Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA 747 Configurations  
User currently offlineBA777 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 2179 posts, RR: 7
Posted (7 years 3 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4331 times:

Hi everyone,

Quick question about BA 744s...understand there are Hi/Mid/Low J configged birds? With the mid-J's being the ones with the new club world onboard?


How many total seats do each of these 3 configs at BA have?

Henry

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePC12Fan From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2453 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 5 days ago) and read 4260 times:

http://www.britishairways.com/travel/seatpl/public/en_us


Just when I think you've said the stupidest thing ever, you keep talkin'!
User currently offlineBA380 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 1466 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 5 days ago) and read 4248 times:

the seat maps are almost useless, I am afraid.

The Upper deck is correct for all 57 of the 744s.

The seat map is correct for Hi J config - for a total of 70 J seats (20 upstairs, 18 + 32 downstairs)

the low J has only the front of the 2 downstairs cabins - for a total of 38 J seats.

Mid J has only the back of the 2 cabins downstairs (32 seats) - for a total of 52 seats.

don't get me started on 777s.... they are even more complex.



cabin crew: doors to automatic and cross-check...
User currently offlineSqb7e From New Zealand, joined Feb 2007, 71 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4052 times:

I will be travelling on BA 744 from BKK to SYD in Sep in J. Does this route offer the new club world?

thanks in advance

sqb7e


User currently offlineAlanUK From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3931 times:

The Low J are on the way out, so soon there will only be Hi and Mid J left in the fleet. Here they are in details:

http://www.bvair.com/BA_tempanet.gif

Hope this helps to visualise it. (obviously the Low J is on the right!)

Regards


User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7616 posts, RR: 17
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3705 times:

Quoting Sqb7e (Reply 3):
I will be travelling on BA 744 from BKK to SYD in Sep in J.

No gurantee but the vast majority of BA's 744s wuill be converted by September.


User currently offlineBAOPS777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3574 times:

Have just operated mid j config and the engineers have said this config will no longer be fitted to remainder 747.

It will probably revert back to 38 due to suprose suprise the number of pax complaining about WTP disembarking if front of them.


User currently offlineAlanUK From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3566 times:

Quoting BAOPS777 (Reply 6):
It will probably revert back to 38 due to suprose suprise the number of pax complaining about WTP disembarking if front of them.

BA crew warned BA management about this issue months before the embodiement was due to start... and yet it still went ahead despite our concerned... If BA reverts on this issue, it will be a good lesson for management: listen to your front line staff!!! If that happens, it will also be an expensive mistake (aircraft will have to be taken out of service etc.)


User currently offlineHotelmode From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2007, 460 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days ago) and read 3500 times:

Quoting BAOPS777 (Reply 6):
Have just operated mid j config and the engineers have said this config will no longer be fitted to remainder 747.

It will probably revert back to 38 due to suprose suprise the number of pax complaining about WTP disembarking if front of them.


That was last months Galley FM rumour and utterly untrue. Theres only 16 extra pax in B zone than there used to be its hardly life or death to most business pax. Most of whom prefer the upper deck anyway even though that delays their disembarkation whatever config the aircraft is in.

[Edited 2007-07-22 16:47:59]

User currently offlineTreeHillRavens From Malaysia, joined Jun 2007, 401 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days ago) and read 3477 times:

Quoting AlanUK (Reply 4):
The Low J are on the way out, so soon there will only be Hi and Mid J left in the fleet. Here they are in details:

Thanks for the map. Can you please post the 777 seat maps as well ? Thanks.


User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2093 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3413 times:

So which 744s have been fitted with the new mid-J layout, and what's total number of F, J, M, and Y seats in those aircraft?


Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9524 posts, RR: 42
Reply 11, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3384 times:

Quoting Hotelmode (Reply 8):
That was last months Galley FM rumour and utterly untrue.

As someone who's far more likely to fly WT+ and would prefer not to be over the wing, that's quite a relief to me.  Smile


User currently offlineHotelmode From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2007, 460 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3319 times:

Config is 14/52/36/236 I think total of 338. I believe they are around half way through the lo-mid j conversion, the terminal 1 routes and MIA seem pretty well covered and BKK/SYD. Theres very few Hi J's left to do havent flown one for several months.

Of todays low/mid j departures 9 are mid J and 11 arent. 2 at CWL at the moment.


User currently offlineUPPERDECKFAN From Spain, joined Jun 2007, 992 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3297 times:

Quoting Hotelmode (Reply 8):
Theres only 16 extra pax in B zone than there used to be its hardly life or death to most business pax

Even BA could've done better I don't think the issue is that big to invest much more money than what they already have to switch the cabins, having 16 people disembarking in front of me won't make me go with another airline, I like BA service too much to try others because of something as meaningless as this.......

Quoting Hotelmode (Reply 8):
Most of whom prefer the upper deck anyway even though that delays their disembarkation whatever config the aircraft is in.

I'd sit in the upper deck even if it's disembarked last.......that's why I'm the UPPERDECKFAN!!!  Big grin



744,742,741,772,773,762,732,735,738,752,727,717,DC10,DC9,M82,M87,319,320,321,343,346,L1011,CRJ2,CRJ9,E190,ATR42,DSH8,
User currently offlineReadytotaxi From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2006, 3314 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3267 times:

Quoting BA380 (Reply 2):

Having flown on the 777 many times, why is the seating map so out of touch?
The Club layout used out of Gatwick does not resemble the seating map at all, the numbering is so wrong.



you don't get a second chance to make a first impression!
User currently offlineGBOAC From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 221 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3252 times:

Quoting Readytotaxi (Reply 14):
Having flown on the 777 many times, why is the seating map so out of touch?
The Club layout used out of Gatwick does not resemble the seating map at all, the numbering is so wrong.

There are several variants of the 777 off the top of my head - the 17F variant, 14F with (IIRC) no 4K due to crew rest, 14F with full F available, 3-class (no F) at LHR for long range with the 4JK area as crew rest, 3-class at LGW with no CW seats blocked for rest...plus no doubt some other subtle variants! Seatmaps to cover them all would be a nightmare and probably confuse people more than now - IMHO BA should just give up on the 777 seat maps and direct people to 'check the seatmap for your cabin in Manage My Booking' (or at OLCI for those who can't assign).


User currently offlineAlanUK From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3184 times:

Quoting TreeHillRavens (Reply 9):
Thanks for the map. Can you please post the 777 seat maps as well ? Thanks.

Here you go:

BA Boeing 777-200 4-Class

BA Boeing 777-200 3-Class

I must say, I can't see BA admitting that they got it wrong in terms of the new Mid-J positionning of Club World. It allows BA to have an non-negligable increase in premium traffic without buying new aircraft.

Regards


User currently offlineBAStew From Australia, joined Sep 2006, 1028 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (7 years 3 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3054 times:

BA knew from the start that mid-J would have its drawbacks - namely dis-embarkation before Club. They admitted this, and there was no 'suprise' when the aircraft came online.

Fact is, it was the most econmical use of space that one the day. Converting all the Low-J to High J would mean too many J class seats. Every other configuration option was considered, including moving FIRST to upper deck, moving WT+ to upper deck etc etc. But the configuration that offered the best use of available space was the current design.

It's not perfect, but it is incredible how fast people adapt. Remember when the rearward facing CLUB seat was first announced years ago? The furore that no-one would be interested in flying in a seat facing rearwards.......?


User currently offlineReadytotaxi From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2006, 3314 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (7 years 3 months 22 hours ago) and read 2833 times:

Quoting GBOAC (Reply 15):

Good reply, thanks.



you don't get a second chance to make a first impression!
User currently offlineTreeHillRavens From Malaysia, joined Jun 2007, 401 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (7 years 3 months 22 hours ago) and read 2801 times:

Quoting AlanUK (Reply 16):
Here you go:

BA Boeing 777-200 4-Class

BA Boeing 777-200 3-Class

I must say, I can't see BA admitting that they got it wrong in terms of the new Mid-J positionning of Club World. It allows BA to have an non-negligable increase in premium traffic without buying new aircraft.

Regards

Thanks  Smile


User currently offlineBAOPS777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2665 times:

Quoting Readytotaxi (Reply 14):
Having flown on the 777 many times, why is the seating map so out of touch?
The Club layout used out of Gatwick does not resemble the seating map at all, the numbering is so wrong.

Just got back from TPA Asked the crew and they confirmed they only use only 2 777 configs ex LGW they are:

0F/40J/24W/216Y - a/c reg G-VIIO/P/R and there is 1 more. a/c have no crew rest area. They use seats in the cabin instead

14F/48J/40W/122Y - a/c reg G-VIIA-N And G-VIIS-Y These a/c are rotated with LHR as required

The Other Configs you will see ex LHR are

17F/48J/24W/127Y - a/c reg G-ZZZA-C

13F/48J/32W/127Y - a/c reg G-YMMG-P

0F/36J/24W/212Y - a/c reg G-YMMA-F a/c has less J and Y seats as LGW 3 class a/c due to space taken for crew rest areas

Hope this is some help


User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7616 posts, RR: 17
Reply 21, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2514 times:

Quoting AlanUK (Reply 16):
It allows BA to have an non-negligable increase in premium traffic without buying new aircraft.

The conversion of the 'Lo J' fleet to 'Mid J' configuration increases BA's total number of Club World seats by 8 per cent. As you say this is far from 'non-negligible' and illustrates the BA strategy of focusing on premium class traffic and not total passengers carried.

Quoting BAOPS777 (Reply 20):
0F/40J/24W/216Y - a/c reg G-VIIO/P/R and there is 1 more

The fourth aircraft with the high density configuration is G-VIIT.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA 747 Hi-J Movements Next Week? posted Sat Feb 24 2007 14:53:27 by JACK02116
BA 747 With Four Engines Failed In 1987. posted Sat Jan 27 2007 13:20:40 by Cumulus
BA's 747-400 Without Taxi Lights. posted Tue Aug 8 2006 21:19:34 by Qantas744ER
BA 747-400 (3 Of Them In YVR In One Day) posted Sat Jul 22 2006 08:05:05 by Ktachiya
BA's 747-100's - Upper Deck posted Sun Jul 2 2006 20:11:50 by Gilesdavies
BA 747 With Double RR Markings On Engine posted Thu Feb 23 2006 04:19:12 by TheBigOne
What BA 747 Will I Be On? posted Sun Feb 19 2006 18:04:09 by SDLSimme
BA 747-100 G-AWNA: Fate? posted Mon Jan 16 2006 16:04:35 by LVZXV
BA 747 Returns To JFK After Engine Sparks posted Sun Jan 1 2006 01:50:34 by AerospaceFan
Remember That BA 747? posted Thu Sep 22 2005 22:47:36 by Nrcnyc