Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MAXjet In Preliminary Discussions With A & B  
User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4161 posts, RR: 36
Posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5770 times:

Quote:
The company leases five Boeing (nyse: BA - news - people ) 767s and is in the market to lease more planes, Stockbridge said. It has held preliminary discussions with Boeing and Airbus about buying more modern planes, but probably wouldn't look to place an order for another three years or so.

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/07/26/ap3957011.html

If I should guess: B787-800/900 and A350-800XWB are the conteners here, I don´t think that MAXjet will go for new B767s or the A330-200. Still, any order seems to be far away.


Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFLYGUY767 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5730 times:

Quoting Flying-Tiger (Thread starter):
If I should guess: B787-800/900 and A350-800XWB are the conteners here, I don´t think that MAXjet will go for new B767s or the A330-200. Still, any order seems to be far away.

Placing my money on the A330-200...

MaxJet needs new equipment and they need it fast. They need an aircraft that can fly routes such as LAX-STN, SEA-PVG, and so forth. They cannot wait 3-5 years for something. They need something now, at current the 767-200 are going mechanical left and right, as was the case a few weeks ago when the Max Jet system came to a halt.

-JD


User currently offlineThirteenRight From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 340 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5658 times:

Quoting FLYGUY767 (Reply 1):
MaxJet needs new equipment and they need it fast. They need an aircraft that can fly routes such as LAX-STN, SEA-PVG, and so forth. They cannot wait 3-5 years for something. They need something now, at current the 767-200 are going mechanical left and right, as was the case a few weeks ago when the Max Jet system came to a halt.

I couldnt agree with you more. I'd love to see MY colors on an A332. Isnt Airbus though trying to load off some A340s? MY loves a discount, maybe MY would go for that if the price is right?


User currently offlineFLYGUY767 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5634 times:

Quoting ThirteenRight (Reply 2):
I couldnt agree with you more. I'd love to see MY colors on an A332. Isnt Airbus though trying to load off some A340s? MY loves a discount, maybe MY would go for that if the price is right?

Yes, and thankfully we are going to see US Airways as the first US based operator of an A340.. I would not rule out the A340 either. MaxJet is getting ready for a large expansion. I have recieved word that South America is on the radar as well as more than just Shanghai in Asia.

-JD


User currently offlineBoston92 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3390 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5605 times:

Quoting ThirteenRight (Reply 2):
I couldnt agree with you more. I'd love to see MY colors on an A332. Isnt Airbus though trying to load off some A340s? MY loves a discount, maybe MY would go for that if the price is right?

MY should be looking at an aircraft that will make them a profit in the long run. There is no need to buy an aircraft that has been 'discounted' only to have low loads and high operating costs.

Quoting FLYGUY767 (Reply 1):
MaxJet needs new equipment and they need it fast. They need an aircraft that can fly routes such as LAX-STN, SEA-PVG, and so forth. They cannot wait 3-5 years for something.

Very much true. Although I do see them (In my mind) sticking with a Boeing product. If 787 is too far away, I just see them updating the 767's with, well, 767's.



"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32787 posts, RR: 72
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5573 times:

Quoting FLYGUY767 (Reply 3):
I have recieved word that South America is on the radar as well as more than just Shanghai in Asia.

Any idea from where? Miami or NYC? No other markets would really be able to fill a widebody, all-business jet to South America. Maybe Maxjet will try to take advantage of the new US-Argentina slots, but they are shut-out from Brazil.



a.
User currently offlineFLYGUY767 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5517 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 5):
Any idea from where? Miami or NYC? No other markets would really be able to fill a widebody, all-business jet to South America. Maybe Maxjet will try to take advantage of the new US-Argentina slots, but they are shut-out from Brazil.

What I have heard, and I give it the credit of ten cents is that they are negotiations with a large casino conglomerate in Las Vegas for service to South America-the flights would be flown under contract, with additional seats sold to the general public. This would be along the lines of the AA RDU-LGW/LHR service. Additionally if and when Brasil gets off of their rear end and makes a sensible decision to open more frequencies to US airlines they "may" be looking at service from MIA-GRU(all Business Class), and MIA-EZE(all Business Class). This would fit into a few other things that I have heard about expanded Stansted service from the United States including SJC, MIA, ORD.

With the recent filing to serve LAX-SEA-PVG it can be deduced that MaxJet is thinking outside of the box to markets that warrant an all business class service such as LAX-STN, LAS-STN, IAD-STN, and JFK-STN. As far as Asian expansion I believe they have already received a green light for service from Spring of next year ex London to a number of points in Asia, Middle East, and Africa. The top markets I have heard of are Dubai, Delhi, Bombay, and Macau. Of course Macau would be the most interesting as the market is booming and their definitely is a lack of service from Europe with the departure of TAP from the Macau market.

-JD


User currently offlineThirteenRight From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 340 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5419 times:

Quoting FLYGUY767 (Reply 6):
What I have heard, and I give it the credit of ten cents is that they are negotiations with a large casino conglomerate in Las Vegas for service to South America-the flights would be flown under contract, with additional seats sold to the general public. This would be along the lines of the AA RDU-LGW/LHR service. Additionally if and when Brasil gets off of their rear end and makes a sensible decision to open more frequencies to US airlines they "may" be looking at service from MIA-GRU(all Business Class), and MIA-EZE(all Business Class). This would fit into a few other things that I have heard about expanded Stansted service from the United States including SJC, MIA, ORD.

With the recent filing to serve LAX-SEA-PVG it can be deduced that MaxJet is thinking outside of the box to markets that warrant an all business class service such as LAX-STN, LAS-STN, IAD-STN, and JFK-STN. As far as Asian expansion I believe they have already received a green light for service from Spring of next year ex London to a number of points in Asia, Middle East, and Africa. The top markets I have heard of are Dubai, Delhi, Bombay, and Macau. Of course Macau would be the most interesting as the market is booming and their definitely is a lack of service from Europe with the departure of TAP from the Macau market.

I've been hearing the same chatter, though of course I'm rooting for additional JFK service (I've heard JFK-TLV). Now that Silverjet isnt starting their 2nd daily, I wonder if that changes things for MY.


User currently offlineDL767captain From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2539 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 5165 times:

The A350 seems like it would bee too big since it is an all business class airline. The 787-8/9 seem like the largest aircraft they would need but both those will not be available for a while so maybe we will see some used 767-300(maybe ER's) or some new 767 orders if boeing agrees. An A340 doesn't seem like a good idea due to its operating costs and the fact that it is an old airplane i think Maxjet needs to look into the future, who knows maybe we will see some older 777-200s (they would still be a little large though) but if they want a quick patch before the 787 would arrive i would see getting some used 767-300's or A330's (they would probably choose the 767 based on fleet commanality)

User currently offlineSkyvanman From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 224 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5113 times:

I think they'll go with leases on 767's until they can get 787s.


The 3 best planes of all time: Shorts Skyvan, 330 and 360
User currently offlineAirNZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5094 times:

Quoting DL767captain (Reply 8):
An A340 doesn't seem like a good idea due to its operating costs and the fact that it is an old airplane

What's the 767? Is it suddenly brand new and cutting edge technology which I have somehow missed?


User currently offlineDL767captain From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2539 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4914 times:

Quoting AirNZ (Reply 10):
What's the 767? Is it suddenly brand new and cutting edge technology which I have somehow missed?


But they are making new ones still (i know the A340 is still being made but they are probably too big) but the technology in the A340 always sounds older than the 767


User currently offlineAllstarflyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4837 times:

Quoting DL767captain (Reply 11):
(i know the A340 is still being made but they are probably too big)

I guess that means the 773ER is out of the question (I'm just a 777 fan  biggrin  ). Whatever Maxjet does, I hope they learn to stick with 1 fleet type for their long-term plans. If they decide to start buying a/c instead of just leasing, that would benefit them not having to train on different types and getting parts for more than 1 type. Having said that, I could see them going with the B767 (why not, if they're still making them?). They could then eventually transition into newer a/c they own and away from the leased.


User currently offlineKL577 From Netherlands, joined Oct 2006, 776 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 4689 times:

Quoting FLYGUY767 (Reply 6):
The top markets I have heard of are Dubai, Delhi, Bombay, and Macau

There is a rumour floating around on a.net of service to LOS.


User currently offlineEA772LR From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2836 posts, RR: 10
Reply 14, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3977 times:

Quoting FLYGUY767 (Reply 1):
They need an aircraft that can fly routes such as LAX-STN, SEA-PVG, and so forth.

Their 762ER's have just as much range as the 332, particularly in the layout they have their jets in. Less seats=less passengers=more payload=more fuel=more range. No doubt they need some new planes, but can't they stick to what they've got and get some new 762ER's to hold them off til they get some 787's or 358XWBs??



We often judge others by their actions, but ourselves by our intentions.
User currently offlineFLYGUY767 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3899 times:

Quoting EA772LR (Reply 14):
Their 762ER's have just as much range as the 332, particularly in the layout they have their jets in. Less seats=less passengers=more payload=more fuel=more range. No doubt they need some new planes, but can't they stick to what they've got and get some new 762ER's to hold them off til they get some 787's or 358XWBs??

Who would they get the new 767-200ER from???

MaxJet cannot wait another 5-6 years for a replacement. The planes they have now have mechanicals left and right..

-JD


User currently offlineBoeing74741R From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2007, 1164 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3570 times:

Quoting DL767captain (Reply 11):


But they are making new ones still (i know the A340 is still being made but they are probably too big) but the technology in the A340 always sounds older than the 767

Even though the 767 was introduced a good 10 years before the A340?

Can't see how 767 has newer technology than the A340s considering the gap between these two aircraft families being flown for the first time (exception would be the 767-400s?). Also can someone tell me whether A340s use the Airbus fly-by-wire technology whilst 767s do not?


User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4682 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3488 times:

Quoting FLYGUY767 (Reply 15):
Who would they get the new 767-200ER from???

Boeing?  Wink



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineEA772LR From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2836 posts, RR: 10
Reply 18, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3477 times:

Quoting FLYGUY767 (Reply 15):
Who would they get the new 767-200ER from???

Boeing. As far as I know the 767 line is NOT closed. I thought they were keeping the line open for the potential order from the US military for 767 Tankers. Am I correct?? Please correct me if not.



We often judge others by their actions, but ourselves by our intentions.
User currently offlineNavymmw From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 257 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3284 times:

YOU KNOW WHAT!?!?!?!?! You all are wrong, they are buying a fleet of Cessna 172's, and some Vokswagon Beatles.  yes 

User currently offlineFlyTUITravel From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 723 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2688 times:

What about some A342s?
I'd have thought they'd be the perfect size, and would be a good choice until they can be replaced by 787s or something..........


FLYTUITRAVEL.


User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4682 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2618 times:

Quoting FlyTUITravel (Reply 20):
What about some A342s?

They don't need the range, the A332 would be better. And there are only few examples on the market.



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineFlyTUITravel From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 723 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2595 times:

I mean new-build A342s. I know they are out of production at the moment but it would be just like building another A343, surely?
And A332s aren't available until 2010 at the least.


FLYTUITRAVEL.


User currently offlineReadytotaxi From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2006, 3263 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2580 times:

Quoting Navymmw (Reply 19):

Will those Beatles have layflat in Club Class?



you don't get a second chance to make a first impression!
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4682 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2485 times:

Quoting FlyTUITravel (Reply 22):
I mean new-build A342s. I know they are out of production at the moment but it would be just like building another A343, surely?
And A332s aren't available until 2010 at the least.

They come from the same assembly line, so there's no advantage regarding availability. Plus it's more expensive, yet resale values will be lower.
If you ask me, no good deal. Unfortunately!  Sad



Exceptions confirm the rule.
25 WildcatYXU : That's correct. The whole A330/340 family is using the fly by wire technology. The 767 doesn't. AFAIK the only FBW commercial Boeings are the 777 and
26 Gkirk : Yer both wrong...it'll be 5 Shorts 360-ERs, with 36" seat pitch and no IFE
27 Post contains images Boeing74741R : Thanks very much!
28 DL767captain : They are keeping it open for that reason and because there are still some orders for airlines that need to be filled so i think they could get some n
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
SIA Engineering In Joint Venture With P&W posted Fri Feb 22 2002 23:55:19 by Singapore_Air
Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380 posted Fri May 5 2006 15:40:35 by Halibut
Boeing In Discussions With MAS On B787 posted Tue Mar 29 2005 00:04:57 by NYC777
Delta Air Lines In Discussions With MEA posted Mon Feb 2 2004 01:03:59 by BA
MaxJet In ATL 7/5 posted Thu Jul 5 2007 13:23:43 by Notdownnlocked
AB In Any Partnership With Legacy Carriers? posted Tue Jul 3 2007 23:43:10 by Mika
Singapore Airlines Giving 744 With F & J Seats? posted Mon Jun 18 2007 18:45:00 by 777way
Small Airports In France-surviving With Low Costs. posted Sat Mar 31 2007 08:24:27 by Beaucaire
AirTran Continuing Discussions With Salt Lake City posted Wed Feb 28 2007 23:45:12 by KarlB737
Stuck In The Middle With Blue (Jetblue) posted Sun Feb 18 2007 06:07:50 by JerseyGuy