Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
727 At Meigs Field!  
User currently offlinePIAflyer From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2007, 150 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 10387 times:

Hi all,

this is my first post so be kind Big grin , i found this video of an old united airlines boeing 727 landing at Meigs field.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NV4tgjSPgks

enjoy

26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineGunsontheroof From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 3499 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 10366 times:

Man...how many times did I try that as a kid in MS Flight Sim?

Awesome video. Love the bounce!



Next Flight: 9/17 BFI-BFI
User currently offlineZenarcade From Canada, joined Nov 2006, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 10148 times:

In the video the chief test pilot says that the 727 could take off from Meigs Field. Is this true?

Was that landing even that great?



If a plane falls on the tarmac and no one is there, does it make any sound? - Starlionblue
User currently offlineCentrair From Japan, joined Jan 2005, 3598 posts, RR: 20
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 10100 times:

That was one of the best news reports. Man I miss good journalism.
When I went to the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry it was one of the first thing I went into.



Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
User currently offlineChicagoOhare From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 71 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 9982 times:

Quoting PIAflyer (Thread starter):
Hi all,

this is my first post so be kind ,

I will definately be kind. As a native Chicagoan that brings back great local aviation memories. Thank you for posting that!!! I miss the 727 and the old UA livery.

The exhibit, although no where near that of say The Museum of Flight or National Air and Space Museum, is still quite interesting. The last time I was there, they had a retired 727 757/767 pilot from UA there to answer everyone's questions. I probably asked more questions than anyone that day.


User currently offlineShannoninAMA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 9975 times:

Quoting Gunsontheroof (Reply 1):
Man...how many times did I try that in MS Flight Sim?

Awesome video. Love the bounce!

 checkmark 

Heck...i finally gave up on trying it Big grin


Great video!


Shannon half 


User currently offlineADent From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1356 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 9950 times:

I think an empty 727 could take off from Meigs, but I doubt it would meet the balanced field requirements.

Miegs runway was about 3950ft.


User currently offlineADent From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1356 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 9774 times:

Page 30 of this chart ( http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/planning/aeronaut/documents/5325-4A6.pdf ) shows a 727-100 can take off in as little 820m (2700ft) .

If I read the chart right you can go to 50k kg (110,000 lb) on 100 deg F at 500 feet elevation on 1200m (4000ft) of runway.


User currently offlineJJMNGR From Brazil, joined May 2004, 1018 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 9427 times:

On the MS Flight Simulator I took of with a B722 many times...confess that it is not easy but there are some tips that were given to me by a B722 pilot.

On short runways normally they do not pressurize the aircraft while on ground. Normally they did it just after getting positive climb rate and gear up. But it was something they can´t forget to do it otherwise the oxygen masc would fall. Not pressurizing the aircraft while on ground would allow engines to have more power.
But this is something that on MS FS could not be done as in fact you will not see real results.

On the FS, the pilot told me that another practice was to start rolling with normal 20 degrees flap indication for takeoff and on a certain moment before rotate, they applied full flap and than the aircraft lifted off. After getting positive climb rate and the aircraft really flying, the flaps were retracted to normal position of 20 degrees for normal climb. I tried and it worked.


User currently offlineTWA1985 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 649 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 9249 times:

Hey,

Great Video!

I noticed what looked like to small airline operated aircraft in the video. I saw a TWA Express plane and another that resembled Air Wisconsin, though I doubt it.

Did airlines operate out of Miegs in 1992 when this clip is from?

If so, does anyone know which ones, destinations served, etc?

Thanks,

TWA1985


User currently offlineTrekster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 9185 times:

Anyone got pics of her in the Museum???

I think i may have to go there now to see it

Got given a DAN AIR 727 (G-BHVT) model for my 26th Birthday. I think the 72 is one of the best aircraft around, and glad to see she is still flying

[Edited 2007-06-26 18:46:22]

User currently offlineReltney From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 191 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 9075 times:

The 727-100 can easily get airborne at Meigs. As some of you pointed out it would have to be empty and probally enough fuel to get to ORD. Based on my old -200 charts the -200 with -9 engines needed 2500 to get airborne with 20000lbs of fuel on an 85 degree day with no pax and cargo. But as someone pointed it would not be a balanced field length which to you non pilots, means if you tried to abort the takeoff a very low reject(V1) speed, you will get wet!.. I have gotten airborne under 3000 feet many times in a -200 but we were light and usually a pretty good wind in the winter time. The best I have noted was flying a 767-300ER from JFK to BDL with 60 folks. We would do normal power takeoffs (if we were not getting a check ride) and rotate as we passed the 1500ft marker and be airborne well before 2000 ft on 13R. When we used 31L we would start to rotate as we passed 22R/4L and be well airborne when we got to the displaced threshold. Landing at BDL was just as good. We could roll the plane on soooo smoothly and with idle reverse use under 3000 ft using light braking.

You airplane watchers should watch a empty FedEx or UPS takeoff . Those planes are super light and my squadron(ANG) buddy says they are airborne under 2000 ft in there 727-100 and he says it is even shorter in the 757.

If it aint Boeing, I aint going!

Airliners are quite the performers when light. They have to meet so many standards at max gross weight with one engine inop that at light weights with all engines, they are performers. My F-16 has a 9 to 1 glide ratio with the engine inop yet my 767 has a 20 to 1 if it were to be a glider. Look at the performance of the Air Transit A 330 glider and the Air Canada 767 that glided. Awesome! A southern DC-9 lost both engines in the late 70s neer Rome Ga. around 15000ft. They were trying to make a military base 29 miles away and could have made it but excessive turns and many other factors prevented on a strait line glide. The controllers thought that was the only runway in the area the 9 could land on. It was determined that the DC-9 with out reverse available needed 1500ft to stop at the weight it was at. Point to make here is the plane crashed on a highway and the controllers never informed the crew they were over a 4000ft paved private airport which was 5 miles away at the time they lost the engines. These planes can glide too!


Airliners are great!


User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2680 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 8967 times:

Quoting TWA1985 (Reply 10):
Did airlines operate out of Miegs in 1992 when this clip is from?

I believe UAX used to fly turboprops to Springfield, IL and East Lansing, MI from Meigs in the 90's.


User currently offlineBoeingmd82 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 238 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 8854 times:

Quoting Reltney (Reply 12):
You airplane watchers should watch a empty FedEx or UPS takeoff . Those planes are super light and my squadron(ANG) buddy says they are airborne under 2000 ft in there 727-100 and he says it is even shorter in the 757.

This is so true, I once watched a FedEX MD-11, stuffed with FLOWERS, take off in a few thousand feet in Hilo, and rocket what looked like straight up on it's way to Los Angeles. It's quite impressive!


User currently offlineORDagent From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 823 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 8779 times:

The 727 was specifically built to be, for its time, overpowered to take off from airports that couldn't handle the aircraft of the era (707/dc-8) such as LGA. IIRC piolts have stated that the 727 was a hot rod for the era. Pity they are gone now. The -200 in particular looks like it's going supersonic sitting still.

User currently offline787EWR From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 204 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 8280 times:

Quoting United787 (Reply 13):
I believe UAX used to fly turboprops to Springfield, IL and East Lansing, MI from Meigs in the 90's.

Wasn't there are small airline that flew between Meigs & O'Hare(at a premium price)?

Quoting Zenarcade (Reply 2):
In the video the chief test pilot says that the 727 could take off from Meigs Field. Is this true?

Was that landing even that great?

12 knot crosswind with higher gusts, on 3400' long runway with no displaced threshold.

That landing was pretty sweet.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24643 posts, RR: 22
Reply 16, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 7411 times:

Quoting KcrwFlyer (Reply 14):
i don't think so because no matter how empty a 727 is it takes alot of runway becuase of it's underpower engines

Are you serious...? 727s have operated on short runways for ages.

The 727, especially the original 727-100, was designed to use runways as short as 5000 ft and had excellent performance. I don't think any other commercial jet could match its runway performance at the time the 727-100 was introduced.


User currently offlineDash 80 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 309 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 7363 times:

Great video. Thanks for sharing. I've been in it and never knew this how they got that aircraft to the museum. You'd think it would have been easier to disassemble it at ORD and truck it, but this method is way cooler.

Steve



...where the rubber hits the runway...
User currently offlinePr1268 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 232 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 5971 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 18):
The 727, especially the original 727-100, was designed to use runways as short as 5000 ft and had excellent performance.

I remember flying Eastern ATL-DCA in July 1979 (I was 10 yrs old at the time) - we landed on runway 33 (5204ft / 1586m). The flaps were set to 40, and on short final, I thought to myself that if the windows could be opened, I might be able to reach down and scoop up water from the Potomac River. It seemed like all the pilots could do (brakes, spoilers, and reverse thrust) to bring the aircraft to a stop at the far end of the runway. I don't remember which variant, but I'm pretty sure it was a -200. Shortly after leaving the terminal, I noticed a DL 727-200 and some other airline's DC-9 taking off from 33. Must've been a stiff crosswind that afternoon...



The only time an aircraft has too much fuel is when it is on fire.
User currently offlineBravoGolf From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 538 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 5904 times:

Quoting Dash 80 (Reply 19):
Great video. Thanks for sharing. I've been in it and never knew this how they got that aircraft to the museum. You'd think it would have been easier to disassemble it at ORD and truck it, but this method is way cooler.

After it landed at Meigs it was loaded onto a barge and spent the winter at the Port of Indiana. In the spring it was taken back to Chicago off loaded and moved into the museum


User currently offlineBeechNut From Canada, joined Apr 2004, 722 posts, RR: 10
Reply 20, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5378 times:

Air Canada flew a DC-9 into Ottawa's Rockliffe Airport a few years ago just after it retired the last Nine. The aircraft was donated to the Canadian Aviation Museum located on the airport. The runway is only 3300 ft long (1000 meters); this would be a feat pretty similar to the 727 landing at Meigs.

Beech


User currently offlineCcrlR From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2232 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5244 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks for sharing this video! There is one in the database of the aircraft in the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago. I remember when they brought this plane across lake Shore drive at 57th street after being barged down the shoreline. They had to take the wings off and one or two of the pillars on the front of the museum just to bring it in.


"He was right, it is a screaming metal deathtrap!"-Cosmo (from the Fairly Oddparents)
User currently offlineFlymd From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 278 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5214 times:

Quoting TWA1985 (Reply 10):
I noticed what looked like to small airline operated aircraft in the video. I saw a TWA Express plane and another that resembled Air Wisconsin, though I doubt it.

Did airlines operate out of Miegs in 1992 when this clip is from?

Actually both UAX and TWE did fly out of Miegs field for a time. UAX flew to Springfield, Illinois (and I believe TWE did as well). Actually UAX was still flying out of CGX as late as the year 2000 (I lived in a high rise apartment complex near Miegs at that time and I always remember seeing the UAX B-1900 flying out for SPI)

Still love Meigs, damn Daley for his gangster closing of the airport!!



Fly the friendly skies of life!. Enjoy every minute.
User currently offlineSTXBohn From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4728 times:

Been in that bird. Granted, in its museum state.

Great vid, thanks for pointing it out.


-Brooks



"Thank you for flying City Airlines. We know you have a choice in airlines, and it looks like you made the wrong one."
User currently offlineDTW757 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1552 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4374 times:

Quoting Trekster (Reply 10):
Anyone got pics of her in the Museum???

Sure, there are some right here on a.net.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andrew Hunt - AirTeamImages



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim Lane



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Harri Laitinen



They put on a great show with it. They make it sound like you're in the cockpit and you hear ATC clearing the plane for takeoff. They are even able to retract the flaps and gear for the show. If you get to Chicago I highly recommend going to the museum even if it's just to see the 727.

There use to be a large picture of the 727 landing at Meigs hanging on the wall in the terminal at Meigs. I was fortunate enough to fly in there in 2002 as part of my cross country trip requirement for my instrument rating. The picture no longer hangs in the terminal now known as a bird sanctuary. UGH



721,2,732,3,4,5,G,8,9,741,2,3,4,752,3,762,3,4,772,3,788,D93,5,M80,D10,M11,L10,100,AB6,319,20,21,332,3,388,146,CR2,7,ERJ,
25 Davescj : Why would it leave empty? Is this not a waste of gas/Freight space? I can't agree more......after all, what other choices are there? LOL Saw that on
26 TWA1985 : So I was not hallucinating! TWA did fly to Miegs. Does anyone know when the TWA service began and ended? Schedules perhaps? Thanks, TWA1985
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Emergency Landing At Meigs Field posted Mon Jul 28 2003 05:12:41 by UAL Bagsmasher
Biggest Planes That Can Land At Meigs Field? posted Tue Jul 31 2001 22:56:28 by AirOne
Helicopter Lands At The Old Meigs Field posted Mon Mar 22 2004 01:21:55 by CcrlR
Kingfisher 727 At OAK (6/23/07) posted Sun Jun 24 2007 08:05:03 by DeltaJet757
Champion Air 727 At OAK posted Sun Jun 3 2007 00:47:46 by RW717
Trump's 727 At FAT posted Sat May 26 2007 15:56:00 by WhatUsaid
What Is The Future Of Meigs Field? posted Mon May 21 2007 21:49:55 by Alberchico
A New 747 At Boeing Field posted Fri May 11 2007 01:43:51 by Gabypn1992
What Is This 727 At DAL? posted Mon Apr 30 2007 20:09:11 by Legion242
Pan Am 727 At MDT posted Mon Apr 16 2007 00:45:14 by BatonOps