Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Damaged Boeing 767 MP At CUR  
User currently offlineDakota From Netherlands, joined Feb 2000, 148 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 3 months 10 hours ago) and read 4066 times:

Last week A Boeing 767 of Martinair landed in CUR with 'a hole' in the fuselage. On Saturday, the passengers flew with another plane back to AMS because it was not easy to repair.

I would like to know: is this plane still at CUR or is the problem solved and did it fly back? Anybody knows more?

Thanks.

links (in Dutch):
http://www.luchtvaartnieuws.nl/news/?id=21226
http://www.elsevier.nl/nieuws/laatste_24_uur/artikel/asp/artnr/161517/

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 5 hours ago) and read 3797 times:

Quoting Dakota (Thread starter):
Last week A Boeing 767 of Martinair landed in CUR with 'a hole' in the fuselage.

How did this happen?

Quoting Dakota (Thread starter):
I would like to know: is this plane still at CUR or is the problem solved and did it fly back?

Ferrying it back to AMS would be very difficult, it might most likely have to fly at very low altitudes because of this. That being said, I doubt that a hole in the fuselage is something quick to repair. If you look back, Boeing had to work for months until they managed to repair the wrinkled fuselage of G-SJMC in PUJ. And given that the 767 is the workhorse for MP's longhaul fleet, its age could influence a decision on whether it should be repair or written off.

BTW: What's the registration of the MP 767 that had this fuselage hole in CUR?


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 5 hours ago) and read 3715 times:

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 1):
Ferrying it back to AMS would be very difficult, it might most likely have to fly at very low altitudes because of this. That being said, I doubt that a hole in the fuselage is something quick to repair. If you look back, Boeing had to work for months until they managed to repair the wrinkled fuselage of G-SJMC in PUJ. And given that the 767 is the workhorse for MP's longhaul fleet, its age could influence a decision on whether it should be repair or written off.

While I don't doubt that the bird with the wrinkled fuselage took some months to repair, fuselage holes are not usually as major damage with respect to severity and repair time.

The usual culprit for damaging the fuselage (and it's not always a "hole" one can put their fist through) is a piece of ramp equipment, such as a belt loader, lav cart, baggage cart, or their other item. In my personal experience, the usual practice for when such an incident occurs (at a place where the airline has no repair facilities) is that the aircraft will be first be inspected by local contract maintenance personnel. If the aircraft is deemed airworthy for a maintenance ferry flight, it will operate unpressurized (10,000 feet or below) to an airport where repairs can be made. I'm certainly not suggesting that the damaged bird here will ferry CUR-AMS at/below 10,000 feet, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it ferry CUR-MIA, hangar space rented, and having a Boeing repair team work on it there. It could also ferry CUR-MIA and then on to another US point for repair. AA @ MCI or DFW? UA @ SFO or ORD? AAR @ OKC? BFGoodrich @ PAE? In the past, we've also used Boeing-Wichita (IAB), where the 737 fuselages are built--certainly alot of expertise there, even with the change in ownership and name change. In more recent years, we use BFG @ PAE, and in fact we ferried our nosegear bird N356SW OAK-PAE for the repair work.

Depending upon how bad the fuselage damage is, the aircraft could be out for as little as 2-3 days, or 2-3 weeks, or more. Even considering the age of the aircraft, I don't see much potential for the economics of the repair warranting a write-off of the aircraft--it'd have to be some really bad fuselage damage, and in that event, you wouldn't be talking about ferrying anywhere for repairs (probably wouldn't be airworthy, even for ferrying), you'd be talking about breaking the aircraft up there in CUR.

[Edited 2007-07-25 21:14:26]

User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3358 times:

But can ramp rash be fully ruled out? Anyone know the official cause of this problem?

User currently offline76er From Netherlands, joined Mar 2007, 551 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3038 times:

The damage was to the wing-to-fuselage fairing. An access panel had somehow sheared off and did some damage while flying off the aircraft. It was ferried back to AMS and returned to service a day later, IIRC it was PH-MCL (not sure).

Pax were either flown home on KLM or ArkeFly, some stuck around till the next MP plane came by. Read nothing about this in the dutch papers, so it must have been a relatively smooth operation.


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12158 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2990 times:

Quoting 76er (Reply 4):
The damage was to the wing-to-fuselage fairing. An access panel had somehow sheared off and did some damage while flying off the aircraft.

Is this the results of a possible bird strike?


User currently offline76er From Netherlands, joined Mar 2007, 551 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2979 times:

Cause has not yet been determined.

[Edited 2007-07-29 15:39:44]

User currently offline777fan From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 2505 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2911 times:

Any pics of the hole? FWIW, I wouldn't mind being lampooned in Curacao...


777fan



DC-8 61/63/71 DC-9-30/50 MD-80/82/83 DC-10-10/30 MD-11 717 721/2 732/3/4/5/G/8/9 741/2/4 752 762/3 777 A306/319/20/33 AT
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
First CO Boeing 767-424(ER) At BRU posted Sun Apr 7 2002 18:45:30 by Apuneger
Damaged Brunei 767 At LHR posted Tue Jan 1 2002 20:39:17 by GDB
Boeing 767-400ER Enters Service At New York's LaGu posted Wed May 2 2001 06:35:41 by United Airline
Boeing's Paint Shop At Paine Field posted Wed Jul 18 2007 19:11:29 by Xms3200
BA Rumour At Work......767/777 At LGW posted Sat Jun 9 2007 20:49:24 by Speedmarque
Who Has Boeing's 767 Upgraded Interiors? posted Fri May 25 2007 18:28:41 by DIA
Boeing 767 Winglets Picture posted Fri May 4 2007 05:59:20 by MD90fan
Air Canada 767-200 At SJC Today - What Happened? posted Thu May 3 2007 05:10:22 by AAL151Heavy
Video Of Painting Boeing 767 In Silverjet Livery posted Sun Mar 25 2007 20:19:17 by AabFlyer
Boeing Flight Testing At McChord AFB posted Tue Feb 13 2007 23:45:45 by RobK