Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA Is 'getting Better' Than AF, In Some Way!  
User currently offlineMusapapaya From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1076 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3936 times:

Dear all,

Just browsing through the photo database and found this:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kenneth C. Iwelumo



Is this extraordinarily dirty?

Best wishes
William


Lufthansa Group of Airlines
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19188 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3930 times:

Who cares? As long as it's safe, it matters not.


"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineMusapapaya From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1076 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3924 times:

Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 1):
Who cares? As long as it's safe, it matters not.

Its just coporate image, and I think it does matter.



Lufthansa Group of Airlines
User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19188 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3894 times:

Quoting Musapapaya (Reply 2):
Its just coporate image, and I think it does matter.

"We're unprofitable but at least our aircraft are clean."

"Oh, well that's OK then!"

And, yes, I realise that BA is not unprofitable.

 

I think airlines have far more to worry about than cleaning their aircraft wings to make them look totally clean.

[Edited 2007-04-24 19:33:43]


"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineMusapapaya From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1076 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3804 times:

BA is not the worst nor the best airline in the world. They are also not the most profitable in the world.
It is important for any company to look for ways to improve, give their customers a better experience, feeling etc. With their negative news routinely spread around the country (you know the country's media) it is important they find something to improve in order to make themself better and MORE profitable. The reason I post this on here is that I have never seen a wing as dirty as this on a 777. Thats it.



Lufthansa Group of Airlines
User currently offlineAF1624 From France, joined Jul 2006, 654 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3751 times:

It's a question of taste. Some like to fly in pretty airplanes, no matter the cost of the airline ticket, or the airline's quality. Some others just care about the airplane's being perfectly taken care of, an airplane that will fly flawlessly.

Of course, the first fact does not prevent the second from being true. But somehow, the airlines tend to cut the costs on paint jobs, and superficial aircraft cleansing, to improve their maintenance departments. AF has had the same livery for years, and do not seem to be willing to change it. Why ? Not because of a lack of artistic tastes. Simply because it's too expensive. They'd rather keep their money to keep on being the biggest, most profitable international airline in Europe.



Cheers
User currently offlinePHKLM From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Dec 2005, 1198 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3708 times:

Quoting AF1624 (Reply 5):
They'd rather keep their money to keep on being the biggest, most profitable international airline in Europe.

I don't want to sound very arrogant, but well, the good AF performance is mainly achieved by KLM.
Don't get me wrong, I think AF is a very capable airline, but you should credit the ones that deserve to be credited.


User currently offlineVarig md-11 From France, joined Jul 2000, 1583 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3610 times:

Quoting PHKLM (Reply 6):
the good AF performance is mainly achieved by KLM

ongeloofelijk!!!!
whenever a dutch company is bought by a foreigner that's the same song.....
you forgot to mention that KL pension fund is financing AF too, or that KL service is much lower now the French are in charge etc etc etc.....



AF TW AA NW DL UA CO BA U2 TP UX LH SK AZ MP KL SN VY HV LS SS TK SQ PC RG IW SE
User currently offlineLHStarAlliance From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3605 times:

Quoting Musapapaya (Thread starter):

It does matter , people who look out of the window will not have a good image of BA .


User currently offlineBA787 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2006, 2596 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3576 times:

Chances are the plane had just flown to the US and was flying back again, this coul make the plane dirty depending on the atmosphere but...


Big whoop, dirty planes mean nothing and don't affect many people confidence in the airline.

Also, BA use those a/c as much as they can, cleaning them unnecessarily too often is a waste of hours


User currently offlineRichierich From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 4242 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3374 times:

Quoting BA787 (Reply 10):
Chances are the plane had just flown to the US and was flying back again, this coul make the plane dirty depending on the atmosphere but...


Big whoop, dirty planes mean nothing and don't affect many people confidence in the airline.

Also, BA use those a/c as much as they can, cleaning them unnecessarily too often is a waste of hours

I totally agree and hear what you are saying, but I will have to say that the greasy wing in the threadstarter's pic is pretty filthy and does not present the best opinion of BA. Just like US Airways' B737s with excessive paint missing - its not unsafe or dangerous but it presents a negative image. '

I don't need a "pretty" aircraft, but it sure helps public confidence to have a sharp, clean aircraft.



None shall pass!!!!
User currently offlineWestJetYQQ From Canada, joined Jan 2007, 2987 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3339 times:

Quoting LHStarAlliance (Reply 9):
It does matter , people who look out of the window will not have a good image of BA .

My thoughts exactly. It also tarnishes the opinions of aviation. There should be perfectly clean beautiful, long, slender wings on every aircraft. This is just ugly.  Wink

Cheers
Carson



Will You Try to Change Things? Use the Power that you have, the Power of a Million new Ideas.
User currently offlineHotelmode From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2007, 460 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3303 times:

Looks to me like it had operated from an airfield with standing snow and thats the residue, thats why its mostly on the aft flap section. Combination of dirty snow and deicing fluid aint pretty. You cant expect aircraft to get valeted every trip.

User currently offlineAA777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2544 posts, RR: 28
Reply 13, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days ago) and read 3249 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

In general BA keeps their planes quite clean on the inside and out. This one clearly has not been cleaned recently- but surely it is the exception, not the norm.

-AA777


User currently offlineKnightsofmalta From Malta, joined Nov 2005, 1750 posts, RR: 18
Reply 14, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3070 times:

I think such a filthy wing coud make passengers nervous because it looks like there's an oil or kerosene leak somewhere on that wing, which is hardly very comforting.

User currently offlineAlexPorter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3066 times:

I have been on a good number of flights where the aircraft exterior is spotless, except that the wings are dirty like this.

Quoting Hotelmode (Reply 12):
Looks to me like it had operated from an airfield with standing snow and thats the residue, thats why its mostly on the aft flap section. Combination of dirty snow and deicing fluid aint pretty. You cant expect aircraft to get valeted every trip.

Of course, I am from Minneapolis, and this could be why I see so many dirty wings.


User currently offlineJasond From Australia, joined Jul 2009, 23 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2986 times:

Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 1):
Who cares? As long as it's safe, it matters not.

Doesn't look fantastic though does it. It doesn't have to be so clean I can eat off it but if I saw that I would think twice about flying with them.


User currently offlineLouA340 From Canada, joined Oct 2005, 385 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2704 times:

I feel its just because of the aircraft utilization and they haven't had time to clean it.
Look at this picture of an Emirates 777. The flaps are also quite dirty. Does that mean u wont fly them, I don't think so.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bernhard Bauske




RyEng
User currently offlineLan1981 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2619 times:

I do agree with those that have said dirty aircraft aren't the best way to enhance the corporate identity of an airline...I would use the same argument when using the 'premises' of any company, let's say a Starbucks cafe or a bank branch.

Having said that, I must also say in defence of BA that the photo above is the exception rather than the rule.

I must also admit that although shiny, clean aircraft look nicer, there are times when one could say that a little dirt marks here or there add a certain 'character' to the aircraft; I quite like seeing those dirt marks that stretch upwards and away from the corners of the flightdeck windows...gives an impression of speed...maybe it's just me!


User currently offlineCaptaink From Mexico, joined May 2001, 5109 posts, RR: 12
Reply 19, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2604 times:

Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 1):
Who cares? As long as it's safe, it matters not.



Quoting BA787 (Reply 9):
Big whoop, dirty planes mean nothing and don't affect many people confidence in the airline.

We can debate this all day. But regardless of the safety and service of an airline, a dirty airplane does not help the company's image. Granted it may not prevent passengers from flying with the airline initially, but in the long run, if continued I am sure the only effect would a negative one.

I imagine this negative effect would be greater if for some reason conditions, (financially, service etc) start to take a turn for the worse as so often happens from time to time in the industry.

[Edited 2007-04-25 21:17:09]


There is something special about planes....
User currently offlineBA787 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2006, 2596 posts, RR: 7
Reply 20, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2539 times:

Quoting Richierich (Reply 10):

I can see what you mean.

If I look at it from an inconfident flyer, I can see why confidence may be lost, even if it is for no reason. Bit of dirt never harmed anyone Big grin


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is The Boac Livery Better Than The Current BA One? posted Sun Dec 15 2002 21:56:52 by CX747
Is Alitalia Interested In Some Of BA's 747-400s? posted Sun May 20 2001 14:12:01 by 777-500ER
1st HP 757 Is Getting Painted In New Colors! posted Sat Sep 23 2006 20:23:09 by Phxplanes
Why Is AA Cheaper Than BA For The Same Flights? posted Thu Jul 20 2006 22:55:14 by Highpeaklad
Who Is Doing Better In ATL, Air Tran Or Delta? posted Thu Jul 22 2004 07:02:41 by TriJetFan1
Landing In SFO And IAD - Which Is The Better Side? posted Sun Jun 20 2004 22:29:45 by Odie
How is AF in economy on intercontinental flights? posted Fri Mar 12 2004 21:51:46 by Mxp
No Secret As To Why AA Is Doing Better In STL posted Fri Feb 13 2004 00:43:17 by LambertMan
There Is No Better Way To Fly! posted Mon Jan 19 2004 01:43:04 by UAL747DEN
Is Biman Getting Better? posted Tue Oct 21 2003 18:48:15 by Mehtabrahman