Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Liveries - Could CO Be Next?  
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6651 posts, RR: 2
Posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 10539 times:

As many should know, Delta has introduced a new livery. This is their fourth livery in the past 20 years. In the past 5 years, Northwest, US Airways, and United have introduced new liveries. Could Continental be next? Continental has the second oldest livery (introduced in 1991) out of the major United States legacy airlines, after American. American will probably not come out with a new livery, as it is considered a classic. I would say that CO is much more likely to come out with a new livery than AA. What does everyone else think?


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
93 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 10516 times:

I don't know, but I've never liked the current one. Then again, I was a fan of the orange and gold "meatball" livery of the 70s.  Silly

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
American will probably not come out with a new livery, as it is considered a classic. I would say that CO is much more likely to come out with a new livery than AA. What does everyone else think?

I think they will have to, at least on their 787s. They're going to order 787s soon and you can't polish plastic to a mirror finish.  Wink



Airliners.net Moderator Team
User currently offlineXJET From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 492 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 10516 times:

I think CO knows there are more important things to spend money on. New liveries are exciting for enthusiasts, but the rest of the pulic could care less. Once they are on the plane they don't even see the outside. CO doesn't need to re-brand the airline right now. The branding that has been in place since Bethune took office has worked better and better every year. That is just my opinion, I could be wrong.

User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6651 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 10517 times:

Quoting MCIGuy (Reply 1):
I think they will have to, at least on their 787s. They're going to order 787s soon and you can't polish plastic to a mirror finish. Wink

Or they could simply use the chrome paint like on their A300s.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlineFloridaflyboy From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 2018 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 10493 times:

I don't think CO will come out with a new livery for a number of reasons. First of all, their brand recognition is very good. People see that livery and associate it with great customer service, and an airline that has been doing quite well. They are in no need of a re-branding. There is no symbolic reason to change the livery. Plus, the CO livery is very modern and elegant. It pretty much speaks worlds about what kind of carrier CO really is. Plus, I love that tail on CO. It would sure be a shame to see that go.


Good goes around!
User currently offlineEXAAUADL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 10493 times:

CO's new livery is from 1994, not 1991 isnt it.

User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 10467 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
Could Continental be next?

Why?

The current one is beautiful. Timeless - like AAs. No need to spend money on rebranding either - CO hasn't tanked and has not a need to try to reintroduce themselves (ficticously) through a pain job in an attempt to continue to cover up lousy cabin service (please see US and DL). Why spend $$$ on something that doesn't need it.

Nope, no rebranding in COs future. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.


User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 10422 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Reply 3):
Or they could simply use the chrome paint like on their A300s.

Just a shot in the dark, wouldn't that be awfully heavy?



Airliners.net Moderator Team
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16908 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 10406 times:

Quoting EXAAUADL (Reply 5):
CO's new livery is from 1994, not 1991 isnt it.

My first flight aboard a new color CO aircraft was IAH-EWR in 1991, an A300.

Airlines tend to introduce new liveries when they are trying to reinvent themselves, as noted by all the livery changes at DL in the last 10 years they have reinvented themselves several times.

CO is very happy with who they are, they have no desire to change an award winning product. So to answer you question I would say CO is very unlikely to change their livery.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10360 times:

Quoting XJET (Reply 2):
I think CO knows there are more important things to spend money on. New liveries are exciting for enthusiasts, but the rest of the pulic could care less.

 checkmark 

Quoting Floridaflyboy (Reply 4):
I don't think CO will come out with a new livery for a number of reasons. First of all, their brand recognition is very good. People see that livery and associate it with great customer service, and an airline that has been doing quite well. They are in no need of a re-branding.

 checkmark 

Let's not forget that painting an entire fleet of planes takes years and $ millions. DL is changing their livery because they are changing their brand. UA, US, and NW all have changed liveries for the same reason. CO is in no need of a new brand: they are currently one of the top ranked airlines for customer service and performance. They do not need an entire PR makeover to boost their business.

DL on the other hand is emerging from BK and is in the process of becoming a different airline. They are trying to change their image and their brand, hence the re-paint.


User currently offlineN844AA From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1352 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10339 times:

Quoting XJET (Reply 2):
The branding that has been in place since Bethune took office has worked better and better every year.

And what's the test Bethune mentioned in From Worst to First when deciding whether to make expenditures like this? The 9D test or something, where he asks whether the hypothetical passenger sitting in 9D would find a new livery (or new cockpit instrumentation, or whatever) worth an extra $5 on his ticket. In this case, I think the answer would be "probably not."

Edit: Of course Bethune is gone at this point, but it seems pretty clear that his management style lives on.

Quoting EXAAUADL (Reply 5):
CO's new livery is from 1994, not 1991 isnt it.

No, but lots of planes were painted in various old liveries until shortly after Bethune took over, including some in Continental Lite titles.

I think the current livery is remarkably current looking, given from when it was established. Lots of early '90s design looks utterly ridiculous now. Not only do I hope they keep the current livery, but I don't think they need to either.

[Edited 2007-04-30 23:00:52]


New airplanes, new employees, low fares, all touchy-feely ... all of them are losers. -Gordon Bethune
User currently offlineJBo From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 2381 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10303 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
I would say that CO is much more likely to come out with a new livery than AA. What does everyone else think?

Everyone wants CO to come out with a new livery because they're the only ones who haven't besides AA. I don't think it's likely to happen. It does look a bit dated, but if they do anything, they'll likely just freshen up the existing look somehow rather than a complete image revamp.

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Reply 3):
Or they could simply use the chrome paint like on their A300s.

Uh, AA doesn't put "chrome paint" on their A300s. That would be a ridiculous amount of weight on the aircraft.

AA's A300s were originally painted grey, due to the bonded primer on Airbus a/c. Eventually a deal was worked out in which either the primer was able to be removed, or the aircraft were given a different skin, thus being allowed to be polished.

So, in short, the AA A300s are, indeed, polished bare metal ... and the only ones of their kind.

However, I do agree that if AA orders the 787, look for a new livery. I doubt they would paint the whole thing grey and go for it. The look would become even more of a hodge-podge than it is now, with different aircraft having different amounts of painted composites.



I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
User currently offlineEI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10270 times:

I really would like to see EI update their livery

User currently offlineDavidkunzVIE From Austria, joined Mar 2007, 431 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10270 times:

I think the next US major to get a new livery is DL. It's already been some hours since we first saw the 2007 colours. Certainly someone in Atlanta is already thinking of the next "long awaited and desperately needed" CI re-design.
Probably by the time when the last DL jet is painted in the 2007 c/s we'll have the first semi-official images for the 2010 or 2011 or whatever paint scheme.

Yes, go ahead. Quote me on this.



DH3 DH4 CR1 CR2 CR7 CR9 F70 732 733 734 73G 738 752 762 763 772 742 743 319 320 321 333 343
User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10255 times:

Quoting EI321 (Reply 12):
I really would like to see EI update their livery

Ah, I'm Irish by descent and besides, my favorite color is green. Whatever they do I'm sure I'll like it.  Silly



Airliners.net Moderator Team
User currently offlineAA1818 From Trinidad and Tobago, joined Feb 2006, 3439 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10209 times:

Quoting JBo (Reply 11):
However, I do agree that if AA orders the 787, look for a new livery. I doubt they would paint the whole thing grey and go for it. The look would become even more of a hodge-podge than it is now, with different aircraft having different amounts of painted composites.

Agreed 100%. I also expect AA to come up with something fresh, timeless once again, and something to maintain their brand recognition. Not something that says 'we're joining the rest with boring paint schemes' like DL and others. I look forward to seeing AA's rebranding when they order 787s!!!

Quoting EI321 (Reply 12):
I really would like to see EI update their livery

Should be easy to do- keep it green, keep the clover...other than that- they can have LOADS of fun coming up with something creative, and something that 'pops'!!!

AA1818



“The moment you doubt whether you can fly, you cease for ever to be able to do it.” J.M. Barrie (Peter Pan)
User currently offlineElcableguy77 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 523 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10209 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 6):
Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
Could Continental be next?

Why?

The current one is beautiful. Timeless - like AAs. No need to spend money on rebranding either - CO hasn't tanked and has not a need to try to reintroduce themselves (ficticously) through a pain job in an attempt to continue to cover up lousy cabin service (please see US and DL). Why spend $$$ on something that doesn't need it.

Nope, no rebranding in COs future. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Amen to that.
Being on a US Express carrier, I can definitely say the cabin service leaves a lot to be desired. I do my best to supply superior service (as much as can be supplied on a CR2), and I do, but the tools I'm given are woefully lacking. US is a quasi-major trying to act like an LCC, and it isn't working out too well.

Now, as for CO, things have been going quite well for them. No bankruptcies, no pissed-off customers, good service, and a brand image that has survived for about 15 years. Maybe that's why I put my application in with them a couple of weeks ago.



Former ZW F/A | "Wisconsin 72A, contact departure, see ya."
User currently offlineORD From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1390 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10151 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
As many should know, Delta has introduced a new livery. This is their fourth livery in the past 20 years.

Actually, this is Delta's 4th livery in 40 years:

1967 - 1997 Traditional widget
1997 - 2000 Ron Allen scheme
2000 - 2007 Flowing fabric
2007 New scheme


User currently offlineDavidkunzVIE From Austria, joined Mar 2007, 431 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10142 times:

Quoting ORD (Reply 17):
Actually, this is Delta's 4th livery in 40 years:

1967 - 1997 Traditional widget
1997 - 2000 Ron Allen scheme
2000 - 2007 Flowing fabric
2007 New scheme

More like their fourth in ten years.  Wink



DH3 DH4 CR1 CR2 CR7 CR9 F70 732 733 734 73G 738 752 762 763 772 742 743 319 320 321 333 343
User currently offlineORD From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1390 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 10129 times:

Quoting EXAAUADL (Reply 5):
CO's new livery is from 1994, not 1991 isnt it.

Incorrect. Continental's current livery was unveiled on February 12, 1991. See part of the original press release below...



February 12, 1991, Tuesday - 12:52 Eastern Time
NEW CORPORATE IMAGE FOR CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
SECTION: Financial News
LENGTH: 569 words
DATELINE: HOUSTON, Feb. 12

Continental Airlines today unveiled its new corporate identity symbolizing the progress Continental has made and its goals for the future. Hollis L. Harris, Continental's chairman, president and chief executive officer, introduced the new look at a gathering of more than 3,000 employees and invited guests at Houston Intercontinental Airport.

During the event, the company presented two jet aircraft, a Boeing 737-300 and an Airbus A-300, a Continental Express ATR 42 and ground equipment, all painted in new Continental colors of white, blue and gold displaying the new company logo."

[Edited 2007-04-30 23:33:24]

User currently offlineBWIA 772 From Barbados, joined May 2002, 2200 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 9997 times:

I like CO livery they dont need to change it. IMO DL need to go tweak their new livery it is better than the fabric thing they had but it isnt that great. It is going to be interesting to see what AA is going to do IMO its hard to top a nice polished livery unless you are AC ( the bare metal 767 looked awful and I saw it in person ).

Regards
BWIA 772
 airplane 



Eagles Soar!
User currently offlineBa777-236 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 674 posts, RR: 4
Reply 21, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 9965 times:

Well if they do something, it should be tasteful, unlike that crap that Delta calls a livery.

I vote for something like this:


Modified Airliner Photos:
Click here for bigger photo!
Design © NcSchu
Template © NcSchu




I like British Airways! I'm not sure why, but I do! ;-)
User currently offlineFloridaflyboy From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 2018 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 9951 times:

Quoting Ba777-236 (Reply 21):
I vote for something like this:

Wow! That bears a striking resemblence to Atlas!!



Good goes around!
User currently offlineN844AA From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1352 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 9907 times:

Quoting Ba777-236 (Reply 21):
Well if they do something, it should be tasteful, unlike that crap that Delta calls a livery.

I vote for something like this:

Does not compute.



New airplanes, new employees, low fares, all touchy-feely ... all of them are losers. -Gordon Bethune
User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8914 posts, RR: 12
Reply 24, posted (7 years 8 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 9861 times:

Quoting Ba777-236 (Reply 21):
I vote for something like this:

Ugh that looks awful. Agree that CO should just stick with it's current livery - simple and timeless. The simpler, the better.


25 AA737-823 : Well, to put in my two cents... Conti is by far my favorite, but I have always been lukewarm on their paint scheme. Looks very business-like. Not very
26 ChiGB1973 : Nowadays, more than classic, it saves fuel. Though AA might not even be considering a new livery, if they did, it would quickly be dismissed. I like
27 Post contains images Floridaflyboy : Hmm, do you have some information the rest of us don't?? If so, share...
28 ChiGB1973 : No, I should have added, IMHO. M
29 Floridaflyboy : Oh, ok. Well, I wouldn't be disappointed if you were correct. I love the CO livery, but, I love seeing a new one!
30 Lemurs : It will be a minor refresh if they do it. The blue/grey/gold setup is a big part of their brand, and as someone said, that navy blue is essentially a
31 EA CO AS : No Full stop. They'll repaint over six hundred aircraft to avoid heavier paint on perhaps 40 new ones? I think not.
32 DALelite : will it be DELTA? As soon as they realize that their new livery isn't much apprecheated? well they tend to change their liverys every three to five ye
33 Cba : The whole design behind the 787's efficiency is that it is much lighter, adding a lot of heavy chrome paint will negate a good chunk of that...
34 Viscount724 : CO's livery still looks good (as does AA's after almost 40 years). If you're going spend money, spend it on the inside of the aircraft, not the outsid
35 Post contains images ThePalauan : The Row 5 Test! I just finished reading that section and I think a rebrand isn't worth it. Borrowing from the book, I'd say Continental would end up
36 COEI2007 : I thinlk CO realises that spending money on a new livery is not high in its priority list. DL's is spending a lot of money on tis livery, and brand. M
37 BN727 : How can anyone call Continental livery timeless? I call it 'Boring". AA has the only timeless paint job and the next generation plastic jets will chan
38 AA1818 : Well put. Agreed on all of those except the B6/ UA similarity...don't really see it!!! AA1818
39 Caymanair : 1. Part of the Ugly-as-Hell clan: Southwest 2. Classy/ businesslike/ pleasing: Continental (the others im not so sure) 3. agreed. 4. agreed. 5. agree
40 Post contains links and images PanAm747LHR : And along with our new coporate image, which I'd love to see, give us new uniforms!!! I'd love to see something like this roll out of the paint hanger
41 BR715-A1-30 : You mean the Row 5 Test? Gordon went back to the passenger in Row 5 and asked if he would pay $0.50 extra on his ticket because the engineers have de
42 ATLflyer : That is NOT tasteful.
43 Elcableguy77 : I rather like that look. Not a lot of change, harkens back to the old days, and still presents a professional image.
44 Rj777 : I think NW will do new one when they emerge next month. I know, they just got rid of the bowling shoe scheme and went to the silver compass scheme, bu
45 Mallthus : For what it's worth, I actually like the new DL livery. I tend to agree with the consensus on CO and AA, they're both unlikely to change. All that sai
46 Post contains images Antoniemey : If CO or AA are going to change, AA will do it first becausewhen they order 787s they'll have to figure something out and the original A300 grey or t
47 DiscoverCSG : This is a false choice. As has been mentioned on here a jillion times, aircraft have to be repainted every so often. It makes no difference whether t
48 EXAAUADL : Thanks: I thought the new livery came with Bethune in 1994, not 1991. CO must not have painted many planes prior to 1994 however as I remember seeing
49 TranStar : My only recommendation to Continental would be to change the font of the titles from Times Roman-ish to an Arial-bold type font. The font used in Cont
50 1337Delta764 : I would actually suggest using a font similar to Trebuchet MS, and maybe add some green to the globe logo while modernizing it. AT&T has modified the
51 PlanenutzTB : Agreed, leave well enough alone! The current CO livery is one of my favorite, absolutly no need to change it.
52 ORD : No problem. I'm glad I could help clarify when Continental's livery came out.
53 KangarooMAN : You highlighted the exact reason they have kept the livery it's business like and the main core of there business is based on the folks sitting in J
54 Jetdeltamsy : I think this is a completely pointless topic. Why would Continental change its livery? Their brand identity very well recognized. Their company's repu
55 Post contains images RB211 : I really like this one...
56 Post contains images N844AA : I do agree that the font is dated, but a.) it's not as dated as the EA/UA-type tubular lettering, and b.) it's a distinctive part of the CO corporate
57 LTU932 : AFAIK, the primer was not removed. The aircraft was reskinned, but there were some parts that couldn't be reskinned, hence why it has so many painted
58 Pronto : No!! Please don't change, Continental!! I can't believe how "old" the current livery is - yet it still looks new and "refreshing". No need to change i
59 Post contains links Gnomon : If you look at all CO-branded material now, including the CO Web site, you'll see that the logo in use is an updated, slightly modernized, two-color v
60 Dw9115 : They need to leave well enough alone it is a classy looking paint scheme everyone saw what Delta just did to there paint scheme with that new ugly one
61 Slovacek747 : I do think CO livery is classy; however, I would like to see minor changes to the white fuselage. I do like the tail and think it should stay for bran
62 PrimetimeDC9 : how bout something not predominantly white, blue and gold, black and gold, maybe some white lettering, something to differentiate between every other
63 Beertrucker : Here we go agian with how much money it costs to paint all the planes something new. All the major airlines repaint thier planes when they go in for t
64 DavidkunzVIE : And how much do airlines pay the design companies and for the refurbishment of all counters, gate areas, uniforms, etc.?
65 1337Delta764 : Here is what I would suggest for a new CO livery: The CO globe should have a color scheme that stands out more. I like the idea of a globe in green an
66 Arcano : I don't know what will be next, but I can tell that as AI, UA, DL, NW ans some others iy will have a tail where the logo is so large that won't fit. L
67 Lemurs : It's very Web 2.0, which is the styling cues they're trying to cash in on. The colors, layouts, simple shapes...it screams Web 2.0. Of course, just l
68 Fl370 : I don't think CO needs to re-brand. their current scheme is nice and classic like AA. US repainted cuz they merged, DL made the dumbest move in aviati
69 Post contains images Nosedive : Green (maybe 2 shades?), light blue, red cheatline.... so a Peter Maxification, of sorts, to the regular CO livery.... best stick to playing on airli
70 Popski87 : Actually I have heard that the polishing needed to be done to keep the fuselage of AA planes from corroding offset's most of the weight benefits gaine
71 Post contains links and images MP : A new CO livery would be likely on the new B787-8, B787-9. I absolutely agree with the fact that the CO font could need an update to keep it more fres
72 RB211 : I think airlines like to fix things that aren't broken and miss the bottom line. If you're losing millions, the problem isn't the paint job. The probl
73 Antoniemey : Umm... Eww?[Edited 2007-05-02 22:18:53]
74 1337Delta764 : What exactly do you have against my CO livery idea?
75 DeltaL1011man : i agree.....now can someone please tell DL this so they dont paint all there planes with that new crap
76 Nosedive : um, it's horrible?
77 Ikramerica : Great post. I agree that CO could introduce a modified livery for the 788 and all future planes. Airline modify and existing livery when they don't w
78 KSUpilot : I like the top on the best...keeps the current scheme and modernizes it a bit...unless CO pulls a DL and does something horrible to their livery, I t
79 Post contains links and images MP : Thank you for the feedback. I must say, that I'm not likely to see CO in a completely new livery. Some minor changes on the line layou would be great,
80 Ikramerica : No problem. You are doing great work! Okay, those are some good changes. If you have it in you, would you try your (new) #1 with the #2 tail and the
81 BN727 : Every single one of these concept designs are a 100 percent improvement over Continentals current scheme.
82 KSUpilot : That top one is amazing. Jeez let's hope CO hires you to improve the current livery.
83 Post contains images VC10DC10 : 1. "Bland as the Food We Serve" Livery Club: Continental, USAir, Delta (all the liveries, including Widget) 2. "Dated as Hell" Livery Club: American (
84 Post contains images LTU932 : Combine the tail of the first one with the last one, and it would be perfect.
85 LAXdude1023 : I dig, I really do!!! Good job MP!!! If they change, I hope they go with a paint job similar to what you have suggested!!! However I must say, of all
86 Ikramerica : I thought that too. Then I looked at his livery modifications, and at the 777 model I have, and the 777 looks less interesting. I like the blue exten
87 Post contains links and images MP : Thanks everybody for the good feedback. Well, I wish that the airlines let their customers and passengers also decide about their new liveries. The op
88 NASCARAirforce : Wasn't the 70's livery called the "burnt meatball" since it was black? I thought the meatball itself came out in the 80s? What about Northwest's bowl
89 CO777DAL : Wow, you do a really good job! I like that you put back the current CO font.
90 Antoniemey : See... I like the concepts, the colors, etc... My issue with it is that it continues the current fad of making the emblem too big to fit on the tail.
91 MP : Well, you're right. Most airlines use an overlarge tail logo, like Qatar Airways for example. I think it depends on the kind of logo. I don't know if
92 Post contains images Philhyde : Nice job. I do like #6.
93 AT777 : Personally I really like this one. It just looks elegant and smooth. Nice flowing lines. Anyone else?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Koln The New Stansted? Could It Be... posted Sat Sep 21 2002 09:26:23 by IndianicWorld
Could CO 767 Fleet Be Better Utilized? posted Wed Mar 29 2006 16:24:37 by UPSMD11
Could Paine Field Be Next For Southwest? posted Fri Oct 14 2005 00:28:14 by Rsmith6621a
Which Euro Cities Could Be Next IB/JK Destination? posted Sat Mar 5 2005 02:39:52 by BBADXB
LHR's New Control Tower To Be Moved Next Thursday. posted Sat Oct 23 2004 18:42:53 by Leezyjet
New LCC Could Be A Awesome Livery! posted Tue Aug 24 2004 00:34:58 by NIKV69
Could JFK, LGA, Or EWR Be Next For WN? posted Thu Mar 25 2004 23:09:01 by Cory6188
What Will Be New At The Dubai Airshow Next Week? posted Wed Dec 3 2003 16:51:02 by KEESJE
Could PHL Be The Home For The New Virgin America? posted Tue Nov 18 2003 00:52:01 by SunValley
Could TTN Be WN's Next Destination? posted Fri Jan 18 2002 23:56:41 by FlyBoeing