Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
China To Cut Domestic Flights, Ban New Airlines  
User currently offlineJasp25 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 613 posts, RR: 2
Posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 8228 times:

Here's the detailed link:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20297896/

-Jasp


-peace and chicken grease!
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21418 posts, RR: 60
Reply 1, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 8191 times:

What does this mean for the 450 737s and A320s on order?

The article talks about how pax numbers have increased, but only talks about cutting flights. Does this mean they will switch to larger jets? if so, this won't cut pax numbers, so why talk about how pax numbers have increased 20% when the real concern is too many flights scheduled per hour (like JFK).



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineTKV From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 8181 times:

The same thread was filed 4 days ago

Pls delete one of them

[Edited 2007-08-20 02:07:35]

[Edited 2007-08-20 02:15:50]

User currently offlineJasp25 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 613 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 8153 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 1):
Does this mean they will switch to larger jets?

Quite possibly they will do that.



-peace and chicken grease!
User currently offlineTKV From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 7997 times:

Quoting TKV (Reply 2):
The same thread was filed 4 days ago [/quote]
----
As my similar thread 4 days ago was not replied, I assume it will be deleted., I will continue to post here.

[quote=Jasp25,reply=3]Does this mean they will switch to larger jets?
Quite possibly they will do that.

I think that the reference to pax no only was included to visualize the grow problem.

This is particularly a problem given the increase of flights mid next year due to the Olympic Games, which will increase the number of international flights, which of course will not be restricted !

Of course, the pax No. at China-intern flights will increase also, as the games are nearly all in Beijing and huge number of visitors will come in from other cities. Now, the announced measures would mean less capacity for more pax. And to divert larger planes from international Chinese routes will be obviously impossible.

If we assume that the Chinese Authorities will maintain the local flight reduction during the games, this would be a real problem. But knowing how things are in China, I would not bet this would happen, safety has, as the news of the last weeks show, not the same priority there as in the West !!

But, as it is probable the measures will be implemented outside the Olympic time frame, it is possible that this will push up twin aisle frames. But as the problem is nearly immediate, orders for new aircraft
will come in far too late, so I could imagine urgent purchases or leases of discarded B767, B742-3 (possibly -4). A330, (possibly A300) or even older aircrafts.

TKV

[Edited 2007-08-20 03:32:08]

[Edited 2007-08-20 03:34:00]

[Edited 2007-08-20 03:36:32]

User currently offlineOzair From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 792 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7820 times:

Quoting TKV (Reply 4):
But, as it is probable the measures will be implemented outside the Olympic time frame, it is possible that this will push up twin aisle frames. But as the problem is nearly immediate, orders for new aircraft
will come in far too late

Too late to solve the current situation but certainly brightens the prospects of the B783!


User currently offlineJasp25 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 613 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7773 times:

The problem is that the growth of air travellers have way surpassed the number of safety personnel. Chinese authorities could have seen this problem years ago and prepared themselves especially for the inllux of foreign tourists for the olympics. But yes, I can see airlines decreasing their frequencies by utilizing bigger jets to service their current routes instead of using multiple smaller aircraft.

-Jasp



-peace and chicken grease!
User currently offlineTKV From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 7748 times:

Quoting Ozair (Reply 5):
Too late to solve the current situation but certainly brightens the prospects of the B783

?img border=0 src="http://www.airliners.net/discussions/graphics/smilies/checkmark.gif" width="15" height="15" border=0>??img border=0 src="http://www.airliners.net/discussions/graphics/smilies/checkmark.gif" width="15" height="15" border=0>?.Excellent remark. A country with the both large distances and cities as China, with the railroad alternative antiquated and slow, seems nearly ideal for the B783, even before the here discussed flight reduction issue arose ! And the same aircraft is adequated for internationa flights to Japan, and many other sorrounding countries.

TKV

[Edited 2007-08-20 05:34:35]

[Edited 2007-08-20 05:37:03]

User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2910 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 7714 times:

As I wrote in another thread, that (probably) got deleted.
CAAC, the same authority that ordered a gaggle of Airbus & Boeing narrowbodies, is at the root cause of the problem.
I suppose an order for 767, 777, A330 could be eminent to solve short-term capacity issues.


User currently offlineTKV From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 7703 times:

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 8):
CAAC, the same authority that ordered a gaggle of Airbus & Boeing narrowbodies

Do you mean the here announced measures or something before that ?? Thanks in advance for answer !

TKV


User currently offlineFly2CHC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7596 times:

Do they mean no new international carrier will be able to start services to PEK, or that no new Chinese carrier can be formed?

User currently offlineJasp25 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 613 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7576 times:

Quoting Fly2CHC (Reply 10):
Do they mean no new international carrier will be able to start services to PEK, or that no new Chinese carrier can be formed?

That's how the newsbyte sounds to me.. that is almost a setback in the growing aviation industry but yet again, it's a good thing as that is a safety concern that the Chinese authority is giving attention to.

-Jasp



-peace and chicken grease!
User currently offlineTKV From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 7482 times:

Quoting Jasp25 (Reply 11):
Do they mean no new international carrier will be able to start services to PEK, or that no new Chinese carrier can be formed?

I am quite sure that this is not the case for the international carriers. These flight have no Chinese personnel (of course, need the attention of the ground personnel) and are all LA and VLA. . As that no new Chinese carriers can be formed, this is expressly stated, but presently there are more than enough !!

TKV


User currently onlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7325 posts, RR: 24
Reply 13, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 7427 times:

Quoting TKV (Reply 12):
As that no new Chinese carriers can be formed, this is expressly stated, but presently there are more than enough !!

Well so much for Virgin China.



Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineAnglo2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 7216 times:

Good decision, there are far too many airlines in the country at the moment. Perhaps other countries with crowded skies will take note of this

User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2910 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 7205 times:

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 8):
Do you mean the here announced measures or something before that ?

What I meant was that CAAC should have known that throwing 200+ narrowbodies into Chinese airspace is going to cause congestion. If there is only a fixed number of runway or airway slots, the only way to increase capacity is to utilize larger aircraft.

Hence, look at the example of Japan in the 1970s & 1980s.
In the 1960s, trunk routes were operated by 727 or DC-8-types. Ten/15 years later with minimal increase in frequencies L10s & 747SRs ply those same routes.

While the big three Chinese carriers are finally starting to take A330s in small numbers, 2000-2005 period saw very little widebody growth despite strong growth minus SARS.


User currently offlineArt From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 3347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 6707 times:

International Rescue in the form of 748-I's and A380's? And 783's for Domestic Rescue? Or can China upgrade its facilities fast enough to avoid being pushed to use larger aircraft?

User currently offlineOzair From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 792 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 6414 times:

Quoting Art (Reply 16):
Or can China upgrade its facilities fast enough to avoid being pushed to use larger aircraft?

I think the infrastructure will come, it's China after all where labour is cheap and anything that helps the economy grow is a good investment.

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 15):
Hence, look at the example of Japan in the 1970s & 1980s.
In the 1960s, trunk routes were operated by 727 or DC-8-types. Ten/15 years later with minimal increase in frequencies L10s & 747SRs ply those same routes.

And yet now the infrastructure has caught up we see 767, 777 flights being the norm.


User currently offlineTKV From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 5917 times:

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 15):
Hence, look at the example of Japan in the 1970s & 1980s.

Respectfully, and with knowledge of this, I advise not try to compare Japan with China. Other that both are Far-Easterners, they are so similar a Scandinavian to a Sicilian and the airliner's related geographical, social and population related parameters are diametrical opposed.

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 13):
Well so much for Virgin China.

Eve if something like this were formally possibly, it would be suicide for Virgin

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 15):
What I meant was that CAAC should have known that throwing 200+ narrow-bodies into Chinese airspace is going to cause congestion. If there is only a fixed number of runway or airway slots, the only way to increase capacity is to utilize larger aircraft.

To be fair. China has done a lot building airports and related facilities, but the planning was faulty and
many of these were overbuilt in some regions and under-built in other

Quoting Art (Reply 16):
I think the infrastructure will come, it's China after all where labour is cheap and anything that helps the economy grow is a good investment

I am very skeptic here. As other A-netter have stated in past topics, the quality of what they do is very poor if not done under Western, Japanese or Korean strict supervision, and even so, as the examples of
Mattel and the pet-food companies (both billion $ Western companies) show a disturbing tendency.
The main problem is that Chinese think that all tasks are "easy" !!
This apply more so for the training and mentality of personnel, as well to put personnel friendship over ethical and business needs.

The West has chosen to ignore these facts because of the extreme low cost, which probably would not
be so favorable if a thorough supervision and control would exist.

The Japanese a exactly the opposite !!

TKV


User currently offlineMCOGVADCA From China, joined Oct 2006, 446 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 5411 times:

TKV, Dude we all know that the Chinese don't like to be compared to the Japanese, and in doing such, it usually results in a diatribe about the Nanjing atrocities, but what Carpethead said has no bearing on Chinese culture whatsoever and simply pertains to perceived similarities between the two aviation markets. I dont feel most Chinese would be offended by that, and it would behoove the Chinese to listen to what Carpethead, and others on this board, have to say. Chinese airlines need to use widebodies on routes other than the shenzhen/shanghai/beijing (very obtuse) triangle, and make the transition that Japan did a few decades ago as a result of restricted slots and airports reaching capacity from mostly narrowbodies on domestic flights to predominantly widebodies on trunk routes.


12 months:pvg hkg bkk doh mxp nce zrh iah lhr gva iad clt lax nrt sin mnl ceb del jai gay vns szx zuh mfm icn can
User currently offlineAwthompson From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 445 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 5374 times:

Quoting Jasp25 (Reply 11):
but yet again, it's a good thing as that is a safety concern that the Chinese authority is giving attention to.

I must praise China for working at a strategic level in order to put a peg on safety. This is where safety management should start. This is one advantage of central control which is not so clear in the west.

Quotation from the link;

“In order to ensure safety and bring about the positive, rapid, healthy and orderly development of the industry, the CAAC has decided to carry out an overall adjustment in the number of flights, entry into the aviation industry, and rise in cargo capacity,” the notice said.

China of course has the advantage of observing how disorderly airline growth has been in the west (fortunately not coupled with any real negative affect on safety) and using this knowledge to it's advantage in managing rapid growth in the airline sector.

If this means less flights by larger aircraft, while at the same time not having a detrimental effect on prices and choice, that must be a good thing for China and the world in environmental terms.


User currently offlineTKV From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 5338 times:

Quoting MCOGVADCA (Reply 19):
TKV, Dude we all know that the Chinese don't like to be compared to the Japanese

Sorry you misunderstood my comments. I was not worrying about the Chinese being offended, but simply stating that the Chinese Market and population are totally different from the Japanese and cannot be compared.
I thought Istated so.

And I am totally open to consider further Carpethead statements !

cordially

TKV

[Edited 2007-08-20 17:30:15]

User currently offlineAither From South Korea, joined Oct 2004, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 3442 times:

The thing is every small to medium city in China wants to be linked non stop to BJS and these cities can't be served by anything larger than a single aisle aircraft. These cities are growing fast (perharps even faster than coastal cities). Eventually what could be needed is more secondary hubs... basically they have to rethink their domestic network.
On the opposite few routes can sustain widebody aircraft and these routes are huge (BJS-SHA, BJS-HKG, etc.), I even think A330s or 787s will be soon too small for these routes.



Never trust the obvious
User currently offlineTKV From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (6 years 8 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3353 times:

Quoting Aither (Reply 22):
The thing is every small to medium city in China wants to be linked non stop to BJS and these cities can't be served by anything larger than a single aisle aircraft. These cities are growing fast (perharps even faster than coastal cities). Eventually what could be needed is more secondary

 checkmark 

Quoting Aither (Reply 22):
basically they have to rethink their domestic network.
On the opposite few routes can sustain widebody aircraft and these routes are huge (BJS-SHA, BJS-HKG, etc.), I even think A330s or 787s will be soon too small for these routes.

Even if above is a fact that many routes are not adequate for widebodies, a lot of other, presently served by narrowbodies, are so. Only a few of the latter airports I visited: Guelin, LiYang, Xiamen, Kunming
So there is a ample room for improvement.
Presently, even including unfilled orders, Chinese Airlines have very few large short range aircraft needee
for such tasks. On the upper end of the range some B767 and A330 could be used, but presently on international routes

Factually, the only widebody adequate for Chinese internal and border country service would be the
B787-3, which can carry in 2 class configuration 330 pax or more in one class, which constitutes, as already stated, an extraordinary opportunity for this aircraft. But until such could be delivered, the only
solution, as also already said, would be buy or lease old used aircrafts, as B763s and A333s

On the other side, for traffic between large cities as Beijing-Shanghai old B747 could be used provisionally.

TKV


User currently offlineAS739X From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6006 posts, RR: 24
Reply 24, posted (6 years 8 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3319 times:

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 13):

There is no Virgin in China, they have over a billion people!   

Sorry I couldn't help it!

In all seriosness as Carpethead said it right, its the CAAC. How did the goverment not see this coming?

ASSFO

[Edited 2007-08-21 15:17:59]

[Edited 2007-08-21 15:18:22]


"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
25 TKV : The answer to this question is partially in my reply 18. Industrial planning is certainly not one of the pinnacles of the Chinese Government TKV
26 Astral : I must ask many of you to look at two major issues that wasn't discuss here, but are the main reasons why the Chinese Government decided to reduce fli
27 Post contains images Ikramerica : Or to build more airports where needed instead of where the communist government decides they should go. But the chinese government wants to keep cou
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
ORD, FAA To Tell Airlines To Cut More Flights Soon posted Wed Jul 28 2004 22:23:40 by Atcboy73
NZ To Cut Domestic Fares? posted Thu Jan 18 2007 19:36:17 by Flyjetstar
DL To Cut Some Flights That Compete With B6 posted Mon Feb 27 2006 14:42:15 by FA4B6
Russia - How To Book Domestic Flights And Trains posted Mon Feb 6 2006 10:41:14 by Airevents
AA To Cut Domestic Capacity posted Thu Jan 19 2006 01:13:13 by Tu154
DL To Cut MSO Flights From Eight To Six A Day posted Sun Oct 30 2005 17:42:45 by Squirrel83
Delta To Cut 7 ICT Flights posted Fri May 27 2005 14:06:00 by BH346
Air India To Start Domestic Flights posted Sat May 14 2005 06:14:29 by LAXDESI
Ryanair To Start Domestic Flights In Italy posted Mon Jan 31 2005 09:43:42 by LXsaab2000
MAS To Increase India Flights, Add New Destination posted Fri Oct 3 2003 18:31:06 by B747-437B