Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Should Airbus Have Built The "A325" Instead?  
User currently offlineMBJ2000 From Germany, joined Dec 2005, 426 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3866 times:

I just had this brilliant idea after lunch  Smile. Perhaps it was wrong for Airbus to go bigger, instead they should've aimed at a plane sized between 757/A321 and 787-3?!

My reasons behind this, they could've used the "old" A300 diameter but build it using newest technology, CFRP, barrels, light but fast wing and calculate it such that the sweet spot lies in the 150-250 pax area with medium up to very long range.

They would've had enough power plants to choose from, maybe even something revolutionary from P&W, and I imagine the market should be huge, all the 757/A321/A300-600/A332/767-200ER/A340-200 needing replacement etc.

Does this make sense to you, what are your thoughts?

Have a nice day


Like most of life's problems, this one can be solved with bending -- Bender Unit 22
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSEPilot From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 6875 posts, RR: 46
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3795 times:

Offering a smaller long-range superefficient plane is an interesting idea-the only problem is that Airbus is not ready to jump on the CFRP barrel bandwagon yet, unfortunately. The only problem I see is that this is essentially what Boeing tried with the 757, and while it was successful it did not burn any barns down. It seems that most airlines flying extremely long routes want somewhat larger planes, and it seems that the 787 has hit just about the right spot. In trying to answer it Airbus obviously had three choices; compete head to head with essentially the same plane, go larger or go smaller. Going head to head probably would have been a poor choice, as they were so far behind; they must have decided that the market was bigger on the larger side, and for long-range flying I suspect they were right.


The problem with making things foolproof is that fools are so doggone ingenious...Dan Keebler
User currently offlineBurkhard From Germany, joined Nov 2006, 4395 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3749 times:

They proposed an A330-500 a while ago, with about A300 capacity, and the interest of the airlines was low. I also think that they will speak with their major costumors on a regular basis. I always wonder that a twin jet with Trent 500 and 150 tons MTOW would ideally fit into the hole.

It looks as if there is no really big interest by the airlines currently - or their interests are too different. You have a long list of aircrafts to replace - looks like it is not simple to do it with one series - and to be sure to sell 1000 frames.

As example, A300 replacements need rather low wing spans, since there aren't enough parkings for larger spans available at many airports. A short wing is not "light but fast".

What I see, is that a future narrow body will allow for a version with larger MTOW to get something like a A321LR.


User currently offlineEI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3738 times:

Very big development cost, very small market.

User currently offlineMBJ2000 From Germany, joined Dec 2005, 426 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3711 times:

Quoting SEPilot (Reply 1):
The only problem I see is that this is essentially what Boeing tried with the 757, and while it was successful it did not burn any barns down. It seems that most airlines flying extremely long routes want somewhat larger planes, and it seems that the 787 has hit just about the right spot.

But we see a big 757 revival transatlantic routes nowadays, I wonder if this "true" 787-3 would've stimulated the p2p market even more, all those Ryanairs, Air Berlins, Southwests etc eagerly wait for smaller wide bodies in order to attack the establishment on intercon routes...



Like most of life's problems, this one can be solved with bending -- Bender Unit 22
User currently offlineMBJ2000 From Germany, joined Dec 2005, 426 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3679 times:

Quoting Burkhard (Reply 2):
They proposed an A330-500 a while ago, with about A300 capacity, and the interest of the airlines was low. I also think that they will speak with their major costumors on a regular basis. I always wonder that a twin jet with Trent 500 and 150 tons MTOW would ideally fit into the hole.

But I guess that was "old tech", no new materials and engines. What I meant was keeping the diameter and the 2-4-2 config, but make her a bit shorter and hitech: lighter, faster, meaner...  Smile



Like most of life's problems, this one can be solved with bending -- Bender Unit 22
User currently offlineSEPilot From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 6875 posts, RR: 46
Reply 6, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3644 times:

Quoting MBJ2000 (Reply 4):
But we see a big 757 revival transatlantic routes nowadays

I wonder how much of this is due to price/availability; i.e. 757's being replaced on domestic routes by smaller planes freeing them up, and thus being available relatively cheaply to fly the Atlantic. What are leasing rates for 757's compared, say, to A321's or 767's? It wasn't very long ago that the 757 line was shut down; there certainly was no demand for new ones, and I doubt that even if the line were still open that many airlines would be buying them.



The problem with making things foolproof is that fools are so doggone ingenious...Dan Keebler
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Should Delta Have Bought The Pan Am Name posted Sun Jun 4 2006 20:00:25 by TTailSteve
Should Airbus Hope For The 747 Adv? posted Mon Jun 13 2005 05:47:00 by A380900
Should ATA Have Kept The 727s? posted Mon Oct 4 2004 16:48:28 by 7E72004
Could Airbus Have Used The Beluga Frame For A380? posted Sat May 3 2003 23:05:40 by JBLUA320
Does WN Still Have The "Bear Flag" Plane? posted Fri Feb 9 2007 22:39:04 by Copaair737
Pilot:"I Have Fixed The Plane, Who Wants To Fly?" posted Tue Aug 12 2003 12:00:43 by Srilankan_340
Which SQ B744Fs Have The "wow" Sticker? posted Sun Feb 16 2003 17:19:48 by Tsentsan
Have You Ever Seen The "Robotic Frown" Of UA Crew? posted Sat Jun 23 2001 17:34:26 by Cedarjet
Have You Ever Seen The "Robotic Smile" Of SIA Crew posted Sat Jun 23 2001 11:27:35 by ROP
What Does Virgin Atlantic Have In The "nose"? posted Fri Nov 17 2000 23:14:30 by Avion