Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CLE To Offer $$ For New Flights  
User currently offlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5432 posts, RR: 7
Posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4458 times:

http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/

Scroll down about 6 stories to read the details.

Assuming this goes forward, CLE would be offering a fairly modest amount per flight (promotional cash and waived landing fees), little enough that it may not be much incentive. Still, they're trying; we'll see what it brings.


I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
35 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAirTranTUS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4400 times:

The only airlines I could see adding service are WN, CO, and DL. CO could start service to additional destinations (SEA was mentioned), and DL and WN could add competition. WN is dropping their only PHX-CLE nonstop, so they probably won't add flights to the west coast (LAX, LAS, etc.). DL is building up LAX, and already flies LAX-CMH daily, so LAX-CLE would be a logical possibility.

CLE does have a tough time with F9 and FL to the south at CAK. F9 has 2x daily to DEN, and FL is starting to LAS soon.


User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5430 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4376 times:

Quoting AirTranTUS (Reply 1):
CO could start service to additional destinations (SEA was mentioned),

CO currently op's a daily n/s to SEA. (Might be summer only.)

bb


User currently offlineMbm3 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 841 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4292 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Perhaps this would be a good enticement for Virgin America?


Let Me Tell You, Landing A 772ER Is Harder Than It Looks!
User currently offlineSurrenr From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 92 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4283 times:

Now if only CLE can get direct flights to Taipei so I don't have to spend ages transfering 4 times a year when I come back home to see the

User currently offlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5432 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 4249 times:

I could see CO sucking up the whole pot of money. I wonder if the already-announced Paris flight qualifies?


I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
User currently offlineHighflier92660 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 676 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4212 times:

Quoting MasseyBrown (Reply 5):
I could see CO sucking up the whole pot of money.

I often resist the temptation to post out of cynicism and the reality of Cleveland's track record. Even as Hopkins over the past decade as evolved into a regional jet airport, there are still those with thoughts of LH 744's and JAL dancing in their heads. As MasseyBrown has suggested, the more likely scenario is for CO to grab the money and in return CLE may get another ERJ flight to somewhere.


User currently offlineGoBlue From Canada, joined Jun 2006, 216 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4210 times:

B6 here we come. A few dailies on E-190 from Boston, Washington and JFK will work nicely. Heck even MCO for a daily might work if the demand is there.

B6 could use the break and the money when opening new stations. However CO will not be a happy camper and make life miserable for B6's operations at EWR even though they are limited!


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16865 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4175 times:

Quoting AirTranTUS (Reply 1):
and already flies LAX-CMH daily, so LAX-CLE would be a logical possibility.

The difference is that there is no competition on the CMH-LAX route where CLE is a CO hub.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineFUN2FLY From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1043 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4175 times:

Any idea when the routes would have to start by? That will affect the potential routes and applicants.

For CO, the seasonal to full-time support could apply to full time on SEA, SAN, and LGW. New CO routes could be CDG, PDX and maybe AMS, SLC.

For SFO, could be interesting. One daily and one seasonal does not cover the need. Suprised UAL never did this (no planes), but Virgin is out there looking for routes.


User currently offlineN231YE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 4071 times:

Interesting...I hope some of it works, in addition to the $16 mil being thrown around for incentives, to persuade CO to choose CLE over IAH and EWR for extra flights, jobs, etc.

User currently offlineHPAEAA From United States of America, joined May 2006, 1024 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4027 times:

Quoting AirTranTUS (Reply 1):
DL is building up LAX, and already flies LAX-CMH daily, so LAX-CLE would be a logical possibility.

DL's cutting that to 4x weekly.. and the city/ Local businesses put up some major cash to get that flight... CLE already has Multiple dailies on CO...

Quoting SANFan (Reply 2):
CO currently op's a daily n/s to SEA. (Might be summer only.)

Peak periods... Summer, Christmas... I think that's it...

I bet CO gets it... I wonder if they'll give it to carriers to reintroduce Mainline service and replace some of the RJs....



Why do I fly???
User currently offlineATLAaron From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 1023 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3970 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AirTranTUS (Reply 1):
WN is dropping their only PHX-CLE nonstop,

Were loads and yields that bad?

Quoting HPAEAA (Reply 11):
DL's cutting that to 4x weekly

Again, I thought LAX-CMH started out very strong for DL . . . did it drop off that bad?


User currently offlineNcflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 486 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3931 times:

WN has hardly grown at all in their days at CLE, in fact I'll bet they offer fewer flights now than 10 years ago. PHL is starving for reasonably priced service and would be my hope.

User currently offlineSLCUT2777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 4056 posts, RR: 11
Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3926 times:

Quoting AirTranTUS (Reply 1):
DL is building up LAX, and already flies LAX-CMH daily, so LAX-CLE would be a logical possibility.

DL also offers CLE-SLC (flt# 899) 1x on mainline, so LAX would be a logical step. DL also serves CMH-SLC direct on mainline in addition to the obvious CVG flights (even though it is in KY, many still consider it OH) Not sure if AS would try CLE-SEA, but CO could make it work perhaps with an AS code-share.

Quoting MasseyBrown (Thread starter):
Assuming this goes forward, CLE would be offering a fairly modest amount per flight (promotional cash and waived landing fees), little enough that it may not be much incentive. Still, they're trying; we'll see what it brings.

CLE represents the biggest market in the northern tier of states between PHL and DTW. They are doing everything to avoid what happened at PIT where service swooned drastically even with the entry of WN.



DELTA Air Lines; The Only Way To Fly from Salt Lake City; Let the Western Heritage always be with Delta!
User currently offlineSLCUT2777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 4056 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3909 times:

Quoting FUN2FLY (Reply 9):
For CO, the seasonal to full-time support could apply to full time on SEA, SAN, and LGW. New CO routes could be CDG, PDX and maybe AMS, SLC.

Don't quote me, but I think the DL CLE-SLC flight is a CO code-share.



DELTA Air Lines; The Only Way To Fly from Salt Lake City; Let the Western Heritage always be with Delta!
User currently offlineNcflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 486 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3905 times:

It is astounding how airlines have cut service to CLE-- yes I know every market is hit by the trend towards regionals but CLE has been slammed. Just noticed that AA is down to 5 daily eagles to ORD during the week. Whereas CMH is served by 10 and CVG 6? And CMH has 5 to DFW including several MD80s whereas CLE has 4 Eagles. Let the incentive money flow. DL only has 2 or 3 full size jets per day now in CLE too, they've really cut back.

User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21526 posts, RR: 59
Reply 17, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3900 times:

Quoting AirTranTUS (Reply 1):
and DL and WN could add competition

why exactly is it fair to bring in competitors on routes by offering them free landing while the one who's dedicated to serving the market already has to pay for the landing rights?

I could see them allowing a "match" where CO also doesn't have to pay fees, but otherwise, that's just stupid policy that will piss off your "hometown" airline.

Quoting Ncflyer (Reply 16):
It is astounding how airlines have cut service to CLE-- yes I know every market is hit by the trend towards regionals but CLE has been slammed

Unfortunately, states like Ohio are stagnant or shrinking while other areas of the country are dramatically growing. Further, CLE is not a major tourist destination.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3875 times:

Quoting AirTranTUS (Reply 1):
CLE does have a tough time with F9 and FL to the south at CAK. F9 has 2x daily to DEN, and FL is starting to LAS soon.

Overall, flies in the ontment, nothing more. F9 and FL are bothersome to CLE, but nothing more. They can't match CO's route structure, and if you look at CO's loads on the routes F9/FL serve out of CAK, it isn't hurting them that much.

Quoting HPAEAA (Reply 11):
I wonder if they'll give it to carriers to reintroduce Mainline service and replace some of the RJs....

And, coincidentally, CO adds 30 new mainline aircraft in the next two years.....


User currently offlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5432 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3862 times:

Quoting Ncflyer (Reply 16):
Just noticed that AA is down to 5 daily eagles to ORD during the week.

I suspect that AA ran all those short-haul ORD-CLE RJ's just as a way to preserve ORD operations until they could find something more profitable to do. AA probably resisted cutting ORD ops lest the FAA hold them to a lower level; and so they "banked" frequencies on the CLE route, among others.

With 4 airlines all offering a bunch of CLE-ORD/MDW flights, I can't fault AA for scheduling bigger RJ's while cutting frequencies to a still-respectable 5 a day.

[edited in hopes of making better sense]

[Edited 2007-07-14 06:26:55]


I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
User currently offlineHighflier92660 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 676 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3791 times:

Quoting Falcon84,reply=18 And, coincidentally, CO adds 30 new mainline aircraft in the next two years...:

That is welcome news indeed. I have a couple "hefty" relatives in Strongsville who, whenever they approach an ERJ, the pilots shudder and silently re-calculate "weight times arm equals moment."

[Edited 2007-07-14 17:13:10]

User currently offlineTOLtommy From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3290 posts, RR: 4
Reply 21, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3769 times:

Quoting Ncflyer (Reply 16):
Just noticed that AA is down to 5 daily eagles to ORD during the week. Whereas CMH is served by 10 and CVG 6?

Well, you've got to look at the entire picture.

CLE-ORD
AA 5x daily (all AE)
CO 8x daily (all COEX or COCONN)
UA 7x daily (5 mainline, 2 express)

CLE-MDW
WN 7x daily
CO 3x daily (all COEX or COCONN)


CMH-ORD
UA 7x daily (5 mainline, 2express)
AA 10x daily (all AE)

CMH-MDW
WN 7x daily

CVG-ORD
UA 5x daily (2 mainline, 3 express)
AA 6x daily (all AE)
DL 7x daily (all regional)

No CVG-MDW service

There are actually a lot more seats offered daily OVERALL in the CLE-CHI market. AA has wisely chosen to place assets elsewhere, rather than drive yield down to fill seats. AA likely gets a better yield overall in the CLE market. It's unlikely to see more AA service in CLE just because of the incentive.


User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (7 years 2 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3698 times:

Quoting TOLtommy (Reply 21):
AA has wisely chosen to place assets elsewhere

Agreed. Until you start to see more mainline in that market, there's no reason for more seats there.

As for this money the city wants to give for expansion, it's probably a wise idea. CO will jump at the chance, to put in routes like CLE-SEA/SAN/PDX, maybe even HNL and AMS, if they're going to get paid for it.

It would also lead, I think, to lower-tier, if you will, expansion, on the RJ/turboprop level, with new markets to feed those flights, like ATW, DSM, ROA and others. They may not get the payment for those, but CO could very easily add even more routes, and really build the hub, with this offer.


User currently offlineFUN2FLY From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1043 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (7 years 2 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3541 times:

Quoting TOLtommy (Reply 21):
CLE-ORD
AA 5x daily (all AE)
CO 8x daily (all COEX or COCONN)
UA 7x daily (5 mainline, 2 express)

CLE-MDW
WN 7x daily
CO 3x daily (all COEX or COCONN)

Sure is different from the old days w/all CO on 737's and several UAL on DC10's. Where did all those pre 9-11 people go to every week?


User currently offlineJetpixx From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 857 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (7 years 2 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3448 times:

Is UA still running a 757 or two out of CLE? If so, then that is a lot of available seats. I'd like to see UA add LAX or SFO with this new incentive - or perhaps bump up their DEN service. UA has always been a big part of CLE.

25 Joeman : Between this latest incentive and the recently announced $16 million in grant/etc. offerings by the state for an expansion of the CLE hub I would def
26 STT757 : In the West for CO I could see SEA (year round), SAN (year round), PDX, ABQ, and YVR. In the Southeast there are a slew of routes CO, COEX, CO Connect
27 WesternA318 : Now THAT would be nice, but didn't CO have service to CLE from SLC with ERJ's back before 9/11?
28 Falcon84 : I believe it was with a 735. DL started the route with an RJ a few years back, and it's now and MD-90.
29 WesternA318 : SO CO could send a 735/733 to SLC from CLE...it seems there is that much traffic there...
30 FUN2FLY : I think the route, due to DL's connections in the west, can handle the MD80 from DL and a 733/735 from CO especially since UAL decreased their DEN se
31 Bridogger6 : Well yield must be horrible... the flights are always packed but HP/US about two months ago went from two to one daily nonstop on the PHX-CLE route..
32 Post contains images Pizzaandplanes : Technically cargo companies are airlines. Now what an incentive that would be for Fedex, UPS, etc.
33 WesternA318 : That's kinda where I was heading, lol...
34 MasseyBrown : That "combat zone" for the Flats legislation was amazing to me. The final legislation hasn't been released, but the article doesn't indicate any proh
35 FUN2FLY : Yeilds will definitely improve w/o WN in the picture. They were always offering the $99 each way and CO/HP matched. Nice for us travelers, but I coul
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CLE To Offer $$ For Flights (part Deux) posted Wed Aug 8 2007 06:08:37 by Jetpixx
EK To Switch A/c On New Flights To IAH And LAX posted Sat Sep 11 2010 01:01:49 by ojas
Forum To Search For Overbooked Flights? posted Mon Jun 9 2008 04:22:49 by Robffm2
Cathay & Dragon To Add 27 New Flights To India posted Tue Jan 15 2008 00:37:10 by Cloudyapple
TRI Submits Proposal To Allegiant For SFB Flights posted Sat Feb 24 2007 18:03:40 by FATFlyer
[KLM] To Offer More BBJ Flights? posted Sat Feb 25 2006 14:17:47 by Tripple7
Name Leaked To Media For New Mesa Hawaii Airline posted Sat Feb 18 2006 18:23:18 by HALFA
AirTran Goes To Public For New Cities posted Sun Nov 2 2003 18:04:57 by Flyer732
How To Search For Future Flights? posted Sun Mar 2 2003 06:36:33 by Vafi88
Lansing Michigan To Pay For More Flights posted Thu Jan 9 2003 18:35:48 by SegmentKing