Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Virgin Or BM To Fly LHR-KUL  
User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2937 posts, RR: 6
Posted (14 years 4 days ago) and read 1842 times:

There was a rumour that following British Airways' pullout from Kuala Lumpur, Richard Branson has been studying the feasibility of operating its own daily A340/744 service into Kuala Lumpur - which will take the MAS-Virgin code-share up to 3 flights a day.

British Midland has also expressed its desire to apply for a licence for the route as this would pave its way to its first Asian gateway (which will not be utilised by any other British carrier from Mar 2001) - unless Virgin steps in to block BM gaining access to KUL. BM of course is rank outsider with no suitable aircraft to operate the route.

Anyone heard any more?

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirmale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 381 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (14 years 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1804 times:

its great if the news is true, there should be more airlines from one country flying worldwide than just the flag carriers, hopefully VS or BM will consider taking over BAs LondonHR-Karachi route too 


.....up there with the best!
User currently offlineAirmale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 381 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (14 years 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1800 times:

its great if the news is true, there should be more airlines from one country flying worldwide than just the flag carriers, hopefully VS or BM will consider taking over BAs LondonHR-Karachi route too 


.....up there with the best!
User currently offlineEnglandair From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2000, 2228 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (14 years 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1800 times:

Why are BA dropping the route?
If it's unproffitable then why would VS or BD want to fly it?

I know BD can't fly to the US but are other long haul flights allowed from LHR?

BD does have A330s on order. Why are these unsuitable?

Regards,
Jamie.


User currently offlineEnglandair From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2000, 2228 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (14 years 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1765 times:

Well?!

User currently offlineG-KIRAN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2000, 736 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (14 years 3 days ago) and read 1759 times:

Englandair:KUL-LHR flights are very profitable for MAS,
there is a 90-100% load factor on more or less every flight.BA says that they are losing money,but I am not sure of this.The A330 does not have the range to fly LHR-KUL so BD will have to make an enroute stop somewhere along the way.
Virgin would be the best candidate for the following reasons:
1.They already codeshare with MAS on the route and onward to Australia.
2.They have 747s and A340s which can fly these routes non-stop.
3.They already have long haul experience which British Midland lacks.
4.They have a reputation for good service.The Virgin brand name known world-wide while British Midland is confined mostly to the Uk and Europe.


User currently offlineG-KIRAN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2000, 736 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (14 years 3 days ago) and read 1757 times:

If I am correct MAS also codeshares with BD on flights from LHR to several UK regional airports.

User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2937 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (14 years 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1739 times:

There is definately good money to be made on the London-Kuala Lumpur route.

We know the reason BA has pulled out is because 'it is trying to develop its Singapore hub with Qantas and pulling out of KUL has meant that it is now able to transfer a 747-400 to Qantas and sell a couple more'...

(Confusing I know - this since KUL has been served by a 777 for a while now - although BA initially announced they were INCREASING flights to KUL and reinstating the 747-400 on the route due to a shortage of seats on the 777....but this was before Rod Eddington took over the helm)  

Emirates announced a couple of weeks ago that it will increase flights to KUL to fly daily from Dubai and the 3 new services will operate nonstop. All flights will also connect with their London Heathrow and Gatwick services.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air India To Fly LHR - Ahmedabad Nonstop posted Thu Sep 11 2003 22:22:01 by B747-437B
Bmi To Fly LHR-TFS/TFN posted Thu Jul 17 2003 11:34:37 by Richardw
BMI To Fly LHR-Lagos? posted Wed Jul 10 2002 02:07:46 by 747firstclass
SQ Or Lauda To SYD From KUL posted Wed Apr 10 2002 04:00:40 by Nickofatlanta
Concorde To Fly Or Not To Fly? posted Sun Nov 25 2001 21:26:35 by Migman
BA, Virgin Or Air India From LHR-DEL? posted Fri May 4 2001 08:25:55 by TOMASKEMPNER
SQ's Bid To Fly LHR-JFK posted Tue Sep 19 2000 07:24:49 by Andrew
How Is British Midland/ SWA Good Or Bad To Fly On? posted Mon Mar 20 2000 22:02:14 by VirginA340
Virgin 744/A340 Or AA 777 From LHR To LA? posted Sat Jan 19 2002 00:58:41 by FlyVS007
RJ Plans To Fly Nonstop AMM-KUL With A340 Or B777 posted Thu Dec 20 2001 02:39:09 by A330-243