Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is 747-400 Fly-by-wire Airplane?  
User currently offlineSonic From Lithuania, joined Jan 2000, 1670 posts, RR: 1
Posted (14 years 1 month 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5592 times:

I've heard that A320-200 was first and it was developed after B747-400. Does 744 is fly-by-wire?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24964 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (14 years 1 month 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5568 times:

No, Im pretty sure that the 777 was the first Boeing a/c to incorporate the fly-by-wire system.


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 month 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5546 times:

GKirk is correct that the 777 is Boeing's first fly-by-wire aircraft. The 747-400 has the same conventional flight control system as the earlier models.

User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 month 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5531 times:

Some might say that the L-1011 was FBW. It is but a bit different then modern FBW stuff, it does not overide what the pilot is doing like Boeing and Airbus FBW.
Iain


User currently offline#-B777-# From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 1 month 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5525 times:

The boeing system DOES NOT OVERRIDE pilot's doeing! The boeing system is the first digital FBW including 3 Axes! The airbus FBW is only digital on 2 axes excluding the rudders. The boeing FBW incorporates force feedback the airbus doesn't. The airbus FBW has "hard limits" The pilot does not have THE FULL AUTHORITY! The boeing FBW has "SOFT LIMITS" The pilot has FULL AUTHORITY! These are main differences you can't doubt! (The 744 has no FBW) !

best regards, josef


User currently offline#-B777-# From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 1 month 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5520 times:

Please don't start a war!!! my first comment only shows differences in construction! thank you

User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 1 month 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5521 times:

B-777 you are correct, with most things you have said! What I meant by overiding the system is with the 777 when you are turning over 30 degrees you have to keep force on the yoke, when the 1011 does not, it will roll from 30-60 degrees just like it did 0-30. So I probably should have written 'question what the pilot was doing'.Airbus FBW is a bit different then the Boeing, but it is my understanding that the pilot does have full authority!
Iin


User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6542 posts, RR: 54
Reply 7, posted (14 years 1 month 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5513 times:

I think the the Concorde was the first FBW airliner. Even if it compared to modern systems is a rather rude system.

I think that there is some confusion about 2-axis and 3-axis control in an earlier post.
The Airbus system has in some way a 2-axis input, but of course the output must be on all 3 axis. ´
In normal flight you control the attitude only with roll and pitch input on the sidestick. Input to the 3rd axis - gearing (or rudder) - is then automatically calculated from the roll and pitch input plus other flight parametres such as indicated airspeed and angle of attack etc.
Any input on the rudder pedals is then added to the computer generated rudder input.
That means that during normal flight you won't have to worry about your pedals - it will automatically "keep the ball in the middle".
Normally you will hardly touch the pedals until you line up for landing in crosswind. Until then you may cross your legs instead.
I don't know such detail about the 777. Incidentally there are no 777 flight crew members among my near friends.
So please tell us here if you know. If you can do it in technical terms, and not in A vs. B emotional terms, then you will be my friend...  
Best regards, Preben Norholm



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineJumbofan From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 17 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (14 years 1 month 23 hours ago) and read 5497 times:

Fly-By-Wire is just that ...Only conction to flight control hydraulic units is electrical wires. Conventional use cables and pullies. 777 is full authuritory FBY along with the boeing C17.The 747-400 uses cable and pullies still with a fancy digital flight control set for auto-pilot and dampner sys.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is Airbus A-300 Fly By Wire? posted Wed Nov 14 2001 00:32:31 by Cmsgop
737NG, 757-300, 767-400 Fly-by-wire ? posted Sat Sep 25 1999 22:59:05 by Blue_Angel
747-8 Fly By Wire? posted Wed Nov 23 2005 22:20:23 by WunalaYann
Is There Any Boeing Aircraft That Uses Fly By Wire posted Sat Sep 16 2000 23:07:53 by Jm-airbus320
Boeing 747 Fly By Wire posted Sun Oct 24 1999 00:28:52 by Daniel
Better Fly By Wire Philosophy: Boeing Or Airbus? posted Mon Oct 2 2006 22:14:40 by Tangowhisky
Will The B787 Be Fly-by-Wire? posted Sat Jan 29 2005 16:21:03 by Krisyyz
Fly-by-wire... Blessing Or A Curse? posted Mon Dec 27 2004 13:59:58 by Soaringadi
7e7 - Fly By Wire Controls posted Sun Dec 26 2004 00:01:30 by Vsa340
7e7 - Fly By Wire? posted Wed Dec 22 2004 09:13:41 by Vsa340
Will The B787 Be Fly-by-Wire? posted Sat Jan 29 2005 16:21:03 by Krisyyz
Fly-by-wire... Blessing Or A Curse? posted Mon Dec 27 2004 13:59:58 by Soaringadi