Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Which US Cities Need International Service?  
User currently offlineZrs70 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 3171 posts, RR: 9
Posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1733 times:

What US cities should have, yet don't have, international service. I'm not asking about international airports (airports with us customs facilities, but no international flights). I mean airports in large/ mid-sized cities that might benefit from non-stop transatlantic/ pacific service.

My list:

BDL
SLC
CMH
IND
MCI



14 year airliners.net vet! 2000-2013
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineChepos From Puerto Rico, joined Dec 2000, 6220 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1655 times:

Salt Lake City
New Orleans
Millwaukee(extremely underserved)
Indianapolis
Kansas City
Hartford
Providence



Fly the Flag!!!!
User currently offlineBH346 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3265 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1649 times:

Kansas City has an Air Canada CRJ flight to Toronto.

Best Regards,
BH346  
Happy Holidays!  



Northwest Airlines - Some People Just Know How to Fly
User currently offlineDsmav8r From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 579 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

SLC would be the only one that could support true international service. That is only because they have a DL gateway. Cities like BDL and PVD are too close to other cities with Intl service (BOS and JFK), same with MKE (ORD).

A city like CMH would be my choice...

Aric Thalman
Omaha, NE



To most people, the sky is the limit. To those who love aviation, the sky is home
User currently offlineZrs70 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 3171 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1633 times:

DSMav8r...

Though BDL and PVD are close to BOS,...

SAN is close to LAX
BWI is close to IAD

etc.




14 year airliners.net vet! 2000-2013
User currently offlineFlyCMH From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 2282 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1626 times:

Regarding Columbus...

Do I think the city is ready for transatlantic service now? No

Do I think the city will be ready in about 5 years? Yes

The need for international service of this caliber is not quite needed yet in Columbus, but as the city continues on its rapid rate of growth, I'm sure the issue will become more prevalent. The city is still embarking on a number of infrastructure improvements. Though many undertakings have recently been completed, such as the Nationwide Arena, the new Center of Science and Industry (COSI) Museum and the expansion of the Greater Columbus Convention Center, Columbus should definitely be ready for transatlantic service by 2005-2006. By then, other city improvements currently under construction and under proposal will be completed or nearing completion. Currently, a major problem is that many people do not know what the city has to offer. Unlike nearby cities such as Cleveland and Cincinnati, Columbus doesn't really have a reputation. However, with numerous events in Columbus gaining nation, and even worldwide attention, hopefully that will change.
If or when Columbus does receive transatlantic service, it would most likely be with an international carrier. Most US airlines fly transatlantic flights from their hubs, so it would be awkward to have an airline such as Northwest or TWA start overseas flights from CMH. America West will definitely not be expanding to Europe any time soon, and if they did, it would not be from Columbus. Also, it would probably be to either London, Paris, or Frankfurt, since there would not be sufficient demand for most other major European markets. The port authority actually met with British Airways and Lufthansa concerning starting nonstop service to Columbus a few years back. I do not know what were the results of the talks, but nothing has happened yet. If an airline were to start service from Europe to Columbus, two or three nonstops weekly with an aircraft such as the 767 would proabably be sufficient.
As a citizen of Columbus, I would definitely like to see nonstop transatlantic service to Europe, but everything lies in the moneymaking potential of such an endeavor.


User currently offlineDsmav8r From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 579 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1623 times:

SAN and BWI are also MUCH larger cities than PVD or BDL.  




To most people, the sky is the limit. To those who love aviation, the sky is home
User currently offlineCactusA319 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2918 posts, RR: 25
Reply 7, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1613 times:


I think JAX would be a good candidate. They flirted with BA for service to London but lost out. Air Transat ran charter services to YYZ a couple of years back but pulled out too. It is a growing city and has some tourism appeal to it also.

IND has international service in the form of ATA flights to CUN.

Doesn't MSY have flights to Mexico too? Maybe one of the N.O. boyz can enlighten us.

How about BNA? RDU?

For the city-code illiterate:

JAX=Jacksonville,FL
YYZ=Toronto, Canada
IND=Indianaopilis, IN
CUN=Cancun, Mexico
MSY= New Orleans, LA
BNA=Nashville, TN
RDU= Raleigh-Durham, NC


User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1603 times:

RDU has Air Canada operating CRJ non-stop.

User currently offlineBig777jet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1590 times:

RDU=AA has service daily B767 to LGW.

Delta should serve city out of Salt Lake City. SLC to LGW,CDG and FRA.

Big777jet





User currently offlineBaec777xx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1585 times:

West Palm Beach, & Fort Lauderdale are close to Miami International.... Jacksonville and Tampa are close to Atlanta.... all 4 needs international service....


All 4 needs Int'l. Svcs...

PBI
JAX
FLL
TPA



Baec777xx  


User currently offlineCactusA319 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2918 posts, RR: 25
Reply 11, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1580 times:


TPA has int'l service by AC, BA, and Condor.
FLL gets SAA, Air Aruba (used to anyway) I'm sure they get AC, they get Air Transat, and I think Air Jamaica.

Also JAX and TPA aren't really that close to ATL. JAX is at least a 5 hour drive.



User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1577 times:

FLL indeed has many flights from Canada with Air Canada and other charter lines. I go to FLL when I need to fly to MIA- it's much cheaper with those fine charter airlines flying there from Canada. Personally, I think RDU can use a few to European high-tech centres.

User currently offlineTWAneedsNOhelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1584 times:

I agree with Bassim, FLL could definately support widescale trans-Atlantic services. Presently, FLL's Terminal Four is the designated interntational terminal and South African Airways, Finnair, Air Transat, Canada 3000, Royal, Air Canada, Bahamasair, and Air Jamaica serve it. American Eagle, and Gulfstream International both also serve The Bahamas. Because FLL is 30-40 mins away from nearly 2 million people (Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties), FLL is certainly capable of being a widescale spill-over airport from MIA. In fact for domestic flights it is and has developed itself into a strong destination for low cost airlines: Metrojet, Delta Express, Southwest, JetBlue, Spirit, Airtran, ATA, and Midway. So I believe FLL could easily support daily service to London, Paris, Amsterdam, and Frankfurt. Really any airline that serves MIA should also consider FLL, and market to the entire Southeast Florida populace. So my vote goes to FLL.

As for BDL , I would like to see TWA start 2x daily service to their SJU focus city before any trans-Atlantic service is begun.

CMH is a tough call...would agree that its porbably 5-8 years ahead of its time.

SLC is a good idea though, at least nonstop to London and CDG (DL/AF codeshare).

STL as I've said before needs stronger trans-Atlantic service, to compliment daily LGW and CDG. Would like to see FRA started, NRT in a year and a half, perhaps AMS, and even TLV to capture the Israel market in the western portion of the country.

Can not see PVD with trans-Atlantic service for a long long time.

I have a feeling British Airways and Lufthansa won't be the only two European carriers to visit PHX . Same goes with Denver...


User currently offlineTheCroupier From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1547 times:

I think you guys missed one of the most obvious selections. Austin-San Antonio intl services. Between these two cities, which are about 80 mi. apart, are nearly 2.75 million people.

-AUS has "brand new" intl airport with 10,000' runways
-AUS is a tech mecca
-San Antonio is a top American destination for many tourists, military personnel and convention goers.
-SAT is the final assembly point/delivery center for Donier/Fairchild 328 JET (and soon, others)
-SAT was Boeing's selection for an DC10 to MD10 conversion facility at Kelly AFB

That said, SAT has 10 daily flights to Mexico with more planned.
AUS lost Air Canada service recently (although a routing of YYZ-AUS-SAT-YYZ might have made the difference.)

Proximity to DFW and IAH, and their generous services to Europe and Asia, will preclude any real intl expansion at AUS/SAT for the next 4-5 years.


User currently offlineLHMark From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 7255 posts, RR: 46
Reply 15, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1538 times:

BUF. YYZ is 4 hours away, EWR is 7 hours away, PIT is about 4.5 hrs away. There are about 2 million western New Yorkers, and more SE Ontario residents. I think it could warrant a route or two.

Problem is, industry in WNY sucks, and the tourist market won't buoy this type of route by itself.



"Sympathy is something that shouldn't be bestowed on the Yankees. Apparently it angers them." - Bob Feller
User currently offlineTWAneedsNOhelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1533 times:

Mark, spend 60 bucks get down to JFK.....the options are endless!

User currently offlineLHMark From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 7255 posts, RR: 46
Reply 17, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1530 times:

TWA- $49 if you plan two weeks in advance. it's about time  


"Sympathy is something that shouldn't be bestowed on the Yankees. Apparently it angers them." - Bob Feller
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1517 times:

Dude - 4 hrs from BUF to YYZ? I drive the route at least 4-5 times each year and its NEVER taken me longer than 2 hrs (and that is with traffic on the DVP).

User currently offlineLHMark From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 7255 posts, RR: 46
Reply 19, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1508 times:

Sorry, B747. I gave a conservative estimate for drive time from Rochester. Small perspective problem on my part.


"Sympathy is something that shouldn't be bestowed on the Yankees. Apparently it angers them." - Bob Feller
User currently offlineFalcon Flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1326 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1506 times:

Laker's Gatwick flights to FLL were not able to sustain themselves with just thrice weekly service. Others who have attempted FLL but withdrew include Martinair and Hapag Lloyd. Condor seems to do well with the Saturday FRA flights but also had a short lived CGN-FLL which ultimately ceased. If I'm not mistaken, Lauda Italy also had a short lived MXP-FLL a few years back. Britannia announced service to PBI sometime ago but withdrew shortly before startup. If there was the potential of a market, don't you think Delta, American or even BA would start service ?


My definition of cool ? Not trying so hard to be cool.
User currently offlineSn330 From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 16 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (13 years 9 months 1 day ago) and read 1498 times:

Hartford is a covenient, and uncrowded, alternative to Boston and JFK.
As for SLC, I really doubt that. With only 500,000 residents within reasonable driving distances, high tax rates, and not that much major buisness activity, it just doesn't seem like a logical choice for an international carrier. It would just be cheaper for them to fly into a hub city, and then codeshare into SLC.
AC did screw up the Austin service. Rather than flying from YYZ, they should have flown from Ottawa. Austin is considered by many to be the Silicon Valley of the South, and Ottawa is the Silicon Valley of Canada. Depending on how the newly announced YOW-SJC route, AC should look into this. A YYZ-AUS-SAT-YYZ route would definitely been better than just YYZ-AUS.


User currently offlineTheCroupier From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (13 years 9 months 19 hours ago) and read 1466 times:

These "tech center" to "tech center" routes aren't all they are proported to be. Although Austin-San Jose runs 3 757s a day, an Austin-Boston route was a big disappointment for AA back in 98-99.

Ottawa-Austin seems a little odd. Heck, there aren't any DFW-Ottawa flights.


User currently offlineJderden777 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1755 posts, RR: 28
Reply 23, posted (13 years 9 months 18 hours ago) and read 1460 times:

i will go for SAT..but i doubt they can accomodate an international carrier unless that new runway is built...the longest current runway is only 8502ft long...i don't think that this is long enough for transatlantic service. it would be nice to see a BA 763 at SAT next time i go down there...by the way is there anyone who has been to SAT lately? or ex-kelly AFB where boeing is doing those conversions? be cool to go there for a day of shooting..if there's anything there now

jderden777



"my soul is in the sky" - shakespeare
User currently offlineWorldVoyager From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 393 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (13 years 9 months 17 hours ago) and read 1450 times:

I don't know about the U.S. but here in Canada, Ottawa (YOW) is definetly on the list. Right now, the city (where I live) is going through a high-tech boom - Nortel, Newbridge, JDS Uniphase, Corel are all either based here or have some of their largest campuses here. Ottawa is currently the fastest growing city in Canada (along with Montreal, I think). We have the lowest vacancy rate in the nation as well. Most travellers through YOW are business travelers (high tech, government affairs, etc.), and most are sick and tired of connecting their asses off through Toronto, Montreal, or a US hub. Although strong nationwide, our air links with the US and the world are very weak. At least we have a daily flight to London Heathrow!

Don't get me wrong: Personally, I despise the city. (As I write this, the temperature outside is -20 degrees celsius without factoring the wind chill - NOT FUN)


25 Boeing757/767 : Hartford has international service to Toronto and Montreal. Trans-Atlantic would work once new terminal is ready -- the corporate community could easi
26 Flashmeister : It's not ex-Kelly AFB for a while, at least until April... and even then, the airfield is being transferred to Lackland AFB technically. Boeing and Lo
27 OA412 : Actually, the number of residents within a reasonable driving distance of SLC is closer to 1.7 million. A daily flight to LGW should be able to do fin
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Virgin Blue To Which US Cities posted Thu Oct 12 2006 17:55:32 by Daddy1
Which US Airlines Have International Hubs Where? posted Thu May 27 2004 16:59:18 by 777kicksass
Great / Profitable US Cities For International posted Sun Apr 4 2004 03:41:51 by KLM11
Closest US Cities With Mainline Service posted Thu Feb 26 2004 08:43:53 by Zrs70
Which US Airports Had Transatl. Service In 1977? posted Fri Aug 22 2003 19:14:52 by Zrs70
Top 5 US Cities For New International Service posted Tue Dec 16 2003 05:19:18 by Paddy
US Airports Which Have Lost All Airline Service posted Wed Jul 5 2006 12:28:13 by Jetpixx
US Airways To End Service To Four Cities From PIT! posted Sat Mar 25 2006 00:34:55 by CentPIT
US Cities Formerly Having Trans-atlantic Service posted Fri Jul 22 2005 05:33:05 by MyOthrCarsA777
European Service To Small US Cities? posted Sat Jul 10 2004 20:07:50 by Ord777