Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Does The A350 Still Have A Chance In N. America?  
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6425 posts, RR: 2
Posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 7020 times:

With US Airways swtiching to the 787, that puts Airbus's hopes in doubt for selling A350s to airlines in North America. Does the A350 still have a chance? Please don't regard this thread as a poll, but as a discussion.

Continental, Northwest, Air Canada, and Aeromexico have all chosen the 787.

Delta and American, being loyal Boeing customers, will probably choose the 787 as well.

United has applied to be Boeing's 787 GoldCare provider, so the 787 probably has the edge with United.

The only airline in North America who I see may order the A350 is Mexicana, but it probably won't be in large quantities.


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
35 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3273 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 7004 times:

Hasn't there been one or two N. American-based aircraft leasing companies and/or cargo airlines that have purchased the A350?

Also, don't forget Air Transat...I'd bet they go A350 in the future.



Ding! You are now free to keep supporting Frontier.
User currently offlineCYatUK From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 810 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 6979 times:

I think the only chances are with airlines ordering both.


CY@Uk
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6425 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 6918 times:

Quoting DIA (Reply 1):
Hasn't there been one or two N. American-based aircraft leasing companies and/or cargo airlines that have purchased the A350?

GECAS, ILFC, and CIT Group have ordered the pre-XWB A350; it has not been confirmed that they have gone with the XWB. However, they are not airlines, they are leasing companies. If they still do have the A350 on order, maybe Mexicana can get some leased A350s from them.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlineAirFrnt From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2823 posts, RR: 42
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 6906 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
With US Airways swtiching to the 787, that puts Airbus's hopes in doubt for selling A350s to airlines in North America. Does the A350 still have a chance? Please don't regard this thread as a poll, but as a discussion.

The big problem with the A350 in the US market is that it is simply too large. Most of the carriers already operate Boeing 777s, which won't be replaced any time soon. Most of them do have large 767 fleets that need replacement, and their options are going to be 330s or 787s. Given the performance advantage of a 787 over a 330 (~20%) very few of them will opt for the 330.

The 350 might have a shot with United, given that UA was one of the first clients for both the 744 and the 777, but given that almost all of the carriers prefer frequency over capacity, I suspect that any order here would be smallish.


User currently offlineAA1818 From Trinidad and Tobago, joined Feb 2006, 3429 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 6737 times:

US hasn't decided 787 or A350 yet, so let's not write them off. Potential candidates as others have mentioned are Air Transat who operate many A330s, US, UA (somehow I see the A350 having a REAL chance with UA), MX (who is all Airbus apart from a handful of a/c and will likely remain all Airbus for the forseeable future. Other than that- AC, CO, NW are all bagged in the Boeing camp, AA and DL are virtual certainties, and we are yet to see new long haul startups in Mexico and the USA which could allow for more A350 operators.

AA1818



“The moment you doubt whether you can fly, you cease for ever to be able to do it.” J.M. Barrie (Peter Pan)
User currently offlineLumberton From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 4708 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 6688 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
With US Airways swtiching to the 78

This hasn't been confirmed AFAIK.

Quoting AA1818 (Reply 5):
US hasn't decided 787 or A350 yet, so let's not write them off.

 checkmark 

IMO, the answer to the threadstarter's question is a resounding "Yes!". Delivery positions for the 787 are filling up fast and AA, DL, UA may have waited too long to commit. Of course, they may have deals working in the background as we speak with either OEM.

BTW, would there be any chance of AA, DL, and UA teaming up to negotiate with Boeing or Airbus for a consolidated mega deal?



"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 958 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 6629 times:

Quoting Lumberton (Reply 6):

BTW, would there be any chance of AA, DL, and UA teaming up to negotiate with Boeing or Airbus for a consolidated mega deal?

Zero chance. Star Alliance couldn't even get it together for an RJ order and they are all on the same team.


User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6425 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 6388 times:

Quoting Lumberton (Reply 6):
IMO, the answer to the threadstarter's question is a resounding "Yes!". Delivery positions for the 787 are filling up fast and AA, DL, UA may have waited too long to commit. Of course, they may have deals working in the background as we speak with either OEM.

Delta and American have "Favored Nation" status with Boeing, which means that Boeing can give them special delivery slot, so I don't see them going with Airbus regardless of slots. Either way they will probably have their 787s delivered before the A350 enters service.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlineCygnusChicago From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 758 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 6315 times:

Quoting Lumberton (Reply 6):
would there be any chance of AA, DL, and UA teaming up to negotiate with Boeing or Airbus for a consolidated mega deal?

My understanding of the deal that AA and DL have with Boeing is that they buy exclusively Boeing in return for the lowest price of the past 12 months, kind of like Walmart's EDLP. Thus, teaming up wouldn't really get them anything.



If you cannot do the math, your opinion means squat!
User currently offlineAminobwana From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 6252 times:

I seem to see a misconception regarding the comparison of delivery dates for the A350 and B787

Assuming that BOEING does not decide to make a radical increase (meaning over 12/month) of their
production, they will be soon booked out until 2014. So, as the A350 will enter commercial service (??)
in 2014, some people seems to think that order B787 or A350 becomes the same thing from the
delivery dates point of view.

But the fact is that the A350 would be (at this obviously is not a slam dunk) in 2014 exactly where
BOEING will be in 2008. Analog to BOEING, they would be able to build may be 60 units in the year
2014-2015, 100 in 2015-2016, But if the orders from Emirates, Qatar, Singapore, Russia etc, in total
about 250 become real,and these would insist to be served first, even if partially, , there will be no
opening for new customers until may be 2017 !!

And obviously, once BOEING gets 1,000+ orders, in spite of all the concerns no to repeat past errors
they will increase capacity from 2009/10 on and make sure that their delivery dates remain before AIRBUS'

AMINOBWANA


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7558 posts, RR: 43
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 6154 times:

I agree. Air Transat, USAirways and Mexicana seem to be the only possible candidates at this point in time. I don't know how much the GoldCare issue will push UA towards the 787, but I think that UA will select the 787.

Quoting Lumberton (Reply 6):
would there be any chance of AA, DL, and UA teaming up to negotiate with Boeing or Airbus for a consolidated mega deal?

No, but maybe in the future, DL could team up with CO and NW to bargain together with Boeing for a combined 787 order (in the case of the latter two, I am talking of a follow-on order).



Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9602 posts, RR: 69
Reply 12, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 6123 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

But the fact is that the A350 would be (at this obviously is not a slam dunk) in 2014 exactly where
BOEING will be in 2008.


You miss one large factor. Assuming both the 787 and A350 are in service and available in 2014, the 787 will have been in service for over 5 years, with known performance figures and all the teething problems worked out.

The A350 won't.


User currently offlinePygmalion From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 966 posts, RR: 38
Reply 13, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 6105 times:

Quoting AA1818 (Reply 5):
US hasn't decided 787 or A350 yet

My take.... US is the unidentified customer for the 30 787's and its already done.


User currently offlineJayinKitsap From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 769 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 6048 times:

Quoting Aminobwana (Reply 10):
Assuming that BOEING does not decide to make a radical increase (meaning over 12/month) of their
production, they will be soon booked out until 2014. So, as the A350 will enter commercial service (??)
in 2014, some people seems to think that order B787 or A350 becomes the same thing from the
delivery dates point of view.



Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 12):
You miss one large factor. Assuming both the 787 and A350 are in service and available in 2014, the 787 will have been in service for over 5 years, with known performance figures and all the teething problems worked out.

I think Aminobwana's point is well said and commonly overlooked. Assuming that all of the old 350, the current 350XWB, and the pending orders are all firmed up for the 350XWB, Airbus has approximately 250 planes which probably have nearly all of the early deliver slots. I am sure the original 350 spots will be pretty compressed in the new schedule as deliveries were to begin around '10. So if the first year is 50 and the next couple of years are around 8/month (the current 330/340 rate - before the increase) it would be 3 years already sold out or 2017 before a substantial number of new slots are available. Right now if the 787 is at a rate of 10/month, Boeing has something like 300 open slots in the same time frame.

That would support 10 airlines taking 10 per year during that interim. Even AA probably won't be taking 10 widebodies a year for an ongoing period. I've heard that their NB replacement numbers are like 20 per year over 15 years.


User currently offlineTristarfreak From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 125 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 6007 times:

I don't think the 350 will do much in the US and it was my understanding from a thread some time ago about AA getting 738's that they also have to order 787's later this year and that their mind is already made up and with DL being an all Boeing a/c operator they which means that they will go 787 as well and I'm sure UA is going to follow suit soon

User currently offlineDank From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 877 posts, RR: 16
Reply 16, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 5998 times:

Quoting Pygmalion (Reply 13):
My take.... US is the unidentified customer for the 30 787's and its already done.

The fact that the US employee notes suggest that there is a single 60-plane order (and the fact that Boeing doesn't list 30 odd 739ERs as a UFO...) might suggest otherwise. Time will tell.

cheers.


User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 5957 times:

I wouldn't be at all surprised to see A350's in the US. I'm not sure about large numbers though, especially if Boeing gets Y3 right and most of all, their timing right. If Y3 is even remotely as successful as the 787, and Boeing times it with the 777 replacement cycle, Airbus might have problems selling a lot of A350's in the US.
As for US Airways, they've made it clear that they're not ready to announce their decision saying it will come in the next several weeks instead (Paris is my guess). If they do go 787 for their wide bodies, I also see a bunch of A32X as well.



Airliners.net Moderator Team
User currently offlineManni From South Korea, joined Nov 2001, 4221 posts, RR: 23
Reply 18, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 5898 times:

Quoting AirFrnt (Reply 4):
Most of them do have large 767 fleets that need replacement, and their options are going to be 330s or 787s. Given the performance advantage of a 787 over a 330 (~20%) very few of them will opt for the 330.

You are only a few years late. US and Northwest have both ordered the A330. As for chosing the 787 over the A330 in 2014... I'd be surprised if any of them would opt for the A330.

Quoting Aminobwana (Reply 10):
But the fact is that the A350 would be (at this obviously is not a slam dunk) in 2014 exactly where
BOEING will be in 2008.

This is not a fact. Airbus talks about halfway 2013. A lot of aircraft can be build in 6 months, and since you are making the comparison with Boeing, perhaps Airbus will also start building A350XWB's beforehand so it can deliver a few dozen at once.

Quoting Aminobwana (Reply 10):
Analog to BOEING, they would be able to build may be 60 units in the year
2014-2015, 100 in 2015-2016,

To early to tell! We dont know anything about the planned production rate for the A350XWB. We do know that Airbus plans to build upto 10 A330 a month.

Quoting Aminobwana (Reply 10):
But if the orders from Emirates, Qatar, Singapore, Russia etc, in total
about 250 become real,and these would insist to be served first, even if partially, , there will be no
opening for new customers until may be 2017 !!

Are you talking orders, commitments and 'old' A350 orders? That would be 268 then, excluding the potential EK order and including (for now) the US Airways order.


One more thing. Wasn't Kingfisher going to start up an American based airline? There you've got your US A350 based operator.  bigthumbsup 



SUPPORT THE LEBANESE CIVILIANS
User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8374 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 5853 times:

The 777 was very successful. The A350 can replace it. Sure, Boeing will do the Y3 but Airbus is already there.

You can wait around for Boeing's super light plastic 777 but remember, Airbus is already building one called the A350. So yeah, there is a market for that. UA for example has many 777s that will be old by then.


User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 5779 times:

Quoting Flighty (Reply 19):
The 777 was very successful. The A350 can replace it. Sure, Boeing will do the Y3 but Airbus is already there.

You can wait around for Boeing's super light plastic 777 but remember, Airbus is already building one called the A350. So yeah, there is a market for that. UA for example has many 777s that will be old by then.

True, but it looks like Y3 will go at least one size past the A350, unless they make a one more stretch past the A350-1000. Boeing will likely market it as a ULR 777-747 replacement.  Smile



Airliners.net Moderator Team
User currently offlineDellatorre From Brazil, joined May 2000, 1088 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 5746 times:

I just don't understand why so many people think that Airlines that are ordering the 787 won't order the A350 in the future.
Of course AA, DL & CO are tied up to Boeing, so zero chance of them getting any, but UA, US & NW and even AC could order it. By 2014 many things will be different, and IF the A350 thus become an airplane that shows equal or better performances than the 787 why would'n airlines, with the exception of the 3 above mentioned, go for it.

Bigger airlines suchs as AF, BA, LH and others Asian ones are ordering a mix of Boeing and Airbus frames. I can't see why that is going to be a problem.

Sure Boeing right now has a big lead over airbus, but 7 to 10 years from now Airbus can normally catch up.


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21458 posts, RR: 60
Reply 22, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 5640 times:

I think you could see UA order them as well as 787s. I wouldn't count on it, but I could see it happening.


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineAirFrnt From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2823 posts, RR: 42
Reply 23, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks ago) and read 5574 times:

Quoting Manni (Reply 18):

You are only a few years late. US and Northwest have both ordered the A330. As for chosing the 787 over the A330 in 2014... I'd be surprised if any of them would opt for the A330.

What does that have to do with the large fleets of 767s at US, DL, and CO?

My point was:

Quoting AirFrnt (Reply 4):
. Most of the carriers already operate Boeing 777s, which won't be replaced any time soon. Most of them do have large 767 fleets that need replacement, and their options are going to be 330s or 787s.

Those 767s still need replacement. If the QR rumor is correct, it's more evidence that carriers that are looking for a smaller A300/A310/767 replacement won't be looking at the 350XWB. I don't completely discount the possibility of a 330 sale here as a interim lift solution, but I think the 350 because of the size factor will be limited.


User currently offlineBHMBAGLOCK From United States of America, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 2698 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 5545 times:

Quoting Manni (Reply 18):
One more thing. Wasn't Kingfisher going to start up an American based airline? There you've got your US A350 based operator.

In reality that's a paper deal that means as much as all the ships registered in Liberia and Panama. You see N numbers on a/c from other parts of the world as well but I don't think of them as US based any more than I think Trump is a Brit.



Where are all of my respected members going?
25 JAAlbert : I think this would be a violation of antitrust laws. There are restrictions against businesses teaming up to force another to buy at terms more favor
26 Ncelhr : I agree with you on the 787 vs. 330. However, consider that both the 787 & 350 will make the 777 obsolete. In fact, the new generation of aircraft co
27 ZKNBX : Hmm. in 2013 many of UA's 777s will be 15 - 16 years old. Not old. But hardly young. You also assume that the 787 and A350 are head-to-head. They are
28 FRAspotter : I remember reading awhile ago that AA has stated that they will no longer operate any more Airbus aircraft after their A300 aircraft are retired. I d
29 Glareskin : Expect the unexpected! See VS and QR orders. There will be a time that AA management doesn't care about the A300 rudder issue anymore and only rememb
30 DAYflyer : Not neccessarily. Boards of Directors are concerned with profitibility and nothing else; they also have short memories. They will buy whatever is goi
31 Brilondon : Only if they can interchange them with British charter ailines.
32 Brilondon : I believe AC has committed its self to the B787 program by converting some of their options to orders in recent days.
33 CygnusChicago : AA signed an exclusivity agreement with Boeing well before the rudder incident. Even if Airbus had rolled over and claimed it was their fault, AA wou
34 DAL767400ER : And that agreement was rendered worthless as the EU massively objected to it, thereby killing that agreement. Although AA, like CO and DL, still has
35 Dellatorre : Don't count on that!!!! AA & Airbus are like oil & water, they don't go together!!!! AA's A300 fleet was some wild experience that actually worked fo
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Does The Q400 Still Have Reliability Issues? posted Thu Feb 15 2007 01:55:17 by CRJ900X
Why Does The UAL HQ Have A Swimming Pool? posted Thu Apr 12 2007 01:32:49 by Afrikaskyes
Will The A350 Also Have Elect.chromatic Window Pnl posted Tue Dec 19 2006 22:59:09 by AutoThrust
Does The A350 Weaken The Resale Value Of The A340? posted Fri Jun 3 2005 18:44:45 by Clickhappy
Will The B7E7 Still Have Bleedless Engines? posted Tue Dec 21 2004 18:11:51 by Sjoerd
Do Any Airlines Still Have Menus In Coach? posted Fri Feb 27 2004 04:31:24 by Cory6188
What All Does The Flight Attendant Have To Say? posted Sat May 3 2003 21:29:24 by Deltadude8
Does The Super 27 Have 2 Or 3 Engines? posted Tue Feb 4 2003 01:00:19 by TrnsWrld
Does Hawaiian Airlines Still Have There DC-10s posted Thu Jul 18 2002 00:24:58 by Superfly
Why Does The BAe-146 Have 4 Engines? posted Thu Jun 27 2002 05:37:54 by Brons2