Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA IN Talks With Westjet  
User currently offlineBAOPS777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 23 hours ago) and read 3932 times:

BA managers have been spending alot of time in canada. Rumour is Westjet could become the oneworlds canadian partner.

This part of the world has been under served by the alliance and it would suit the majority of members

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBA787 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2006, 2596 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (7 years 14 hours ago) and read 3538 times:

This has been rumoured before, and I think, if it's correct, it could be quite good. Perhaps not as valuable as CP were but valuable. oneworld is lacking in Canada, and it would be good if they could fill the gap. Westjet may have to alter the low cost style though.



BA787


User currently offlineChrisA330 From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 630 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 14 hours ago) and read 3486 times:

Not going to happen anytime soon. WS needs to implement it's new Reservation system before it can even interline with other airlines let alone join an alliance. Work has stopped on the project and they are currently in contract amendment negotiations with TravelPort. Additionally at a recent analyst conference, WS said they weren't planning any alliances at this time which is a change from their previous comments on this subject.

User currently offlineHanginOut From Austria, joined May 2005, 550 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 7 hours ago) and read 3204 times:

Quoting ChrisA330 (Reply 2):
Not going to happen anytime soon. WS needs to implement it's new Reservation system before it can even interline with other airlines let alone join an alliance. Work has stopped on the project and they are currently in contract amendment negotiations with TravelPort.

 checkmark 

Quoting ChrisA330 (Reply 2):
WS said they weren't planning any alliances at this time which is a change from their previous comments on this subject.

They may not be joining an alliance in the near future, but it doesn't stop them from signing an interline agreement or codeshares with CX or BA in the interim (to test the waters before plunging into OW once their reservation system and possible long haul operations begin).



Dreaming of the day I can work for an airline
User currently offlineEvolv From Canada, joined Jun 2007, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 12 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2923 times:

I think the next step in growth for westjet will require them to be part of an alliance. I do wonder if One World would push westjet to make a name change so that loyal oneworld fliers will be able to associate westjet with Canada.

Not having Canada, in some way, in the name is probably one of the reasons the have had little success to date in the U.S. Canadians know westjet, Americans don't. When Americans plan to come to Canada they will only think of Air Canada.

Could they re-name themselves Candian Airlines, or would they have to try something different.

MAybe an option is to brand themselves Canadian Airlines/Airways on international routes and leave domestic as westjet.

Cheers


User currently offlineSpeedbirdEGJJ From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 429 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (6 years 12 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2910 times:

But surely Westjet represent every reason that Aer Lingus left OW??, One class cabin , no lounge network, point to point services??, cant see how this would work unless Westjet were to evolve somewhat into a more 'legacy' type carrier.

User currently offlineDrgmobile From Canada, joined Aug 2006, 594 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 12 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2834 times:

Not having Canada, in some way, in the name is probably one of the reasons the have had little success to date in the U.S. Canadians know westjet, Americans don't. When Americans plan to come to Canada they will only think of Air Canada.

I don't think Americans think of Canadian carriers period when they fly to Canada. They fly the airline they usually fly, decide on price, and if anything, would be more likely to favor a U.S. carrier over a Canadian one, everything else being equal.


User currently offlineRikkus67 From Canada, joined Jun 2000, 1619 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (6 years 12 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2654 times:

For the benefit of North American travellers, I would think an alliance between LCC's might be of greater worth. Although Westjet has definitely blurred the lines of a true LCC, I would imagine an alliance with Southwest or Jetblue may be a better fit, then with a global alliance.

Until such time as they can link their reservation systems properly with other carriers, an alliance of any type is still a ways from happening.



AC.WA.CP.DL.RW.CO.WG.WJ.WN.KI.FL.SK.ACL.UA.US.F9
User currently offlineDrgmobile From Canada, joined Aug 2006, 594 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 12 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2572 times:

For the benefit of North American travellers, I would think an alliance between LCC's might be of greater worth. Although Westjet has definitely blurred the lines of a true LCC, I would imagine an alliance with Southwest or Jetblue may be a better fit, then with a global alliance.

Based on what? Similar product offerings? That isn't much of a basis for an alliance and I am not sure it makes as much business sense for say WestJet to ally with a Jetblue so that passengers can fly, say, Toronto-New York-Nashville? Those passengers are just as likely to try and fly direct or on another carrier's pairing. The economics start to lose their draw when you consider that WestJet and Air Canada already are at about par on cost and you are adding costs by adding a connection.

For a long-haul carrier without a network partner (ie anybody not in Star) to feed onto WestJet from a Canadian city makes a lot more business sense for both carriers.


User currently offlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2340 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (6 years 12 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2513 times:

Quoting SpeedbirdEGJJ (Reply 5):
point to point services??,

What does point to point have to do with joining an alliance?

Quoting Rikkus67 (Reply 7):
Although Westjet has definitely blurred the lines of a true LCC.

What lines have been blurred? WestJet has no F cabin, no hubs to speak of, no lounges, weak partnerships, and a useless FF program. US has done a better job of "blurring" the line between legacy and LCC.

Quoting Rikkus67 (Reply 7):
I would imagine an alliance with Southwest or Jetblue may be a better fit, then with a global alliance.

And how would that benefit Westjet pax? Why spend the effort to build an alliance with two airlines that are geographically limited to the US? A Westjet/AA alliance would better suit canadian pax and Westjet.



The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
User currently offlineHanginOut From Austria, joined May 2005, 550 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (6 years 12 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2297 times:

Quoting Evolv (Reply 4):
Could they re-name themselves Candian Airlines

No, the rights to that name were acquired by Air Canada after the merger between AC and Canadian, somehow I don't see them letting anyone use it.



Dreaming of the day I can work for an airline
User currently offlineHKGKaiTak From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1050 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (6 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2216 times:

Quoting SpeedbirdEGJJ (Reply 5):
But surely Westjet represent every reason that Aer Lingus left OW??, One class cabin , no lounge network, point to point services??, cant see how this would work unless Westjet were to evolve somewhat into a more 'legacy' type carrier.

WS operates on a very similar business model to Australia's DJ - indeed DJ's CEO Brett Godfrey is on the WS board! DJ provides interline services to UA and VS for starters - even premium passengers. IIRC pax gets a food & drink voucher and of course premium pax gets access to the DJ lounge where available.

There's no reason why WS can't provide interline services (or "alliances" in PR speak) for BA - premium passengers just have to be told they're travelling in economy for the Canadian leg of their journey. I'm sure they won't mind, esp if the fare / time savings are substantial compared to AC. And leisure pax would definitely love it.



4 Engines 4 LongHaul
User currently offlineSflaflight From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 1183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (6 years 12 months 9 hours ago) and read 1977 times:

Quoting BAOPS777 (Thread starter):
This part of the world has been under served by the alliance and it would suit the majority of members

Well, maybe domestically, but the truth is that Canada is very well served using US carriers. Part of Canada's biggest problem (when it comes to alliances of course) is its neighbor to the south. Almost all international passengers can be sent to major Canadian cities through US hubs.

Quoting Drgmobile (Reply 6):

I don't think Americans think of Canadian carriers period when they fly to Canada. They fly the airline they usually fly, decide on price, and if anything, would be more likely to favor a U.S. carrier over a Canadian one, everything else being equal.

Exactly true for trans-border flights. I guess if someone were traveling to small cities like Val D'or or Comox it might be a problem, but most passengers end up in cities served by US partners. And with many US carriers start up to smaller and season cities, a lot of territory has been covered.


I actually think North America is very well covered with alliances:

1W = AA/MX (logically, though not official) - Canada served thru AA's LAX/DFW/MIA/ORD/NYC hubs/focus cities
*A= AC/UA - Mexico could be beefed up thru UA (I'll keep dreaming) and TA
ST= DL/CO/AM - Canada served thru DL's hubs and Mexico very well covered between AM and CO


Sounds like the biggest North American problem might be for *A in its weak Mexico coverage.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA In Talks With SKYTEAM, Oneworld Breaking Up posted Thu Oct 26 2000 21:59:59 by Aer Lingus
Skyteam <u>MAY</u> Be In Talks With BA posted Mon Oct 23 2000 01:31:58 by EVA744
Boeing In Talks With Airlines On BWB Freighter posted Mon May 21 2007 10:43:05 by Bells
Virgin In Talks With Boeing/Airbus On New Aircraft posted Fri Mar 2 2007 15:42:56 by Pilot21
AP: Boeing In Talks With Potential 747 Customers posted Wed Feb 28 2007 20:44:00 by USAF336TFS
ANA In Talks With Asiana About Tie-up posted Sun Feb 25 2007 13:49:43 by Columba
B. In Talks With Air Europa Over 787 posted Tue Feb 6 2007 17:08:18 by Manni
Delta Not In Talks With Northwest posted Wed Jan 24 2007 15:30:28 by D L X
Southend In Talks With KLM posted Wed Sep 27 2006 20:50:27 by Humberside
CO In Talks With Newcastle posted Sun Dec 18 2005 13:18:07 by Sean377