Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DL-PVG Route Application/Gateway  
User currently offlineCV880 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1100 posts, RR: 2
Posted (6 years 10 months 21 hours ago) and read 1683 times:

What is the urgency in Delta's application for ATL-PVG route authority, when a LAX-PVG authority would appear to be of more value? As there is no US Carrier in the market, a LAX-PVG route would certainly put DL back on the map in the LAX market, and the ATL-China route would be available whenever new authorities are granted. I don't see another carrier ever applying for an ATL:-China authority.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRobertS975 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 931 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 10 months 19 hours ago) and read 1599 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

ATL vs. LAX is really a dilemma... obviously, ATL would have a much larger feed from connecting flights than LAX would have. But I suspect that much of the market for this flight would originate far enough west of ATL to make the backtracking to ATL impractical. The feed into LAX would be far less, but the demand greater, I suspect.

User currently offlineLawnDart From United States of America, joined May 2005, 968 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (6 years 10 months 18 hours ago) and read 1532 times:

Quoting CV880 (Thread starter):
What is the urgency in Delta's application for ATL-PVG route authority, when a LAX-PVG authority would appear to be of more value?

Six of one, half a dozen of the other? ATL provides DL with far greater connecting passenger opportunities (including from Latin America), while LAX probably has stronger O&D, but far less connections on DL. So, ATL it is...

And, no, probably no other airline would apply for ATL-Shanghai (or anywhere in China), but it is not city specific rights that are at stake, but limited US-China rights. DL is probably a shoe-in for the first award (2007) as basically the only non-incumbent to apply for the first award. The next couple of awards will go to incumbents, and should be more interesting from a "my service would be more beneficial than yours" perspective.


User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7329 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (6 years 10 months 15 hours ago) and read 1476 times:

Quoting LawnDart (Reply 2):
Six of one, half a dozen of the other? ATL provides DL with far greater connecting passenger opportunities (including from Latin America), while LAX probably has stronger O&D, but far less connections on DL. So, ATL it is...

I would imagine that the biggest advantage would be filling the planes to Latin America. Its not like Florida, the South, or ATL itself is going to fill the planes. But given ATL is a good gateway to Latin America, this could be what drives it.

The local market in Los Angeles is many many times the size of ATL for China, but you are correct. The connections will win this one.



Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineSwiftski From Australia, joined Dec 2006, 2701 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (6 years 10 months 15 hours ago) and read 1467 times:

Quoting CV880 (Thread starter):
As there is no US Carrier in the market

At the moment the closest you get it United 857 which is a "plane change" flight LAX-SFO-PVG, similar to United 835 which is LGA-ORD-PVG, with a "plane change" at ORD.


User currently offlineCV880 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1100 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (6 years 10 months 14 hours ago) and read 1421 times:

It appears to me a "prime" opportunity to "snare" the LAX market before another carrier has the chance, whereas the ATL market will be there for the taking at anytime in the future. True ATL is THE Hub for the Southeast, but it's not the only gateway for the Southeast to China. UA does have codeshare with US from CLT, which is basically one stop service from CLT to anywhere in Asia where UA flies. On the other hand there are numerous one-stop alternatives from many cities in the southeast via ORD on both UA & AA. DL /ATL is the logical choice for pax in GA/AL/FL/TN/SC, but anywhere north or west of that area involves some "backhaul", and is probably just as easy to connect via ORD or SFO with greater choices of destinations.
All I'm trying to say is that the LAX opportunity may never be there again after this round.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL New Route Map posted Sat Oct 15 2005 04:51:13 by Delta4eva
UA's Response To DL's ATL-GIG Application posted Wed Oct 6 2004 05:19:03 by MAH4546
Where To See Route Application Lists? posted Thu May 24 2001 17:02:44 by Englandair
What Happened To DL's SLC-Cancun Route? posted Sun Jun 24 2007 18:40:10 by Haggis79
DL's JFK-SAT Route? posted Wed Jun 20 2007 15:17:03 by HVNandrew
How Does DL Determine Which DCI Runs Which Route? posted Sat Jun 9 2007 18:31:37 by RampGuy
DL's First 757 Tatl Route: JFK-EDI (ATL-EDI Gone) posted Thu May 31 2007 23:51:18 by MAH4546
DL's ATL-EDI Route..how Is It Doing? posted Sat May 12 2007 03:10:38 by B777ER
Boarding A DL Flight "en Route" posted Tue Mar 27 2007 04:49:50 by Jycarlisle
Any News About DL ATL-PVG? posted Sun Mar 25 2007 00:33:43 by Twolz2rn