Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Is Virgin Retiring 4 747-200s?  
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4453 posts, RR: 5
Posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1680 times:

It seems to me that Virgin Atlantic is making a mistake in retiring their 4 P&W powered 747-200s when the 7 747-400s begin arriving. Currently the fleet is under an immense amount of pressure and is overstretched. Why not keep the P&W 747-200s G-VGIN, G-VIRG, G-VJFK and G-VLAX around for 2-3 more years? Wait until all of the 747-400s on order are delivered to the fleet and the first few A340-600s begin arriving at LHR.

On a personal note, I saw G-VJFK "Boston Belle" on the 21st of this month at EWR. She looked splendid.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1609 times:

It probably costs a lot to to maintain the P&W's. The 744 will be coming in soon as they where the Alitilia ones! Also Virgin is getting a ton of A340's, I am sure they will have more then enough planes without the P&W classics.
I think you are just bitter towards Virgin as the got rid of G-VMIA and now they are getting rid of some more classics!
Iain


User currently offlineYfe From Netherlands, joined Dec 2000, 128 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1595 times:

I completly agree with Iianhol

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4453 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1581 times:

It is true that I was not happy with them when they retired MY plane G-VMIA! The other "P&W Classics" though don't have any real sentimental value to me. I have never flown on any of them etc. In fact, it was only for the first time on Thursday that I saw a P&W Virgin "Classic". (Obviously I have seen them at one time or another before, but I didn't write down the registration.) Constantly though, we hear how the current fleet is stretched to the max. It seems to me that rather than have an increase of just 3 planes (If they were to retire the 747-200s) why not have a 7 plane increase? That will allow for the expansion that Branson is keen on obtaining. Does anyone know if the P&W "Classics" are up for D checks soon?


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1561 times:

But maybe it is cheaper to get the 400's to replace them! Mayeb if they kept the P&W Classics tey would not have got the 400's! I would much rather see a 400 then a P&W classic.
Iain


User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4453 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1512 times:

I think that we should take a deeper look at their route structure. Currently they fly from LHR and LGW to EWR, JFK, BOS, MIA, MCO, ORD, LAX, SFO, LAS, IAD, JNB, NRT, HKG, CPT, and DEL. They also have 3 Carribean destinations that I do not know the codes for.

Now, many of these airports are served more than once a day. For instance EWR (Newark) has service from LHR and LGW in the form of a 747-400 and 747-200. I believe that JFK is served 3 times daily with a 747-400, and the 747-200, A340-300 switching on and off for the other two flights. HKG requires 2 airplanes to operate the route along with NRT. What I am trying to say is, that Virgin is playing with fire currently. I think they should hold on to the P&W "Classics" to allow some breathing room. Possibly, you could base 2 at LHR and 2 at LGW as back up aircraft. This would also lessen the stress of having to bring aircraft back from maintenance in shortest amount of time possible.

Any thoughts, questions or remarks are welcome towards this idea.



"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineTWAneedsNOhelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1501 times:

Don't be offended, but the aviation experts and executives at Virgin in London know a little more about the situation than you....

User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1496 times:

I have heard that they are getting some B 747-200s from Air New Zealand.

User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5297 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (13 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1489 times:

Virgin Atlantic has already received all 5 of Air New Zealands 747-200's the last left Auckland in May 2000.
It went somewhere else to be painted in Virgins new colours where exactly I can't remember.

Scott
Auckland NZ.


User currently offlineVC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3700 posts, RR: 34
Reply 9, posted (13 years 7 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1452 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The answer is simple, the P&W a/c will not comply with the new noise restrictions.

User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 7 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1452 times:

Very sensibly, they are standardising on just one engine type - the RB211-524B4 - with aircraft from both Cathay Pacific and Air New Zealand.

I flew on G-VRGN (Maiden Voyager) from MIA-LGW earlier this month in Upper Class, and I have to say that the interior was looking very tired and worn-out. Both the J and Y class seats are the same as when the aircraft was first introduced - albeit with the addition of seatback videos in Y and pop-up screens in J. Sony Watchmans are still provided to J class pax to watch additional movies.

They will be leasing in several (I believe three) B747-300s from Air Atlanta as an interim measure whilst they are overhauling and refurbishing aircraft.


User currently offlineVC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3700 posts, RR: 34
Reply 11, posted (13 years 7 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1446 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

"RGN" left the fleet at least 7years ago

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4453 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (13 years 7 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1413 times:

VC-10: I assume that Ceilidh was talking about G-VGIN. That aircraft is still in use.

Ceildh: Do you know which aircraft are going to be refurbished? I thought that all of the 7 RB-211 powered aircraft have been refitted to VS standards.



"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (13 years 7 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1390 times:

CX747 - you are right, VGIN was the aircraft in question. VRGN is now with Tower Air.

The refurbishment programme is centering on the installation of the new Upper Class sleeper seats, bar units and beauty areas; I don't know what (if anything) is being done in the Y class cabin. I understand that this work is being carried out at FLS in Dublin.


User currently offlineF_boot From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (13 years 7 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1372 times:

Oh dear Ceilidh, you've shown yourself (yet again) to be a chancer and full and free with the truth.
Pick a registration, any registration ...


User currently offlineVC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3700 posts, RR: 34
Reply 15, posted (13 years 7 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1352 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

If it was G-VGIN it can't have been named "Maiden Voyager" because that is the name of G-VIRG !

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4453 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (13 years 7 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1343 times:

G-VGIN is "Maiden Voyager"
G-VIRG is "Shady Lady"



"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13738 posts, RR: 19
Reply 17, posted (13 years 7 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1342 times:

I think it is a mistake, as VS needs more capacity. But they are old and as one pointed out above me, the P&Ws are costly to maintain or something. But the sexy Singapore Airlines has P&Ws on their 744s, and they fly to LHR 3x daily. :?

Oh well, I suggest VS keep them

More capacity = More profits = More profits for SIA!

Happy New Year!
Bon an!
Gut whatever!



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineVC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3700 posts, RR: 34
Reply 18, posted (13 years 7 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1322 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I suggest you visit the VS website & check those names.

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4453 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (13 years 7 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1307 times:

I apologize to all.

G-VGIN "Scarlet Lady"
G-VIRG "Maiden Voyager"



"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (13 years 7 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1297 times:

Then it was G-VIRG that I was on ... I am not a 'reggie spotter', but was aware that it was Maiden Voyager - the name painted on the lower fuselage being a bit of a give-away!    

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is UAL Retiring Its 747-200s? posted Sat Nov 11 2000 19:22:40 by United Airline
Why Is SAS Retiring The MD90? posted Mon Jul 10 2006 23:56:52 by LS737
Why Is It The 747-8? posted Wed Jan 4 2006 22:56:22 by DTW757
Why Is Virgin Thinking Of The 777er. posted Sat Feb 7 2004 23:50:58 by 3lions
Why Is UPS Repainting A 747 In The Old Livery? posted Tue Aug 5 2003 10:46:04 by Na
Why Is Virgin Express Growing So Slowly? posted Sun Feb 16 2003 01:11:27 by Bmi330
Get It Straight: NW Is Not Retiring 747-400s posted Tue Jul 24 2001 23:53:03 by DeltaSFO
Why Is This Northwest 747 At Las? posted Wed Jul 11 2001 19:41:13 by N521NA
Is Virgin Still Looking For Some B 747-200s? posted Tue Feb 13 2001 04:54:59 by United Airline
Why Is This 747 Still Not Flying? posted Sun Mar 26 2006 00:22:05 by EZEIZA