Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Flight Delays -- Thoughts/solutions: 787-3?  
User currently offlineORDFan From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 378 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1641 times:

Many of us have heard about and probably even experienced the recent surge of flight delays (I know I have) across the US. There are many theories/explanations as to why American flights are becoming increasingly delayed, from a shortage of pilots to a plethora of RJ traffic to antiquated airport design, etc., etc.

When flying throughout Asia last summer, however, even in monsoon-happy Thailand, the few delays I experienced were neither as extensive nor as prolonged as those that I've experienced in the US. However, it's no secret that Asian carriers routinely fly widebody aircraft between medium and even relatively short city-pairs, i.e. 777s on SIN-BKK or even A330s KUL-BKK.

I began wondering if maybe it was high-time that American carriers started adopting a similar strategy, even if it means sacrificing frequency for scale? I know that there are some heavily traveled domestic routes (some seasonal) that do employ widebodies like AA on DFW-MIA or DL on ATL-MIA or several of the legacies on transcon NYC-LAX. But is it time for this to become more common between shorter city pairs say the overly crowded, continously delayedCHI-NYC? To that end, should more US carriers begin looking at the 787-3 as a means to accomplish this? Personally, I wouldn't mind sacrifing some frequency for larger aircraft with fewer delays....

[Edited 2007-08-07 02:37:51]

[Edited 2007-08-07 02:38:26]

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineA340313X From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 175 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1616 times:

It's a good plan in my eyes but it won't happen anytime soon in the same way we won't all be driving fuel cell cars within the next ten years. It'd help the consumer and the earth too but it doesn't make the companies as much money.

User currently offlineSirOmega From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 735 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1566 times:

I don't think airlines will give up frequency unless someone makes them. Congress, airports, FAA someone. What i'd like to see is having wb aircraft on call in bad weather to get everyone where they're supposed to go without stranding people overnight. Of course that wont happen either because airlines arent responsible for wx delays.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Website That Lists Major Flight Delays posted Wed Jul 18 2007 05:06:39 by Airplanenut
Future Of Flight Museum To Hold 787 Rollout Event posted Fri Jun 29 2007 20:02:26 by Clickhappy
Emirates Flight Delays & Inflight Services posted Fri Feb 23 2007 11:03:42 by Ek-a380
Busiest Travel Day - Expect Flight Delays posted Wed Nov 22 2006 21:15:31 by N62NA
How About Some Odd Flight Delays?... posted Tue May 23 2006 17:01:36 by Ulfinator
20/20: MYTH: Flight Delays Are Due To Weather posted Sat May 13 2006 21:12:58 by Tercer
Solution To SFO Flight Delays In Bad Weather posted Fri Apr 28 2006 19:59:56 by Egghead
Superbowl Flight Delays posted Fri Feb 3 2006 23:16:15 by CaptSkibi
Air Traffic Controllers: Flight Delays Ahead posted Thu Oct 6 2005 20:01:11 by KarlB737
UA Express Flight Delays - Common? posted Tue Jun 28 2005 04:07:04 by GoAllegheny