Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Legacy Airlines  
User currently offlineNycaviator From United States of America, joined May 2007, 55 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 1 month 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2142 times:

I've been hearing and reading in the news alot of Legacy carries such as NW, AA, and UA cancelling routes and having difficutly filling up other ones.
In the future, what airlines do you think are going to be the lasting carries in the United States?

I think DL and CO are deffinately in the running.
I'm surprised to hear that AA is having some difficulty, such as the situation in BOS to name one.

Any insight of the outcomes of any of these airlines would be nice.

[Edited 2007-07-25 18:09:55]


Flying is like having eyes on the top of the world.
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEHHO From Bulgaria, joined Dec 2005, 815 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2100 times:

JB, FL, WN to name a few... oh and don't worry about the others, they'll be fine too.
The demand in the USA is huge, and with a few strategy changes, all the legacy carriers will stay in business. It's not AZ for god's sake...  tombstone 



"Get your facts first. Then you may distort them as much as you please" -- Mark Twain
User currently offlineInnocuousFox From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2805 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1960 times:

As long as our buerocratic nanny state is in effect, the majors won't go completely out of business. Their investors (i.e. stockholders) may get shafted every time they declare bankruptcy, however.


Dave Mark - Intrinsic Algorithm - Reducing the world to mathematical equations!
User currently offlineWorldTraveler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1864 times:

Don't draw the conclusion that because network(legacy) carriers are cutting routes means they are not capable of surviving. They are pulling routes down because they don't make enough money. I'll remind you that WN, FL, and B6 have all recently announced route pullbacks. Part of responsible airline management is cutting your losses when something changes in a market or when it becomes obvious that the market didn't materialize as expected. Remember that airplanes are mobile factories and can be moved very easily from one place to another.

As for the staying power of airlines, I'll also remind you that several of the network carriers - DL and UA have posted operating profit margins on par or better than B6 or WN. And the network carriers don't have hundreds of aircraft on order which will strain the balance sheet. The LFCs might move fast enough in a downturn to stay out of trouble but from a financial standpoint, the network carriers as a group are turning in very good performance and have reasonably healthy balance sheets as a result of their trips through bankruptcy. You are as likely to see bankrupties among some of the LFCs in the next downturn as you are from network carriers.


User currently offlineDL767captain From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2539 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1750 times:

it is probably because these are less profitable routes due to too much competition, if 6 legacy carriers all have to pull the price down by $100 and lets say there are 600 people wanting those flights, if those 600 people split up evenly to the 6 different legacy carriers they will all make much less compared to if those 600 people all split up evenly onto 2 or 3 legacy carriers, this is why i think mergers are necesary, there is simply too much competition, but these mergers would need to be done with much care to ensure a smooth transaction to hurt the least amount of people. I could see CO DL and AA coming together and UA US and NW coming together to make 2 legacy carriers. US has already shown that they want to merge so that wouldn't be too hard, i see them merging with NW (mostly because of identical fleets). CO and DL seem to have the same ideas followed closely by AA (plus they all have the same fleet). Or another direction could be a CO+DL AA+UA and NW+US and just try and help every one in the different unions get along and consolidate so all the airlines could begin making money again. Just think, 600 people split into 2 or 3 airlines will make each airline more than if those 600 people were split into 6 and the prices would still remain competitive but the routes would be more profitable per airline (plus we would see the return of widebodies to domestic flights  Smile )

User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1728 times:

I wouldn't hazard a guess. I never though PanAm and TWA would go under.  Wink


Airliners.net Moderator Team
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Legacy Post-Ch11 Strategies posted Wed Jul 18 2007 18:36:06 by ChicagoFlyer
How Many US Charter Airlines Still Exist? posted Mon May 28 2007 09:50:26 by CV990
Excellent Op-Ed On US Domestic Airlines posted Thu Apr 5 2007 16:08:40 by InnocuousFox
Boeing Sees US Legacy 787 Campaigns For 07/08 posted Wed Dec 6 2006 16:13:44 by NYC777
Rules On Investment In US Based Airlines posted Wed Nov 22 2006 20:47:55 by Qwame
Legacy Airlines Are Hot Again posted Thu Oct 26 2006 15:36:00 by WorldTraveler
US-China Market For US/Chinese Airlines posted Wed Aug 16 2006 21:39:03 by B2443
Future Of US Legacy Carriers Post-new Threats posted Fri Aug 11 2006 15:57:30 by B777A340Fan
Do US-based Airlines Hire Canadians? Have A Lead? posted Wed May 24 2006 08:32:43 by ETStar
$50 Fare Inc By US Legacy Carriers... posted Sat Apr 8 2006 00:03:12 by AirRyan