Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MUC-DEN And MUC-ICN/PUS Load Factors  
User currently offlineSailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6
Posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2549 times:

According to data from the German Statistical Agency (sorry I lack better word for "Statistisches Bundesamt") the load factor on MUC-DEN has been 87% and on MUC-ICN/PUS 86% of the seats have been sold. All data for April 2007.

Even though the data is (afaik) not fully accurate, it doesn't look bad ...

SailorOrion

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 8741 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2536 times:

Quoting SailorOrion (Thread starter):
I lack better word for "Statistisches Bundesamt") the

"Buddhistisches Standesamt"  Wink - (Federal) Statistics and Census Office should be right.

Quoting SailorOrion (Thread starter):

Even though the data is (afaik) not fully accurate, it doesn't look ba

I would consider that an understatement. 86/87 % are bloody well for a full service carrier.



I'm not fishing for compliments
User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4952 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2406 times:

Are these stats available online? How did MUC-YUL do in relation, as well as MUC-BOS/CLT?

User currently offlineSailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2391 times:

Same source:

MUC-YUL: 81%
MUC-BOS: 83%
MUC-CLT: 89%
MUC-JFK: 90%
MUC-LAX: 92%
MUC-SFO: 94%

Please note that the original data states only the number of passengers, load factor are computed by someone on the MUC-Forum using normal equipment. Thus equipment changes can distort the data.

SailorOrion


User currently offlineAirFrnt From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2822 posts, RR: 42
Reply 4, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2179 times:

Quoting SailorOrion (Thread starter):
According to data from the German Statistical Agency (sorry I lack better word for "Statistisches Bundesamt") the load factor on MUC-DEN has been 87% and on MUC-ICN/PUS 86% of the seats have been sold. All data for April 2007.

Strangely enough I was talking with a friend who worked at the Airport yesterday about this. What I heard from him was that LH was ecstatic about how well their routes have been doing, but are not happy with the hot/high performance of the A343 on the route. The 346 and the 744 seem to be okay.


User currently offlineSailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (6 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2033 times:

Quoting AirFrnt (Reply 4):
The 346 and the 744 seem to be okay.

Good, then they can upgrade the route to a 346 :P

SailorOrion


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Load Factors Muc Ath posted Fri Sep 3 2004 15:43:06 by Sonyericsson
Aircraft Costs And Break-even Load Factors posted Sat Nov 12 2005 15:18:21 by Spectre242
Air Canada And Westjet Load Factors MAY 2005 posted Tue Jun 7 2005 19:32:47 by Lnglive1011yyz
EUjet And Load Factors posted Sat Sep 18 2004 18:21:49 by Delta777jet
SQ And CX August Load Factors.... posted Fri Sep 17 2004 09:09:56 by N754pr
Please Help With Load Factors And Utilisation posted Tue May 18 2004 00:37:09 by Startknob
Load Factors And Code-shares? posted Thu Dec 20 2001 03:42:52 by FFlyer
LH Flight IAD-TGL--Load Factors And Yields posted Sun Apr 29 2001 16:20:39 by 747firstclass
Seat Factors/Load Factors And All Zat posted Wed Jan 24 2001 13:48:07 by IndianGuy
Load Factors For Old And Current Routes posted Sun Oct 1 2000 20:25:52 by Trvlr