Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Load Factors On KUL-EZE Route  
User currently offlineRAFVC10 From Spain, joined Sep 2005, 1980 posts, RR: 6
Posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4538 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi all,

just a question...

is profitable this route? How about load factors?

Regards,

Gerard


El dia que los gilipollas vuelen, no podremos ver la luz del sol!
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDCAjet From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 422 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4445 times:

Quoting RAFVC10 (Thread starter):
is profitable this route? How about load factors?

Well, keeping in mind that load factors do not equal a route being profitable... The last two times I was leaving from EZE, my UA flight back home was at the gate next to the MH 744, and judging from the crowds, they seemed quite full. Furthermore MH just went through a quite extensive overhaul of their long haul network in an effort to put the carrier on a fast track to profitability so one thinks that had this route not been attractive to the airline (and there are many ways to define "attractive") it would have been gone by now.

Interesting fact: some of the cabin crew on this flight are from Mexico, a legacy from the days MH used to fly to Mexico City. I believe these days they are based either at KUL or EZE.



"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
User currently offlineFlydreamliner From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 2759 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4417 times:

Isn't this flight operated with a 744? If they were hurting that badly, they could drop it down to a 772... MH isn't really hurting for long haul metal. Even with having to dodge ETOPS dead zones, 772ER could make this route easy.... haha, they could even use the long ranger.

I love unique flights like this one. Kind of like, what is it, MH's EWR-ARN (or is it JFK-ARN?) and SQ's FRA-JFK?

Too bad MH isn't in an alliance, I'd love a flight like this for a southern hemisphere round the world flight.



"Let the world change you, and you can change the world"
User currently offlineEZEIZA From Argentina, joined Aug 2004, 4964 posts, RR: 25
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4417 times:

Quoting DCAjet (Reply 1):
The last two times I was leaving from EZE, my UA flight back home was at the gate next to the MH 744, and judging from the crowds, they seemed quite full.

I'm guessing a lot of that crowd is for South Africa? (pure speculation  Smile )

regards  Smile



Carp aunque ganes o pierdas ...
User currently offlineDCAjet From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 422 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4393 times:

Quoting EZEIZA (Reply 3):
I'm guessing a lot of that crowd is for South Africa? (pure speculation )

Actually, both times, mostly Asians were queuing up for boarding. Lets not forget Argentina has a pretty sizeable Asian population and barring LA as a connection point to the Far East, this flight may offer the best connections to places such as Shanghai, Taipei, etc.

IIRC, AR's flight to Auckland and Sydney was designed with that in mind - a quick route to Asia - but it took a life of its own with mostly South Americans, Aussies and Kiwis being the users these days - and not going to Asia.

Regards from DC



"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
User currently offlineSukhoi From Sweden, joined May 2006, 373 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4317 times:

Quoting Flydreamliner (Reply 2):
MH's EWR-ARN (or is it JFK-ARN?)

It´s EWR


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7561 posts, RR: 43
Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4226 times:

Quoting DCAjet (Reply 4):
Lets not forget Argentina has a pretty sizeable Asian population and barring LA as a connection point to the Far East, this flight may offer the best connections to places such as Shanghai, Taipei, etc.

Interesting point, but I guess this would only work if the fares are attractive; otherwise, one would have to fly EZE-CPT-JNB-KUL-XXX and that is a pretty long and tiresome itinerary. Might be easier to just fly AR's EZE-AKL and then fly AKL-XXX with NZ or an Asian carrier.



Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineDCAjet From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 422 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4148 times:

Quoting EddieDude (Reply 6):
Interesting point, but I guess this would only work if the fares are attractive; otherwise, one would have to fly EZE-CPT-JNB-KUL-XXX and that is a pretty long and tiresome itinerary. Might be easier to just fly AR's EZE-AKL and then fly AKL-XXX with NZ or an Asian carrier.

Indeed, it should be faster, but as it is timed now, that is, leaving EZE at midnight and landing at AKL at around 4:45 AM, it is certainly not connection friendly on account of the long layover - 4 hours or more- and then not that many flights from AKL to PVG or TPE, for instance. Sydney would be perfect for connections, but then you have to add to the already long flight from EZE (almost 14 hours) the stopover in AKL and a 3 hour flight to Sydney. That's when a through plane service to KUL starts to make sense. It is only around 3-4 hours from KUL to PVG.

LB



"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
User currently offlineUPPERDECKFAN From Spain, joined Jun 2007, 992 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4078 times:

Quoting EZEIZA (Reply 3):
I'm guessing a lot of that crowd is for South Africa?

Does MH have 5th freedom rights in South Africa?



744,742,741,772,773,762,732,735,738,752,727,717,DC10,DC9,M82,M87,319,320,321,343,346,L1011,CRJ2,CRJ9,E190,ATR42,DSH8,
User currently offlineBrenintw From Taiwan, joined Jul 2006, 1612 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4069 times:

Quoting UPPERDECKFAN (Reply 8):
Does MH have 5th freedom rights in South Africa

I would assume so -- my original flight JNB - TPE was on this exact flight (in the days when it was still flown by the MD-11!) I was seated next to a woman who had boarded the flight in EZE ... she wasn't thrilled with the 31-hour delay we had in JNB either!



I'm tired of the A vs. B sniping. Neither make planes that shed wings randomly!
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11616 posts, RR: 60
Reply 10, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3948 times:

Quoting Flydreamliner (Reply 2):
Isn't this flight operated with a 744? If they were hurting that badly, they could drop it down to a 772... MH isn't really hurting for long haul metal. Even with having to dodge ETOPS dead zones, 772ER could make this route easy.... haha, they could even use the long ranger.

It would be even better if this flight was non stop - then it would take you over both the Falklands and the Southern French Antarctic Lands! I don't think a 777 on the EZE-JNB route would work though economically compared to the 744; even at ETOPS 240 you'd have to make a diversion North, and at 180/207 it would be much more pronounced.


Dan Smile



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineMD11junkie From Argentina, joined May 2005, 3146 posts, RR: 58
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3933 times:

Quoting UPPERDECKFAN (Reply 8):
Does MH have 5th freedom rights in South Africa?

I'm guessing you're talking about 8th freedom rights for the JNB-CPT/CPT-JNB legs?

Gastón - The MD11junkie



There is no such thing as Boeing vs Airbus as the queen of the skies has three engines, winglets and the sweetest nose!
User currently offline6thfreedom From Bermuda, joined Sep 2004, 3323 posts, RR: 20
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3895 times:

It's a waste if you ask me...

2 services per week takes a up almost 6 days of aircraft utilisation.

The same aircraft could operate daily services to an Australian city, which I think would generate more in pax and cargo, especially with the strong Australian dollar.

With this service MH has crew stationed for 3 days at a time in EZE, CPT and JNB!


User currently offlineMX77W From Mexico, joined Apr 2007, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3839 times:

Quoting DCAjet (Reply 1):
Interesting fact: some of the cabin crew on this flight are from Mexico, a legacy from the days MH used to fly to Mexico City. I believe these days they are based either at KUL or EZE.

Oh I remember those days, I actually was lucky enough to fly on MH's 744 on the MEX-LAX-MEX leg of what used to be MEX-LAX-TPE-KUL-TPE-LAX-MEX. I wonder why the stopped? Well I guess that's a stupid question, it was obviously an unprofitable route for them probably, in any case, it seemed successful to me (I was 10 then) since the 744 went out overbooked, the prices were very competitive, and the service was extraodinary. I wish MH the best on their fast-track to profitability and hopfully they'll open MEX again someday.

MX 77W



When Will MX Fly to Europe??? I guess '09 is the year!!!
User currently offlineTreeHillRavens From Malaysia, joined Jun 2007, 394 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3765 times:

Quoting UPPERDECKFAN (Reply 8):
Does MH have 5th freedom rights in South Africa?

Yes. They do.

Quoting DCAjet (Reply 1):
Interesting fact: some of the cabin crew on this flight are from Mexico, a legacy from the days MH used to fly to Mexico City. I believe these days they are based either at KUL or EZE.

No more Mexican crew work for MAS, as far as i'm concerned. Only South African and Argentinian crew.

Quoting MX77W (Reply 13):
I actually was lucky enough to fly on MH's 744 on the MEX-LAX-MEX leg of what used to be MEX-LAX-TPE-KUL-TPE-LAX-MEX. I wonder why the stopped? Well I guess that's a stupid question, it was obviously an unprofitable route for them probably,

LAX-MEX-LAX was profitable for MAS. They also earned a lot of money from the cargo business. The US government revoked MAS 5th freedom rights between LAX/MEX and MAS had no choice but to stop this route completely.


User currently offlineAR326 From Argentina, joined Jul 2007, 30 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3607 times:

Quoting EZEIZA (Reply 3):
I'm guessing a lot of that crowd is for South Africa? (pure speculation )

I actually flew on this flight EZE-CPT and JNB-EZE last year and the crowd was quite mixed. On the eastbound leg, there were quite a few Argentines going to South Africa on holiday and many others continuing on to Asia. On the return flight, most of the flight was made up of South African high school rugby teams going to Argentina on some sort of rugby exchange programme between Argentine and South African schools. The flights were operating at full capacity on all legs.

Cheers.


User currently offlineEZEIZA From Argentina, joined Aug 2004, 4964 posts, RR: 25
Reply 16, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3549 times:

Speaking of South Africa to S. America, weren't there rumours that SA was going to start JNB-EZE by 2008?

regards  Smile



Carp aunque ganes o pierdas ...
User currently offlineDCAjet From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 422 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3514 times:

Quoting EZEIZA (Reply 16):
Speaking of South Africa to S. America, weren't there rumours that SA was going to start JNB-EZE by 2008?

The announcement was made, PR and all, (was going to be operated with their Airbus 342), but the plans were shelved at the same time SAA anounced the retirement of the 744 fleet, and standardizing their long haul fleet around the Airbus 340 platform, in an effort to return the airline to profitability.



"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
User currently offlineHardiwv From Brazil, joined Oct 2004, 8780 posts, RR: 50
Reply 18, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 3419 times:

Quoting EZEIZA (Reply 16):
Speaking of South Africa to S. America, weren't there rumours that SA was going to start JNB-EZE by 2008?

As mentioned, the plan was shelved and SA decided instead to increase JNB-GRU from daily to 10 weekly.

Rgs,


User currently offlineJj From Algeria, joined Jun 2001, 1227 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3313 times:

I hadn't heard they shelved the plan. Too bad! But coinciding with the supposed start of the route, MH was to withdraw from the CPT-EZE segment (still flying KUL-JNB-CPT). I guess now MH will maintain their EZE tag on. There is a nice market between EZE and South Africa... I wouldn't be surprised if 75% of the pax that board @ EZE deplane either in CPT or JNB...

User currently offlineEZEIZA From Argentina, joined Aug 2004, 4964 posts, RR: 25
Reply 20, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3220 times:

Quoting Jj (Reply 19):
There is a nice market between EZE and South Africa..

That's what I was thinking too. Why doesn's AR (Marsans) look into that? I think it would be a profitable route and with virtually no competition

saludos  Smile



Carp aunque ganes o pierdas ...
User currently offlineMD11junkie From Argentina, joined May 2005, 3146 posts, RR: 58
Reply 21, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3216 times:

Quoting EZEIZA (Reply 20):

That's what I was thinking too. Why doesn's AR (Marsans) look into that? I think it would be a profitable route and with virtually no competition

What have we been talking about in the other thread??  Smile

There are no planes to even look or maintain current schedules! Big grin No need to add more...

Gastón - The MD11junkie



There is no such thing as Boeing vs Airbus as the queen of the skies has three engines, winglets and the sweetest nose!
User currently offlineEZEIZA From Argentina, joined Aug 2004, 4964 posts, RR: 25
Reply 22, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3208 times:

Quoting MD11junkie (Reply 21):
There are no planes to even look or maintain current schedules!

 Wink



Carp aunque ganes o pierdas ...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Load Factors On The LAX-Paris Route posted Sat Jul 8 2000 01:18:34 by Ben88
CLE-MCO Load Factors On CO 5/20 posted Wed Apr 18 2007 01:47:20 by ATLAaron
LAX-HKG Load Factors On CX posted Wed Oct 25 2006 03:43:04 by Dallasnewark
VS Load Factors On LHR-DXB posted Thu Jul 6 2006 14:36:03 by JWMD123
Why LOW Load Factors On 9/11 Hijacked Aircraft? posted Thu Apr 13 2006 20:13:41 by N484ER
OzJet Load Factors On The Improve! posted Sat Dec 3 2005 02:36:10 by Simpilicity
Load Factors On Thai Jfkbkk posted Sat Jun 4 2005 18:21:02 by Eyeonthesky17
Load Factors On BA European Flights posted Fri Nov 5 2004 22:54:02 by SQNo1
Load Factors On QF USA Flights? posted Mon Apr 7 2003 06:46:10 by QANTASpower
Load Factors On New CO LGA Flights posted Tue Oct 17 2000 02:19:41 by Ishky15