Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AeroMexico Ending Fort Lauderdale (again)  
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33287 posts, RR: 71
Posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2456 times:

Looks like another failed attempt at Ft. Lauderdale for AeroMexico. Despite launching Ft. Lauderdale as a daily service this time, with times better suited for business travel, AeroMexico will once again discontinue service to the airport for the second time in three years. Last flight is 7 September 2007. This leaves Avianca, once again, as the only Latin American airline serving FLL.


a.
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6789 posts, RR: 17
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2452 times:

Would it have done better with a smaller aircraft with double frequency? or were loads/yields just too low?


Aiming High and going far..
User currently offlineRCS763AV From Colombia, joined Jun 2004, 4396 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2396 times:

I just don´t get it, they must be doing something wrong. AV advertised FLL as the pleasant alternative to MIA (aka hell) for south-florida bound passengers, and offers connections onward with Delta, plus putting low-yield connecting pax from UIO, LIM and other destinations on the flight, freeing seats up for the MIA ones, which were running completely full.

AM could have done the same thing, being they are in Skyteam. And the Mexican market is much bigger than the Colombian one....


User currently offline102IAHexpress From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1156 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2387 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Thread starter):
Looks like another failed attempt at Ft. Lauderdale for AeroMexico.

That sucks. Is FLL better suited for 5D (Aeroméxico Connect) service, or is AM just droping the ball?


User currently offlineRojo From Spain, joined Sep 2000, 2482 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2229 times:

Quoting ERJ170 (Reply 1):
Would it have done better with a smaller aircraft with double frequency? or were loads/yields just too low?

It is impossible for AM to make FLL work when they have MIA so close... MIA offers a choice of 3 daily non-stop flights and one via MID (operating 4x week). Therefore, 1 flight FLL-MEX at not so convenient times is not what business travelers are looking for. Leisure travelers prefer MIA since there is no incentive (low fares) at FLL.

FLL-MEX would be a great route for NK if they can offer convenient connections (Caribbean, East Coast) and they know how to price it, but I don´t know what holds Spirit from opening MEX. Anyway, I can see one of the new Mexican airlines operating to FLL when they start flights to the US.


User currently offlineUcunnn2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 71 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2229 times:

maybe Mexicana should take advantage of it...Their MIA flights have been pretty full lately and their service to CUN as well..

User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33287 posts, RR: 71
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2207 times:

Quoting Ucunnn2 (Reply 5):
maybe Mexicana should take advantage of it...Their MIA flights have been pretty full lately and their service to CUN as well..

Take advantage of what? They aren't going to fly to FLL when they could add frequencies to MIA, which is where business travelers want to go, and where partner AA has a hub. Miami-Mexico City is one of few busy Miami-Latin American routes with virtually no VFR traffic to speak of (the VFR traffic also goes to Merida). It is a huge business route and dominated by business traffic, which can help explain why it isn't working from FLL.

Quoting Rojo (Reply 4):
FLL-MEX would be a great route for NK if they can offer convenient connections (Caribbean, East Coast) and they know how to price it, but I don�t know what holds Spirit from opening MEX.

Look for Spirit at TLC, not MEX.



a.
User currently offlineSflaflight From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 1183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2126 times:

Quoting Rojo (Reply 4):
Leisure travelers prefer MIA since there is no incentive (low fares) at FLL.

Not sure what you mean by that. FLL was always priced cheaper than MIA. It was never meant for business travelers. As far as I know, it was for leisure passengers. I think another mistake was not doing FLL-CUN-MEX. Would AM have the authority for that. A CUN stop is definitely not out of the way. Another good possibilty would for 5D to do the route like Mark said earlier.


User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5603 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2114 times:

I guess it's a bit of consolation that this kind of nonsense goes on at other AM stations besides SAN! I can't even begin to list the various routes and start-and-stop dates of AM's history at Lindbergh Field. I certainly understand that we have a unique situation in San Diego (LAX 100 miles north and TIJ and the country of Mexico 20 miles south) yet AM continues to try... and continues to fail, year after year after year. (OK, I admit that somehow they have managed to keep the SJD flight operating continuously -- and profitably, I assume -- daily since Fall 1995!)

I'm glad they keep trying but over a 15 year period (since Summer of '92), shouldn't we expect them to have been able to establish and maintain some regular service to PVR, LTO, GDL, MZT and/or MEX? Since the same thing happens elsewhere in the system, I just wonder about the planning, scheduling and marketing departments at AM.

bb


User currently offlineGhost77 From Mexico, joined Mar 2000, 5236 posts, RR: 51
Reply 9, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

Quoting Rojo (Reply 4):
It is impossible for AM to make FLL work when they have MIA so close... MIA offers a choice of 3 daily non-stop flights and one via MID (operating 4x week). Therefore, 1 flight FLL-MEX at not so convenient times is not what business travelers are looking for. Leisure travelers prefer MIA since there is no incentive (low fares) at FLL.

Add to that, Mexicana's flights which are doing great! FLL is no option for any mexican carrier.

Quoting Rojo (Reply 4):
Anyway, I can see one of the new Mexican airlines operating to FLL when they start flights to the US.

Yes? Who? From Tolousseca or MTY?

Quoting Rojo (Reply 4):
FLL-MEX would be a great route for NK if they can offer convenient connections (Caribbean, East Coast) and they know how to price it, but I don´t know what holds Spirit from opening MEX.

Yeap! That would be nice, to get cheap options to fly Caribbean and East Coast and not only depend on AA's @ MIA.

Quoting Ucunnn2 (Reply 5):
maybe Mexicana should take advantage of it...Their MIA flights have been pretty full lately and their service to CUN as well..

MX doesn't need to take advantage. Who knows who or what makes MX have more control at US stations, routes and frequencies but they have done wonderfully building a stronger relation with AA day by day and increasing and opening flights where they really have to for over years.... MX/AA domain Mexico-MIA market.

Quoting SANFan (Reply 8):
I guess it's a bit of consolation that this kind of nonsense goes on at other AM stations besides SAN!

Unfortunately, history doesn't help... AM a government owned airline since 1994... CINTRA... doing a lot of chaos... CEO's come and go... counsel board changing everytime...

Quoting SANFan (Reply 8):
I'm glad they keep trying but over a 15 year period (since Summer of '92), shouldn't we expect them to have been able to establish and maintain some regular service to PVR, LTO, GDL, MZT and/or MEX? Since the same thing happens elsewhere in the system, I just wonder about the planning, scheduling and marketing departments at AM.

Same as above... AM has no continuation on several plans brought up except for its long haul network, which is what best works in the whole system... but that is because of all the years of uninterrupted service.

g77



Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
User currently onlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7633 posts, RR: 42
Reply 10, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1987 times:

Quoting Ghost77 (Reply 9):
FLL is no option for any mexican carrier.

Does anybody know if AM took advantage of DL's sizeable presence at FLL in terms of interlining and codesharing?



Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineRojo From Spain, joined Sep 2000, 2482 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (7 years 5 months 21 hours ago) and read 1872 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 6):
Look for Spirit at TLC, not MEX.

You are correct, they approached TLC airport in Jan/Feb 07 and I heard they got a good deal, but we have not heard anything from NK regarding this route.

Quoting Sflaflight (Reply 7):
Not sure what you mean by that. FLL was always priced cheaper than MIA. It was never meant for business travelers. As far as I know, it was for leisure passengers. I think another mistake was not doing FLL-CUN-MEX. Would AM have the authority for that. A CUN stop is definitely not out of the way. Another good possibilty would for 5D to do the route like Mark said earlier.

AM did not price FLL cheaper than MIA, they both shared a similar fare structure (at least for MEX-FLL and MEX-MIA, don't know the other way around), what you could see was that the cheap fares on the MEX-MIA flights sold quickly and FLL became cheaper, but there was no real price and schedule incentive; if you add the costs of the FLL station for a single flight that does not attract many Premium Passengers, you have your answer. The company where I work has offices in both Dade and Broward Counties and I could see many co-workers take the flight to MIA and rent a car to get to the Fort Lauderdale building. When I asked them why didn't they fly to FLL, the answers were: (1) is there a flight to FLL? (2) AM schedules are awful (3) maybe next time... (4) I need more alternatives in case I change my flight and I don't think you can change a flight FLL-MEX to MIA-MEX!!!

Quoting Ghost77 (Reply 9):
Yes? Who? From Tolousseca or MTY?

From TLC, since "chilangos" bought a lot of properties in the Miami / Ft Lauderdale area last year... In part, this is why MX, AA and AM have seen decent loads to MIA (I would not say extraordinary) with good yields (since MIA is also a "Premium Market" and FLL is not)

The success of NK or any LCC on the route will depend on good marketing, a good fare structure (from good price elasticity calculations) and the CASM of the airline flying. Obviously, NK will also get help from connections. But MEX-MIA/FLL is a good O&D market.

Quoting EddieDude (Reply 10):
Does anybody know if AM took advantage of DL's sizeable presence at FLL in terms of interlining and codesharing?

No codeshare


User currently offlineUcunnn2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 71 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 5 months 2 hours ago) and read 1717 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 6):
Take advantage of what? They aren't going to fly to FLL when they could add frequencies to MIA, which is where business travelers want to go

sorry to say but personally i think this is not true...i think the main problem of AM flight at FLL was that it wasnt well advertised and promoted and thats why many people didnt even know that exist...aso a smaller aircraft in two different scedules 5 days a week would have worked.... i live in MIA-FLL area and i know so many mexican people and people who is involved in airline industry ..may mexicanas have even flown from FLL to MEX via different airlines...as well yeah is true that Maybe MX or Am should think in FLL-CUN as well...


by the way.. becuase work i constantly go to places oin Palm Beach county and Okeechobee county etc..u guys have no idea of how many mexican there are in those counties...it is 2 hours form miami but in places like West Palm Beach and Jupiter, Ft Pierce and Okkeechobee City i was in aproject with the mexican consulate and i was amazed of how many mexicans live there....Do you guys could actually think that maybe instead FLL a regular non stop from PBI-MEX could actually work better??? maybe the more distance (not as close as FLL) PBI handles flights from nay places and even Bahamas intenrational flights...maybe this would work better..

What do you think Logan, Ghost Mark, Rojo??


User currently offlineOB1504 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 3447 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (7 years 5 months 1 hour ago) and read 1673 times:

Quoting RCS763AV (Reply 2):
AV advertised FLL as the pleasant alternative to MIA (aka hell)

Well, with Spirit's massive international buildup, Terminal 4 at FLL is becoming just as hellish as MIA.

Quoting Ucunnn2 (Reply 12):
i was amazed of how many mexicans live there...

How many of them fly back to Mexico on a regular basis, though?


User currently offlinePremoBrimo From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 428 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (7 years 5 months 1 hour ago) and read 1667 times:

Now maybe AM will start MSP-MEX with the extra aircraft....


Now You're Flying Smart.
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33287 posts, RR: 71
Reply 15, posted (7 years 5 months ago) and read 1626 times:

Quoting OB1504 (Reply 13):

How many of them fly back to Mexico on a regular basis, though?

There isn't a large Mexican community in South Florida at all, especially compared to LA, parts of Texas, Chicago, etc.. There is a decent sized population for the Yucatan peninsula, hence MIA-CZM/MID/CUN are big VFR markets.

Quoting PremoBrimo (Reply 14):
Now maybe AM will start MSP-MEX with the extra aircraft....

Don't hold your breathe. Not happening.

Quoting Ucunnn2 (Reply 12):
sorry to say but personally i think this is not true...i think the main problem of AM flight at FLL was that it wasnt well advertised and promoted and thats why many people didnt even know that exist...

That might be true, but the truth remains that MIA-MEX is a huge business route, and business travel is going to Brickell Avenue, not downtown Fort Lauderdale.



a.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA 9533 Guantanamo-Fort Lauderdale Today posted Thu Aug 24 2006 20:42:32 by Njdevilsin03
Metro II Off Runway At Fort Lauderdale Executive posted Tue Jun 6 2006 18:48:57 by KFLLCFII
US Airways Fort Lauderdale Focus-why Reduce Feed? posted Tue Jun 28 2005 00:29:59 by SHUPirate1
DC3 Crashed In Fort Lauderdale posted Mon Jun 13 2005 22:04:28 by Jfkaua
New Airline @ Fort Lauderdale/Nassau? posted Wed May 18 2005 00:36:23 by Debonair
US Airways And Fort Lauderdale posted Tue Dec 28 2004 12:14:15 by Kkfla737
Yet Another Airline Boost At Fort Lauderdale posted Sat Aug 21 2004 21:42:23 by Clipperaurora
Wrecks And Relics In Fort Lauderdale - Miami Area posted Wed Jul 28 2004 10:55:31 by Jiggles
Wannado City: Fort Lauderdale, New Jersey posted Fri Apr 23 2004 05:24:16 by Flairport
SAA And Fort Lauderdale posted Fri Jan 4 2002 18:52:40 by Capt.Picard