain with respect to which London airport the flight will use.

I'd say the future of that flight is much less certain with respect to a nonstop to LON period.

Buzz from the bees is that the subsidies on that flight have no kept up with market/fuel swings; and as such is nowhere near as lucrat9ive for AA as it once was.


User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4918 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1937 times:

Commavia - how come you think that long term, AA will keep their LGW station open for just one DFW flight


Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently offlineNorthstarBoy From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1826 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1924 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

i was thinking about this concept earlier today. i'd be very surprised if they didn't switch the DFW flights to LHR, and I think if BA wants to stay competitive, assuming they don't get anti-trust immunity and partner up with AA, that their DFW flight will also switch to LHR. i can actually envision that just about all of the service from US Business markets to London will make the switch once heathrow is opened up. I can see some leisure service, such as MCO, LAS, SAN, and Phx maybe staying at Gatwick, but i'd be very surprised if CO, NW, DL and US didn't apply to switch most, if not all of their london routes to Heathrow. Finally, i would not be surprised, once the 2008 dust clears if Gatwick became the moral equivalent of Paris-Orly, a great small airport for the leisure pax.

Slightly off topic, what does anyone think the chances are of AA starting SJU-Europe once open skies comes into effect, to capture caribbean-europe traffic without sending those passengers all the way to MIami?



Why are people so against low yields?! If lower yields means more people can travel abroad, i'm all for it
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 11, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1904 times:

Quoting NorthstarBoy (Reply 10):
Slightly off topic, what does anyone think the chances are of AA starting SJU-Europe once open skies comes into effect, to capture caribbean-europe traffic without sending those passengers all the way to MIami?

I would rather see AA start SJC-Europe service instead, but AA already tried SJC-CDG and it was miserable from the start... Sad



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1896 times:

Quoting NorthstarBoy (Reply 10):
and Phx maybe staying at Gatwick

PHX's only LON service is to LHR. If it were to maintain a LGW service, my bet would be on US providing that-- though no guarantee they wouldnt want/try to have it to LHR as well.


User currently offlineJfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8339 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1873 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would envision AA moving the main DFW to London flight to LHR then the second daily one too. They may run a 763 as a third daily trip to LGW for leisure and free award travel. That may solve the RDU problem with a 763 going DFW-LGW-RDU-LGW-DFW.

User currently offlineBigGSFO From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2920 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1858 times:

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 11):
I would rather see AA start SJC-Europe service instead, but AA already tried SJC-CDG and it was miserable from the start... Sad

Who knows? The economics might justify SJC-LHR. We simply don't know. Now of course if AA is the one to operate the flight is another story. Maybe BA? Who knows.


User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 15, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1825 times:

Quoting BigGSFO (Reply 14):

Who knows? The economics might justify SJC-LHR. We simply don't know. Now of course if AA is the one to operate the flight is another story. Maybe BA? Who knows.

How I would love to see SJC-LHR..but the problem is that I dont' think it AA (or BA for that matter) could sustain B777 services and AA doesn't send the B767's to LHR.. no 



"Up the Irons!"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA JFK-LHR - Terminal 8 Or 9 At JFK? posted Fri Dec 8 2006 06:05:09 by Nickofatlanta
AA DFW-ORD Vs. UA DEN-ORD posted Mon Sep 18 2006 22:28:44 by Theweave33
AA DFW-PEK 3/25/2007 posted Sat Sep 2 2006 19:13:56 by Dfwmex
Was AA 109 LHR-BOS One Of Them? posted Thu Aug 10 2006 15:33:07 by ChrisNH
Connecting From BA To AA At LHR posted Tue Jul 11 2006 23:43:18 by RJpieces
AA DFW-LGW Summer Schedule posted Fri Jan 13 2006 03:24:44 by DFW13L
AA ORD-LHR Service posted Thu Dec 22 2005 07:28:16 by Ckfred
AA's DFW To KIX posted Wed Nov 9 2005 21:36:21 by Bartond
Why No AA On LHR-LOS? posted Thu Oct 13 2005 14:07:45 by Soups
AA: DFW-China Soon? posted Sat Oct 8 2005 03:49:45 by Commavia