Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Give And Take For More Enviro Friendly Engines  
User currently offlineSirDeath From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 88 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2333 times:

I've been wondering why there isn't more give and take for the development of more fuel and environmentally friendly engines. The objective for new engines seems to be quieter, using less fuel, creating less pollution, with lower CO2 emissions. It seems to me it would be more productive to allow a little give and take. For example, it's fairly well known to aviation geeks that ultra-high bypass engines and/or unducted fan engines are more efficient, but have a higher noise threshold. While that can be overcome inside the cabin with active noise canceling (I think Saab did something like this), outside noise is still a problem. So here's my idea: why not, for the sake of the environment, and fuel savings, allow a "noise exception" for environmentally friendly engines for the near term allowing manufacturers to put units in production, get the bugs worked out and work on making successive quieter generations. If it's really important to lower emissions as many believe it is, isn't it worth a little noise to save the world? We'll have to sacrifice if we want to save resources. (Insert standard rant here about people who move next to airports and then complain about noise... yeah PDKwatch I'm talking about you.) As we all know, standard turbojets have become MUCH quieter with maturity of technology (just compare a JT3D fuel-to-noise converter with a CFM56-7), so why wouldn't the same apply for UHB/UDF technology? So my bottom line is why has no one proposed this, or why would this never work as a proposal?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
More Airlines And Flights For CVT posted Sun Oct 15 2006 13:15:15 by Humberside
looking for more info and photos of EOS Airlines posted Fri Jun 30 2006 00:49:36 by Canflight
PAL In Talks For More A330s And A340s posted Wed Apr 19 2006 19:56:26 by Lumberton
2 More A310 For AR And CAT 1 For Argentina posted Wed Aug 4 2004 02:31:06 by ARGinMIA
More Routes And 732s For Zip posted Thu Dec 5 2002 16:10:48 by Mcdougald
Updated A380 More Light New Engines? posted Tue Jul 10 2007 23:34:27 by Olle
Arkia For 2 More B787-9 posted Tue Jul 10 2007 18:32:52 by Mptpa
When Will AA Take Back More Employees? posted Thu Jul 5 2007 21:04:35 by Snn2003
One For All And All For One:Swiss Sky Thread 10! posted Tue Jun 19 2007 15:54:09 by RootsAir
Porter Airlines Getting Financing For More Aircraf posted Wed Jun 13 2007 16:17:31 by Drgmobile