Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AZ In CA. And 747 To MD11@LAX In 1992  
User currently offline777-500ER From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 480 posts, RR: 2
Posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

Does anybody know why Alitalia changed there aircraft on the MXP-LAX from 747-200 to MD11 in 1992?It's seems as if the route is always full. Does AZ plan to expand it's market in California by adding new flights to SFO or LAX. They seem very requested and the flights, especially in the summer, seem to be always booked and overbooked many times. Why doesn't AZ fly a bigger plane to SFO and maybe decrease frequencies to JFK or some other destinaton to help it's very requested California market. The MD11 to LAX is very small in capacity because it's a Combi version. Alitalia should really focus on there Bay Area service. They even just opened a new international terminal. Is it true that in Nov. 1999 the company operated the 747-200 to SFO. Does anybody know why?
 
Michael

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMason From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 748 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1901 times:

What basis do you have for saying that AZ should increase its service to SFO? Do you have a bet going or something? To just come on here, and say "Look at me, everybody! I'm from San Francisco; therefore, all airlines should increase service here, just because I say so" is dumb and unnecessary. Stop complaining. SFO, in my opinion, is WAY overserved. Half the flights in there are just for connecting service on UA. Don't take this personally. A lot of people on this forum state that all airlines should serve 'their' city, just because he/she thinks it would be in the best interest of the community and airline. Who are you to say? Honestly? I want to know. Just because a flight is full does not mean the airline is profiting on it. So stop whining, and be greatful for what you have.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AF And QI To Cooperate In LYS-LHR posted Fri Mar 26 2004 11:50:20 by QIguy24
CX 747 To YYZ In May posted Mon May 5 2003 18:56:33 by Dvmpaunch
LH Says CA And FM To Join Star But CA Not Sure posted Mon Jan 16 2006 08:02:38 by Kiwiandrew
KLM Downgrades YUL To B767 And YYZ To MD11! posted Sun Oct 14 2001 09:54:39 by Marco
CA To Fly In C/S With AZ posted Sat Jul 16 2005 21:25:37 by Lxsaab2000
Saudia In Talks To Buy 777 And 747? posted Mon Mar 28 2005 22:19:55 by MrComet
Up Close And Personal To A 747 Take Off.. In UK? posted Sat Oct 4 2003 08:54:57 by Ammunition
What Happend To SQ 747-400 Today In ZRH? posted Sat Feb 25 2006 18:50:59 by RootsAir
747 To Be Used As A Home In LA posted Fri Jan 13 2006 06:48:17 by Geoffthomas
LH And OS To Change Terminal In ZRH posted Sat Aug 27 2005 19:05:15 by ZRH