Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Put An End To The Heathrow Misery  
User currently offlineKL911 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2003, 5305 posts, RR: 16
Posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 7994 times:

Just read this in the Financial Times:

Source : http://www.ft.com/cms/s/5d6d532a-1830-11dc-b736-000b5df10621.html

quote:

The depressing thing is the relentless predictability of it all. The interminable delays at security. The shuffling crowds in search of somewhere to sit as yet another flight is delayed. Worst, when you eventually escape you know the reprieve is only temporary. You will soon be flying back to broken travelators, long queues at immigration and mayhem in baggage reclaim. Welcome to Heathrow.

I could go on. I will. I have seen too much of Heathrow lately to feel anything but rage towards one of the world’s busiest airports. Starved of investment, inefficient and understaffed, it is a veritable money machine for its owner BAA. For the rest of us it is a nightmare – the unacceptable face of monopoly capitalism.

End quote....


For thee whole story see the website.

KL911

48 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMMEPHX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 7939 times:

precisely why I avoid LHR at all costs. The most overcrowded, passenger unfriendly airport I've had the displeasure of flying through. I connect through AMS when traveling to Europe. An airport that has got it just about right, spacious, clean, well maintained and even still manages to cram in plenty of shops. T5 will help Heathrow but even that won't help much to solve the crowding issues in T2 & T3. I don't understand the fascination with airlines wanting to fly to LHR. It will get even worse when open skies finally takes effect. Even more long haul, larger aircraft flying in, more people etc. But BAA don't care, as long as the shops make money.

User currently offlineElite From Hong Kong, joined Jun 2006, 2878 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 7933 times:

Avoid long-haul flights on Boeing 777s – for reasons unexplained they always seem to park on remote stands miles from the terminal.

Anyone know the answer to this mystery?


User currently offlineKL911 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2003, 5305 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 7910 times:

Quoting MMEPHX (Reply 1):
I connect through AMS when traveling to Europe

The funny thing about AMS is that they make a lot of money, mainly from the retail areas ( about 1/3 of their profit) and the high charges to airlines and passengers, but they also invest every year a large amount in updating and renovating. I've never been at AMS without seeing an area being closed due to refurbishing. I think it's better to continuously updat the airport then once every 20 years a whole terminal.

KL911


User currently offlineCygnusChicago From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 758 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7826 times:

The delays are bad, but not as bad as O'Hare in my opinion. My Thursday ORD-LHR was early into terminal 3, but my Friday LHR-AMS was an hour late. Yesterday I was delayed two hours from AMS-LHR, but that was partially equipment malfunction.

Now, while LHR can be hectic, I've never experienced the luggage nightmare. Yesterday, by the time I'd clear immigration - which was only about 15 min, my luggage was already on the conveyor at Terminal 4. That's far quicker than would ever happen at ORD.



If you cannot do the math, your opinion means squat!
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8041 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7783 times:

The reason why LHR is still preferred is because you can ride the Underground from LHR into downtown London, something not possible at LGW, which has its own train service into London. Mind you, I think the British Airport Authority should build a new airport on the Thames Estuary with high-speed rail service back to either Waterloo or St. Pancreas stations in London and phase out both LHR and LGW.

User currently offlineLHR27C From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 1279 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7719 times:

Quoting Elite (Reply 2):
Avoid long-haul flights on Boeing 777s – for reasons unexplained they always seem to park on remote stands miles from the terminal.

Rubbish to be honest, there is no earthly reason why 777s are more likely to get allocated remote stands than any other widebody, just depends on the ground situation at the time and AOSU's allocation.

This guy seems to do a lot of complaining in his article without much suggestion of what to do about it. I don't believe that splitting up BAA is going to be the magic solution to LHR's problems. He seems to think it will result in more being spent on improving the passenger experience. In fact to give BAA credit they are investing a lot into doing just that, renovating T3, T5 next year and now Heathrow East going ahead to replace T1 and T2, but it's not going to be easy at an airport processing hugely more passengers than its facilities were designed to.

Inherently, LHR is plagued with problems in that it is vastly overcrowded and slot constrained. Whenever anything goes slightly wrong to upset the balance, like fog at Christmas, everything comes crashing down - where it wouldn't have at most other major airports. And the only long term solution to that is going to be expansion outside the airfield boundary. Right now the airport is in more need of another runway than anywhere else on the planet. You get people like this guy in the UK who complain and winge about the state of the airport, and having to spend ages in holding patterns, and hate that it's so overcrowded, but I'm sure they'll be the very same people heavily opposed on the grounds of climate change etc to building a third runway or terminal 6, or going mixed mode, which are really the only solutions to their problems. The UK is in a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.

Of course, there is a strong argument that theoretically a third runway would actually help reduce pollution in that it would result in much less need for holding patterns and ground delays with engines running. Can the environmentalists see that? In your dreams.



Once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned forever skyward
User currently offlineUAL777UK From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 3356 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7701 times:

Quoting LHR27C (Reply 6):
Rubbish to be honest, there is no earthly reason why 777s are more likely to get allocated remote stands than any other widebody, just depends on the ground situation at the time and AOSU's allocation.

This guy seems to do a lot of complaining in his article without much suggestion of what to do about it. I don't believe that splitting up BAA is going to be the magic solution to LHR's problems. He seems to think it will result in more being spent on improving the passenger experience. In fact to give BAA credit they are investing a lot into doing just that, renovating T3, T5 next year and now Heathrow East going ahead to replace T1 and T2, but it's not going to be easy at an airport processing hugely more passengers than its facilities were designed to.

Inherently, LHR is plagued with problems in that it is vastly overcrowded and slot constrained. Whenever anything goes slightly wrong to upset the balance, like fog at Christmas, everything comes crashing down - where it wouldn't have at most other major airports. And the only long term solution to that is going to be expansion outside the airfield boundary. Right now the airport is in more need of another runway than anywhere else on the planet. You get people like this guy in the UK who complain and winge about the state of the airport, and having to spend ages in holding patterns, and hate that it's so overcrowded, but I'm sure they'll be the very same people heavily opposed on the grounds of climate change etc to building a third runway or terminal 6, or going mixed mode, which are really the only solutions to their problems. The UK is in a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.

Of course, there is a strong argument that theoretically a third runway would actually help reduce pollution in that it would result in much less need for holding patterns and ground delays with engines running. Can the environmentalists see that? In your dreams.

 checkmark 


User currently offlineCV580Freak From Bahrain, joined Jul 2005, 1033 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7696 times:

I've never had a problem travelling through LHR. My last trip to BAH on GF was a dream. Arrived at the airport at 08.00 for the 10.00 flight, was checked in and through immigration and security and seated in TGIF's by 08.30. On the return leg the queue at immigration was quite long but moving and my bag was sailing around the baggage belt when I got there.


One day you are the pigeon, the next the statue ...
User currently offlineKL911 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2003, 5305 posts, RR: 16
Reply 9, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7680 times:

Quoting CV580Freak (Reply 8):
I've never had a problem travelling through LHR. My last trip to BAH on GF was a dream. Arrived at the airport at 08.00 for the 10.00 flight, was checked in and through immigration and security and seated in TGIF's by 08.30. On the return leg the queue at immigration was quite long but moving and my bag was sailing around the baggage belt when I got there.

But where you tranfering to another flight in another terminal? because to me that's the biggest problem. AMS-LHR is always easy for me, but a transfer can be hell.

KL911


User currently offlineMax999 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1086 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7612 times:

Quoting LHR27C (Reply 6):


Inherently, LHR is plagued with problems in that it is vastly overcrowded and slot constrained. Whenever anything goes slightly wrong to upset the balance, like fog at Christmas, everything comes crashing down - where it wouldn't have at most other major airports. And the only long term solution to that is going to be expansion outside the airfield boundary. Right now the airport is in more need of another runway than anywhere else on the planet. You get people like this guy in the UK who complain and winge about the state of the airport, and having to spend ages in holding patterns, and hate that it's so overcrowded, but I'm sure they'll be the very same people heavily opposed on the grounds of climate change etc to building a third runway or terminal 6, or going mixed mode, which are really the only solutions to their problems. The UK is in a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.

Of course, there is a strong argument that theoretically a third runway would actually help reduce pollution in that it would result in much less need for holding patterns and ground delays with engines running. Can the environmentalists see that? In your dreams.

You seem to lay the blame on people who are opposed to expanding the airport. However, the writer makes a good point here...I listened the other day to one of the company’s managers explaining that the wait at security (this in the so-called fast track) was due to lack of space in Terminal 4. Nothing could be done until Terminal 5 opened next year. This from an airports authority that allocates 48,000 square metres to shopping malls.

Building a third runway will give LHR more slots, but does nothing to increase capacity in the terminals. And there's no guarantee that T5 will not be another gigantic shopping mall.

Blaming environmentalists might be easy, but the fact is that expansion at LHR will not fix the customer experience unless BAA changes its attitude.



All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening.
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7612 times:

Quoting LHR27C (Reply 6):
Rubbish to be honest

...a rather accurate summary for much of this article.


User currently offlineRivet42 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 818 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 7505 times:

Quoting Max999 (Reply 10):
Blaming environmentalists might be easy, but the fact is that expansion at LHR will not fix the customer experience unless BAA changes its attitude.

Very well put.  checkmark 



I travel, therefore I am.
User currently offlineANother From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 7504 times:

Quoting Max999 (Reply 10):
I listened the other day to one of the company’s managers explaining that the wait at security (this in the so-called fast track) was due to lack of space in Terminal 4. Nothing could be done until Terminal 5 opened next year.

Lack of space? Not in my experience. Last time through T4 there was one, out of four, machines being used. It was explained that because it was a bank holiday, they couldn't get the staff.

Although I am BA Gold, I intend to avoid Heathrow, it just isn't worth. Next flight to BJS via FRA, then BKK via AMS.


User currently offlineVC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3708 posts, RR: 34
Reply 14, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 7447 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting RayChuang (Reply 5):
The reason why LHR is still preferred is because you can ride the Underground from LHR into downtown London, something not possible at LGW, which has its own train service into London.

What is the difference? From LHR your train ride is Underground, from LGW the train ride is Overground. In both cases you end up in central London


User currently offlineGeotrash From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 326 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 7412 times:

Quoting KL911 (Thread starter):
the unacceptable face of monopoly capitalism.

Or the unacceptable face of unrestrained regulation.


User currently offlineStarGoldLHR From Heard and McDonald Islands, joined Feb 2004, 1529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 7374 times:

DON'T DESPAIR...

THERE IS HOPE....

save £29 on the BAA owned heathrow express.
save 1 hour from the centre of london to heathrow (paddington is not the centre of london.. not by any means).
save 2 hours queuing in line
save 1 hour waiting for the xray machine
Check in with 20 minutes and still make the plane
Dont worry about being screamed at for the size of your carry on
No long walks to the gate
No buses to the gate


Step 1: www.londoncityairport.com
Step 2: fly to another european airport
Step 3: fly onwards from their.

and guess what..


You'll won't leave on time here either... chances are... you'll leave early and arrive even earlier !



So far in 2008 45 flights and Gold already. JFK, IAD, LGA, SIN, HKG, NRT, AKL, PPT, LAX still to book ! Home Airport LCY
User currently offlineMax999 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1086 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 7317 times:

Quoting StarGoldLHR (Reply 16):
DON'T DESPAIR...

THERE IS HOPE....

save £29 on the BAA owned heathrow express.
save 1 hour from the centre of london to heathrow (paddington is not the centre of london.. not by any means).
save 2 hours queuing in line
save 1 hour waiting for the xray machine
Check in with 20 minutes and still make the plane
Dont worry about being screamed at for the size of your carry on
No long walks to the gate
No buses to the gate


Step 1: www.londoncityairport.com
Step 2: fly to another european airport
Step 3: fly onwards from their.

and guess what..


You'll won't leave on time here either... chances are... you'll leave early and arrive even earlier !

Great for short, domestic flights, but no such hope for the millions of long-haul fliers coming into London every year.



All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening.
User currently offlineLHR27C From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 1279 posts, RR: 16
Reply 18, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 7202 times:

Quoting Max999 (Reply 10):
Building a third runway will give LHR more slots, but does nothing to increase capacity in the terminals.

A third runway at LHR would certainly help terminal capacity, as it would probably include a terminal 6 next to it, to save all aircraft having to cross 09L/27R to reach it.

Quoting Max999 (Reply 10):
And there's no guarantee that T5 will not be another gigantic shopping mall.

Have a look at the plans, or give it a try next year. It will be a completely different experience to what is at LHR at the moment.

Quoting Max999 (Reply 10):
Blaming environmentalists might be easy, but the fact is that expansion at LHR will not fix the customer experience unless BAA changes its attitude.

You can't say BAA are doing nothing when T3 is being heavily renovated, T5 is almost finished and Heathrow East will be ready for 2012. I'm not trying to defend them, but there's only so much you can do with terminals designed for far less people than the airport is processing, and only so far you can go without expanding outside the very small area LHR occupies compared to other airports handling similar numbers of passengers. Hopefully T5 and Heathrow East will help to make the customer experience somewhat better but until LHR gets a third runway it will be plagued with delays in the air and on the taxiways that somewhat negate the effort put into the new facilities.

(By the way, LHR was ranked one of the best airports in the world in a poll recently on the grounds of its incredible array of duty free!!)



Once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned forever skyward
User currently offlineMax999 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1086 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 7164 times:

Quoting LHR27C (Reply 18):

A third runway at LHR would certainly help terminal capacity, as it would probably include a terminal 6 next to it, to save all aircraft having to cross 09L/27R to reach it.

I've read about proposals to build the third runway, but I have not heard anything about terminal 6. It would be logical to build both simultaneously to handle the capacity increase. If there is going to be terminal 6, BAA would have to acquire enough land for runway and terminal...keeping in mind there's going to be a lot of pushback from the local opposition regarding the large amounts of space that will be needed.

Quoting LHR27C (Reply 18):
Have a look at the plans, or give it a try next year. It will be a completely different experience to what is at LHR at the moment.

I have not seen the plans...is there a link to a website?

Quoting LHR27C (Reply 18):

You can't say BAA are doing nothing when T3 is being heavily renovated, T5 is almost finished and Heathrow East will be ready for 2012. I'm not trying to defend them, but there's only so much you can do with terminals designed for far less people than the airport is processing, and only so far you can go without expanding outside the very small area LHR occupies compared to other airports handling similar numbers of passengers. Hopefully T5 and Heathrow East will help to make the customer experience somewhat better but until LHR gets a third runway it will be plagued with delays in the air and on the taxiways that somewhat negate the effort put into the new facilities.

(By the way, LHR was ranked one of the best airports in the world in a poll recently on the grounds of its incredible array of duty free!!)

I don't deny that there's been renovation and upgrades being done, but it seems like all the money was directed towards the shopping malls. That is what I meant by an attitude problem with the BAA. Old airports around the world have been renovated and brought to modern standards, but for LHR, the shopping malls are the only places which are up to date. Other essential parts of the airport (such as security lines, check in, customs, immigration, etc) is stuck in the 1960's.



All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening.
User currently offlineLHR27C From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 1279 posts, RR: 16
Reply 20, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 7097 times:

Quoting Max999 (Reply 19):
If there is going to be terminal 6, BAA would have to acquire enough land for runway and terminal...keeping in mind there's going to be a lot of pushback from the local opposition regarding the large amounts of space that will be needed.

Compared to the amount of land required for the third runway and linking taxiways to the existing airport, a (smaller) terminal 6 wouldn't require much more land. BAA have got it carefully planned out (as you would guess!).

Quoting Max999 (Reply 19):
I have not seen the plans...is there a link to a website?

http://www.baa.com/portal/controller...dispatcher.jsp?ChPath=XYZTerminal5

Quoting Max999 (Reply 19):
I don't deny that there's been renovation and upgrades being done, but it seems like all the money was directed towards the shopping malls.

I can't argue that BAA certainly take full advantage of the duty free opportunities, then again they are also investing large sums of money back into the airport. Terminal 5 is not funded at all by the taxpayer for example. Give it a few years and for many passengers the terminals will be markedly improved, very little "stuck in the 1960s", even if they still have a fair bit of shopping opportunities!



Once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned forever skyward
User currently offlineJsnww81 From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2074 posts, RR: 15
Reply 21, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 6973 times:

Quoting Max999 (Reply 19):
I don't deny that there's been renovation and upgrades being done, but it seems like all the money was directed towards the shopping malls. That is what I meant by an attitude problem with the BAA. Old airports around the world have been renovated and brought to modern standards, but for LHR, the shopping malls are the only places which are up to date.

I think this is what frustrates so many of us about LHR. It's true that investment is finally being made in the proper places (T5, the new check-in halls for T3, Heathrow East) but these are improvements that should have been made 10 years ago - which is precisely the time that BAA was pumping money into the new retail zones for T1 and T3. Now that the neglect has reached a critical mass, BAA are finally moving to correct it, but the process is twice as painful as it would be if they'd done the work in the 1990s. It's this behind-the-curve thinking that hurts LHR the most. When you step out of the shopping area at T3 and into the concourse, the airport becomes one of the most disgraceful in Europe.

Yes, it's difficult to upgrade 50-year-old infrastructure, but BAA simply ignored the problem until it was too late, and now any redesigns are complicated by the fact that the new shopping areas take up a lot of the space that could have been given over to passenger operations.

Quoting LHR27C (Reply 18):
Have a look at the plans, or give it a try next year. It will be a completely different experience to what is at LHR at the moment.

I want to believe BAA when they say that T5 will be a showcase facility. I really do. But I know that they're looking at all that space and salivating over the number of retail outlets they can cram into it. All those glass windows that can be covered up by duty free shops! Floor space that can be filled with Sock Shop and Tie Rack kiosks!

To be fair, I have seen a very small floorplan rendering, and it does look like T5 will have massive amounts of simple open circulation space - which is exactly what the other four terminals lack. I just wonder how long it will last - after all, when T4 opened in 1986, the departure lounge was much more open than it is today.


User currently offlineRivet42 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 818 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6876 times:

Quoting Jsnww81 (Reply 21):
I want to believe BAA when they say that T5 will be a showcase facility. I really do. But I know that they're looking at all that space and salivating over the number of retail outlets they can cram into it. All those glass windows that can be covered up by duty free shops! Floor space that can be filled with Sock Shop and Tie Rack kiosks!

Yes, this is indeed a valid concen, one which I shared, until I read (can't remember where) that BA have been very tough in driving the focus on comfort ahead of retail, much (allegedly) to BAA's frustration.

I don't see much chance of T3 and Heathrow East going in the same direction, as no doubt BAA will want to recoup the retail income that they going to lose out on in T5...

Of course we all want to be proved wrong. I'd love LHR to be as pleasant a connecting experience as AMS, Heathrow is after all my 'home' airport, and I have spent far too much of my life there already. However, since there is no intention to blend T3 and Heathrow East into each other, and T5 and T4 are where they are, Heathrow will forever be blighted by its history. Which is exactly why it is even more important to focus far more on comfort than retail. BAA generates very substancial income already from landing fees and existing retail franchising, they should be obliged to plough the vast majority of that back into the airport itself, rather than using it to pay shareholders and subsidise other parts of the Ferovial business. Of course that raises the issue of whether such a key piece of infrastructure should be in private hands at all, but unfortunately it is, and it'll certainly remain that way.

Riv'



I travel, therefore I am.
User currently offlineEI564 From Ireland, joined May 2007, 373 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6842 times:

Quoting Jsnww81 (Reply 21):
I want to believe BAA when they say that T5 will be a showcase facility. I really do. But I know that they're looking at all that space and salivating over the number of retail outlets they can cram into it. All those glass windows that can be covered up by duty free shops! Floor space that can be filled with Sock Shop and Tie Rack kiosks!

This has a lot to do with how the BAA is regulated also. They are forced to make a huge amount of their money from shops, not from airport charges. In fact, its those shops that keep airport charges lower than they otherwise would be.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 26021 posts, RR: 22
Reply 24, posted (7 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6805 times:

Quoting VC-10 (Reply 14):
Quoting RayChuang (Reply 5):
The reason why LHR is still preferred is because you can ride the Underground from LHR into downtown London, something not possible at LGW, which has its own train service into London.

What is the difference? From LHR your train ride is Underground, from LGW the train ride is Overground. In both cases you end up in central London

But most of the Underground from LHR to central London is actually above-ground! And the train from LGW is much faster than the Underground from LHR, although less frequent. The Heathrow Express train is fast but too expensive.

LHR has been shabby and depressing since my first visit in 1970, and I've been to (or through) it at least once almost every year since, but now do my best to avoid it. LHR Terminal 4 was an improvement when it opened but it's also the worse for wear now with worn carpets, walls overdue for repainting etc.


25 LHR777 : Only the section of Piccadilly Line track from Hounslow Central to Barons Court.
26 ContinentalEWR : It's true. I fly NYC-LHR-NYC about 8 times a year and let me tell you, Heathrow was once one of my favorite airports to one that frankly, I would pref
27 ANother : Can you imagine what a T5 to T1/2/3 or 4 connection is going to be like? Knowing BAA they will probably send you to T4 on one bus so you can grab ano
28 LHR27C : T2 will be closed and demolished pretty much as soon as T5 is open and all the airlines have been reshuffled around the terminals, with the first par
29 757ops : I agree with UAL777UK I work at Heathrow and my 757's are often sent to remote parking spots, and usually that problem lays with the carrier for brin
30 Ubidenmark : Why is the proposal to build a fourth runway at Heathrow always referred to as the proposal to build a third runway ? The third existing runway 23/5 i
31 Post contains images Bennett123 : Any scope for spotiing landside or indeed airside, or is that a silly question ?
32 AirNZ : This seems to be a constant gripe from some on a.net. I'm sorry, but what utter nonsense and pray tell me what exactly is the great and seemingly ins
33 UAL777UK : If any aircraft tried landing on that runway now there would be a disaster on our hands, apart from the fact that I think its been officially decomis
34 AirSpare : That answers why my AA flights from MIA were parked downtown, they (surprise!) were almost always early. I never complained about LHR after I flew th
35 LHR27C : 23/05 doesn't exist any more. LHR has two runways. 23/05 has been decommisioned and just forms part of the Alpha taxiway. Plus at the top end it's al
36 Bennett123 : Does the one bag rule include lap top bags. Alternatively you could carry the camera round your neck with a zoom lens on and pack the rest. I have als
37 ANother : One means one. If you have a wheelie and a hand bag - the hand bag has to go into the wheelie before security.
38 CygnusChicago : Yup, they are incredibly strict. I ran foul of this on Friday morning transiting from AA at T3 to KLM at T4. They made me clear immigration to check
39 Glom : Yeah, right! Imagine two aircraft on finals, one for 23, the other for 27R. That I'd like to see. Preferably from far, far away. BANG! It is for that
40 AirSpare : This is not a solution for me. I am carrying 2 bodies and 7 lenses in a carry on size Pelican, along with a super small Gitzo CF trippod and a mini R
41 Trintocan : LHR misery is right! I flew in there yesterday from MUC on BA and, despite the pilot making up time from a late departure at MUC and landing 5 minutes
42 Aminobwana : What means monopoly capitalism ?? London has already 3 major Airports !! But let imagine what would happen to 525, 670 or 1000 pax leaving or arrivin
43 StearmanNut : I was in Heathrow T-3 last week. I see why it is passenger unfriendly. Most of the moving walkways were out of order. There is a long distance between
44 Bongodog1964 : I'm sure BAA would have loved to build T5 10 years ago, unfortunately our archaic planning laws resulted in a 5 year public enquiry, which allowed as
45 Glom : When do they break ground on Heathrow East?
46 Post contains links ANother : For all of you that think T5 will make a 'difference' have a look at this article from the Guardian. 700 seats - a new definition of terminal torture!
47 Max999 : This proves that T5 will not improve the customer experience...it's shopping mall status quo for BAA.
48 Bongodog1964 : This quite simply cannot be correct. 700 seats would mean literally a handful at each gate. As the report is in the Guardian who with their history o
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA Finally Put An End To VS Concorde Hopes posted Tue Apr 29 2003 23:54:54 by Gordonroxburgh
When Did Swissair Put An End To Its B 747s? posted Sat Nov 4 2000 11:56:14 by United Airline
Bmi Urges An Immediate End To Illegal Heathrow-USA posted Mon Oct 17 2005 02:50:11 by Squirrel83
End To The Subsidies Row? posted Wed Jan 12 2005 21:42:03 by Econoboy
Finally An End To High, Premium Fares! posted Tue Jun 8 2004 01:52:27 by KL911
What´s The Best View From An Airport To The City? posted Mon Sep 29 2003 15:18:40 by Kavanagh
A Big Airbus Order To Come By The End Of The Year? posted Thu Dec 7 2006 19:01:07 by RootsAir
Which Airlines On The List To Serve Heathrow? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 19:52:32 by 8herveg
When Does An Airliner Reach The End Of Its Life? posted Sun Jun 4 2006 18:51:59 by BA787
30 Minute Rule At DCA Comes To An End posted Sat Jul 16 2005 20:43:58 by AAFLT1871