Tullamarine From Australia, joined Aug 1999, 1653 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2044 times:
I would guess CX must be really tempted. They won't like the idea of VS flying the A3XX to HKG.
Likewise UA must be sorely tempted, even though they are incredibly distracted at the moment by their labor problems. UA loves the high yield it earns on its routes between Australia and USA and will not want QF stealing high yielding pax on this route. Whilst it is possible they could opt for the 747X, the problem is that it is unlikely the 747 will capture the public's imagination like the A3XX. People will know the A3XX is new but probably won't recognise the 747X as being just as new.
Sndp From Belgium, joined Feb 2000, 553 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2015 times:
Possible new buyers of the A3XX are indeed Cathay Pacific and maybe some cargo carriers, ATLAS or UPS or Cargolux. There has been a lot of speculation about the Japanese carriers going together with Boeing and the 747X because Japanese companies are highly involved in the production of the 747, which may force the carriers to buy Boeing products.
Lufthansa and United have made clear that they won't buy any A3XX's now. For Lufthansa, it is one of the first new Airbusses for which it isn't a launch customer.
Airbus said that it will stop adding customers to the list of launch customers which means the next buyers will have to buy 'full price'. It is likely that we will see a drop in orders the coming years, though Emirates is understood to discuss additional orders. We have to wait now, however, to see the carriers who signed letters on intent now, to firm up all their intentions in real orders. For the A340-500 for example, EVA AIr signed a letter of intent but never signed a real purchase contract. It is clear howver that the biggest airplane ever will fly, the launch is expected this week.