Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA A300-600R  
User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1144 times:

Does anybody know if American Airlines is satisfied with the performance it's Airbus A300-600Rs? If so, would they ever consider going for either the A330-200/300 or A340-500/600 which are almost the same body style but longer than the A300?

23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1089 times:

They won't. AA will be buying Boeing for a long time to come. The A300's will be replaced with 767-400's more than likely.



User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 48
Reply 2, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1079 times:

They must be if they've been operating that fleet of some 35 aircraft since the late 80's.
But as for whether they will opt for some A330's and/or A340's, I see that as a very long shot at best.
Remember, AA signed up an "exclusive' Boeing deal back in c. 1997.
Look at all the 737NG's, 757's, 767's, and 777's they are getting.
I imagine that's what they want their fleet to be made up of.
So to go back to Airbus would make little sense from a commonality standpoint. I think this discussion was had recently. The only reason AA bought those A300's was to poke a stick into Boeings eye for not giving some price breaks on some 767's, or something like that.
They may be happy with them for now, but they are definitely the oddball of the fleet, and will eventually be disposed of long before anything new from Toulouse gets delivered wearing the double AA's.


User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1064 times:

What if Airbus gives them again a very good deal on some A330-200/300s over Boeing on the 767-400?

User currently offlineBaec777XX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1045 times:

Nothing wrong with having a few type of aircrafts, mixture of Boeing, Airbus, Tristar, MD, Fokker, but some airlines prefers what they like for their fleet.

Im going for a few of what I listed for some type of long haul / short haul destinations.


Let AA go for the Boeing if they prefer.



Baec777XX  


User currently offlineRWally From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 555 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1024 times:

AA has said that they are going all Boeing.

User currently offlineHeavierthanair From Switzerland, joined Oct 2000, 751 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1027 times:

The exclusivity contract with Boeing means AA has to buy Boeing up to a certain aircraft weight. The A340-600 is slightly above that limit and there is a chance that AA goes for them. The A 340 has Rolls engines like their 777, whereas the 773ER only comes with GE engines, something AA does not particularly like.

Cheers
Peter



"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." (Albert Einstein, 1879
User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 48
Reply 7, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1014 times:

From an economic, training, and maintennance standpoint, diversity is NOT better.
Most of the airlines (such as AA) that have mixed breeds like that did so when no one cared about aircraft commonality. Now, and for the forseeable future, the trend will be standardization.


User currently offlineFDXmech From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3251 posts, RR: 35
Reply 8, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1016 times:

If I'm not mistaken, the exclusivity contract between AA/Boeing was dropped due to protests from the EU as being unfair. If I'm wrong, please correct me.


You're only as good as your last departure.
User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 985 times:

I hope that AA goes for the long range A340-500 with RR Trent 500 series engines if AA can't get Boeing to put the Trent 800 series engine on the 777-300ER.

User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 48
Reply 10, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 981 times:

I also heard about the EU protesting the "exclusive" clause with Boeing. I don't remember if it was geared towards AA, DL, or CO, as all three of them made such pacts. It had to be the most pointless protest in the history of demonstrations.
Now stop and think about it.....
what good is that protesting going to do?
Would those airlines publically stating that they would retract those contracts solve the EU's problems?
Ok, fine....I won't SAY publically that I'm going to buy just Boeing.....
I'll just BUY them when I want to...
And turn down Airbus over and over and over and over.....
Isn't that what it basically amounted to?
Besides, who the hell does the EU think it is to tell three privately held American airlines who they can and cannot buy their planes from?
Geez....I don't imagine the EU would scream too loud if UA, US, and NW announced "Airbus only" commitments...
what a bunch of idiots.


User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 954 times:

I don't hear the EU complaining after Air France and Alitalia went for the GE90 777-200LR & 300ER models instead of the A340.

User currently offline777gk From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 938 times:

I can remember some European agency protesting our decision to cancel our A330/340 orders and go for the parallel Boeing product. But I don't remember it being the EU.

User currently offlineRedraider From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 531 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 935 times:

AA may not have the exclusivity contract with Boeing, but you can bet your bottom dollar that they have a handshake agreement to purchase Boeing.

Further, I think it makes more sense, and this has been discussed millions of times before, to go with a standard airframe rather than engines. The 777NG will be a small part of AA's overall fleet and they can certainly outsource engine maintenance rather than develop a new program for the GE's.



My wife can't wrestle, but you should see her box.
User currently offlineBY738 From Tonga, joined Sep 2000, 2180 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 919 times:

The sooner AA get rid of the airbuses the better. I flew LHR - JFK on an A300-600 and it was old and cramped. I was hoping for a new 777, but it was not to be.

User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6294 posts, RR: 54
Reply 15, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 910 times:

I will not get involved in A vs. B flames, just ask a question.
These AA / DL / CO exclusive contracts with Boeing, which may or may not be cancelled, what was the "wisdom" related to them?
I am sometimes involved in purchasing agreements on behalf of my company, on a much smaller scale. The whole game is to have choises. Even if you don't have much choise in reality, then the game is to make your supplier believe that you have different choises in order to optimise the deal.
What is going on in the head of AA / DL / CO managers when they first sign a contract with Boeing telling that they will only buy Boeing planes for the next 10, 50 or 100 years. And then later come and tell Boeing that we need x# of y planes, and we want them modified for our needs, and we want them delivered on these dates, and then ask: What's the price? Are you in good mood, do you offer any rebates today? Oh, you just raised the list price yesterday, that was a shame.
I mean, if I made such stupid contracts today, then I would be unemployed tomorrow.
Did those AA / DL / CO managers totally miss first year at business school?
What about the AA / DL / CO shareholders? Didn't they fire their CEOs right away? If not, why not?
Single supplier system, that is exactly what the former Soviet Union is struggling to get rid of after 70 years of total failure. How can large American business corporations re-invent such a system years after the Soviet Union collapsed?
This has in principle nothing with Boeing or Airbus to do. It would be all the same if there were ten airliner suppliers and they were all American.
After 30 years as a businessman there is something here which is so far away from clever business operation that I am totally lost. Please help me if I have got is wrong.
Best regards, Preben Norholm



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 904 times:

Maybe AA/DL/CO received better deals by locking themselves in for the long-haul? Maybe they have an option to get out during the life of the contract. It makes sense for both parties. It guarantees reputable customers for almost any new planes they launch- since these airlines' fleet requirements are quite broad and extensive. It's good for AA/DL/CO if they had received a nice deal. Don't bash these managers- maybe it was a deal they couldn't turn down.

User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6294 posts, RR: 54
Reply 17, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 898 times:

Watewate, I'm afraid that you missed first year at business school too.  
Just in 5-10 years time nobody will know:
1. What products Boeing will have to offer
2. How labor market has developed
3. What progress engine producers have made
4. New environmental enforcements on airliners
5. Etc. etc.
How can they make "a good deal" on an unknown product not knowing anything about production costs neither at prime supplier nor at competitor(s)???
And if they really made a deal which most certainly would turn out to be a good deal, what would the Boeing shareholders tell their CEO when they learned that he might be "giving his products away"?
There is something really strange here. There can only be one sensible explanation if this is not re-inventing the collapsed Soviet Union system. And that would be that all FOUR companies, AA, DL, CO AND boeing are actually owned and controlled by the same investor group. Could it be so?
Best regards, Preben Norholm



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 894 times:

Maybe you missed my point about having an OPTION to get out of the contract.

User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6294 posts, RR: 54
Reply 19, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 883 times:

Watewate wrote:
-------------------------------
Maybe you missed my point about having an OPTION to get out of the contract.
-------------------------------

A contract - or exclusive clause or similar, which you can jump out of by choise, that's not a contract, that's a "letter of intent".
Best regards, Preben Norholm



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 882 times:

Many contracts include clauses that allow for one to walk away after certain period of time with no penalty.

And this is not aimed at Prebennorholm, but for everyone in general. If a management makes a questionable move, everyone comes out and trahses them. Maybe there was a good reason behind the move? It's easy to judge after things have happened, but let's give it some time and see if the deal worked out to their advantage or not. It's plausible that one airline can be coaxed into signing a bad deal- but to see AA/DL/CO all signing exclusive deals must have offered them serious advantages as opposed to buying planes without their exclusive contract.


User currently offlineFDXmech From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3251 posts, RR: 35
Reply 21, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 867 times:

I'll have to check the timeline but I think the proposed Boeing/AA deal was about the time Boeing was buying or waiting for government approval to merge/buy McDonnell Douglas which also required EU approval. I'm sure this type of international business scenario works both ways across the Atlantic, I'd imagine.



You're only as good as your last departure.
User currently offlineJkelley480 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 127 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 849 times:

AA may have the Trents on their 777s, but thier large 767 fleet is all GE.

User currently offlineFanoftristars From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1601 posts, RR: 5
Reply 23, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 847 times:

You know, its too bad that airlines can't buy airplanes like we buy cars. Is it big enough for all my stuff? Is it fast? how many MPG does it get? How many people can I fit in it? What color can I get? How 'bout a moon roof and CD changer? Oh, and don't forget the bike racks!  

It's a shame they have to worry about commonality. I know it makes sense, but it would be a lot more fun if they could buy whatever and still be competitive.



"FLY DELTA JETS"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA A300-600R posted Tue Dec 12 2000 16:42:20 by TEDSKI
AA's 35 A300-600R posted Thu Oct 28 1999 18:31:00 by GoA340
AA A300 Questions posted Thu Nov 9 2006 07:58:54 by AAden
AA A300 At PHL posted Tue Oct 24 2006 02:01:06 by Matt D
AA A300 Crash On National Geographic Tonight. posted Thu Sep 7 2006 02:38:48 by JAM747
AA A300 Routes posted Sat Aug 5 2006 06:04:20 by AAden
Trying To Book Flight On AA A300 posted Wed Jun 7 2006 17:45:30 by RJpieces
AA A300-600 posted Wed May 31 2006 03:45:49 by ATLAaron
AA A300's On Transatlantic Routes posted Sun Apr 30 2006 02:39:27 by WorldTraveler
AA A300 At LGA; Gate D10 Right Now posted Fri Mar 31 2006 17:18:43 by JFKLGANYC