Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing Orders For 4/17/07  
User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5772 posts, RR: 47
Posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 8238 times:

Here's Boeing's Weekly Update for 4/17/07:

http://active.boeing.com/commercial/orders/index.cfm

5 x 737 for CIT
2 x 737 for UFO
5 x 737 previously UFO now for Sky Europe
Cancellation of 4 737s

737s making a come back...watch out!

[Edited 2007-04-19 16:29:39]


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
42 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3509 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 8225 times:

2x737 are probably exercised options by Southwest.

User currently offlineScouseflyer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 3393 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 8148 times:

Last week it was the week of the wide boys and this one it's "the 737 Strikes Back!" Big grin

Good YTD totals for B (but A isn't too bad either), one thing does concern me though - this year B will build about 400 planes, A about 450 and yet they took orders in the last 2 years for nearly 4000 planes (that 4.5 year production) - either they're some lean years in sales terms ahead or they're both going to have to bump production even more.


User currently offlineRaggi From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 1001 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 8065 times:

What, no large order for WBs??  Silly
I was getting used to double digit 76s, 77s and/or 78s every week... hehe



raggi



Stick & Rudder
User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4161 posts, RR: 36
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 8065 times:

Quoting Scouseflyer (Reply 2):
Good YTD totals for B (but A isn't too bad either), one thing does concern me though - this year B will build about 400 planes, A about 450 and yet they took orders in the last 2 years for nearly 4000 planes (that 4.5 year production) - either they're some lean years in sales terms ahead or they're both going to have to bump production even more.

Considering their forecasts of about 20,000 new planes for the next 20 years to come we will have a pretty sharp trough sooner or later.



Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
User currently offlineEI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 8015 times:

Quoting Scouseflyer (Reply 2):
either they're some lean years in sales terms ahead or they're both going to have to bump production even more.

Airbus is increasing production of the models that are responsible for the bulk of those sales - A320 line will reach 40/month including the new Chinese line and A330/340 will reach at least 9/month. Its too early to wory about A350XWB levels. Boeing were loking at increasing 777 production also I believe. If they dont increase 787 production they will certainly see a slowdown in 787 orders.


User currently offlineScouseflyer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 3393 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 8015 times:

Quoting Flying-Tiger (Reply 4):
Considering their forecasts of about 20,000 new planes for the next 20 years to come we will have a pretty sharp trough sooner or later.

So talk of production of around 500 / 600 each a year will be about ok but the sales have to slow down.

From memory by 2011 Ab want to make 40 A318/19/20/21, 9 A330/40s and 4 A380s a month - that's nearly 630 planes a year! - I'm guessing that Boeing has similar ideas with all of the 787s that they have to make too


User currently offlineEI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 7990 times:

Quoting Flying-Tiger (Reply 4):
Considering their forecasts of about 20,000 new planes for the next 20 years to come we will have a pretty sharp trough sooner or later.

If the market setles at 50/50, thats still only 500/year each. Not sure about Boeing, but the current Airbus plans should allow for that figure easily.


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31055 posts, RR: 87
Reply 8, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7905 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting EI321 (Reply 5):
Boeing were loking at increasing 777 production also I believe. If they dont increase 787 production they will certainly see a slowdown in 787 orders.

I believe the 777 is going to 7 a month.

If the suppliers can feed it - and orders flood in once the 787 takes the skies - I expect Boeing could go to 20 a month on the current line around late 2010.


User currently offlineDeltaDC9 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 2844 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7733 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 8):
I expect Boeing could go to 20 a month on the current line around late 2010.

Would that not be the highest widebody production rate ever? What other WB's have exceeded 10 a month muchless approached one per business day?



Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
User currently offlineEI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7665 times:

Quoting DeltaDC9 (Reply 9):
Would that not be the highest widebody production rate ever? What other WB's have exceeded 10 a month muchless approached one per business day?

The initial rate will launch at four per month, rising to six per month within one year. The rate then increases to 10 per month in 2010 under the current rate acceleration plan agreed under the initial study. Boeing are considering the feasibility of going to 14 or even 16 per month when the 787-10 enters service, but these studies predate the launch of the A350-1000.


User currently offlineLY777 From France, joined Nov 2005, 2688 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7626 times:

Nothing very exciting this week...I still wonder why the 737 is selling so poorly...Maybe Boeing is waiting for Paris Air Show?


אמא, אני מתגעגע לך
User currently offlineScouseflyer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 3393 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7626 times:

Quoting LY777 (Reply 11):
Nothing very exciting this week...I still wonder why the 737 is selling so poorly...Maybe Boeing is waiting for Paris Air Show?

I guess a lot can be explained by the quote that Carson made a few months ago about everything being sold out until 2010 or 2011!


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 978 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 7587 times:

Quoting EI321 (Reply 10):
Boeing are considering the feasibility of going to 14 or even 16 per month when the 787-10 enters service, but these studies predate the launch of the A350-1000.

The A350-1000 hasn't been launched.

Quoting EI321 (Reply 7):
If the market setles at 50/50, thats still only 500/year each. Not sure about Boeing, but the current Airbus plans should allow for that figure easily.

The volume of aircraft deliveries might settle at 50/50, but the value of aircraft being delivered is consistently trending in Boeing's favor.

Quoting DeltaDC9 (Reply 9):
Would that [20 787 a month] not be the highest widebody production rate ever?

Easily


User currently offlineEI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 7464 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 13):
Quoting EI321 (Reply 10):
Boeing are considering the feasibility of going to 14 or even 16 per month when the 787-10 enters service, but these studies predate the launch of the A350-1000.

The A350-1000 hasn't been launched.

Do you mean an industrial launch? Has the 787-10?

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 13):
Quoting EI321 (Reply 7):
If the market setles at 50/50, thats still only 500/year each. Not sure about Boeing, but the current Airbus plans should allow for that figure easily.

The volume of aircraft deliveries might settle at 50/50, but the value of aircraft being delivered is consistently trending in Boeing's favor.

Thats like something randy would say.

Looking at your point, lets assume the following values for each aircraft from the lines: A380 200m, A330/340 100m, A320 30m, 747 160m, 777 120m, 787 100m, 767 75m, 737 30m.

2007
Airbus
8 A330/340 per month, until now was doing a handful of A300s per yr, A320 30? per month. Lets Ignore the A300.
Total: 1700m per month

Boeing
6 777 per month , about 1 for the 767 and 1 for the 747, 737 25? per month.
Total: 1705m per month.

2010
Airbus
A330/340 will likely be at 10 per month. A380 will be 4 per month. A320 will be 40 per month.
Total: 3000m per month.

Boeing
777 will likely be 7 per month, 787 will be 10 per month*, 747 will be about 2 per month, 767 will be 1 per month, 737 will be 30? per month.
Total: 3060m.


2013
Impossible to say. The A330/A340/777 will have started to reduce. A380/747 will likely be the same. The A350 will be introduced. The 787 will likely be about 14 per month.

edit: adjusted as per below.

PS does the current A330/340 rate include the A330 tanker?

*this happens some time in 2010. Until then 6 per month, but I included the 10/mth figure for all of 2010.

[Edited 2007-04-19 19:05:22]

User currently offlineBrendows From Norway, joined Apr 2006, 1020 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 7371 times:

Quoting EI321 (Reply 14):
747 will be about 1 per month

In 2010 the figure will be more like 2 per month, if not 3.

Quoting EI321 (Reply 14):
767 will be any? per month

It will, UPS secured orders into 2012.


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9634 posts, RR: 68
Reply 16, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 7354 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Who cares about revenue volume.

If you want to have this discussion lets talk about profit.

We can start with the A380. How many units now to breakeven, given the delays, penalties, and the strong euro?


User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2713 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7354 times:

Quoting LY777 (Reply 11):
I still wonder why the 737 is selling so poorly

Maybe it is because Boeing has hinted that the 737 replacement might be sooner than thought.

Quoting LY777 (Reply 11):
Maybe Boeing is waiting for Paris Air Show?

I don't think Boeing has control over when airlines place orders  Wink


User currently offlineEI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7354 times:

Quoting Brendows (Reply 15):
Quoting EI321 (Reply 14):
747 will be about 1 per month

In 2010 the figure will be more like 2 per month, if not 3.

Quoting EI321 (Reply 14):
767 will be any? per month

It will, UPS secured orders into 2012.

cheers, will adjust


User currently offlineWINGS From Portugal, joined May 2005, 2831 posts, RR: 68
Reply 19, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7227 times:

Quoting NYC777 (Thread starter):
Here's Boeing's Weekly Update for 4/17/07:

http://active.boeing.com/commercial/orders/index.cfm

5 x 737 for CIT
2 x 737 for UFO
5 x 737 previously UFO now for Sky Europe
Cancellation of 4 737s

Well it's good to find out who was the airline behind the UFO. Hopefully more will be revealed soon.

Quoting NYC777 (Thread starter):
737s making a come back...watch out!

7 minus 4 = 3 frames.

So three new orders means a come back? Even the A32X managed to outsell the B737 this week with 3 A320's for Israir and 1 A319ACJ for Senagal.

Regards,
Wings



Aviation Is A Passion.
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6489 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7131 times:

EI321's projected rate does not even include what happens to the 767 line if Boeing wins the KC-X competition. In that case, the 767 will be secure for some time, and they'll have to increase the production rate.


When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 978 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7117 times:

Quoting EI321 (Reply 14):
Do you mean an industrial launch?

The A350-1000 has not been given an industrial launch nor has Airbus found a launch customer at this time.

Quoting EI321 (Reply 14):
Has the 787-10?

As of April 19, 2007: the 787-10 has not been launched either

Quoting EI321 (Reply 14):
Thats like something randy would say.

Uhh... okay. Make up your own fake numbers if you want, but the trend is quite clear that Boeing is securing a greater value of orders (and therefore deliveries) than Airbus, who is becoming heavily dependent on narrow-body orders to maintain sales volume.  Yeah sure


User currently offlineEI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7080 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 21):
Quoting EI321 (Reply 14):
Thats like something randy would say.

Uhh... okay. Make up your own fake numbers if you want

If you think any are below are that unrealistic, please say so.

Quoting EI321 (Reply 14):
Looking at your point, lets assume the following values for each aircraft from the lines: A380 200m, A330/340 100m, A320 30m, 747 160m, 777 120m, 787 100m, 767 75m, 737 30m.



Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 21):
greater value of orders (and therefore deliveries)

Orders dont = deliverys. If Airbus or Boeing get 1000 orders in 2007, the value of those orders could be $x, but unless they plan on delivering all 1000 in a given year, then they have just taken over two years worth of production, which will not be $x per year.

[Edited 2007-04-19 19:51:20]

User currently offlineDeltaDC9 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 2844 posts, RR: 4
Reply 23, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6985 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 13):
The volume of aircraft deliveries might settle at 50/50,

I think the chances of an even split are remote.

Quoting Brendows (Reply 15):
Quoting EI321 (Reply 14):
747 will be about 1 per month

In 2010 the figure will be more like 2 per month, if not 3.

Boeing was making 1 per month, last year they announced an increase to 1.5 or 18 per year. They are now looking at 2 per month but have not AFAIK even started that ramp up. I realy do not see them taking it past 3 or 4.



Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
User currently offlineBoomBoom From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6946 times:

Quoting EI321 (Reply 5):
A320 line will reach 40/month including the new Chinese line

When will the Chinese A320 line open?


25 Post contains links Stitch : Next year, ramping to full capacity (of four planes per month) by 2011. http://www.eads.com/1024/en/investor...ir/2006/20060608_airbus_china.html
26 BoomBoom : The article you linked to says: So has the feasibility study been completed and a final decision been made? Ground broken for the new assembly facili
27 Post contains links Stitch : That I do not know. This article says the line won't open until 2009: http://www.businessweek.com/globalbi...ews_top+news+index_global+business
28 EI321 : Actually they have found one. Qatar have said they will be firming up their order soon, which will include 20 A350-1000s. But as you know, what you s
29 EI321 : Actually, how do you come to the conclusion that they gave industrial launch to the -800XWB & -900XWB but not the -1000XWB?
30 Scouseflyer : i think that there's some confusion - it was mentioned that BA had seen the specs for the A358 and A359 but the ones for the -1000 were not quite rea
31 EI321 : I think thats plausable considering that it will be the last one to enter service. It seems to be a similar situation with the 787-10. Thats correct.
32 Tugger : What are all the different "launch" point for airliners? I know in my industry/company it goes: CV - Concept Verification DV - Design Verification PV
33 EI321 : There are lots of 'programme milestones' on the 787. I think this is a good way to relay the aircrafts development to the public.[Edited 2007-04-19 2
34 DfwRevolution : Because at this point there is absolutely noting binding about the A350-1000. Airbus has signed no firm contracts with airlines, they have establishe
35 RICARIZA : How come you don't see the order from AV for 10 788s + rights for 10 more? Are they still part of the Unidentified?
36 EI321 : None of that has anything to do with the question. It appears that the aircraft has in fact been launched. What is the point? Orders recieved in a pa
37 Post contains images SCAT15F : I have a feeling this EK range issue is holding up the 748I firm configuration, and everyone who is looking at the 748I is waiting to see the results
38 EI321 : Theres only so much they can do with it. EK are just showboating. I dont think the range is an issue for BA or China Airlines
39 EBJ1248650 : Not sure you'll see a flood of large orders, but you'll likely see a lot of smaller orders as smaller or less dominant airlines get in line for the p
40 Manni : Why would anyone cancelling 737s? Surely they must be able to sell them immidiately after taking delivery,just as DL is reportedly planning to do. Un
41 PanAm_DC10 : That is because they were ordered in 2006 and appear under that years sales. They booked their 10 on 4 October, 2006 and when the order was formally
42 RICARIZA : THANKS
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing Orders For 07/18/2006 posted Thu Jul 20 2006 18:11:22 by NYC777
Boeing Orders For 4/10/2007 posted Thu Apr 12 2007 16:28:28 by NYC777
Boeing Orders For 3/27/2007 posted Thu Mar 29 2007 17:34:26 by NYC777
Boeing Orders For 02/27/2007 posted Thu Mar 1 2007 16:33:06 by NYC777
Boeing Orders For 2/14/2007 posted Thu Feb 15 2007 17:08:02 by NYC777
Boeing Orders For 2/6/2007 posted Thu Feb 8 2007 16:55:46 by NYC777
Boeing Orders For 12/19/2006 posted Thu Dec 21 2006 17:39:11 by NYC777
Boeing Orders For 12/13/2006 posted Thu Dec 14 2006 16:22:29 by NYC777
Boeing's Orders For 12/6/06 posted Thu Dec 7 2006 17:07:40 by NYC777
Boeing's Orders For 11/15/06 posted Thu Nov 16 2006 17:00:24 by NYC777