Joemac547 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 113 posts, RR: 0 Posted (5 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1645 times:
A while ago I read a posting here regarding LAX's "aging" TBIT. The posting was discussing a LA Times article on the subject. In the article I remember it stating that QANTAS is moving "8 flights a week from LAX to SFO". I recall how a.net members said this was in error and that in fact QF was moving 2 flights a week to increase SFO to 5 / wk.
I suppose that the LA Times simply got it wrong. Seems like an obvious error that simply was not caught by the general purpose press.
However, now I read in this month's Airports of the World the same thing. Come on, It seems to me that a publication THAT SPECIALIZES IN THE INDUSTRY should get it right. Or Have I been wrong all along and QF is increasing to 8x/week from SFO? Is the press that cavalier with the facts when it comes to aviation - even if it is an aviation specific publication?
Laxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 22028 posts, RR: 51 Reply 1, posted (5 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1609 times:
Yes the press was wrong. SFO service was boosted to 5x weekly, not 8.
EA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 12559 posts, RR: 64 Reply 2, posted (5 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1534 times:
Quoting Joemac547 (Thread starter): However, now I read in this month's Airports of the World the same thing. Come on, It seems to me that a publication THAT SPECIALIZES IN THE INDUSTRY should get it right.
They absolutely should. This sounds like a case of journalistic laziness. Airports of the World probably just ran a story from the AP or Reuters that the LA Times had carried - and that story was the factually-incorrect one to begin with.
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan