Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Runnin' Out Of Oil! What To Fly With?  
User currently offlineTurbulence From Spain, joined Nov 1999, 963 posts, RR: 18
Posted (15 years 5 months 5 hours ago) and read 3387 times:

Hi all.
First of all, I guess that maybe this topic should be at the non-aviation forum, but first of all, it started in this forum, and second, if it has to do with suitable for flying fuel, it has also to do with aviation. So here we go:
Last september, Aaer777 started a new topic having to do with the shortening reserves of crude. The topic went “out of topic”, but became very interesting in the ecologic point of view.
I answered two threads to this topic, one of them having to do with the silly idea of the electric cars and the pollution they create because of their nature and used energy, despite how clean they look, and another clarifying (or trying to...) the difference between water desalinization for human use (drinakble water) and water distillation for obtaining hidrogen (H2O strictly). You can read more (all) about it at http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/287669/
This thread now is because I wrote about Mercedes Benz and BMW already using hydrogen engineered cars NOW. This has nothing to do with heat pumps, fuel piles or gas turbines. Those cars have NORMAL piston engines, and you can have more information about "Zero Consumption Vehicles" (of course, at global ecologic level), which have nothing to do with the sucking stupid "Zero Emission Vehicles", which, although some hundreds of miles away (meaning in electricity production plants) actually HAVE WORSE emissions and still quadruplicate the manufacturing, entertainment, consumption and recycling costs.
http://www.bmwgroup.com/e/index2.shtml?s70&0_0_www_bmwgroup_com/6_veranstaltungen/6_3_expo/intro.shtml has explanations about past, present and future of “h” cars (including photos of the new BMW 750hL), and http://www.zukunftsenergien.de but this one is in German and, when I tried to, the “English Version” link did not work.
To finish, a very thought provoking sentence by Shell’s Council Administration member, prof. Fritz Vahrenholt:
“Spending only 1% of the ecologic tax on fossil combustibles, we could be able to make 100 gas service stations become hydrogen service ones, every year”
Hope everybody enjoy these “technological present futures”.

Best turbulences

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineTurbulence From Spain, joined Nov 1999, 963 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (15 years 5 months 5 hours ago) and read 3294 times:

Actualization of the english version for the HYFORUM 2000:


Hope this helps

Best turbulences

User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4652 posts, RR: 37
Reply 2, posted (15 years 5 months 4 hours ago) and read 3292 times:

I know that Tupolev has been experimenting with Liquid Natural Gas (though that too is a limited resource)

Hydrogen is definitely the way it will go. Of course, the Hydrogen has to be produced, AFAIK, this is done from electrolysis of water. The hydrogen returns to water when it is combusted. Effectively, the engine is turning electrical energy into kinetic energy, through the intermediary of hydrogen. This means that it will only be good for the environment if the power generation is from clean sources (solar, geothermal, nuclear, wind, tidal) and not from pollutant sources (coal, oil, even gas and gas turbine).

Another environmental problem is that when hydrogen is combusted in air, which contains nitrogen, the heat causes the nitrogen to react with oxygen, which creats NOx (Oxides of nitrogen), which are all harmful to the environment.

A nice thought would be aircraft with giant solar panals accross the wings (and of course plenty of battery capacity, should the sun be obscured by cloud) that uses electrically driven propellers (before you say that propellers are useless for modern jet age aircraft, remember the turbofan gains most of its thrust not from the jet, but from the air that is bypassed, going through the fan, which is actually a type of propeller, albeit somewhat more complex than the prop you see on the front of a Cessna.). If the design was perfected, such an aircraft could reach similar speeds to the contemporary jet aircraft, without NOx and CO/CO2 emissions.

"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineTurbulence From Spain, joined Nov 1999, 963 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (15 years 5 months 4 hours ago) and read 3273 times:

No, no.
No electric engines. Solar electricity would be the best for electrolysis, but then the hydrogen is directly burnt into absolutely normal piston engines (except for the high pressure injection, which otherwise is already used in normal diesel) like the ones we know today. Could it be possible to burn hydrogen in jet turbines, too?

User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (15 years 5 months 4 hours ago) and read 3286 times:

I say they build pedal planes  

User currently offlineAaer 777 From Ireland, joined Aug 2000, 199 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (15 years 5 months 2 hours ago) and read 3253 times:

First of all, thank you Turbulence for all the useful updates and it is good to know that the topic is still at the back of someone's mind...
It is only through more widespread awareness of the problem that we can expect something to be done. It is only once an economic force (i.e. a growing number of consumers demanding non-damaging means of transport) is present that we can expect some serious budget to be set aside for real progress.
I don't want to sound mean Virginflyer, but anyone who has read anything about the impact of the Tchernobyl disaster would find it hard to concider nuclear energy as safe... (and that's without even mentioning the growing problem of stocking nuclear waste...)
Keep these planes flying!
Let's just REALLY try to make them CLEAN.
It certainly won't be done overnight. Time to put the skates on!

Which part of "NO" do you not understand?
User currently offlineRyaneverest From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (15 years 5 months 1 hour ago) and read 3248 times:

I guess burning hydrogen is too dangerous. In small amounts, we do it in the school lab and it gives a pop sound. In large amounts, we'll get another Hindenberg (or Hindenburg?).

While the only waste is pure drinkable water, electrolyzing water for hydrogen is costly. It's not very cost effective doing that.

User currently offlineSurf From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (15 years 5 months ago) and read 3250 times:

High speed trains over land and we shall go back to crossing the Atlantic on ocean liners YAY!!!!!

User currently offlineSurf From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (15 years 5 months ago) and read 3243 times:

oh yeah and also crossing the seas (and overland even) by airship like the Hidenburg only filled with helium lifting gas. Man that would be AWESOME. I would LOVE to do that (cross the Atlantic in an airship like the Hidenburg).

User currently offlineLOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (15 years 5 months ago) and read 3259 times:

HAHAHAHAH surf good one man!!!!!!!!

User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4652 posts, RR: 37
Reply 10, posted (15 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3217 times:

Well, Nuclear power is clean, as long as the station is maintained very well, and waste is effectively handled. Agreed, there are a lot of risks associated with nuclear power.

Liquid hydrogen can be, and already has been, used in gas turbine type engines.

Ryaneverest - Drinking water isnt wasted, as the when the hydrogen is burnt in oxygen, it simply becomes water again, which will condense in the air, and eventually fall to the ground as rain. While electrolysis may be costly, hydrogen is a very powerful fuel. A problem of course is where to store it? Because it is a lot less dense than jet fuel, it will need a much larger, and also heavier, tank. I remember an Airbus concept that had the tank above the cabin, like a second deck, and I have read about having the tank behind the passanger cabin, although this could make for a very long aircraft. Some of you may be thinking why not just have it in the wings. The problem is, Hydrogen would have to be stored in dive-cylinder like tanks, which makes for problems when you want to fit the fuel tank into the wing.

"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What If The Price Of Oil Continues To Rise? posted Mon Jul 17 2006 20:29:22 by FLY2LIM
What Are Futura Like To Fly With? posted Thu Jul 18 2002 14:42:53 by Shamrock105
What Are Continental Like To Fly With? posted Sun Nov 11 2001 15:24:48 by Peter_A330
Great People To FLY With? What Should IT BE? posted Wed May 9 2001 20:02:48 by GF-A330
What Are Iberia Like To Fly With? posted Thu Mar 16 2000 23:59:53 by EI133
Airbus - What To Do With A300/310 Line posted Tue Nov 21 2006 21:41:28 by A342
AA Out Of MAN: Where To posted Sat Aug 5 2006 22:41:17 by BA787
Airline To Fly With Reviled Raccoon posted Tue Aug 1 2006 22:29:18 by Legallykev
How Far Do Airlines Go Out Of Their Way To Help... posted Sat Jul 8 2006 00:30:56 by AirCanada014
CO/DL - What To Do With A/C From CCS posted Fri Feb 24 2006 20:52:49 by SCEagle