Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MUC-DEN And MUC-ICN/PUS Load Factors  
User currently offlineSailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6
Posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2734 times:

According to data from the German Statistical Agency (sorry I lack better word for "Statistisches Bundesamt") the load factor on MUC-DEN has been 87% and on MUC-ICN/PUS 86% of the seats have been sold. All data for April 2007.

Even though the data is (afaik) not fully accurate, it doesn't look bad ...

SailorOrion

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9659 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2721 times:

Quoting SailorOrion (Thread starter):
I lack better word for "Statistisches Bundesamt") the

"Buddhistisches Standesamt"  Wink - (Federal) Statistics and Census Office should be right.

Quoting SailorOrion (Thread starter):

Even though the data is (afaik) not fully accurate, it doesn't look ba

I would consider that an understatement. 86/87 % are bloody well for a full service carrier.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4999 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 2591 times:

Are these stats available online? How did MUC-YUL do in relation, as well as MUC-BOS/CLT?

User currently offlineSailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2576 times:

Same source:

MUC-YUL: 81%
MUC-BOS: 83%
MUC-CLT: 89%
MUC-JFK: 90%
MUC-LAX: 92%
MUC-SFO: 94%

Please note that the original data states only the number of passengers, load factor are computed by someone on the MUC-Forum using normal equipment. Thus equipment changes can distort the data.

SailorOrion


User currently offlineAirFrnt From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2827 posts, RR: 42
Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2364 times:

Quoting SailorOrion (Thread starter):
According to data from the German Statistical Agency (sorry I lack better word for "Statistisches Bundesamt") the load factor on MUC-DEN has been 87% and on MUC-ICN/PUS 86% of the seats have been sold. All data for April 2007.

Strangely enough I was talking with a friend who worked at the Airport yesterday about this. What I heard from him was that LH was ecstatic about how well their routes have been doing, but are not happy with the hot/high performance of the A343 on the route. The 346 and the 744 seem to be okay.


User currently offlineSailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2218 times:

Quoting AirFrnt (Reply 4):
The 346 and the 744 seem to be okay.

Good, then they can upgrade the route to a 346 :P

SailorOrion


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Load Factors Muc Ath posted Fri Sep 3 2004 15:43:06 by Sonyericsson
Aircraft Costs And Break-even Load Factors posted Sat Nov 12 2005 15:18:21 by Spectre242
Air Canada And Westjet Load Factors MAY 2005 posted Tue Jun 7 2005 19:32:47 by Lnglive1011yyz
EUjet And Load Factors posted Sat Sep 18 2004 18:21:49 by Delta777jet
SQ And CX August Load Factors.... posted Fri Sep 17 2004 09:09:56 by N754pr
Please Help With Load Factors And Utilisation posted Tue May 18 2004 00:37:09 by Startknob
Load Factors And Code-shares? posted Thu Dec 20 2001 03:42:52 by FFlyer
LH Flight IAD-TGL--Load Factors And Yields posted Sun Apr 29 2001 16:20:39 by 747firstclass
Seat Factors/Load Factors And All Zat posted Wed Jan 24 2001 13:48:07 by IndianGuy
Load Factors For Old And Current Routes posted Sun Oct 1 2000 20:25:52 by Trvlr