ILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8 Posted (12 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 981 times:
Most of the time, the SFO-LAX and LAX-SFO flights are full/oversold. There are aprox. 3 flights/ hour from SFO to LAX. So here is my question...Should UA introduce, oh lets say 6 757s to fly on Shuttle? These planes could be equiped with Shuttle Galleys, and Video systems would be removed. The 757s would fly in addition to the 737s on this route, but would help to ese congestion at both SFO and LAX.
FLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4510 posts, RR: 3 Reply 1, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 927 times:
Interesting idea...(one proposed by SFO airport).
Instead of flying 737's and 757's, United just needs to put on larger aircraft for all of their Shuttle flights. The 757's could help in the interim (galleys and video to stay for mainline cross-utilization), but overall, United just needs to put some A320's on there.
FFMilesJunkie From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 2, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 916 times:
Although SFO would like to see bigger planes on these shuttle services, don't expect it anytime soon. The airlines like their planes in the air, and the larger the plane, the longer it needs to spend on the ground (loading/ unloading/ fuel/ cater, etc). That's one reason why SW has been so sucessful. They turn around planes in an extremely quick and efficient manner. The 737 is the right plane for the job in my opinion. I'm sure the bean counters at UA have calculated that the 737 is the best for the job.. and I guarantee the second they figure the route justifies a 757 on economic basis, you'll see it there.
CactusA319 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2918 posts, RR: 27 Reply 6, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 845 times:
Bean counters are the guys who run the airlines, and jam-packed 737's bring up the dollar signs for them. They are the model aircraft for this type of operation=Easy and quick to turn, meaning short ground time, and economical on short-runs. If anything, the A320 would be a better fit on shuttle routes instead of the larger 757. It would bring a capacity increase, yet have a decent turn-around time for Shuttle runs.
The 767 and 777 are the worst idea. PSA tried the ultimate shuttle aircraft out in the '70's in the form of the L1011. PSA was similar to SWA or the United Shuttle operation, as it flew high-frequency, short-haul routes. The L10 was just the wrong type of plane for that, as are the 767 and 777. They are meant for other types of routes.
ILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8 Reply 10, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 815 times:
The reason that you would convert the galleys is to hold more soda, and other beverages. On the shuttle planes there is sort of a closet area with lots of extra soda, and snacks. If you convert the galleys on a 757, you cut the turn time down.
Next. On the 757 you get 2 additional doors. Boarding can be done through 1l, 2L, an 3L. So can deplaning.
CactusA319 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2918 posts, RR: 27 Reply 11, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 810 times:
Yes, but does UA have 75's to spare for this kind of thing??? They might have more need for those planes on other, longer routes..Just a thought, I don't think you're idea is bad at all. It makes sense, and it's better for SFO and LAX since it would help reduce a few 737 flights....
SEVEN_FIFTY7 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 957 posts, RR: 4 Reply 14, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 794 times:
Who says flights between LAX-SFO *HAVE* to be all Shuttle flights? Why not have regular Shuttle flights supplemented with a few extra mainline ones? Don't convert any galleys or try to mimic Shuttle in any way. Just treat these extra SFO-LAX frequencies the way you would a mainline SFO-SNA segment, or a LA-DEN one.
RayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 7860 posts, RR: 5 Reply 15, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 776 times:
Those who said that UA will never introduce the 757-200 on the SFO-LAX shuttle are right in their assessments.
Between having to embark and disembark 175 passengers, you also have to load and unload a larger cargo hold and likely load more fuel into the plane. That's why it takes about 45-55 minutes to turn around a 757-200 even in Shuttle configuration; WN can turn around a 737-300/700 in an amazing 20 minutes!
I believe back in the 1970's when PSA flew the 727-200 between SFO and LAX their turnaround times was about 35-40 minutes given having to embark and disembark 150 passengers on a 722.
Deltaflyertoo From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1617 posts, RR: 1 Reply 17, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 759 times:
Seven Fifty7 is right, UAL doesn't have to have LAX-SFO exclusively Shuttle. They could throw in a mainline 757 or 320 in there during peak times and still charge Shuttle prices. Some of the Shuttle flights on the route don't even carry the designated Shuttle 2000 series flight number and often originate as 777/757/747/320 flights in other cities and then transfer the flight number to the 737 for the LAX to SFO or SFO to LAX hop.
Just six or seven years ago UAL used to routinely fly 727, DC-10 and 757s between LAX, OAK, SFO and SJC. This was before SW of course.
ILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8 Reply 18, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 760 times:
On current Shuttle flights they board using both doors 1L, and 2L. If 757s were to be put on shuttle, they could use all 3 doors on the left side. Door 2 would get the jetway, and 1 and 3 would get stairs.
FLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4510 posts, RR: 3 Reply 19, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 753 times:
Actually, the galleys wouldn't need to be configured at all. The 757 has plenty of room (cart space) on it for 4-6 legs of pretzels/sodas (the standard for Shuttle galley packing). In addition, the video equipment wouldn't need to be removed (needless cost)...just throw an episode of Seinfeld or two at them...they already have free headsets...
ILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8 Reply 22, posted (12 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 736 times:
Its a very good idea to keep video on those flights, as long as some video is shown. I flew down to SNA and back on tuesday, and the only video was the safety video. For that 1 flight, they could easily shown an episode of Seinfeld (sp?) or Alley McBeal. Looking at water got a little boring.
By keeping the video and the galleys it allows you to move the planes on to mainline flights.