Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Non Passengers Get Access To PIT AirMall  
User currently offlineLogos From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 796 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2889 times:

After 3 years of debate, at least some non-passengers are going to get access to the AirMall at PIT. Of course, it's only those staying at the Hyatt, but it's a step in the right direction, I guess. Here's the link

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07103/777778-100.stm

Cheers,
Dave in Orlando


Too many types flown to list
19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUSPIT10L From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 3295 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2822 times:

I'm impressed. I thought the TSA would never cave in, period. Nice to see it's also being done in DFW and DTW.


It's a Great Day for Hockey!
User currently offlinePITSpeedbird From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2636 times:

Great news !

Does anyone else think this is a sign of possible major expansion at PIT?

PITSpeedbird



you leave. Arrive before
User currently offlineSilentbob From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 2188 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2567 times:

Terrible idea. The only saving grace is that the airport is usually dead enough to handle the extra bodies.

User currently offlineUSPIT10L From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 3295 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2514 times:

Quoting PITSpeedbird (Reply 2):
Great news !

Does anyone else think this is a sign of possible major expansion at PIT?

It has nothing to do with traffic at PIT. This is just to get people to go to the AirMall. People that want to shop do not neccesarily want to fly. Frankly, I seriously doubt the TSA could ever handle things if they let non-passengers through security again. We didn't call them Thousands Standing Around for nothing. In PIT, they're really just glorified mall guards, with the county cops being mall cops (sorry ANCFlyer)!



It's a Great Day for Hockey!
User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9272 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2496 times:

Quoting USPIT10L (Reply 4):
In PIT, they're really just glorified mall guards, with the county cops being mall cops (sorry ANCFlyer)!

I guess there's a smart-@$$ in each of us! Good one!!!  Smile

Quoting Silentbob (Reply 3):
Terrible idea.

...whatever dude...

I think it's a good idea. Those shops at the airmall have been suffering ever since those security measures were put in place. One time I flew out of there and I walked into a shop down the A concourse, and the cashier in there told me that he'd be lucky to have 2 or 3 customers... throughout an entire 8-hour shift.

Again, USPIT10L, I think you put that beautifully! Maybe back in the days of the US hub this whole thing with security would be necessary, which in fact it probably was. but PIT is no longer a hub for anybody anymore and hardly anyone flies into or out of PIT anymore...



Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlineLuketenley From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2479 times:

Quoting PITSpeedbird (Reply 2):
Does anyone else think this is a sign of possible major expansion at PIT?

Doubt that but US is building a new North Matrix baggage facility where they have just tore down a section of the E Gates.

Quoting Silentbob (Reply 3):
Terrible idea. The only saving grace is that the airport is usually dead enough to handle the extra bodies.

Not a bad idea at all. Non- traveling people don't pose a risk to air travel. They aren't getting on the planes and would have to go through security just like normal traveling people.

Quoting USPIT10L (Reply 4):
It has nothing to do with traffic at PIT. This is just to get people to go to the AirMall. People that want to shop do not neccesarily want to fly. Frankly, I seriously doubt the TSA could ever handle things if they let non-passengers through security again. We didn't call them Thousands Standing Around for nothing. In PIT, they're really just glorified mall guards, with the county cops being mall cops (sorry ANCFlyer)!

The idiot TSA reps we have can handle it. They just around and cause problem most of the time anyways. Now maybe they will hire more of them and actually have all 7 lanes and the alternate checkpoint open longer instead of cramming everyone into our damn employee line!!!

I actually learned the other day that if Kent George wanted to, he could get rid of the TSA and hire his own private security team. I guess that it was only mandatory for a few years after 9/11. Kent and the TSA have been fighting for years to get the public back into the Airmall. He has threatened them many times that he will get rid of them if he has to. Doubt that would ever happen though. Too much liability. If the airport was built how it was originally plannes, we would have small checkpoints at every gate area or at the entrances to each concourse. That would make things a bit easier for the public getting over to Airside.

I definately think this is a huge step for PIT. I don't think it neccessarily means PIT is going to be growing anytime soon but things are starting to look up for us.

Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 5):
I think it's a good idea. Those shops at the airmall have been suffering ever since those security measures were put in place. One time I flew out of there and I walked into a shop down the A concourse, and the cashier in there told me that he'd be lucky to have 2 or 3 customers... throughout an entire 8-hour shift.

Again, USPIT10L, I think you put that beautifully! Maybe back in the days of the US hub this whole thing with security would be necessary, which in fact it probably was. but PIT is no longer a hub for anybody anymore and hardly anyone flies into or out of PIT anymore...

Not only did not letting the public in hurt sales for the Airmall, but US dropping the hub was the MAIN problem. The public only accounted for 4% of sales actually.

And O&D is up as well as some connecting traffic. Our O&D is higher then CLT.

[Edited 2007-04-14 07:10:57]


Pittsburgh International Airport lover
User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9272 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2470 times:

Quoting Luketenley (Reply 6):
Doubt that but US is building a new North Matrix baggage facility where they have just tore down a section of the E Gates.

So that is US' expanded baggage system then??? Wow... now that is interesting!  scratchchin 

I think putting the screening machines at the gates would make a ton of sense. I am sure there will be people to flame us for that, regarding the pace for boarding planes and deplaning and what have you...



Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlineLuketenley From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2461 times:

Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 7):
I think putting the screening machines at the gates would make a ton of sense. I am sure there will be people to flame us for that, regarding the pace for boarding planes and deplaning and what have you...

Most people are already in their gate areas with plenty of time to board. Would be just like going through security on Landside, just in a different location right by your gate. Might make things easier if someone is running late for a flight too. At least the gate agent can tell if you're standing in the checkpoint line and not running down the concourse or center core somewhere.



Pittsburgh International Airport lover
User currently offlineSilentbob From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 2188 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2456 times:

Quoting Luketenley (Reply 6):
Not a bad idea at all. Non- traveling people don't pose a risk to air travel. They aren't getting on the planes and would have to go through security just like normal traveling people.

Everyone is a potential risk to air travel.


User currently offlineLuketenley From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2452 times:

Quoting Silentbob (Reply 9):
Everyone is a potential risk to air travel.

People that get onto planes have a much higher risk then people going over to shop or send off loved- ones on a flight.



Pittsburgh International Airport lover
User currently offlineN670UW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1606 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2442 times:

It's good news, but I don't think it's a major deal. The only non-passengers allowed are guests at the Hyatt. And even then, the article says you have to notify the front desk and then get clearance from the airport. I don't know if some people would want to go through all that just to go shopping. They could as easily drive to Robinson.

User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9272 posts, RR: 21
Reply 12, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2433 times:

Quoting Silentbob (Reply 9):
Everyone is a potential risk to air travel.

ummm... ok... So I am putting a flying traveler in danger by buying a newspaper at an MSNBC Pittsburgh News stand or a latte at the coffee shop, or a beer at the TGI Fridays bar...

Quoting Luketenley (Reply 10):
People that get onto planes have a much higher risk then people going over to shop or send off loved- ones on a flight.

Spot on...



Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlinePITSpeedbird From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2359 times:

Why does PIT need an expanded baggage system??
Is the current one overworked??
Surely the addition of the 40+ flights will not stress the current system??
I mean the current system was in effect when PIT was a fortress for US right?

thanks

PITSpeedbird



you leave. Arrive before
User currently offlineLuketenley From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2297 times:

Quoting PITSpeedbird (Reply 13):
Why does PIT need an expanded baggage system??
Is the current one overworked??
Surely the addition of the 40+ flights will not stress the current system??
I mean the current system was in effect when PIT was a fortress for US right?

I'm not really sure why they are building a new one. They built a bigger one of the south end of the landside building a number of years ago as well. I don't know if it's to make it more modern or what. I'll try to find out.



Pittsburgh International Airport lover
User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2103 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 2127 times:

The TSA is a Bush Administration creation that is about as effective as abstinence only. They should just go back to the old screening and look at other methods. Weapons, banned items and unscreened people pass through all of the time. What really makes security work is the attentiveness of the passengers and crew.

Many airports have virtually no food or services outside of security so keeping non-passengers out makes it really miserable waiting for passengers to arrive. The TSA should just give it up since their screenings are longer, slower and more invasive but hardly more effective.


User currently offlineBosWashSprStar From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 201 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2067 times:

Quoting N670UW (Reply 11):
It's good news, but I don't think it's a major deal. The only non-passengers allowed are guests at the Hyatt. And even then, the article says you have to notify the front desk and then get clearance from the airport. I don't know if some people would want to go through all that just to go shopping. They could as easily drive to Robinson.

Particularly since most people would believe, accurately or not, that the prices at the airport shops would be higher than at comparable mall shops.


User currently offlineTooluther From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 307 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2035 times:

Quoting PITSpeedbird (Reply 13):
Why does PIT need an expanded baggage system??

Irnthink it is so that bags can be dropped one stop at the US check inrncounters. As it is not, if you fly US you have to carry your bags overrnto the TSA drop point after you check in. The other airlines havernenough space on their half of the landside term. to put that all behind the scenes.


User currently offlineUSPIT10L From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 3295 posts, RR: 7
Reply 18, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1938 times:

Quoting Luketenley (Reply 6):
I actually learned the other day that if Kent George wanted to, he could get rid of the TSA and hire his own private security team. I guess that it was only mandatory for a few years after 9/11. Kent and the TSA have been fighting for years to get the public back into the Airmall. He has threatened them many times that he will get rid of them if he has to. Doubt that would ever happen though. Too much liability. If the airport was built how it was originally plannes, we would have small checkpoints at every gate area or at the entrances to each concourse. That would make things a bit easier for the public getting over to Airside.

Wow, would've loved to know that in 2002, when I was an intern at ACAA.



It's a Great Day for Hockey!
User currently offlineLuketenley From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (7 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1845 times:

Quoting USPIT10L (Reply 18):
Wow, would've loved to know that in 2002, when I was an intern at ACAA.

What did you do for the ACAA?



Pittsburgh International Airport lover
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Non-passengers Allowed Through Security At PIT.... posted Mon May 3 2004 19:40:46 by MAINRUNWAY
Non-passengers Allowed To The Gate posted Mon Jan 5 2004 05:54:50 by Flybynight
NW Passengers Get To Vote On Security Breach posted Sat Dec 15 2001 19:03:56 by LoneStarMike
Rumor: US To Add More Flights To PIT posted Mon Mar 26 2007 06:18:03 by Luketenley
How Could I Get A Letter To Neeleman? posted Mon Mar 12 2007 05:45:24 by ATLAaron
Why No Non-stop UA Flights To DEN From LHR? posted Wed Jan 31 2007 01:01:46 by 8herveg
B6 Offering $29 To PIT.....Getting Deesperate? posted Mon Dec 11 2006 18:33:04 by JFK69
Why Are Passengers So Rude To Pilots? posted Tue Nov 21 2006 18:04:42 by Flyf15
CDG Withdraws Access To 70 Muslim Staff posted Thu Nov 2 2006 08:55:31 by OzGlobal
Help - Which Non-US Airlines Fly To Grand Cayman? posted Thu Nov 2 2006 03:22:47 by Nickofatlanta