So A.net, what do you think? Is offsetting effective in your opinion? Could it save the industries un-avoidable emmisions?
IMO I think that this is the way forward, but it needs to be done now like VirginBlue and DL (?) have. Everyone is using the industry we love as a scapegoat, when in fact power generation and vehicle emissions are by far the biggest contributors.
DLPMMM From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 3529 posts, RR: 9 Reply 1, posted (5 years 10 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1349 times:
I think someone should tell this self-important, egotistical, hypocritical, thief to sod-off.
This is all just another way to try to make people feel good about raising taxes.
Someone please follow the members of this "Environmental Audit Committee" including Mr. Yeo and report on their individual "Carbon Footprints". I'll bet they are travelling around on aircraft, taking private cars, not car pooling, living in oversized and air conditioned accomodations, have fossil fuel burning "toys" (boats....).
Airlines are very low in the world-wide carbon emissions tonnage. This type of pap coming out of these sleezy politicians and bureaucrats is clearly just a trial balloon meant to gauge the chances of getting away with imposing additional manditory taxes on air travel under the guise of "Carbon Offsets".
SailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6 Reply 2, posted (5 years 10 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1328 times:
Worldwide air traffic accounts for 1.6 (ONE POINT SIX) percent of human greenhouse gas (note: not only CO2) emissions . So all this seems like using a steamroller to crack a nut.
Currently, all domestic flights within the EU produce less CO2 than Germany's dirtiest power plant, all airlines in Europe produce less carbon dioxide than Germany's "Top 10" power plants together [2, 3].
Further, introducing a Single European Sky would cut around 12% of air traffic based CO2 emissions in Europe [2, 4].
I find the issue of environment protection far too important to have politicians mess this one up like everything else :S
PPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8492 posts, RR: 43 Reply 3, posted (5 years 10 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1318 times:
Commercial Aviation is the epitome of an industry driven by efficiency and implementing new technologies. The only way to replace older aircraft right now is to increase aircraft production. . . so maybe some of that tax money raised could help finance new aircraft instead? Or at least developing new technologies for aircraft (applied eventually to other industries)?
I see that happening
"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat