Trent1000 From Japan, joined Jan 2007, 594 posts, RR: 1 Posted (8 years 2 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3450 times:
An attendant on this 2007 flight makes an announcement briefly before landing (it appears to be in German). Then in English, he says "Ladies and gentlemen, may we now ask you to extinguish now your cigarette and adjust the back rest of your seat and your table to an upright position" I wonder if he also mentions smoking in the German announcment.
Could this be LH? If not, any idea which carrier? Is smoking still allowed on certain sectors or charter flights (how about Turkish Airlines)? Can anyone identify the city this flight lands in? Wouldn't passengers be asked to fasten seat belts, stow tray tables and bring seats fully upright at the beginning of descent? This announcement takes place less than 2 minutes before landing. So if I was having a cigarette, would the attendants not stop me until then?
Could it be that the information read out was simply outdated and it really was a non smoking flight?
What makes you think it might be TK? You have no idea about Turkey are you? I am highly offended by this comment because I know exactly why you thought it would be TK....
Smoking has been banned on TK since 1998.
Besides, TK''s final approach announcement is as follows:
"Ladies and gentlemen, in a few minutes, we will be landing at Istanbul Ataturk Airport. Please check once again that your seat belts are fastened, your seats are upright and your tray tables are closed. Thank you"
4holer26 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 65 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 3382 times:
Quoting TurkishWings (Reply 4): Because, he knew it was a European airline and thought it would be TK because Turkey is the most underdeveloped country in Europe where smoking might still be allowed.... Your ignorance pardoned...
Understood. Maybe I over estimated the original posters mental aptitude, seeing as the video description clearly states the airline is LH.
Trent1000 From Japan, joined Jan 2007, 594 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3274 times:
The reference to LH and JFK is there. However, the description did not feature when I originally accessed this link.
Sorry Turkish Wings - I've been to Turkey and love it. No offense intended, but I did think that smoking may have still been allowed on Turkish Airlines. Thank you for the clarification on that point. It seems that the video is old footage, just posted this year - hence my enquiry.
PanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 10243 posts, RR: 32
Reply 11, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2798 times:
Quoting LTU932 (Reply 5):
Why? I find that it's a way to thank the pilot for an outstanding landing
because it is stupid. Pilots are professionals and not artists All landings that are no crash landings are outstanding. On the other hand, I would eventually clap after a survived crash landing, because that would be really outstanding.
Quoting Trent1000 (Reply 7): Sorry Turkish Wings - I've been to Turkey and love i
No need to apologize to a guy for his nationalistic over reaction to funny remark.
Please do explain your comments ??? I really wish to know why you are not suprised!!!
Quoting PRGDLGUY (Reply 14): Don´t know if now...but about 3-4 years back I was o/b Thomas Cook/ Condor flight Dresden - Tenerife and I was suprised that that flight was smoking!!!
Is there a law that says airlines must not allow smoking onboard?? Could a EU airline suddenly allow it if they wanted?? I am against smoking onboard but I am just wondering if it is self governing or is it actually the law.
PanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 10243 posts, RR: 32
Reply 17, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2590 times:
Quoting PRGDLGUY (Reply 16): There was also rumour a couple of years back that someone wants to fly C class "smoking" only a/c on Germany - Japan market.
"Smintair" which stands for "Smokers International Air" is the brain fart of a Duesselforf business man who got some media attention. As trains go (fortunately) smokeless as well this autumn, he will start a smokerail or railsmoke as well. He may end up owning some Shisha lounges.
Anyway, he will never get the permission to start such an airline, especiallysince we get finally some anti smoking legislation. in Germany as well. Too many legal obstacles. He could try to run it as a club, but then he still needs staff. Staff will have the right to a smokefree workplace. He can make smoking a condition in the contracts, however when there is a law that gives employees the right for a smokefree workplace, a worker can sign what he wants, he still could insist on a smokefree workplace and would win that case.
Anyway, this airline will never take off, for many more reasons than shown above.
OA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 28241 posts, RR: 60
Reply 19, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2555 times:
Quoting TurkishWings (Reply 18): You first tell me why my remark was over the top then I will tell you what you already know...
The guy said was it TK so whats wrong with that ??? He was asking a question and wasnt implying that it was good or bad. He was asking a question. He could have said the same if he thought it was AZ,LY,OA,TK or whatever!!! He was not making a statement about anything else . You just took it the wrong way . There are different attitudes to smoking between Western Europe and the Balkans/Turkey so one could be forgiven to think that a Balkan or Eastern airline might have allowed smoking . Living in a country where there is a total smoking ban inside public areas I hate it when I go to the Balkans to visit family and have to sit in smoke and I think they are behind when it comes to public health but Im sure my family who smoke would disagree.
Sorry, but why do you think this flight is from 2007?
Try reading the "Comments & Responses" to this video:
... Heterodyne (2 months ago)
Extingush your cigarette? There are airlines that still allow you to smoke these days?!
vmMovies (2 months ago) _1993!!!
The thread went off the deep end with the third reply, and continued to remain more a host of personal attacks and 'apparently' hurt feelings. Rather than using SD feature, the thread degenerates into a bash fest. Great work.