Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Qantas Plane Flies With Burning Rag...  
User currently offlineTerminalQ From Australia, joined Jul 2007, 13 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2140 times:

From the front page of 'The Age' website

Quoting www.theage.com.au:

A Qantas plane flew from Darwin to Brisbane with a burning cloth in the engine after crew had ignored a fire warning, an investigation has found.

An Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) report concluded the October 11, 2006, flight went ahead despite an alarm going off in the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) about 2.20pm (CST).

Aviation Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) personnel who visually checked the outside of the Boeing 767-336's APU found no signs of fire, but did not examine inside the engine, the report found.

They then advised the crew there was no sign of fire and the aircraft was returned to the Gate ready for departure for Brisbane.


http://www.theage.com.au/news/travel...gine/2007/07/31/1185647892746.html

This doesn't strike me as being particularly dangerous, however that may be because of my lack of Operational knowledge! Do things like this happen often?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineScouseflyer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 3255 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (5 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2073 times:

Quoting TerminalQ (Thread starter):
A Qantas plane flew from Darwin to Brisbane with a burning cloth in the engine after crew had ignored a fire warning, an investigation has found.

An Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) report concluded the October 11, 2006, flight went ahead despite an alarm going off in the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) about 2.20pm (CST).

Don't know about whether it was dangerous or not - I'm guessing that it wasn't the most sensible of ideas though! but as usual the press is being misleading - they're giving the impression that it was in one of the actual underwing engines not the tiny little bit in the tail!

User currently offlineSparklehorse12 From Australia, joined Feb 2007, 869 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (5 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1823 times:

Even though the press are running with it in their usual fashion, it seems QF are not the 'safety first' airline they once were. I wonder why this is, and it seems ever since 2002.


Airlines Flown : QF,NW,AA, CX, AC, MH, SQ, DJ, NZ, TG, PG,US, FJ, J8, AN, DD, JQ
User currently offlineJetfuel From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2066 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1703 times:

The ATSB has reviewed the incident and said in future shut down APUs after a fire must be engineer inspected before flight


Where's the passion gone out of the airline industry? The smell of jetfuel and the romance of taking a flight....
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Could A Plane Survive With Both Engines Out? posted Fri Jul 6 2007 19:33:11 by Sacamojus
Virtual Plane Spotting With Google's Street View posted Wed May 30 2007 14:43:42 by Ravel
20 Years Ago: Plane Collides With Fish posted Fri Mar 30 2007 04:58:32 by WestWing
XM Now Flies With Air Canada posted Thu Mar 1 2007 18:22:01 by Jimyvr
Commercial Jet Flies With Anti-Missile System posted Thu Jan 18 2007 01:45:03 by Detroitflyer
Who On Earth Flies With Sterling? posted Wed Jan 3 2007 09:18:59 by Mika
Swiss A320, Flies With JetStar. posted Mon Nov 27 2006 10:21:48 by VH-BZF
Qantas Having Problems With The 744`s? posted Mon Sep 11 2006 01:08:05 by Qantas744ER
Video: A380 Flies With Red Arrows! posted Thu Jul 20 2006 17:39:33 by Bells
Qantas Club Access With Amex? posted Fri Jun 16 2006 00:46:40 by DeltaGator