Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA 777 Between LHR And CPT  
User currently offlineSA-JET From South Africa, joined May 2000, 297 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 6 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4487 times:

As of 2001, British Airways will replace the 747-400, with the 777 on its flights between LHR and Cape Town
BTW-BA now offer 14 flights a week between LHR and Johannesburg (one is a day-light flight) same goes for SAA
In term of revenue vs. target, Johannesburg and Cape Town are now the most profitable routes in the BA system.

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 25347 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (15 years 6 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4416 times:

Is that bit at the end true? I thought the JFK route and SYD were the most profitable BA routes. Why are they downgrading to 777 if the Capetown route is so successful then?

When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineSA-JET From South Africa, joined May 2000, 297 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (15 years 6 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4417 times:

Information comes from a BA press release to local travel agents. As to why they are switching to the 777-I don't know.

User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (15 years 6 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4406 times:

This is probably an attempt by BA to capitalise on the premium pax market again. As certain 777's in BA's fleet (especially those flying to destinations in the Gulf) have significantly larger FIRST and Club World cabins, management will attempt to duplicate this configuration on the ER a/c.

I expect the total number of premium seats on the 777's currently used on flights to Kuwait, Bahrain etc. are higher than a standard 744, and thus getting these to fly to CPT will mean the airline will be able to reap a greater profit.

I am not certain about the proportion of profit generated by World Traveller seats, but it can't be a lot, or the 744's would not have been withdrawn so soon.

Incidentally, I am flying a BA 744 to CPT on the 15th Dec. I'll ask the Captain exactly why they've decided to stop flying the 744 down there, but it will most probably be because of the larger number of premium seats on the 777's.

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Propfreak

User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4652 posts, RR: 69
Reply 4, posted (15 years 6 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4402 times:

Two important remarks:

1) It is ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE that BA's JNB and CPT flights would be the airline's top revenue routes, as it is widely known that the South African market is a very low yield market, which is the basic reason why airlines like OS and SN will stop flying there. I think what the press release says is that BA is getting its revenue target on the JNB/CPT routes...

2) CPT is as widely known to be a primely leisure market, with quite a light load of business traffic. I therefore don't agree with Capt. Picard's statements. I don't think BA will put 777s in the 'Gulf flight' configuration on the route. (They'd better put the 'Flying Colors' charter version on the flight...)

User currently offlineAFa340-300E From France, joined May 1999, 2084 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (15 years 6 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4371 times:


I agree for Cape Town, although poor people usually don't take a long-haul flight to the other end of earth to spend their holidays.
Also, Johannesburg is a high-yield market with mostly premium traffic. As a matter of fact, Virgin Atlantic, seeking services only on most profitable routes serve JNB and CPT (they have been fighting hard for CPT).

But with 747-400s being withdrawn from the route: where will they go? Will they be part of those due to be sold/leased out?

Thank you,

Best regards,
Alain Mengus

User currently offlineLouis From Canada, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (15 years 6 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4367 times:

Not related, but how is SAA doing on their JFK and ATL routes? I heard the JFK route is always packed. Don't know about ATL. But are they both profitable?

User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (15 years 6 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 4361 times:


I have no doubt from your profile you'll know more than I do about these things, but is the entire South African market low yield?-I'd be surprised really.

OS and SN may be pulling out, but that doesn't mean BA aren't filling their premium classes well. The Austria and Belguim-South Africa market may be low yield, but I don't think that really applies to the UK-South Africa market, and neither do I think that the LHR-CPT market does particularly badly either.

Firstly, you'll be aware of the colonial ties-which are very strong. Secondly, many affluent British people fly down to South Africa to see their family, or to simply spend their winter holidays there.

Thirdly, many UK businessmen use BA to JNB/CPT as the gateway to other countries in South Africa (Angola/Namibia).

The UK basically has a very strong "personal" connection to South Africa, unlike the other European countries, and thus I would be surprised if the South African market was low yield for UK carriers. On the contrary, I think it is very lucrative.

The BA58 flight is daily remember.

User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4652 posts, RR: 69
Reply 8, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 4342 times:

Some remarks, though:

1) Premium fares ex LHR are indeed higher than out of any other european city. This is a general fact that goes for all intercontinental destinations.

2) Regarding traffic originating in Europe, however, BA's and SA's planes out of LHR are not filled only by local boardings. Actually, most of the traffic is connecting European traffic. Fares of BA and SA ex AMS, BRU, VIE or whatever european city will of, course be, similar or even more competitive than fares charged by the local airline for a direct flight...

3) Fares originating in South Africa are another story. A lot of frequent travellers will be able to talk to you about how interesting it is to go shopping for airline tickets in South Africa, as the local fares -on all carriers- are extremely cheap. Typical coach seats to europe start from R.1.500,- roundtrip, whereas business class tickets will sell for as cheap as R.12.000,-.
Premium fares on combined longhaul flights are actually even cheaper. The local fare for, say CPT-LHR-NRT roundtrip is cheaper than LHR-NRT roundtrip for premium fares. It is therefore widely known that businessmen go shopping for open tickets in SA, and sometimes simply throw awa the South Africa-Europe portions of the ticket, although this is illegal.
Note that those fare are local fares that can only be obtained in South Africa.

4) Finally, I didn't say that those flights are actually loosing money. I just said that their yields are for sure not the highest in BA's network. I think, for instance, that BA's 2 daily NRT flight are bringing much more money to the company.
VS was not fighting so hard to get some flights to CPT because of the yield, but because it just didn't want BA to get these flight...

User currently offlineWEAPON From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4338 times:

I used to work at Atlanta Hartsfield, and let me tell you, that SAA bird seemed to come in with alot of cargo, but it would go back out with alot of people. I read that SAA switched from MIA to ATL because ATL offered the ability for more people to get on the flight from DAL. Not saying a code-share, but with more flights coming into ATL than MIA, more people can possibly get ont the flight. I heard from a cargo standpoint, that 747 had alot of stuff in it.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Connecting Between LHR And LGW posted Thu Feb 16 2006 18:18:44 by Levg79
BA 777 Leaves LHR Leaking Fuel! posted Fri Jul 30 2004 15:48:21 by EZYAirbus
Difference Between LHR And LGW In Destinations? posted Sat Jun 5 2004 16:15:07 by Mrniji
BA Transfers Between LHR & LGW posted Fri Mar 19 2004 21:08:03 by Stretch 8
LH/UA Codeshare Between LHR And The US!? posted Wed Feb 4 2004 17:58:51 by Daumueller
Continental 777's Between IAH And EWR posted Fri Jan 24 2003 22:06:59 by SJCguy
Changing Between LHR And LGW posted Thu Nov 7 2002 00:31:03 by Adam T.
SQ Flight Stopping Between LHR And Sin? posted Tue Apr 16 2002 18:28:22 by Ryanb741
BA 777 In Waco And Not Cll? posted Sat Apr 6 2002 06:10:47 by TCAS
Varig 777 To LHR And CPH Eff 15 Nov posted Wed Nov 14 2001 11:31:38 by The777Man